Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


It's carry on Sgt Eros as his police baton is judged inoffensive

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 April 2008
JUSTICE, it is said, is blind but in the case of the extendable baton of "Sergeant Eros", she may simply have blushed and preferred to avert her gaze.
The long-running saga of whether or not a male stripper's authentic police baton, designed to tease the female spectator, was an offensive weapon has, at last, come to a climax.

Sergeant Eros, aka Stuart Kennedy, a 25-year-old student of genetics
at Aberdeen University, is an innocent man, according to the three judges at the Court of Appeal. In a case of comic proportions, Mr Kennedy had previously been charged with carrying an offensive weapon, the baton, but when a sheriff acquitted him last year, the Crown attempted to have the ruling overturned on appeal.

However , at the Court of Appeal in Edinburgh yesterday, three judges decreed that the appeal had failed, the full reasons for which will be issued in the future. The ruling will now allow Mr Kennedy to reinstate the extendable baton into his routine, no doubt to the delight of his fans. Last night Mr Kennedy said: "I am definitely happy. I can't believe a case like this could ever make it to the Court of Appeal."

He vowed once again to carry the batons, which had been discarded while the appeal was pending. A real baton, he said, extended with a dramatic "click". He said: "The police costume is the most popular, partly because of all the press attention. I have never stopped doing the police strip, and have no intention of stopping. You can get a plastic, squeaky one (baton] but it doesn't look the part."

The saga of the extendable baton began in March 2007 when Mr Kennedy, in his full "police" uniform, was spotted by plainclothes female officers outside a pub in Aberdeen who mistook him for a genuine policeman. He quickly put them right, explaining he was about to go inside to perform a stripogram, a service he was giving to finance his way through university.

The officers were unsure if he was breaking any laws, but, after his act, Kennedy agreed to go to a police station for questioning.

He was charged with possessing offensive weapons, two police-issue batons which he had acquired by mail order at a time when selling such items was legal, and a canister like a CS gas spray. At his trial, Kennedy's lawyer maintained he had no case to answer as the items were simply props, and Sheriff Kenneth Stewart upheld the plea and acquitted him.

Last week, at the Justiciary Appeal Court in Edinburgh, the Crown accepted the verdict in relation to the canister, but argued it should be reversed for the batons. It was submitted that Kennedy could have used fake batons in his act, and if it was deemed a reasonable excuse to be carrying real batons because they were part of his uniform, a host of dangerous weapons could be carried by people claiming "fancy dress defence".

The judges indicated that they wanted time to consider the case. Neither Kennedy nor any lawyer on his behalf had attended the hearing, and they later complained that they had not been given notice of it.

A re-hearing had seemed likely, and the case was called yesterday to discuss the next move. The presiding judge, Lord Johnston, informed Chris Shead, counsel for Kennedy:

"I think it is proper to announce that the Crown appeal will fail, and reasons will be given in due course."

>HEADLINE
THE two female police constables who triggered the strange case of "Sergeant Eros" stopped him just minutes before he was due to strip in an Aberdeen pub.

In order to authenticate Stuart Kennedy's claim he was dressed as a police officer as part of his job, the two officers – Amanda Lawson, 33, and Fiona Duncan, 30 – watched hisperformance at the Para-mount bar, so they could find out why he was dressed as a policeman. As PC Lawson told Aberdeen Sheriff Court: "We had never been in a situation like that before. We needed proof he was a stripper."

Mr Kennedy later accompanied the officers to a nearby police station.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2008 10:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

2Right,

On Location 26/04/2008 02:41:50
Come along Ladies
2

Guga II,

Rockall 26/04/2008 03:00:16
This has been a total waste of taxpayers money, bringing a case like this to court, then appealing the original verdict.

I would have thought the police and the Crown Office had better things to occupy themselves with, like trying to catch and punish real criminals; including all the little neds and thugs that run around with genuine offensive weapons - which they actually use as offensive weapons.

This is a bit like Political Correctness gone mad, and brings to mind that very apt description of Political Correctness:

"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
3

Ezekiel Gazooks,

26/04/2008 03:29:16
If you take a weapon, for whatever reason, to a drunken night out, there's a chance that it will be used for it's original purpose. It would be better to use a toy baton.
4

Guga II,

Rockall 26/04/2008 03:40:46
#3 That's a totally spurious argument. The stripper is working, not indulging in a drunken night out, as you imply.
5

calum,

26/04/2008 08:23:57
And in the good old days when being a police officer actually meant something, no doubt a gnarled Sid James lookalike desk Sergeant would have told the 2 police "persons" to get out of his station and do some proper police work. What a carry on!
6

