Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


First Minister pledges to move more Capital jobs to the Highlands

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 March 2007
FIRST Minister Jack McConnell is promising to move more government jobs out of Edinburgh if Labour is returned to power in May.
A Labour newsletter circulated in the Highlands and Islands boasts of the party's record of transferring civil service and quango posts out of the Capital.

And it quotes Mr McConnell promising: "We plan more".

But today a spokesman for the Fi
rst Minister said he was not aware of any imminent relocation plans to give the Highlands more jobs, prompting accusations Labour was saying one thing in the Highlands and another in Edinburgh.

The newsletter, Highlands & Islands Labour Rose, has a panel on the front, headed: "When Labour is in power, it delivers", with a list of achievements ranging from "a buoyant economy" to "the smoking ban", and including: "Government jobs relocated out of Edinburgh".

It adds: "These are Labour priorities being delivered here and now in Scotland."

And inside, the newsletter quotes Mr McConnell saying: "We have brought well-paid, stable government jobs to Kinlochleven, Campbeltown, Tain, Dingwall, Tiree and Inverness and we plan more."

Around 2500 jobs have been switched out of Edinburgh since the relocation policy was introduced in 1999, more than half of them to Glasgow.

The promise of more government jobs for the Highlands is particularly sensitive in the run-up to the Scottish Parliament elections. It was in March 2003 - just weeks before the last elections - that ministers announced the decision to relocate Scottish Natural Heritage headquarters from Edinburgh to Inverness.

The decision was taken despite strong opposition from staff, unions and the quango's own board. Inverness had been ranked last on a shortlist of five locations drawn up by consultants.

Opposition politicians claimed the move was politically motivated - designed to help Labour win the Inverness seat from the Scottish Nationalists. In the event, Labour failed to win the seat, and also lost the Edinburgh South seat, where SNH had some of its offices. Only 55 staff out of the 270-strong workforce opted to relocate, with 109 taking redundancy.

Earlier this month, the parliament's cross-party audit committee produced a highly-critical report on the operation of the Scottish Executive's relocation policy, branding the SNH decision "not value for money" and not justified by the arguments.

A spokesman for the First Minister said he was not aware of any imminent decision or announcement about further relocations.

But he defended the newsletter. "All that promise is saying is that the relocation policy will continue. It is not a target to move more jobs to the Highlands."

Lothians SNP MSP Kenny MacAskill said: "This is the same lot who just before the last election did Edinburgh over with SNH. Here they are, before the 2007 election, campaigning for more jobs to be relocated out of Edinburgh. How many jobs must go before Labour stops picking on Edinburgh?"

Mr MacAskill said the comments from the First Minister's spokesman smacked of Labour double-dealing. He said: "They are bragging about relocating jobs in the north, but denying it here. It shows they cannot be trusted."

Apart from SNH, most of the relocations to the Highlands have been small-scale. Dispersal of jobs in the Crown Office transcription unit meant six jobs for Dingwall and four each for Tain and Campbeltown, while relocation of the Crofting House Grants Scheme gave eight jobs to Tiree and moving the central inquiry unit to Kinlochleven created nine jobs.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 March 2007 1:15 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Public bodies relocation
 
1

Paul Ventaire,

16/03/2007 12:54:18

Since when was Glasgow a Highland town? Or was Mr. McConnell referring to all the tower blocks?

2

Richard Lionheart,

edinburgh 16/03/2007 12:59:47

If all the money wee Joke has wasted on this programme was added up, it would probably have paid London's bill for the Olympic Games.

What he means is, if I get back in, you are in for more of the same.

Good reason not to vote Labour, if you need another reason.

3

Angus Mcdonald,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 13:00:53

Jack Mcconnell is an idiot and is damaging Scotland's Capital city. When would you see Jobs from London being relocated to Berwick upon tweed or Carlisle in England or Jobs from Cardiff relocated to Rhyl or Wrexham?. Let's vote this punk out and get rid of him once and for all. He is making a clown of this Country.

4

Angus Mcdonald,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 13:02:22

As long as Jack Mcconnel is the leader of the Labour party of Scotland, I will not vote for the Labour party until he is out. Would rather See Liberal Democrats given a chance.

5

Mallory,

16/03/2007 13:02:51

Well I think moving jobs around the nation is right. Surely all parts of Scotland should 'enjoy' the fruits of a vastly increased public sector. Certainly with today's broadband comms there is noe reason not to conduct much business via teleconferencing.

6

NotANumber,

Tollcross 16/03/2007 13:13:51

Lets hope one of the first personnel relocated out of the capital is Cap'n Jack.

7

JAMES-DAVID,

EDUCATION.ED.AC.UK 16/03/2007 13:16:54

LET'S TRANSFER THE FIRST MINISTER TO THE HIGHLANDS AND GIE US A REST.

8

Justmasel,

16/03/2007 13:19:27

this seems to be the only policy this plank of a first minister is focused on,bring on the elections

9

Pierre Vileterre,

16/03/2007 13:20:33

The principle of job dispersal is probably right, but in the hands of our inept and corrupt politicians, is simply a recipe for more favours and backhanders.

