Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Carbon ration cards demanded

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 July 2008
SCOTS should sign up to the idea of emissions rationing in order to become a zero-carbon community, according to the scientist behind a radical new environmental campaign.

Dr Justin Kenrick believes climate change should be approached in a similar manner to living through a war – and our use of should be rationed in a similar way to food during the Second World War.

The social anthropologist at Glasgow Univ
ersity said he believed the Scottish Government targets – to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 – do not go far enough, and we should aim to become a zero-carbon society.

In order to achieve this, Dr Kenrick said rationing must start within 12 months. He is now preparing to launch a campaign, Holyrood 350, to encourage supporters to sign up to the idea and put pressure on government.

Each adult would have an annual quota of carbon, and in order to go beyond that limit they would have to buy rations from those who use less.

Every year, the annual quota would shrink, in order to reduce annual output by forcing people to lead greener lifestyles. A swipe card could be used to record use of carbon every time petrol or a flight was bought.

Dr Kenrick said: "The idea is to put pressure on Holyrood to bring in measures to cut emissions dramatically.

"What the government is doing is setting targets for the future. We need to have action now and the idea is to build a majority view."

His campaign will be launched at The Big Tent festival in Fife later this month. Last year the festival, which hosts environmental debates about the future of the planet, led to the creation of Fife Diet, which has seen 300 people in the region take the challenge of eating only local food.

Dr Kenrick hopes Holyrood 350 will meet with similar success, with many of the festival's thousands of visitors signing up. The number 350 was derived from a research paper by Nasa chief scientist James Hansen, which concluded that to avoid climate catastrophe, the amount of in the atmosphere must be cut to 350 parts per million (ppm) from its current levels of 385ppm.

The idea of carbon rationing has attracted some political support. The all-party parliamentary group on climate change at Westminster has called for it and David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, showed an interest in the scheme when he was environment secretary.

What life would be like in an emission-free Scotland . . no meat, no flights, no fumes

A ZERO-CARBON Scotland may sound like a futuristic dream, but the reality is that in some ways it would be a step back in time.

There would be cutting-edge technology offering electric trains and buses and solar panels and turbines would be fitted to homes.

On the other hand, life would mirror the past, becoming more community oriented, with fewer foreign flights taken, food grown locally and meat an expensive delicacy.

Air travel to the United States would be out of the questions, as a return flight alone produces an estimated four tonnes of carbon dioxide.

"Air flights are something we will look back on and say 'that was fun, wasn't it?'" says Dr Justin Kenrick, an academic at Glasgow University.

Similarly, a car that runs on petrol would become a relic of the past – an average vehicle is estimated to produce 1.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year.

Instead, Dr Kenrick predicts there would be electric public transport systems.

"You would probably need fewer roads," he said. "You could turn them over to gardens and allotments. It would be a much greener and healthier environment."

A food shopping trip would involve a walk to a shop stocked with produce grown locally to reduce food miles.

Less meat would be eaten, as livestock produces methane – a potent greenhouse gas – and takes up valuable space and resources that could be used for growing food and fuel.

As a result, meat would become a delicacy rather than a staple.

Smart meters would be used so households could keep an eagle eye on the amount of energy being used.

Houses would all be insulated to the highest level, and heating and power would be provided by clean home energy kit such as solar panels, wind turbines, ground-source heat pumps and biomass boilers.

"The prospect of climate change can either paralyse us into inaction or radicalise us into taking action," he said.

"If we act, we can build a far better world. If we don't, then our species will become extinct. There is nothing to lose in taking rational radical action now."

Dr Kenrick admits that becoming zero carbon is "impossible" but he added: "If it isn't done we are extinct, so we have to push for it now."

He compared the need for change with the shift in attitude required to bring in votes for women or to abolish slavery.

"These things looked impossible at the time. It's one of those shifts which looks impossible within the current thinking.

"There's no way anybody is going to do this on their own. It needs collective action," he says.

Dr Kenrick compared current events to a war situation, but with potentially worse consequences.

"One of the most difficult things about it is that when you look out of the window now it looks fine. It feels quite normal.

"If it was a war we would see things happening. But there's nothing to indicate the situation we are in. But the predictions are basically far worse than a war, because it is extinction of a species."

As well as imposing carbon rationing for cleaner lifestyles, Dr Kenrick thinks the Scottish Government should increase funding for community projects to tackle climate change, building on the £18.8 million available in the Climate Challenge Fund.

He also wants legislation to ensure that corporations have to put cutting carbon emissions ahead of shareholders' profits.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 July 2008 11:42 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 15/07/2008 01:41:51
This nutter Kenrick must be smoking some of his home produce, as he is definitely away with the fairies.

