Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Nature group urges marine reserves test

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 March 2008
MORE than 30 per cent of the North Sea should be turned into a network of protected marine reserves to help rebuild fragile fish stocks, according to an environmental pressure group.
WWF UK says there is an urgent need for protected areas to provide refuges for commercially important species, such as cod, haddock and plaice.

Existing fisheries management regimes, it argues, fail to protect these species, whose numbers have fa
llen as much as 90 per cent since 1990. Some, including the common skate, have all but vanished from the North Sea.

In the organisation's response to the government's proposals for a new Marine Bill, WWF UK is urging ministers to set up five small marine reserves to test their effectiveness.

Last year The Scotsman launched a "Save our Seas" campaign calling for the creation of a network of reserves and protected areas around the coast, a system of marine planning to organise human activity and for control of conservation of the sea to be devolved to Scotland.

Today, Richard Lochhead, the cabinet secretary for the environment, will call on the Scottish Parliament to unite behind moves to devolve more powers to manage the country's "unique" coastal and marine environment.

Speaking ahead of a debate in parliament, Mr Lochhead said: "I have made it clear we agree with The Scotsman that there should be further devolution for the marine environment between 12 and 200 nautical miles from Scotland's shore."

The five sites earmarked for reserves by WWF are an area north of Shetland, the Aberdeenshire coast, close to the Dogger Bank, the North Norfolk sandbanks and part of the northern North Sea close to the boundary with Norwegian waters.

Giles Bartlett, the fisheries policy officer at WWF UK, said: "The report shows that areas closed to fisheries can meet conservation targets without having a substantial negative impact on the fishing industry."

But Bertie Armstrong, of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, said the WWF proposals were "fundamentally flawed".

SETTING THE AGENDA

THE Scotsman has launched a campaign to protect our precious marine life. We want:

• A network of marine reserves and protected areas to be created to safeguard sites properly.

• A system of marine planning, effectively zoning areas for appropriate use, to safeguard important fishing grounds from offshore wind farms and other projects.

• A single organisation to administer this system.

• Scotland to be given control of conservation to the 200-mile boundary with international waters.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 March 2008 9:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Save our Seas
 
1

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/03/2008 00:57:24
It is imperative to keep international organisations, colonial institutions, the UK and especially the EU out of our waters and our concerns, we will end up with nothing with these quangos.

did you know the WWF was set up by nazis?
2

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/03/2008 01:00:09
"THE Scotsman has launched a campaign to protect our precious marine life. We want:"

Allow me to re-phrase, the Scotsman group has been told to begin a massive social creation of consensus to remove yet more liberties from YOU, all under a moral guise.
3

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/03/2008 01:05:41
Protection of Scottish waters begins by them being fully owned by Scotland and manning a navy to sink any thing that comes with in 350 miles of our coast-line, that is not invited. NOT FOREIGN QUANGOS and loss of control.

Read Ian Mitchell's Afterword in The recent "isles of the west" book to understand the full measure of the consequences of such administrative theft.
4

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/03/2008 01:14:44
Mr Lochhead said: "I have made it clear we agree with The Scotsman that there should be further devolution for the marine environment between 12 and 200 nautical miles from Scotland's shore."

It is interesting to note that the Scotsman gutter press has been told by london to apparently take "a visionary stance of public coercion" It is the role of media to report is it not? Oh and surprise, surprise, Mr colonial agrees with said newspaper. What a fix.


5

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 20/03/2008 01:18:17
It has been agreed locally that all "improver's and meddlers of Scottish resources" shall be ousted forthwith and all assets sequestered and thrown into jail.

WE will organise our affairs.

INDEPENDENCE NOW > > >
6

bythesea,

20/03/2008 12:43:02
Whilst the aims are worthwhile, WWF are missing the destruction of fish stocks and marine biodiversity of the West and South West coasts of Scotland that is taking place because of the destructive langoustine industry.

Twenty species of fish which were once regarded as abundant in Scottish waters have become locally extinct or reduced to the point where only juvenile specimens are caught.

In a recent study by the FRS it was shown that trawlers were struggling to catch more than one cod, haddock, or whiting per hour in many areas from the Clyde to the Inner Solway. See http://tinyurl.com/2wqse9

Bertie Armstrong and his 'voluntary closures' - only one of these has ever been called in 6 months, either no-one is volunteering or there are no juvenile cod; not a good message either way.

As for the call for conservation up to 200 miles - it doesn't make sense - Scotland has control up to 12 now and doesn't manage the situation, all non-quota species are being hammered into oblivion. Even WWF are only concerned with quota species.


www.ssacn.org

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.