Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Shameful' toll of medical experiments on monkeys in Scotland

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 January 2009
ALL use of monkeys in medical research should be banned, a Scottish MEP said yesterday.
David Martin described it as "Scotland's shame" that one in ten experiments involving monkeys in the European Union was carried out in Scotland. In 2007 1,213 monkey experiments, mainly involving marmosets and macaques took place in the country, according to analysis by the charity Advocates for Animals.

But scientists said the only reason monkey use appeared to be high in Scotland was that so much quality biomedical science was carried out here.

They also said the level of animal use in experiments was already low and reducing it further would drive research to other countries where there was less regulation.

Mr Martin hoped a European ban on using chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans in research could be extended to all primates, including the many being used in Scotland.

He said that though the centres where tests were carried out were often kept secret, research units using monkeys could be found in the Lothians, Inverness and Glasgow.

"This is a moral issue," he said. "Monkeys are so similar to us. "They feel pain, they anticipate pain and react to pain in the same way as we do."

The Labour MEP also claimed that although monkeys were similar to humans, they were different enough to give misleading results in research.

"We have a population of five million, Europe had a population of 500 millions, so proportionately it should be one in 100 – but it is one in ten," he said.

"Scientists admit that they are already using other methods to carry out their research," he added. "It is clear that we need to put more energy and resource in expanding these methods."

But scientists said monkeys were used only when absolutely necessary. Simon Festing, head of Understanding Animal Research, said: "There are still many things we just can't do without using animals. We can't study movement or brain function in a test tube. We can't get computers to do things that are quite simple, such as catch a cough. It is about working towards treatments and cures for very devastating diseases, from hepatitis to Parkinson's."

Dr Festing said testing involving monkeys was not a Scottish phenomenon.

"It's just that several of the facilities which are carrying out this research are located in Scotland," he said.


FACT BOX

• RESEARCH involving monkeys has led to many medical breakthroughs, including the discovery of the polio vaccine, that have saved many lives.

• Monkeys are also being used to help find treatments for hepatitis and Parkinson's disease, with patients already seeing the results.

• In Scotland, monkeys are being used to help look for the causes of infertility, affecting one in six men.

• Based on funding, only 20 per cent of research in the UK involves animals, and of this less than 1 per cent involves monkeys.

• Anyone wanting to carry out animal research in the UK has to go through a lengthy Home Office process that can take months or years. Scientists claim testing is easier abroad.

• The United States is thought to use around 50,000 monkeys a year in research.

• Professor Bob Millar, from the Human Reproductive Sciences Unit in Edinburgh, says monkeys are used for research into women's health because they are the only other species to menstruate.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 January 2009 10:42 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Animal Testing
 
1

,

08/01/2009 00:16:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

muppetfinder,

08/01/2009 00:59:58
couldn't they experiment on labour politicians, less intelligent but the public wouldn't bother
3

,

08/01/2009 03:07:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

08/01/2009 03:11:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

FerryPort,

08/01/2009 03:15:58
No, there are less controls now than before.
A liscene is one thing but the actual number of animals being used is another.
In the 80's they changed the stipulation on this. If you have a liscence it is not requested to record how many animals are being used.
Just so sad for the individual animals in cages where no-one knows thier plight.
6

Snuffy Ivy,

Aberdeen 08/01/2009 03:43:44
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME! on Scotland. This is disgraceful.
7

donald anderson it's me,

glasgow 08/01/2009 06:37:48
Red Rosette Monkeys Fear Extinction.
8

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 08/01/2009 06:42:57
These monkeys are bred for medical research/testing in the same way cows/pigs/sheep/chickens are bred for meat.
If there was no medical research facilities then these monkeys would not exist so why all these whingers are complaining is beyond me !!
I wonder if they would complain as loudly if they sat down and realised just how many medicines, medical procedures, etc. members of their families have benefited from that were developed from the results of this research ?
9

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 08/01/2009 08:03:20
So a Labour MEP is initiating this, is he?

Listen buster, Labour were in power for a very looong time before our current government, so why didn't you do anything about it then?

Because one thing Scotland IS good at is biomedical research. And of course, while Labour were in power, they were proud of thier achievements in scotland with regards biomedical science.

Now that they are not in power, they will do anything to discredit Scotland. First the shipping, then the banks now our scientific research.

If they get back into power, they will then re-instate all of th above and claim it has a Labouir victory.

Well boll*x to you I say. We see right through your veiled hypocrasy.