2

Maisie from Morningside,

15/07/2008 01:50:29
I agree with Guga.
The adjective "deluded" occurred to me several times.
3

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 15/07/2008 02:22:14
And how big an army of enforcers does he envision to make this work?
4

syntax,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 03:05:20
So while the rest of the world moves forward (particularly China and India) Scotland is to become a third world country and we should move back to the stone age?

When are these nutty scientists going to learn? We aren't fooled by the taxes and rhetoric. Global warming IS a reality... it is NOT caused by humanity.

Frequent ice ages and subsequent melting have been going on since the birth of the earth.... none of it related to man's behaviour.

People complaining about aeroplanes obviously don't understand (or refuse to understand) - when all the American planes were grounded after 9/11 the worlds temprerature ROSE by a couple of degrees in three days. It was the contrails from these aeroplanes which was helping to keep temperatures DOWN........

Some of our industrial emissions are in fact helping to slow the warming process. Why doesn't this get reported more ?? Governments are jumping on the bandwagon (as are climate scientists chasing funding) and using this as an excuse to tax us into oblivion.... The rest of the world will just take over.....
5

johnpaulgeorgeandringo,

australia 15/07/2008 04:44:05
#4
you are right.
burn it, bury it, spill it, who cares about the mess.
or, leave the place in a better state than when you found it.
don't be fooled by the rhetoric- flatly deny it all and bury your head in the sand.
I don't deny that there are charlatans and opportunists out there, but to dismiss it all?
take some sort of responsibility for your children.
6

Pilrig.,

Livingston 15/07/2008 05:50:01
Mair control freakery.
7

Pilrig.,

Livingston 15/07/2008 05:51:30
5 - Written from the land of compulsory voting
8

Itchy,

15/07/2008 06:26:45
"In order to achieve this, Dr Kenrick said rationing must start within 12 months"

Told you it was all a communist plot, that's why state planning is always put forward as the solution.
9

Jimmy the Pie,

15/07/2008 07:08:02
Kenrick sounds about as completely deluded as Comrade Broon.

Another Non story from the Hootsmon.

Do you still do investigative journalism???
What about a look into David Marshall's finances????
10

SouthernSkye,

15/07/2008 07:11:54
The problem with Climate Change (as it appears to now be called) is the number of Nutters (like the focus of this story) that spout balderdash.
The more people like this Gentleman that are given serious (ahem!) press coverage, radio/TV air-time, then the greater will be the number of people turning away from "helping the planet" as they will be fed-up of listening to fools and charlatans.

Cimate Change is happening, the causes may be many. Fossil fuels will run out, we need to find/use alternatives.
What we do NOT need is pie-in-the-sky media pieces like this and retrospective taxes (car tax) that even the greens said would give green-taxes a bad name.
11

11+failed,

the pans 15/07/2008 07:29:50
Kenrick wants to introduce emissions rationing rather like carbon trading where millions are made by carbon traders and Kenrick and his ilk can continue their hypocritical lifestyles while using the conscience salving excuse of paying for emissions on the inevitable black market that rationing invariably produces. His hero worship of the dis-credited Hansen who seems to spend his time traversing the country giving speeches complaining that his employer the American government is trying to silence him pretty well sums up this nonsense.
12

drew 33,

duddingston 15/07/2008 07:59:39
If this was a serious suggestion unused carbon rations would be canceled and not sold on to speculators or "carbon" hypocrites like Al Gore or I suspect Dr Kenrick so that they can carry on with their extravagant lifestyles.
13

ianH,

Balerno 15/07/2008 08:09:09
Sounds like a nice little earner, where do I sign up to run to run this
14

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 15/07/2008 08:19:51
#4 syntax said

"when all the American planes were grounded after 9/11 the worlds temperature ROSE by a couple of degrees in three days. It was the contrails from these aeroplanes which was helping to keep temperatures DOWN.
Some of our industrial emissions are in fact helping to slow the warming process. Why doesn't this get reported more ??"

The events you mention after 9/11 actually nicely illustrate the problem: it is indeed the case that contrails and other smoky emissions tend to cool the Earth (since they reflect incoming heat back out to space). But, as those events illustrate, such things only last in the atmosphere for a very short time - they are rapidly washed out and it is only our continuous addition of them that keeps their levels up. That is not the case with carbon dioxide - any additional CO2 we add stays in the atmosphere, mostly for well over a century, and continues to absorb heat. That is why it is a problem.
15

sceptic,

15/07/2008 08:20:40
14 ianH
No problem, just join the queue - behind Dr Kenrick please!
16

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 15/07/2008 08:38:56
And this nutter from Glasgow University gets paid from public funds.
He needs sacked then sectioned.
17

Road to the isles,

in the middle of nowhere 15/07/2008 08:55:48
So we're all going to walk to the shops for some local produce. For me that would be a walk of 20 miles to a SPAR type store. It doesn't stock much and I doubt any of it is local with the exception of the spuds. Think I'll just have to get the car out and drive the 35 miles to the nearest town where I can get local produce.

