Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Charles and Camilla: It sounds like a loco anniversary but…

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 April 2008
IT WOULD make for a pleasant enough diversion on a Sunday afternoon, but could hardly be considered a suitable way to mark the day one exchanged marital vows with one's dearly beloved.
Yesterday, on the occasion of their third wedding anniversary, Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall eschewed Parisian amour, or the luxury of a private yacht, for an altogether more pastoral destination - the village of Ballater.

Once in Royal Deeside, the couple did not head straight into Birkhall, their private residence on the nearby Balmoral Estate, for a candlelit dinner, nor did they decamp to the Cairngorms for a peaceful stroll. Instead, they chose to open an exact replica of the Victorian railway carriage, used by Queen Victoria in 1869 to travel between Windsor and Scotland.

It was quickly evident that Charles, dressed in a kilt of Gordon Highland tartan, was drifting into nostalgia but not necessarily for his wedding day. On countless occasions during his youth, he passed through Ballater's humble rail station, and yesterday's visit rekindled fond memories. "I have incredibly special memories of arriving and departing from here as a child," he said. "It is wonderful to see it brought back to life."

If a train station sparks Charles into talking happily of days gone by rather than a milestone in his marriage, it comes as no surprise to some observers. Among their circles of aides and close friends, there is some concern that their union is in crisis.

Some aides have suggested whereas Charles is said to relish the slow-paced, pedantic lifestyle a future king might be accustomed to, Camilla finds it inhibiting and cumbersome.

In the past 11 months, she has taken three holidays away from Charles: cruising the Aegean with friends last May, visiting the Mediterranean in September and flying off to Antigua in February to spend time with her ex-husband, Andrew Parker Bowles, their son, Tom, and his family.

But yesterday there were no signs that Camilla, who wore a Balmoral tartan dress, would have preferred to have been in sunnier climes, despite the mixed weather Ballater delivered.

The couple, who visited Ballater yesterday as part of a two-week getaway in Scotland, were happy to speak to the crowd of around 100 who waited outside the station.

Josephine Hazley, from Ballater, said: "They were more than pleasant, and when I wished them a happy anniversary, he said, 'Thank you for remembering'."

Penny Junor, who has written books on Prince Charles, said: "They are both terribly fond of Scotland and Charles loves railways and has a great interest in history and family history, and to see a replica of a carriage of how his distant relative would have travelled in would have been fascinating.

"Camilla may have preferred to have been on an island but would have been happy to be there."

Those involved in the reproduction project, meanwhile, were simply flattered that the couple chose to visit them on such a special day.

Ian Dunlop, VisitScotland's area director for Aberdeen and Grampian, said the prince was clearly enthusiastic about the scheme.

He said: "He asked a lot of questions about the physical building, and his interest in railways and Victoriana was obvious.

"It is a very proud day for us all, and we are delighted they chose their third wedding anniversary to come here."

KEEPING IT LOW-KEY

THE couple are not ones for marking anniversaries in style.

Their first was spent at Birkhall, on the Balmoral Estate – where they spent their honeymoon. To celebrate, they released an official photograph taken in the grounds of Clarence House by Mario Testino. Once in Scotland, they attended church for the Sunday service, before relaxing on the 50,000-acre estate.

Not wishing to break with tradition (until now), they also spent their second anniversary at Birkhall. Camilla had just had a hysterectomy, so the festivities were kept to a minimum.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 April 2008 1:41 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

10/04/2008 00:28:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Sierra Foothills Scot,

Diamond Springs 10/04/2008 02:19:42
The Scotsman still insists on referring to the Duchess of Rothesay as Duchess of Cornwall.
3

JudyS,

Australia 10/04/2008 04:13:52
'Onya "The Scotsman"!
I hope that you never ever honour this woman with the proud Scots title of Duchess of Rothesay!
4

Iain fae Elgin,

10/04/2008 07:44:11
Third anniversary. A milestone? Of what kind?

