Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scientists unravel 'dolphinese' chatter

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 December 2007
SCIENTISTS have finally unravelled the meaning of squeaks and whistles that make up dolphin "speech".
According to the Australian researchers who have picked up "dolphinese", the language shows the animals are more similar to humans that previously thought.

The scientists identified almost 200 different whistles that the dolphins make to co
mmunicate, and linked some to specific behaviours.

Biologist Dr Liz Hawkins and her colleagues listened to the chatter of wild bottlenose dolphins off the western coast of Australia for three years.

Dr Hawkins, of the whale research centre at Southern Cross University, New South Wales, said: "This communication is highly complex, and it is contextual, so in a sense it could be termed a language."

Dolphins were known to use "signature" whistles to identify themselves to others, but the meaning of the other whistles they make was a mystery.

Dr Hawkins recorded 1,647 whistles from 51 different groups of dolphins living in Byron Bay, New South Wales.

The biologist, who presented her work at a meeting of the Society for Marine Mammalogy in Cape Town, grouped all the whistles into five tonal classes and found that these groups, and even individual whistles, clearly went with different behaviours.

Dr Melinda Rekdahl, of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, said it was too early to know whether whistles might mean something specific, but added: "It is possible. Dolphin communication is much more complicated than we thought."

The research, the scientists claim, will lead to a reassessment of the social complexity of dolphins, raising moral questions over how those kept in captivity should be treated.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 December 2007 9:22 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 19/12/2007 00:29:04
"the language shows the animals are more similar to humans that previously thought"

The dolphins must be disappointed to learn that.
2

Kipling,

Atlantis 19/12/2007 01:14:48
Several decades ago a book was written promoting the evolutionary theory that man developed from sea ?mammals. The female scientist was marginalised for her somewhat eccentric views.
Trawling Google for the name of the book i came across the story of :
"...the fossil of Gogonasus, a 380 million-year-old fish, provides an evolution- ary link between earth's most ancient creatures and humans.
"The 30-centimetre fish had a large breathing hole in its head and muscular front fins with bones similar to those in human arms."
Well, maybe someday the scientist will be proved less crazy than was thought at the time. It would have been nice if Dolphins could write, there might have been a Rosetta Stone around to aid interpretation of the more abstract sounds! Instead the scientists will be dealing as much with the prejudices of the scientific community as with their own evolving decoding prowess.
3

Yane,

Melbourne 19/12/2007 05:19:13
"Scientists have finally unravelled the meaning...." the article says they haven't! And, maybe this is pedantic, but shouldn't it be "interpret" instead of "unravel" if it's a language & not a bit o string?
4

Unimpressed one,

19/12/2007 08:37:37
"Biologist Dr Liz Hawkins and her colleagues listened to the chatter of wild bottlenose dolphins off the western coast of Australia for three years." Nice work if you can get it! And the final use of this research? Dolphins get a seat at the UN perhaps?
5

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 19/12/2007 08:50:32
The devil and details are usually in the margins. From observing the inner-firth tribes, I tentatively suggest that we came from Mars for we're implausable apes. As you're unlikely to have one for study, look at a goat or a horse to get an impression of what terrestial engineering really looks like.

Where was Mars: nearer the sun than now. Where was Earth: dinasauric in climate. Venus had yet to arrive to locked in a contra-roating period with our earth-moon system. Sheep likely arrived from Mars too and the path of the moufllon made a symbiotic relationship with the inner firther for it's Willie Bauld oot there.

ibid: Peter Buchan: "Fit like, Skipper?"
6

Yane,

Melbourne 19/12/2007 10:47:15
#5 trippy! Looks like you can get that book on the net as well Yok.
7

Findlay Thompson,

19/12/2007 11:21:39
Methinks the Dolphins are having the last laugh, who pens these articles?

Was Flipper's happy chuckle not the phrase "mair fish if you don't mind skipper"?
8

Ayrshire Scot™ ,

21/12/2007 20:13:08
.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.