Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Brussels 'lunacy' on amateur anglers' catches

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 January 2009
BRUSSELS bureaucrats were accused of "total lunacy" yesterday after it was revealed they plan to bring thousands of Britain's amateur sea anglers under the direct control of the European Parliament.
They have tabled controversial proposals to make recreational anglers subject to the common fisheries policy (CFP), which is already used to police commercial fisheries in the North Sea and Scotland's west coast waters.

The move could result in a
nglers' catches being included in annual discussions over national fish quotas.

There are fears the move could lead to anglers being limited in the number of fish they catch for the pot in a leisure industry that contributes £650 million a year to UK economy.

The proposal is expected to begin its passage through the European Parliament later this month, with a final vote in April.

And yesterday, Struan Stevenson, the Scottish Conservative MEP, pledged to fight the proposals.

He said: "Recreational fishing is a simple pleasure that would become a bureaucratic nightmare if these plans become law. This kind of draconian approach would do very little to assist in the recovery of fish stocks, yet it will cause a great deal of damage to tourism and the whole fishing sport."

He added: "If the European Union is serious about acting to protect fish stocks in the EU, it should launch a fundamental overhaul of the CFP, not target an ancient hobby."

The European Commission's proposals were also condemned by the Angling Trust. Richard Ferre, who chairs its marine committee, said: "Under the commission's plans, all boats from which recreational angling takes place will have to be registered, catches of quota- managed species recorded, and those catches included in quota discussions for each country, and you won't be able to sell what you catch as a sea angler.

"The proposals are ridiculous and unworkable. A million people a year go sea angling at least once and spend about £650 million a year doing it.

"We know that the fish we take out of the sea, in terms of numbers, are tiny in comparison to the total catches which are landed commercially.

"In theory this would require pretty much every boat around the country to be both registered and have its catch recorded, which is just total lunacy."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 January 2009 9:32 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dark Lochnagar,

Symington 20/01/2009 02:23:22
And there not allowed to fish with bent bananas as bait!
2

sam the god,

20/01/2009 08:16:25
At least the angler does not dump the fish he does not want dead back into the sea as are done because of the EU quota system. If the EU were to say that what ever you catch you must land and be sold at market not only would there be more fish in the sea but the public would get a chance to try other types of fish.
3

Jock E,

Edinburgh 20/01/2009 09:30:16
The EU will never get UK people to see the benefit of membership with this type of stupid legislation.
4

sigholm,

ayr 20/01/2009 10:06:57
#3 The benefits being what Jock? and to whom? You most probably. Every probability you are bleeding the public dry in a nice civil service job, just like the corrupt spongers on the continent.
Benefit of membership my eye.
5

drunken proffet,

Tassy 20/01/2009 10:30:48
You cannot accuse the folk in Brussels of lunacy. A better description would be intellectually challenged. A bit more PC,eh!
6

,

20/01/2009 10:38:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Anne,

Eaglesham 20/01/2009 10:46:36
Angling is the sport with the highest number of participants in the UK.

If they can get their act together, more than a few MPs and MEPs will feel the cold wind of redundancy blowing in their direction!
8

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 20/01/2009 10:48:13
The first question that enters my head is "Why?"

What possible justification could there be in regulating amateur fishermen who in a year probably collectively catch less than a professional trawler would catch in one trip.

Our fishing grounds are well policed by both the Royal Navy and government fishery patrol vessels. There have been absolutely no incidents of professional fishermen masquerading as amateurs out for an afternoon's fun---which is the only possible justification for this madness.
9

bythesea,

20/01/2009 11:30:24
Sea angling makes minimal impact on the environment, it is worth over £150 million / yr to the Scottish economy and supports the fragile economies of many coastal communities; it is also one of the few pastimes an entire family can enjoy together at a low cost.

Scotland was once a key destination in Europe for sea anglers offering a range of species unparalleled anywhere else, available from both shore and boat.

However, successive governments have done little to ensure the sustainability of fish stocks and even now, due to political policies and poor fisheries management, over 500 million fish are discarded dead every year in Scottish waters - 2 billion in the North Sea alone by the EU fleet.

But rather than make some bold decisions and address the real issues, the politicians think they can fix the problem by making anglers fill in loads of forms.

If stocks continue to decline at the rate they currently are, one wonders what they will do with a load of blank returns ?

www.ssacn.org

10

DeniseX,

20/01/2009 11:38:16
#6. I agree vote UKIP for freedom from Europe and freedom of bans.
11

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 20/01/2009 13:26:19
I'll vote for any party that wants out of Europe.
12

DeniseX,

20/01/2009 13:32:44
TICAP. The International Coalition Against Prohibition next Tuesday and Wednesday at the European Parliament.
13

Niall,

Cairnbulg Aberdeenshire 20/01/2009 13:50:35
More Eurocratic control freakery.

I enjoy sea angling and my hobby puts food on the table. I fish mainly for Flounders, Plaice and Sole with the odd Cod and ling from time to time. I return all undersize fish ALIVE back in the sea and I fail to see how 70 fish a year will make any difference to stocks in the N Sea. If these Eurocrats have nothing better to do than dream up inane rules like this one then it's time for them to be sacked and save us taxpayers a few Billion Euros.
14

Iain's,

Spain 20/01/2009 14:14:38
Over here, in the real world, the govenrment would sign up to the new regulations, then forget to enforce them.

Only Broon and his gang do what Brussels tells them.
15

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 22/01/2009 11:32:11
Brussels is only another cog in the Politicians, jobs for the Boys trough. Time to put a spoke in the the whole sorry appartus. The savings would be gifreakingnormus without a doubt. Next President will no doubt Brown or one of his crop of faecaliths!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.