Oh no...I get it. They're trying to stir up quite possibly the lamest scandal/controversy ever.
5

Beth Boyle,

Rural NY 10/04/2008 08:33:20
I like the Dutchess she wears wellies with pride and she knows what end is what of a gude horse.
6

,

10/04/2008 08:34:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 10/04/2008 09:34:11
If you don't have a story. Invent one.
Did it ever cross this reporters mind to simply congratulate them on their anniversary instead of trying to stir up scandal where none exists.
8

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 10/04/2008 10:34:42
This article just confirms what I have suspected for a long time that "The Scotsman" is an English newspaper and that their journalists are English propagandists with all their anglocentric bias and prejudice.
If the newspaper had in any way an understanding of Scotland and the Scots, they would have known that Prince Charles and his wife's title is TRH THE DUKE & DUCHESS OF ROTHESAY
Not only are the Royal pair probably fonder of Scotland than anyone at 'The Scotsman', they are probably also more knowledgeable.
9

jdships,

10/04/2008 10:59:20
7 nabodican,Rural Scotland

My thoughts exactly !!

9 Bob Christie,
"Poor Jug ears."

Pathetic !!
You of course being the perfect example of male man !!No matter what we think of PC he cannot help his looks .
10

Yane,

10/04/2008 11:14:40
Och! I woulda liked a peek at her luffly tartan frock — but what's the story mornin glory? — I thought this journo was takin the p!ss
11

norhgaw,

Chatham, Kent 10/04/2008 11:36:50
Prince Charles and his dedicated companion, Duchess of Cornwall deserve every happiness on their Wedding Anniversary. They are hard working servants of the public, not an easy job to do. Good health and many more years to come.
12

Buttress,

10/04/2008 12:00:03
Em - let's not forget the part he played in this spectacular rescue too:

http://www.dumfries-house.org.uk/


Job well done.

13

Dougie Welsh,

Halifax 10/04/2008 12:05:08
Sounds like the man at the station/museum had more class than this paper. I'm disappointed in you.
14

The Strategist,

10/04/2008 12:08:37
#9

Or indeed a real woman!
15

,

10/04/2008 12:11:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Nic83,

10/04/2008 12:20:02
Slow news day Martyn? (c:
17

Joe90,

10/04/2008 12:22:02
"Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall eschewed Parisian amour, or the luxury of a private yacht,"

Could it be because they have just returned from a two week caribbean junket on board a private yacht which cost us, the taxpayers, £40,000 per day to hire?

Has anyone else noticed how the so-called royals always have a nice holiday in the West Indies or the Antipodes when the weather is at its worst in UK?

18

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 12:42:22
#6 Boy Wonder

I care about anything to do with Her Britannic Majesty and Queen of canada and her family.

#3 Judys from Australia, your ignorance is showing.
Upon The Duchess of Cornwall's marriage to the Prince of Wales she assumed ALL of his titles.

Therefore HRH IS The Duchess of Rothesay.

Vivat Regina. Vivat! Vivat! Vivat Regina Elizabetha!
19

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 12:49:31
I forgot to wish Their Royal Highnesses HAPPY ANNIVERSARY!

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY YRHs AND MANY, MANY MORE!!!!
20

AJ Fife,

10/04/2008 12:59:40
TCW,

I'm sure Charlie Big Lugs and old 'prune features' Camilla are overjoyed at your continued support.
21

McX,

10/04/2008 13:01:08
Interesting poll here folks. Make it so.

http://www2.jpscotland.co.uk/Scotsman/survey/referendum/_scotland_on_sunday_referendum_survey.htm
22

kimba,

10/04/2008 13:15:10
AJ. Think you've just committed treason!
23

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 13:18:01
22 AJFife

I am sure Their Royal Highnesses are.

Thanks for YOUR continued support of the Royal Family.

It is gratifying to have such afervent monarchist as thee.
24

AJ Fife,

10/04/2008 13:30:24
TCW,

Did you get my post removed? It was only an honest observation!
25

SBW,

Edinburgh 10/04/2008 13:48:59
#8 The Scotsman is owned by Johnson Press. Johnson Press was founded in Falkirk and now has it's head office in Edinburgh.
26

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 13:51:31
26 AJ FIFE

'twas not moi, sir.

I heartily agree with free speech in these forums EXCEPT when the postings are obscene, insulting, or otherwise not adhering to the precepts according to the Scotsman.

It must have been some troll or mental deficient who removed your post.

I enjoy reading them, even if we heartily disagree - I believe that is called "FREE SPEECH" and we both live in parliamentary democracies, thank God, and not in Muslim countries where dissension can get you stoned or beheaded.

