Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


£200m hotel plan 'will spoil capital's historic skyline'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 February 2008
EDINBURGH'S most powerful heritage group is on a collision course with another developer over a multi-million-pound hotel scheme.
The body responsible for protecting the capital's World Heritage Site is warning that classic views of the city will be ruined by a 16-storey Haymarket complex being planned by the Irish developer Tiger.

The Edinburgh World Heritage (EWH) Trust ha
s demanded that the plans for the scheme are scaled back, because of the impact it claims it will have on views all across the Unesco-designated area.

Trust officials have already warned the council that the world heritage status is being put at risk by major new developments, such as Caltongate, the hotel and office development in the heart of the Old Town, and Quartermile, which has seen skyscrapers created on the site of the former royal infirmary.

A leaf-shaped five-star hotel is the centrepiece of Tiger Developments' £200 million development, which will fill a gap site near Haymarket Station.

The luxury hotel chain InterContinental – which has only one hotel in the UK – is set to run the 180-room complex, complete with a swimming pool and gym near the top floor, where visitors will enjoy spectacular views of Edinburgh Castle.

A 250-bed Travelodge is planned next to the main hotel, while the scheme also includes three modern office blocks and cafés, bars and restaurants.

Tiger has drawn up plans for the site, which has lain derelict for at least 40 years, after outbidding 12 companies to snap up the land from Edinburgh Council.

A previous hotel and office development, pursued by the council's development wing, EDI, was given the go-ahead onlyafter a lengthy public inquiry, but was shelved when the local authority ruled that it had to sell the site to help fund a huge equal-pay settlement for staff.

However, the new scheme involves a much higher centrepiece building, which will be roughly the same height as the Balmoral Hotel.

The award-winning Edinburgh architect Richard Murphy, who has designed the five-star hotel, has declared it will "redefine" the Haymarket area.

However, the EWH trust, in its submission to the council, said: "It is a fact that Edinburgh's historic skyline is dominated by church spires and narrow, sometimes broken, unoccupied structures.

"The building will overshadow the existing buildings and townscape, and unfortunately we do not believe that this building will make a positive contribution to the World Heritage Site."

Concerns over the Haymarket scheme have previously been raised by Scottish Government watchdog Architecture and Design Scotland.

But Historic Scotland has put itself at odds with critics by giving its endorsement to the scheme, saying it is a "marked improvement" on the previously approved development.

John Nesbitt, the managing director of Tiger Developments, said: "Tiger Developments carried out an extensive eight-month consultation process with the local community and other key groups.

"We believe our proposals represent a vast improvement on the previous scheme, which already has planning consent," he added.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2008 12:07 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 19/02/2008 03:19:38
iworked on the one in toronto cheap crap the worst brick work i saw in my life
2

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 19/02/2008 03:26:50
it will be a giant eyesore to the area it will not fit in look before you leap
3

Pilrig.,

Livingston 19/02/2008 06:34:50
Caltongate West
4

Buttress,

19/02/2008 10:14:10
Good. Let's hope someone starts to listen. Drip by drip, ruined view by ruined view, demolition by demolition, ill thought out development by ill thought out development, the WHS status of the Old and New Towns is in great danger of being placed on the World Heritage in Danger list of UNESCO and, unless something is done to stop the rot, Edinburgh can have its status as a WHS removed.

It is time that Historic Scotland was investigated for its support of schemes such as this and Caltongate. Questions need to be asked about the competence of the organisation now, and why it seems scared to oppose developments which it should be fighting.

CEC has already shown a blatant disregard for heritage and planning issues in passing the Caltongate development, with its demolitions of listed buildings, which it can only be hoped is called in and halted.

www.eh8.org.uk

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/

Thank heavens EWHT is standing up for what is right for the city, against architects with large egos and developers keen to make a fast buck.

If the city loses the status of a WHS, I wonder who those planners, politicians and the Chamber of Commerce who supported schemes such as this will blame? Themselves?







5

weemacgreegor,

buenos aires 19/02/2008 10:34:39
why don't the planners set a height restriction throughout the WHS and then you wouldn't need to waste all this time debating. developers would then know in advance the exact parameters
6

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 19/02/2008 10:37:12
Luciano Pavarotti remarked on the simplicity of his family retreat in contrast to the cities as "excessive progress"

"Excessive progress", I find to be an accurate statement of affairs in planning in Edinburgh.


Its those brown envolopes between developers and council planners that are the motivator.
Corrupt scum.

6 Keep up the pressure.
7

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 19/02/2008 10:39:20
7

Go further and implement a build as like or don't build policy in areas of superb masonry. This could easily include a height "ceiling"
8

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 19/02/2008 10:40:49
The council are well known for allowing superb building deteriorate and then knocking them down and putting up S H I T E

Sack em.
9

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 19/02/2008 10:59:56
The developers and those idiotic councillors of yours will have UNESCO and world opinion to answer to if this abomination is erected.

By the way, where do they find these numptie councillors in Edinburgh - on the bottom of your shoes after stepping in dog sh*t?
10

Buttress,

19/02/2008 11:10:39
I hope that all who are appalled at what is happening are writing to ICOMOS UK and UNESCO to tell them so?

11

Buttress,

19/02/2008 12:20:36
Mario - I have been around a while and seen plenty of 'nightmares'... but I can assure you that the drip feed effect on Edinburgh is eroding the WHS status. UNESCO cannot ignore it.

12

Buttress,

19/02/2008 12:37:57
It's the height which is the problem.

No-one is suggesting a museum, but it is a WHS...
13

Passionateaboutbuildings,

Manchester UK 19/02/2008 13:01:41
Please think twice before allowing this, we did it in Manchester and we are left with a hideous building which overshadows our historical buildings and their beauty. We visit Edinburgh regularly and it would be a crying shame to allow a monstrosity to do the same there. Passionate about buildings.
14

Neale,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 14:18:14
What is the current citywide height restriction? Is it directly inline with the flag atop the castle and anything below goes?

This project does seem to be quite a few stories higher than anything around (dominating, even) and can be seem along Shandwick Place and possibly from Prices St. Why don't they build this in Granton.
15

Slasher McGurk,

19/02/2008 16:37:29
All you people who pi** and moan about the building not fitting with surroundings will only pi** and moan about the big hole that will have to be dug to get the stone that will fit in with the surroundings.
Always something to moan about eh! If its not war, its trees or squirrels or swans being fed white bread.
16

GP,

19/02/2008 17:58:09
No more building in Edinburgh full stop.
No more building in Glasgow full stop.
All new buildings should be in the highlands and the borders where the green energy will be.
What a load o sh*** lack of hotels one week complaints the next.
17

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

19/02/2008 21:37:17
Why two articles on the same day on the same subject.
Here's what I thought on the other article.
Are you all deliberately missing the point of the "classic views" argument. These views will be had from
the upper floors of the building and will doubtless add
extra value to the price of the room.
Just think of the endless options which will be offered to the punters.
Classic view, castle view, sea view, fife view, tynecastle view, murrayfield view, pub view, railway station view, massage parlour view, kenny richey view,
saughton view, pentland view, tram view, and many more!
18

"Scotty",

Usa 21/02/2008 13:45:52
These hotels do absolutely NOTHING appearance-wise; they are cheaply built and look it. WHAT IS WRONG with Edinburgh's council members; it must be all about money for them. How very sad; Edinburgh was one of the most beautiful cities I've ever seen.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.