All you chaps above spouting "shame" and "disgusting", let me tell you that it's pointless. Where were you years ago when this was happening and what you going to do about it now? I'll tell you what, nothing.
10

sam the god,

08/01/2009 08:11:40
why not use the lifer in our prisons at least that way we would get value for money paid in taxes and these scum would be helping descent people and by the way they should not have any human rights privaliges anyway
11

Gdgy,

08/01/2009 08:22:34
"We have a population of five million, Europe had a population of 500 millions, so proportionately it should be one in 100 – but it is one in ten," he said.

So by this statement is he suggesting that those countries whihch have no facilities for primate research should shoulder their share?
The high proportion of primate research reflects the high quality of biomedical research carried out int he UK.
IF we don't so it then it will be done, under less stringent conditons elsewhere...so the MEP wants to assuage his hurt feelings but it won't save one monkey......
12

,

08/01/2009 08:35:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

08/01/2009 08:37:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Maximus,

Roberton 08/01/2009 09:07:50
I agree #4!

Whilst animal experimentation is to be condemned, it does highlight the dilemma society has placed itself in, when animals become more important than human persons - from conception to death - and yet we embyros are being experiemented on too.

15

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 08/01/2009 09:19:48
Funny this is election year for MEP's and this guy is an MEP.
All of which leads me to surmise that this noble cause is about as noble as the gentleman’s expense claims since his election to the European Parliament.
16

ddmc,

08/01/2009 09:47:06
#4 dont agree with you often, but your comments about how ineffectual our politico's are is spot on.

Testing on animals is horrid but required, robust oversight of the need to test them is required, medical scientists like any other R&D takes shortcuts, with uneeded animal testing one of these shortcuts. An independent body is required to validate the need for animal testing on a per case basis.
17

Lianachan,

Highlands 08/01/2009 10:12:06
#2 Sorry, I don't think their DNA is close enough to that of humans to be of any research use.
18

AJ Fife,

08/01/2009 10:12:34
Monkey experiments are important. How else can we get an insight into the habits of the average unionist?

Would wee wendy alexander have been found out, if it wasn't for such experimentation?
19

,

08/01/2009 10:17:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

fair scunnered,

edinburgh 08/01/2009 10:22:03
why not use child molesters,terrorists etc as subjects,prob cheeper than hanging,yet these sickos can kill and molest people,do untold harm,yet are protected by law,whereas the victims dumped and told get on with it,deal with it yourself
labour you have had 50 years of power in scotland,and only now are you bleating like dolly the sheep
thank god gordon hasnt cloned labour voters yet
jilted john sang a song during the punk era that summed up broon perfectly,with the line
"gordon is a moron"
ahead of his time methinks
21

SEUMAS,

fearn 08/01/2009 10:23:24
Where are you rufus s#itfly---you can surely find a reason to blame Alec Salmond.
22

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 08/01/2009 10:25:05
#17
You usually talk sense but today your post is just silly. Are you seriously suggesting that the purpose of animal research is solely to inflict suffering on the animals?

It's just one step (but an important one) in making sure that treatments are safe or that the side effects can be controlled. I agree with #16, though, that there should be validation of the need for animal testing on a case by case basis over and above the licence for keeping the animals.

And don't forget that there are usually veterinary spin-offs which help to cure animal illnesses.
23

,

08/01/2009 10:32:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

,

08/01/2009 10:36:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/01/2009 10:52:04
Presumably then, David Martin will be volunteering his services to take the monkeys' places then.

Prat.
26

Lianachan,

Highlands 08/01/2009 11:03:27
#22 Are you sure you meant that as a reply to my post at #17?
27

,

08/01/2009 11:08:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

lulach mac gille coemgain,

08/01/2009 11:19:41
'Shameful' toll of medical experiments on monkeys in Scotland

sheesh ! Sounds like a headline from the Houses of Parliament Labour run Scotland Office and How to treat the Scottish public Newsletter
29

,

08/01/2009 11:20:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

AJ Fife,

08/01/2009 11:21:47
#28,

Happy New Year Vince.

It was indeed a bumper edition, but I was clever and liquidised the thing, with some added custard of course.
31

,

08/01/2009 11:27:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/01/2009 12:16:35
I cannot understand what sicko 3 is going on about yet again.

Sometimes he is coherent but today's rant is all over the place and involves personal issues that are not germane to the headline of this newsitem.

I agree with one poster @ #12 that the article was incomplete and not enough facts and figures were supplied for us to make an informed opinion based on the slapdash reportage.