CHRIST ALONE IS GOD AND NEEDS NO PROPHET

NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT

VENGEANCE IS MINE SAITH THE LORD JESUS
27

TAF,

RI, USA 10/04/2008 13:55:50
Being American, I have no particular feeling for your Royalty. However, I have a problem with this notion:

"...but could hardly be considered a suitable way to mark the day one exchanged marital vows with one's dearly beloved."

Really? This would be just the sort of pleasant, relaxing, interesting, and delightful manner in which my wife of 18 years and I would spend our anniversary, if we didn't miss most of them because of work!

Obviously the people at the Scotsman have jobs with very little responsibility, allowing them to indulge in (and suggest that others should as well) some form of make-believe fairy tale lifestyle. More power to you, but that isn't reality for most people...and for those folks for whom that lifestyle IS their reality (royalty, the extremely rich, and politicians), a more normal existence may just be what they would prefer, at least once in a while.

Sounds like they had a marvelous anniversary...I wish them many more.

Who knows, maybe once he becomes King, he can have the publisher of the Scotsman beheaded as a gentle reminder that while most of the traditions that made the UK great have gone out of favor (thanks in no small way to papers like the Scotsman), the laws haven't necessarily changed, and tradition can always be brought back...Parliament certainly wouldn't stop him...they can't be bothered to vote to keep their own powers against the EU...and it seems unlikely you folks will vote for independence.

28

Joanna,

Cambs, England 10/04/2008 14:28:29
Tim @ 20
"Upon The Duchess of Cornwall's marriage to the Prince of Wales she assumed ALL of his titles."


Not quite all of them, she has not been styled as HRH The Princess of Wales, which of course is his main title, has she?

The most recent holder of that title still haunts it.
29

Beth Boyle,

NY 10/04/2008 15:25:43
Grushka I do agree. They do have balance and they are good people. Such a shame people enjoy bashing them so much.
30

Iain fae Elgin,

10/04/2008 15:29:39
#28..."VENGEANCE IS MINE SAITH THE LORD JESUS"

Erm...sorry. What was that about forgiveness?

"CHRIST ALONE IS GOD AND NEEDS NO PROPHET"...

No...sorry...still not getting it. Was he not a son, and therefore a wee bit of a prophet?

Sounds awfully confusing. How do you religious types keep up with it all?

Oh...I see. It's made up as you go along. Why didn't you say so?




31

kimba,

10/04/2008 15:42:13
26.Bet that came as a shock,what goes around comes around!
32

AJ Fife,

10/04/2008 15:48:13
Beth#32,

It's shocking I know! Charlie Big Lugs and the Prune seem to get it in the neck all the time, don't they?
33

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 16:19:24
30 Bob Christie the Gormless Wonder

FYI, I ain't no "sycophant". I Am surprised you even know that word.

YOUR Queen Elizabeth the Second is also Queen of Canada and is quite well liked and loved here.

What has Her Majesty done to you personally to merit such rudeness?

I am not "indulgent" except for putting up with shrill republicans such as yourself.

Your really should find yourself a better hobby than badmouthing YOUR duly annointed and crowned Queen as established by canon law.

31 Joanna

Alas, that witch Diana haunts us still and why doesn't she just sink into the sands of forgetfulness. Diana was a serial adulteress and used the services of soothsayers, clairvoyants, masseuses, astrologists, etc., etc., ad nauseam.

She was a VERY SICK PERSON MENTALLY and she was losing her looks - that nose on her needed work done years before she died.

But then the Spencers are known for their mental aberrations and Charles Spencer is an untalented writer and pompous serial adulterer. JUst read up on the history of the Spencer clan and all will be revealed.

THe current Earl Spencer wrote a book on his family and he glossed over most of the more lurid and scandalous carryings-on of that family of fruitcakes.

34

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 17:14:18
# 37

In case you are not aware, it is a free and democratic country here in Canada and in Scotland.

This is an open forum and I can post whatever I want - abiding by the rules and strictures of the moderators - and I don't need bossy numpties like you telling me what or what not to post.