Douglas,

Bathgate 26/04/2008 09:05:27
Did anyone think to check the warrant cards of the two police women to verify THEIR story. The cynics of the world might say that they had an itch that needed scratching and the whole thing snowballed from there.
I'm now away to consider the consequences for two male officers and a female stripper at a stag night after hearing she used a truncheon in her act and they needed proof.
7

yockel,

26/04/2008 09:33:01
The invitation to go in for questioning when the polis weren't sure if any law had been borken is the worrying thing about this case. It illustrates the inflated sense of their own importance held by many plod despite their obvious incompetence.
8

T M,

LA, USA 26/04/2008 09:33:53
Almost every day I read an article in the Scotsman about how normal law abiding citizens cannot get the police to to show up and confront thugs, but a male stripper who obviously would be the last person to actually participate in any violence has to go through this ordeal. Three words come to mind........
Country hell handbasket.
9

Tina McGreevy,

Glasgow 26/04/2008 10:10:06
Guga II, you might like to know that the new summary justice reforms mean that little thugs who run round our city streets with real weapons are no longer being prosecuted. Instead, they will receive a "warning letter" or at worst a fixed penalty.

Ironic perhaps in the week when we hear of a man being taken to court for putting too much rubbbish in his own wheely bin, that those who are involved in crimes against the person and against public order will be spared.

Lots of cases come to court which should not and with the new reforms lots of cases which should go to court will be "diverted". For example, if you are assaulted and require three stitches or less, your assailant will not be taken to court but will instead be sent a letter telling him not to do it again. Well, we can all sleep easier in our beds knowing that.

Without a solicitor to challenge this ridiculous prosecution and counsel to argue it at the appeal stage, this young man would have been convicted and his future prospects prejudiced.

You may have heard that solicitors voted this week to take industrial action as a protest against these new reforms and the way in which they will be paid. Whilst the general public will no doubt show limited sympathy for the legal profession, one might remember if it were not for an independent criminal bar, ready, willing and able to put the Crown to the test, our revered legal system will be endangered.
10

,

26/04/2008 10:14:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

26/04/2008 10:17:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Calum Crubag,

26/04/2008 10:57:00
Amanda Lawson, 33, and Fiona Duncan, 30

Thick cops of the year award.

Have they nothing more pressing to attend to? NPI...!
13

Calum Crubag,

26/04/2008 10:58:04
Or are the cops working undercover for one of the churches? Wee Frees? Or maybe the Catholics? They've been quite vocal in recent weeks.
14

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

26/04/2008 11:40:23
Seems tae me the two lassies need an excuse to watch the pseudo Sg get 'es kit aff....then realised they needed an excuse tae cover up thir ogling of said stripper..jist take 'im doon the station an parade 'im in front o' their mates fir a wee bit..bet they enjoyed that....even if 'e wis only a 'kiddy on' Sgt...
15

PC McGarry#452,

999 Letsby Avenue 26/04/2008 13:50:33
Bet they get promoted soon to get them away from the front line and out of harm's way.
16

Deeside,

Scotland 26/04/2008 15:26:07
Another typical example of Grampian Police's bullying and harrassment tactics - and that's a fact! This police force makes common practice of breaking guidelines and laws in order to cover their tracks of absolutely appaulling policing tactics.

Those two female officers should be charged - there is clearly a doubt as to whether they actually were in the bar on official police business. For any police officer to enter a licensed premises when not on official business but whilst on duty is an offence.

Whilst humour can be applied to this rediculous situation, there is a much more serious side to it all - future careers can be damaged due to having a police record; the emotional impact of such treatment by the police is beyond most people's imagination; and you are much more open to further abuse of police powers;

There should be an independent inquiry as to why senior management has allowed this case to escalate - the fact they have persued Mr Kennedy to the appeal court, locked him up for two nights in a police cell and made him endure 17 court appearances, amounts to nothing less than police harrassment and intimidation.

It is actually very very scary that art is being sensored in this way - and it is a performing art that he undertakes.

Those two female officers should get a life - but there again, it is Grampian Police after all and it would be a little bit too much to ask for them to actually do some proper policing!
17

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

26/04/2008 22:36:00
16...Thats crap...loads of police women out there 'on the front line' with their male colleagues....if you are a real cop, shame on you mate...

17..."Performance art?"....gies peace...have you been to one of these "performance" do's?.....man or wumman git their kit aff...wumman scream wae laughter and grab a haud o' his truncheon....men foam it the mooth and volunteer tae be sat oan etc......geezpeace...."performance art".....!
18

,

27/04/2008 09:29:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

27/04/2008 09:29:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

JT,

27/04/2008 09:31:19
Although strippers dont float my boat, this case has made me laugh as Sgt Eros is laughing all the way to the bank with all this publicity. Whoever thought this was worthy of getting to court let along the court of appeal should be sacked as total waste of money.
21

,

27/04/2008 09:31:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

,

27/04/2008 09:32:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Douglas,

Bathgate 27/04/2008 11:20:31
Digory, do you have a bet on with someone that you can beat C. Linskaill Esq. for the highest number of postings on a given story?
24

,

27/04/2008 12:29:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.