Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Secret meeting' to alter bypass route

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 September 2008
BOTH Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire councils were kept in the dark about the Scottish Executive's surprise decision to champion a "hybrid" route for a controversial bypass, a public inquiry heard yesterday.
Until at least two weeks before the announcement was made, they were unaware that Scottish Executive officials had begun to work up plans for a route that would avoid driving the Aberdeen bypass through the heart of a community for people with specia
l needs.

And the inquiry in Aberdeen was also told that the so-called "sixth way" option only emerged after a secret meeting between Tavish Scott, the transport minister, and the chairman of the board of the school that had been threatened by the path of the preferred route chosen by the two councils and their other funding partners.

On 1 December, 2005, Mr Scott announced that he had firmly rejected the "Murtle" option, recommended by both councils, which would have routed the trunk road through the internationally renowned Camphill Community at Newton Dee, disrupting the lives of the 200 vulnerable adults and children with learning difficulties.

Instead, the minister revealed that he had opted for a new bypass that would be a combination of two of the five suggested routes, 28 miles of dual carriageway stretching from Stonehaven to the Blackdog junction on the Aberdeen to Peterhead road.

The timing of the "significant change of tack" was revealed as Alasdair Graham, Transport Scotland's project manager for the bypass, was questioned by counsel for the campaign group Road Sense as the 13-week inquiry got under way at Aberdeen's Treetops hotel.

Mr Graham agreed that both councils and Scottish Executive officials had backed the Murtle option, following a public consultation exercise on the five possible options.

A Scottish Executive memo showed that Mr Scott had then arranged a private meeting on 26 October with the chairman of the school board at Camphill. At the meeting the chairman had again refused to consider relocating the school.

Following that meeting, what became known as the hybrid route began to be developed between Scottish Executive officials and the minister.

Stuart Gale representing Road Sense, asked Mr Graham: "This was introducing an option not previously subject to public consultation and is presumably seen as a significant change in tack as far as officials are concerned, is that correct?"

Mr Graham replied: "It did combine two options previously presented to the public. It was different from those at consultation – yes."

Mr Gale then suggested it was "extraordinary" that, according to documents, both councils knew nothing of the decision.

As the inquiry got under way protesters staged a demonstration outside the hotel.

Shiona Baird said the Green Party would be boycotting the inquiry.

She said: "This road, by the time it is built, will be an enormous white elephant."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 September 2008 11:00 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Resolutions,

10/09/2008 00:18:37
Is it true that no minutes exist of these secret meetings? Wonder why that is not a surprise?

So one school refused to relocate - not really surprised at that as a great deal of development of 'specialist' facilities have been built up over many years, but it was ok to slap a road past another (younger) school who had just built a 'state of the art' facility and through conservation areas, communities built up over years.

This whole exercise stinks!
2

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 10/09/2008 06:25:22
Can anyone remember back to the time when the 'Murtle' option was the preferred route, and when the usual protestors campaigned for an alternative option?

It seems that these folk don't want any sort of development, ever. Apart from the people whose homes are in the path of the development, it's the 'usual suspects'. In fact, William Walton, Chairman of 'Roadsense', appeared only recently at the Trump PLI. You can guess which side he was on.

The sooner the PLI Reporter abides by the remit of the Inquiry, the better. My understanding is that evidence of who made the decision when, why and where, is not part of the remit. It also seems obvious that the Hootsman is again trying to sensationalise certain aspects of the proposed bypass, instead of looking at the overriding arguments for actually building a bypass. I suppose however, that would involve a reporter travelling to Aberdeen and doing some investigation. Ain't gonna happen.
3

clola,

south west africa 10/09/2008 08:07:59
I live on the north side of aberdeen There are two bottle necks getting south to any other part of UK.
There is a 10km stretch of single carriageway between Ellon and Aberdeen, which most of the day is moving at the pace of the slowest truck, then there is the major blockage that is the city itself. The new bypass will be a huge benefit to anyopne trying to get through the city heading south or west and it cannot come soon enough. Its the usual suspects, the nimbys etc who will delay and try to subvert what is an excellent scheme. Trump will get the go-ahead for the $2 billion investment for houses and golf courses, they will require a decent road service from the airport to his location just north of the city. The new road will fit right in.
Needless to say the enquiry will crawl all over every nook and cranny, but the road will still be built.
much faster to cut out the grandstanding and get it done.
4

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 10/09/2008 09:36:06
Spot on #3.
5

Resolutions,

10/09/2008 12:18:55
Perhaps of your home was slap bang in the middle of a route which was never discussed or mooted, you would feel differently.

#2 As I grew up in the Murtle area, I am very familiar with the ins and outs of the many botched schemes for a new bridge, former by-passes never built etc.

I agree that Aberdeen is a bottleneck and something needs to be done, but this problem has been many years in the making, successive councils, both County and Town have consistently failed to grasp the nettle and PLAN properly.

Back room deals and unminuted meetings and drawing on a map without open consultation is one thing which positively stinks. It is time that planning was open and transparent and it patently is not at the moment - at all levels.
6

Resolutions,

10/09/2008 18:41:42
#6 Jock
Of course, there will be losers - there always are, but the point I was trying to make, was that of all the routes mooted THE ONE DRAWN AT THE LAST MINUTE was not one! People on the original proposed routes had at least some warning. The poor folk on this scrambled one did not. Nor was there any opportunity given to do the balancing act and assessing the best way to accomplish this desirable development - something needed for the best part of 40 years if not more and when most of any route was in Aberdeenshire or Kincardineshire.If they had got their act together then, there would be less of a problem now.

Every option needs to be properly and openly assessed and this blatantly was not done in this botched backroom affair. It smacks of SLEAZE and certainly not above board. Why were the concils not informed?

Bluntly, it STINKS
7

overton,

Balmedie 12/09/2008 05:08:53
Whilst sitting in traffic last night for over one hour and fifteen minutes (along with thousands of other local commuters)I had time to dwell on the idylic lifestyle that is apparently led by the Irvine-Fortescues, Waltons and Fords of the World.

How lucky they are not having to work for a living.
8

Mr Fuzzy,

Edinburgh 29/09/2008 18:21:45
The decision to choose the route as it originally was, was based entirely on a council meeting reaching deadlock over which set of luxury homes would be demolished, and so one councillor gave up his home, much to the horror of his neighbours. Some people have become so fed up of the dithering that they have just sold up their home and relocated to Newcastle.

I've been caught in the traffic jams caused by two sets of commuter traffic simulataneously trying to go East/West through North Deeside Road and North/South through North Anderson Drive.
Imagine if Edinburgh didn't have the city bypass and all traffic had to go through Sighthill and Wester Hailes.

At some point the bypass has to cross some ribbon development of housing. So, some poor unfortunates have to lose the homes that they have paid off the mortgage for, and take out a new mortgage for an equivalent home elsewhere (if that is possible).

It's a shape they couldn't just build a tunnel like Boston's Big Dig, and this wouldn't be an issue.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.