Got it?
35

Tris,

10/04/2008 17:21:43


I'd have a bit more time for Charlie if all these years ago, the man who will be the head of the Church of England didn't stand in front of his Mother's senior archbishop and swear faithfulness to some poor teenager, till death do they part. Then later that night he phoned his mistress and arranged their next meeting for when he would be back from his honeymoon.

Then he, still a member of same church, still wanting to be its head, got divorced, and then married Mrs Parker-Bowles in a civil marriage, because the church of which he will be head one day would not, no, could not, marry him.

Make yer mind up mate. Either you wanna be the head of the church, or ya wanna be jack the lad. Can't be both...

... oh no, wait, you're royal, you can be whatever you like, and all we have to do is keep paying for it. I forgot.

Waste of space.
36

Tris,

10/04/2008 17:23:20


#31

Ha HA HA HA HA HA.
37

Boy Wonder,

10/04/2008 17:36:59
Don't really care who got my comment @#6 removed ... but I repeat ... who the heck cares?

And if you lot in Canada love them so much, Timbo ... then YOU pay for them!!! Cos most of us sane people have have had enough of these parasites!
38

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 10/04/2008 17:56:17
The Railway carriage will be a major attraction on Deeside. The Balmoral Estate, especially around Lochnagar and Loch Muick is probably one of the finest open public spaces in Scotland and is popular with tourists and hillwalkers.
The Old Station is already popular but an actual period carriage, even though a replica, instead of the cardboard cut-out will make the visit even more interesting.
Ballater is the heart of the Royal Deeside and geta much of its prosperity from tourism. The Braemar Gathering is also a major earner.
The royal connection brings a huge economic benefit to whole area and gives employment to a great many locals. It is quite apparent when upper Deeside is compared to upper Donside.
'Parasites' they certainly are not but the means for sustaining a major rural industry.
39

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 18:03:08
41 Boy Wonder

Whatever did the royal family do to you personally or to those you hold near and dear to merit such outbursts?

Could you please find me a statistic or source for your statement: "...most of us sane people have had enough of these parasites!"?

Thank you, kind sir. I am glad that these forums allow us to agree to disagree without getting TOO viciously insulting.
40

Tris,

10/04/2008 18:19:36
Tim

You want them... you have them.
41

Barton,

Arlington 10/04/2008 18:39:14
Best wishes to Their Royal Highnesses for a deeply happy wedding anniversary. We appreciate you, and the happiness you have found, more than words can say!
42

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 18:41:00
Tris

YOU don't want them but YOU have them!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

The joke is on YOU and your republican friends and co-conspirators.
43

Tris,

10/04/2008 19:01:43


Tim

Well, I certainly got to hand that to you mate. You got me there. We got them, and we have to pay taxes to keep them in all these holidays and palaces and coaches and clothes and food, while our pensioners choose between food and heating. Our nice Labour government has just doubled the rate of tax for the poorest people in our society, and still the Royals travel first class through life, changing rules as they go.

You're certainly right. The joke is certainly on us. More fools us....

But we're not conspiritors. In a democratic country we are allowed to say that they are a pile of pants and that we want rid of them. Nothing conspiritorial about it.

Of course.... on the other hand... I may not wake up tomorrow morning if Prince Philip reads this....and I'll certainly be avoiding trips to Paris any time soon.

44

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/04/2008 19:24:33
Duchesses are great. They are very intelligent and good with horses and usually have a glossy coat. There's a dish with potatoes called Duchess potatoes. You can always rely on a Duchess to open things and hand out prizes at school prizegivings. Sometimes they can smell a bit funny but all in all they are good value and they know how to eat oranges. The Duchess of Argyll was famous for her elegant head. It is a common fallacy that their blood is blue - it is nearly always red like with ordinary people.

If we listened to Duchesses more often, we would be a lot better off.
45

jdships,

10/04/2008 19:28:06
39 Tris,

Not really fussed about the Royals but you missed the bit about PC marrying a " Barbie Doll" who turned out to be a "sleep around tart"
46

Tris,

10/04/2008 20:17:49
~50

jdships

Yeh, she was, but she was just a teenager and he was already in his 30s, and having a long term affair. Frankly I don't give a ....., but I hate the hypocracy of the man who will be the head of the church of England, making a vow in front of the Archbishop of his mother's church at 11am, and then breaking that vow at 8.30 pm.