Just wait until that looney-toon organisation PETA gets wind of this article.
33

OddJob,

Edinboring 08/01/2009 12:50:10
I've always wondered how Cancer Reasearch spent my £2 a month. In the adverts on TV they imply it is to save the little girl with the tube coming out of her nose, but it seems it's just used to torture monkeys. I'm cancelling the direct debit immediately. Thanks for bringing it to my attention Mr Martin!
34

Paul55,

Cambridge 08/01/2009 12:52:27
David Martin is talking rubbish again, of course the amount of research on monkeys done in Scotland is greater than the European average since Scotland does a huge biological and medical research for it's size...as Donnie Murdo said it's one thing that Scotland is good at. If you looked at the amount of in vitro biomedical studies, rodent studies, or clinical studies done you would come up with similarly high figures.

Though research on monkeys accounts for a tiny proportion of biomedical research overall it is vital to several areas, particularly virology and neuroscience. While new in vitro methods, methods that use genetically modified rodents and scanning techniques that can be used on humans may be able to reduce the number of monkeys that need to be used they are unlikely to be able to replace all monkey studies for at least the next couple of decades.
35

Brian the Barbarian.,

the slums 08/01/2009 13:07:12

They will be trying to ban fox hunting next.

Why not experiment on Chavs instead ?

And whoever the prats were who voted for this useless clown.
36

far enough away from skotland to feel safe...,

08/01/2009 13:13:41
If we don't experiment on these monkeys, sure as eggs is eggs, they'll be experimentin on us in our own back yard... But seriously folks, the reason we use animals is cos they react a bit like us, and give better results than computer modelling. Believe it or not folk who work in these labs are not all animal hating nazis. And neither am I...
37

,

08/01/2009 13:32:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

,

08/01/2009 13:45:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
39

Mcsnagpile,

08/01/2009 14:51:40
Ave hid a few Labotomys wae the Three Monkeys in Portabelly.
40

Bele's bane,

Scotland 08/01/2009 16:08:43
Ever stop to consider how grateful those whose lives were saved from Polio were? Lives are still are being saved to this day all because of animal experimentation.

Those saved lives include the posters of this column! Without the vaccine for Polio many would not have survived to write their comments on this article!
41

Hickory,

US 08/01/2009 16:09:34
Aye #2, there's an unlimited supply at holyrood.
42

Ewan Oosami,

08/01/2009 19:45:50
#10 you are spot on, how about supplementing the list of prisoners with those others who are parasites on our society? - the do-gooders, tree-huggers, greenies, MPs, defence lawyers, MEPs,councillors,global wrming flat earth society, House of Lords.....jeez the list is getting long. Leave the animals alone!
43

,

08/01/2009 21:54:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

Poetess50,

08/01/2009 22:14:05
Get a grip, people. IT'S ONLY AN ANIMAL. Or would you rather have new medicines tested on humans?
45

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

10/01/2009 01:22:24
46...What makes you think that you are sane?...you flatter yourself...

"Only an animal?"...you arrogant piece of that stuff you find on your shoe when you have been for a walk to the pub/shops/cinema/post office or peep show..

"Only an animal?"

If only your life were equal

Nonentity
46

Carmena,

Ro 12/01/2009 17:58:29
SHAME, SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!!! LET'S DO RESEARCH ON OURSELVES, THE MONKEYS HAVE THE SAME LEVEL OF SUFERENCE LIKE US! HOW YOU CAN DO IT?????????
47

Wednesda,

Eng a LAND 13/01/2009 12:22:06
Superman gave millions to the vivisection industry, and died a natural death. The industry had said: "There is a cure in the pipeline, Superman." Listen to me vivi, you can't even cure the common cold, and I KNOW IT!"
"He jumped from fourty thousand feet without a parracute, and he AINT gonna jump no more."
48

cristina vieira,

lisboa, portugal 22/01/2009 08:36:15
The paradox that the scientific community has to explain is that either the apes are different from humans and then there is no interest on the results of research; or their are similar and then there is no ethical justification for using them in a way we would never use one of us.
Research is payed by industry and much of the research is done in western diseases (caused mainly by our habits); so, instead of promoting a healthy lifestyle, we kill millions of animals to create new drugs for the rich people.
The claim to be for the sake of human species is clearly a misleading claim. All this is to feed a huge industry.
49

Steve R.,

United States 16/02/2009 11:05:38
Regarding the use of monkeys in manufacturing the polio vaccine - that led to the contamination of the vaccine with a oncogenic virus. The CDC in the U.S. has admitted that is linked by at least two studies to the developement of childhood brain cancers.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/archive/polio_and_cancer.htm#13

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6116


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.