Fairly clear this nutty academic is a city boy.
18

bluehead,

edinburgh 15/07/2008 09:24:40
stick you carbon ration cards where the monkey sticks it's nuts,!!
poor old Britain is piled high with nut cases,I wish those people would take a long walk of a short pier,or take the first slow boat to china.
19

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 15/07/2008 09:33:32
There is NO evidence that Carbon Dioxide is the cause of global warming. CO2 makes up so little of the atmosphere - just 400 parts per million (0.0043%)- that it could arguably be termed ' rare'. The evidence we do have suggests that CO2 rises AFTER planetary warming. We also have evidence that in the distant psat CO2 levels were more than five times higher than at present. There was no 'tipping point' as a result - no melting of the ice-caps - no deserts in southern England.

The engine which drives the heating of the planet is the Sun - a thermonuclear furnace which is ONE MILLION TIMES larger than the Earth (by volume). When the sun begins to 'boil' we see sunspots appear on the surface - in reality these are vast explosions of plasma - each one of which is far larger than our planet. More sunspots = more heat = hotter Earth. Currently there are NO sunspots evident which has many scientists rather concerned - they should have begun a new cycle 8 months ago. The lack of sunspots means that we are in for a very cold planetary period - which is why the Northern hemisphere had the coldest winter for 50 years in 2007 - many American states recording record levels of winter cold.

Self-promoting eco-fascists like Kenrick are jumping on the bandwagon of what they see as the best chance to become famous - or a millionaire - in their generation. He should stick to the social anthropology of stabbings in Glasgow.
20

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 15/07/2008 09:34:35
So - in an ideal world we should all carry our carbon rationing cards and if we want to use more, we buy some off someone else who is presumably prepared to use less. Are we back in WWII? As if we don't have enough tax on most things and especially anything that smacks of fuel consumption or energy this whacko presumes to lecture us on how we should further be confined in our activities.

In this ideal commie world of his, only he and his ilk could afford to pay for a couple of lumps of coal and maybe a second cave. The rest of us would have to suspend economic activity and starve or freeze to death. Oh yes that's what's happening to some pensioners now isn't it? Maybe this would make sense if GW/CC wasn't a figment of Al Gore's deep imagination and a host of well-paid researchers and polticians.
21

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 09:41:06
Why has this idiot not been locked up as insane?

What he suggests is a recipe for civil unrest if the government were ever stupid enough to impliment it---which I wouldn't hold my breath on given the likes of Robison and MacAskill who are complete and utter lunatics.

He talks about rationing during the war. That was wartime. There was a reason for it. There is not reason to impose restrictions on people's consumption now.

In any case, Kenrick has got his terminology wrong. Anyone who talks about rationing "carbon" is talking out of their backside in any case.
22

Mcsnagpile,

15/07/2008 09:49:36
Zero carbon emissions are possible and possibly inevitable.

Some suggestions in the mean time—ban books, magazines and newspapers—make them all e books. The daily newspaper could be downloaded on to an e-reader.
Ban packaging on all goods.
Make all city cars, bubble cars only, (650cc Max), possibly vehicles for day hire.
Close down all fast food retailers, double whammy of reducing obesity.
Limit the supply of chocs and sweets to government outlets or rationing.
Bring back collapsible brolly shopping baskets with wheels.
All methane to be collected from ruminating animals.
Humans to be fitted with a calorie meter and to have a daily methane limit.
Ban all fries. Oil to be used as bio fuel.

The bottom line is all hydrocarbon usage must be based on the planets ability to recycle.
Zero carbon is possible by using hydrocarbons that are recycled. Tomatoes, like most plants love CO2. We do not need to bury it we can use it to improve the growth of our plants and recapture it. One method is sea farming for oil and carbon capture.

Eventually the air will be so healthy we will be able to live in it.
23

Unimpressed one,

15/07/2008 09:51:34
This guy is obviously a happy nutter looking for some free publicity. But the more serious side of this farce is that once the likes of FoE, Greenpees and WWF start lobbying the holyrood, our weak-minded politicians may just adopt this sort of lunancy to set an example of Scotland 'tacking climate change'.