It may be that a lot of or even most men do it... although I doubt it (I should imagine most manage for a good deal longer than that), but most men aren't going to be head of a church that preaches against stuff like that.

I feel sorry for him that he couldn't marry Camilla in the first place; probably something about her having been round the block a bit. That seemed to matter back then. Clearly doesn't now.

Goes to show that the whole concept of royalty is well past its sell-by date. Let them go and be normal people, and live normal lives like the rest of us.

Poor wee Willie and Harry. No wonder Harry said he hated England.
47

Joe90,

10/04/2008 20:20:03
Tim "nice-but-dim" - I can't make up my mind whether you are a true blue Canadian born Canadian or an expatriate newcomer Brit, but what I do see is that you are a patronising pr!ck! Several people have alluded to Charlie's shenanigans and, as far as I am aware, (and I am no lover of Diana, although I think she was royally shafted in more ways than one) there is no record of Diana 'playing around' during the actual marriage. You have forgotten that Diana said, during that famous interview, that 'there are three people in this marriage'. Now who could she have been talking about? Have a closer look at the 'gorgeous' Camel. She is a clone of his mother!

As many have said before me, if you want the so-called royals, you are welcome to them if you can afford them.

48

Bachus,

10/04/2008 20:29:37
Q: How does Camilla hold her liqour?
49

,

10/04/2008 20:30:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

Phillip,

10/04/2008 20:36:57
I find it horribly hypocritical that the Church of England, which broke away from Rome because King Henry VIII wanted a divorce, would then tell HRH that he can't get married to his true love because he has had a divorce. Rank hypocrisy at its worst is what I see and on the part of the Church of England.
51

John Blackley,

Florida 10/04/2008 21:01:02
Envy, insult, ignorance and prejudice.

There, I think that covers about the majority of posts on this story.

What on earth is wrong with the people who comment here? By all means say that you're not in favour of the monarchy if that is your position and, by all means, discuss the rights and wrongs of a constitutional monarchy supported - in part - by the taxpayer. But is it in any way necessary to resort to personal insult and invective to make a point?
52

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/04/2008 21:06:04
Bob Christie

The last recourse of an empty "intellect" such as yours is name-calling and insult.

If you are so brillian and intelligent you would not denigrate yourself to fling such invectives at me.

Grow up and discuss the matter under review with pondered thought and considered opinion.

You are a disgrace to your soi-disant "Republic of Scotland" and, if it happens, let's hope numpties such as yourself are put in NO position of power or influence because you are a toxic presence and counter-productive to whatever cause that you people are fomenting.
53

,

10/04/2008 21:15:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
54

Tris,

10/04/2008 21:19:54

~57.

Didn't you rather spoil your argument there by personally insulting Bob Christie?
55

Jock Scot,

East Lothian 10/04/2008 21:33:29
Timmy avec le poignet mou, vous semblez offenser beaucoup et êtes devenir rapide TROLL par votre condescendance, avec les affiches avec ces fourms. Vous êtes un twit arrogant et vos avis ampoulés sont employés pour renforcer seulement le fait que vous êtes en effet un mégalomane scollardical. Chester votre chien lèche-t-il le beurre d'arachide de votre molle appendage? ?

Excuser mon français. eh grand garçon.
56

Bachus,

10/04/2008 21:48:40
And while my tounge is still sharp.......
When we liberated from our fey colinial masters......it will not be the diaspora that will decide our future.
History has shown us,and in particular recent history (the fall of the Soviet Union)that when the rats who fled the sinking ship returned on the favourable tide to the "Mother Country" they shaffted their fellow countrymen wholesale.
57

Beth Boyle,

NY 10/04/2008 21:50:46
Hypocrisy is the word and even when Charlses was first to find a bride it had to be a "virgin". Oh give me a break! Who did the research on that deal? Then you look at the Archbishop of Canterbury, he wouldn't know God if He bit him on the butt so why did Charles have to wed Camillia in a civil ceremony? Dr. Rowan Williams might just as well me Muslim or a agnostic he is certainly not very interested in what happenes to the Church of England in fact it seems he would like to see it die.
58

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 11/04/2008 00:49:26
So MANY comments and insults directed at me - and one even in rudimentary French. I will reply to that one presently.

59 Tris

Don't use jesuitical casuistry on me - I am a past master at that.