Never forget the Nazis were fervent environmentalists. The same sort of lunancy we see today being rammed down our throats was being actively promoted up the upper echelons of the third reich. The present generation of 'environmentalists', just like the Nazis, often put the environmental agenda before human needs, and indeed, many are on record as saying we need to have some sort of mass cull in order to reduce our numbers. We've seen it all before - a clique who believe that only they have all the answers to our problems. History has a habit of repeating inself and we ignore the messages we are hearing now at our peril.
24

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 09:57:48
#24:

I entirely agree with what you say there. We spent nearly 6 years ridding the world of Nazis, only to slowly start adopting their principles a few decades later.

Thankfully, the only thing that is missing is the mass murder. Otherwise, there are a great many similarities.
25

11+failed,

15/07/2008 10:02:08
23 Mcsnagpile
Yep and just shoot anyone who doesn't comply! Isn't it marvelous that we used to have a democracy envied by half the world.
26

Andy Pandy,

zero carbon hell 15/07/2008 10:25:01
Seriously - who are these people? Have they no idea of the concept of progress? Let's police ourselves to death and re-visit the old days of scurvy and the like. Next it'll be a return to trams. Oh hang on a minute.....etc etc
27

hertscot,

15/07/2008 10:41:17
What about food and alcohol rationing, reduce obesity and nail the booze binge culture in one move..... the man is deranged.
28

Mcsnagpile,

15/07/2008 11:25:37
26#
My statements are not political but proposed (Perhaps Humorous) solutions to a problem. When problems are not addressed then extremist politics come into play. A resource war is around the corner where military and political extremists will have a hay-day.
29

Neil,

Glasgow 15/07/2008 11:35:09
Normally such stories begin "scientists say" but in this case we learn it is only 1 "scientist". In the 2nd paragrapgh it turns out he is a "social anthropologist" which appears to be one of the new "sciences" which don't involve knowing any maths & in which the answers are all matters of opinion.

Certainly his authority to seak about the catastrophic global warming we are currently alleged to be suffering from is in no way a scientific one.

Just more heavily publicised eco-fascist scare tactics then.
30

Itchy,

15/07/2008 12:46:44
#23 and #29 your proposals are totalitarian.

BTW, obesity is not a feature of communism. That is because it makes people starve to death.

"When problems are not addressed then extremist politics come into play."

The problem is that 'climate change' is an excuse for neo-nazis and neo-commies to emerge from the woodwork. How are we going to address this problem?

31

Geomac 1,

Scotland 15/07/2008 13:01:35
When is this Haworth woman going to stop PREACHING drivel and nonsense??
Her role in life would appear to be to search out the weird and the extreme. She seems to have found one such in Kenrick.
Don't these people think about what they're spouting? Consider:
o Plants need CO2 to survive
o If we have zero carbon, how do me manufacture trains and buses (and windmills)?
o Why should we Scots vote to penalise ourselves whilst most of the the rest of the world increases CO2 emissions?
o Without a gas layer in the atmosphere to reflect heat, the earth would freeze over - then we would really be zero carbon - plus zero everything else!!!
When is the editor of this paper going to rein in the regular publication or haverings like this?

32

fred_bloggs,

Munich 15/07/2008 13:12:58
Global warming? Had I written this 15000 years ago, I would been sitting under about a mile of ice - that's what I call global warming!
33

Bigwull,

edinburgh 15/07/2008 13:52:15
We only ever seem to hear the one side of this story mainly produced by people employed specificaly to find what their employers want them to find, its all guff, whats next? There are too many people breathing and producing carbon dioxide on the planet? This global warming thing is almost becoming the same as a religion and is based on belief and not fact and is appearing to now be used in the same manner to control the masses, please note there is a big difference between stopping polluting the earth and this global warming bunkum.
34

Geomac 1,

Scotland 15/07/2008 14:25:51
Let's all write to the Scotsman editor (Mike Gilson) to protest about this one sided and biased ranting about climate change and carbon emissions
35

,

15/07/2008 14:47:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

Van (not white) Diesel,

Amsterdam & Augsburg 15/07/2008 17:15:39
I note a distinct lack of comment from the ecowarriors/ecopreachers on this article.

#33 fred_bloggs
Transport yourself back in time the 15,000 years referred to, peer out of the window, and tell me how many swallow nests you can see glued to the side of the glacier.
37

Allan(handofgod137),

15/07/2008 17:20:37
So why do non of these idiots state the obvious, environmental damage is caused by people, so cut down on the population.
38

Euan,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 17:26:47
I'm telling you, this whole 'carbon footprint' drivel is starting to bring down this country and all those who live in it.