It would seem that the hatred and vitriol directed towards the royal family is truly astounding and one wonders if all of those who detest the House of Mountbatten-Windsor have been PERSONALLY insulted or injured by ANY member of that august family.

I think not.

Wake up, grow up, and accept the inevitable. Charles and Camilla will ascend the throne as King and Queen and the monarchy WILL prevail.
59

gaffer,

Kamloops, Canada 11/04/2008 01:11:40
# 31 I dont know how you look , but if your rudeness is any example , you must be fairly ugly, just bacause you may or may not have time for a deceased princess, there is no reason to behave the way you did.

beyond that point , if Charles becomes our next King, would Camelia really become Queen , or would that be Consort of some sort , anyone got the answer?
60

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 11/04/2008 01:32:51
THe Duchess of Cornwall, upon ascending the throne, could only be given the honourific "Queen Camilla" because she will be the duly anointed Consort of a crowned King, Charles III.
61

The Daleks,

Longmen 11/04/2008 03:53:51
Tim, Tim, not nice, and very dim.

You've really managed to work yourself up into a big hissy fit of royal sycophancy today.

What a laugh.

"Monarchy WILL prevail" Ha ha. Where do you get this stuff!! You sound like a really bad actor in a third rate Victorian play!!
62

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada - ex Perth & Glesca' 11/04/2008 06:15:42
#65-TimW1234 - Ottawa,Canada.

As you seem to be relatively intelligent, perhaps you can tell me if the following is true.
Prince Charles got his ears from being lifted by them as a child by his Nanny. Is there any truth to that?
Cheers,
Haggis MacBagpipes™©
63

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 11/04/2008 11:36:49
66 THE DREARY DALEKS

You Daleks truly are the dregs of society. GO back to you religious tracts and leave INTELLIGENT comment to your betters. YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY OF ANY INTEREST TO ANYBODY!!

"In Defeat Defiant, In Victory Venomous" (my motto)
64

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 11/04/2008 11:44:17
67 Haggis

Good morning to you, sir.

I AM "reasonably intelligent" and it is a trial at time to read the ignorant rants and uneducated blather of many who post here.

I was amused by your speculation about Charles's birth but since I was not physically present at said event one can only surmise that he inherited those ears from an ancestor such as the Duke of Cumberland or the Duchess of Wherewithal - both on the wrong side of the sheets, as it were.

Have a pleasant day.
65

CeceliaSophia,

Philadelphia 11/04/2008 13:17:35
#56 Please don't try to stop them-the comments are vastly more entertaining than the article.
66

Tris,

11/04/2008 13:24:48


Yeah, probably Tim, the monarchy will survive, because the Brits are too lazy to do anything about it, and there are a pile of old ladies and gay lads who absolutely love them.

But I wonder when the Queen dies and Chick spends most of his time and that of government ministers, who should have more important things to do, insisting that his wife be given the titles and honours due to her.....due to her?????....... then even the old ladies will get a bit pi$$ed off with him.

I can't see how the Church of England can possibly crown her as a queen without losing what little vestage of credence it has left. Anyway queen Camilla???? dear or dear, sounds like a toilet cleanser.

For me they can stay, but we need to get rid of the 5 palaces in London that one family have to live in. We need to get rid of titles farther down that the immediate family. (Why on earth are Andrew's children princesses?), and we need to stop all the degrading waste of time nonsense like pretending that the Queen is the head of the armed forces, particularly when they are engaged in illegal wars. This makes HER a war criminal, not Blair.
67

The Daleks,

Longmen 12/04/2008 02:06:49
#68 Tutu Tim

What a hilarious little Rudolph Nureyev you are!!

Religious tracts!!!??
68

Independent,

12/04/2008 07:37:08

I see Penny Junor is still on the payroll. Since when does Camilla just love Scotland?

They are in their right place in the home of their emotional forebears, the Macbeths.

69

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 13/04/2008 03:24:44
THE WRETCHED DALEKS

I have no consideration as to why you mention the name of Rudolf Nureyev with reference to me.

Whilst we are and were both Pisceans, that is where the similarity ends.

Why DO you post such nonsense? Get a life!!
70

tassiestag,

rosebery 15/04/2008 09:34:29
#28 tim whit a load o,sh..e

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.