Global warming is a total myth, yet there are still those hell-bent on trying to force their warped ideas on us in order to make themselves feel better.

I mean what next?, are we all going to have to buy 'f@rt quotas' in order to reduce methane emissions?

Or is it going to be technically advanced corks up every cows @rse in the land?

Come on, COME ON, ENOUGH of this ridiculous carbon this, carbon that.

LET US LIVE IN PEACE - PLEASE!
39

GlenB,

15/07/2008 18:34:17
I must be a bit dyslexic, I'm sure I read his name as Dr Junk Eccentric.

As a social anthropologist he should be telling us how come so many people have been brainwashed by all the ecohype surrounding climate change not telling us what to do about a phenomenon the climate scientists don't fully understand.
40

Boggle fey the Bog,

15/07/2008 19:27:38
Aye anither nutter oan the Hootsmauns pages, is there no end to it?

Why haven't the Hootsmaun exposed the flawed ICM poll in Glasgow East that purports to show Nu Labour/Owld Torie miles aheid?

41

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/07/2008 19:55:16
Absolute bowdlerdash. Now I'm off to watch ch5 about Hitler's bunkers.

What about the magnetic change? Does that cause climate change? The silence has been deafening.
42

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/07/2008 19:58:49
All those creatures with magnetic navigation devices in their heads going awry?

Migratory birds, whales, dolphins?
43

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 15/07/2008 20:57:38
What a feeding frenzy of denial we have witnessed today.

Forgive me if I've missed anyone, but it seems that no-one in the above 40 odd responses is even prepared to admit that global warming (climate change if you are feeling sensitive) is even happening, let alone anyone prepared to discuss what to do about it.
So we have such gems as:

"What about the magnetic change? Does that cause climate change?"
"the ecohype surrounding climate change"
"Global warming is a total myth"
"This global warming thing is almost becoming the same as a religion"
"If we have zero carbon, how do me manufacture trains and buses"
"'climate change' is an excuse for neo-nazis"
"There is NO evidence that Carbon Dioxide is the cause of global warming."

Not one single serious comment that accepts that global warming is happening and that we need to seriously discuss what to do about. Just bone headed denial.

You are like a load of kids at a tea party when told that someone has made off with the jelly and ice cream.
44

,

15/07/2008 21:21:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

15/07/2008 21:21:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

,

15/07/2008 21:29:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

Itchy,

15/07/2008 21:47:39
#44 "Not one single serious comment that accepts that global warming is happening and that we need to seriously discuss what to do about. Just bone headed denial."

How come 'Global Warming'? Not 'climate change'?

And how come it is always communist planning put forward as the solution?
48

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/07/2008 22:21:21
re 43, and all these creatures mith magnetic navigation devices in their heids going awry, think chancellors and the metallic strips in banknotes.
49

truthsleuth,

15/07/2008 23:46:33
Well no surprise here
The petrolheads and motormouths and airbrains are like the three monkeys if it might hurt a little put your hands on your sensory organds your head in the sand and your A*** in the air.
Keep blaming the Arabs the Russians the Indians the Chinese Gordon Brown Al Gore the Environmentalists the Greens in fact anyone who may have a differing point of view.
If that don't work then ask where is the evidence and when some is produced belittle it by referring to some 'lonely' denier professor in the pay of the oil barons (the major culprits after the Arabs) who actually put the fuel price up and are quite happy to do so and to blame it on the Arabs the Chinese ..... Gordon Brown.
Of course the Petrolheads Motormouths and Airbrains are to hooked on their next fix they would beleive anything their dealer told them especially if they thought they could get a better deal. But if course the Addicts nmever do get a better deal no matter how many times they are told the truth they dread having to go through the pains associated with the removal of their dependancy even though they know they deserve it.
50

truthsleuth,

15/07/2008 23:56:46
#48 Itchy,

It seems to me the Arabs and the Oil Companies have played the Free Market so where does 'communist planning' come in

Oh I forgot you are an anarchist who believes that as long as you have the biggest club the the world is ok.

Think!!! recognise when YOU are being conned
Gordon DID NOT PUT UP THE PRICE OF FUEL

Gordon
CUT the road tax on the lowest CO2 vehicles
Put NO INCREASE on the medium range vehicles
Inreased Road tax on the most polluting vehicles

PS
To help you respond amnd not waste your time
I drive a car
I fly to see my realtives abroad (Asia and Australia)
I am no supporter of Communism Nor Capitalism in fact I believe Capitalims if the least WORST of these two options.


51

danbob,

15/07/2008 23:58:08
51# So many insults and valueless words. Nothing in your rant that could change somebodys opinion on climate change.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.