10

Dr Ballantyne-Browne,

Endoscopy 16/03/2007 13:21:05

#5 Surely all parts of Scotland should 'enjoy' the fruits of a vastly increased public sector.

I agree, Mallory but the record is that the bulk of Edinburgh dispersals have gone to Glasgow, a city with a far higher per capita public sector than Edinburgh.
It is a policy, in my view, of greed overcoming need.

11

Angus Mcdonald,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 13:21:54

EDINBURGH IS THE CAPITAL CITY OF SCOTLAND AND SHOULD HAVE ALL THE RESOURCES PUMPED INTO IT LIKE LONDON HAS FOR BEING THE ENGLISH AND BRITISH CAPITAL.

12

Sean B,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 13:27:01

#3 (Angus)
A country cannot be a clown. Only a person can be a clown.

13

Yonthing,

16/03/2007 13:28:17

Great for the environment having all the Government workers driving to their office in small towns where the public transport system is minimal.

Put *ALL* the government jobs in one place and then you can justfy the cost of building a mass transit system to move the office workers around.

Now where did we put that £592 million for a tram.

14

Tomsk,

In Medias Res 16/03/2007 13:32:10

# 5

So, you would have people in Edinburgh made unemployed, their careers haulted or wrecked, their families disrupted or split. You would have public money wasted and increased inefficiencies in public services.

I have often wondered how politicians get re-elected. Now I know. None of them ever failed underestimating the bovine stupidity of the average voter.

15

Sean B,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 13:40:02

Yonthing (#13)
Your first sentence suggests that it's not a good idea to relocate civil service jobs, but your second and third sentences suggest that it is a good idea to do that. Are you in favour of the idea or not?

16

rpb,

16/03/2007 13:51:03

Can anyone imagine the fuss if Scottish Enterprise was relocated out of Glasgow to Wick...? or even 40 miles east down the M8

14 Tomsk is right sadly, voters are brain dead. But also the majority of voters all live where 90% of these jobs are being relocated.

Without naming anywhere, its the biggest city with apparantly Scotland's most prosperous economy.
So obviously it needs these jobs more than anywhere in Scotland.

Dr Endoscopy , no 10 , do you think sticking up a tube up mr McCConell would elicit the truth about why these jobs are being sent 40 miles west down a motorway?

So its alright for the government to make people unemployed in edinburgh, but not the Pru doing the same in Stirling?

Handily with both TV providers being based in Glasgow there will never be any mass media disapproval of moving all public sector jobs to Glasgow.

17

I'm no really here,

16/03/2007 13:53:54

Look at the poll on the right. Looks like Hurricane Jeck has once again captured the "pulse" of the nation.

18

Sean B,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 14:32:12

rpb (#16)

It is not clear from your comments whether you are in favour of the relocation of public sector jobs or not.

Is your "obviously" in the third paragraph meant seriously or sarcastically?

Why would there be a fuss if Scottish Enterprise was relocated to Wick?

Is your third paragraph about Edinburgh or Glasgow?

19

Tomsk,

In Medias Res 16/03/2007 14:37:56

# 16

Scotland's most prosperous economy is Edinburgh -- there's nothing apparent about it.

It is a prosperous, dymanic, burgeoning city ... or at least it would be if what passes for government in this country would get off its back! Instead, we have an administration that's only interest in the city is to strip its assets.

Edinburgh, despite everything, is still world class. With the best efforts of the Scottish Executive it can be second rate. Vote Labour/Liberal Democrats for mediocrity!

20

Twitchfinder General,

16/03/2007 14:52:12

Jack is getting really desperate now. I can just see half-a-dozen pampered Edinburgh bureaucrats stuffed into some wee croft with a peat fire and a leaky roof... Hang on, I might vote for that!

21

Richard Lionheart,

edinburgh 16/03/2007 14:54:07

Time we moved Jack to retirement on The Full First Ministers Pension he truly deserves.

#5 Mallory, do you mean the Buildings and infrastructure should stay in Edinburgh. The employees can live anywhere. Like India for example.

22

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 16/03/2007 15:32:45

I would grudgingly have to say this is probably good news for the Highlands. And while you're at it , Jack - why not move yourself also ? Or do we have to carry you out of Bute House, screaming and ranting in the same demented fashion in which you've misruled Scotland from Holyrood?

23

Moray Stewart,

Edinburgh 16/03/2007 16:20:45

A very poor attempt to win a few votes. It won't be happening anyway as Labour are gone.

24

Nurse,

16/03/2007 16:22:02

I am all for Jack Mconnel to be transterred permanently to ST Kilda, though he might bore the feathers of the Birds!!

25

unbiased,

In the Highlands 16/03/2007 16:34:25

no 7: We dinnae want him!!!!!!!!

26

rpb,

16/03/2007 17:55:45

Sean B, 18...I think there may be is a case for some sensible relocation. However, I object to the distasteful manner in which a policy that is sold as being for Scotland's benefit is really about punting jobs down the M8 at a ridiculous cost to all Scottish tax payers.

Apologies..the 'obviously' was scarcastic. Its just that the relocation of jobs was meant to be to areas of Scotland that really need them. Time & time we're told that Glasgow is now a prosperous 21th century city...so why on earth would Labour be putting all these public sector jobs there? J McConnell also told Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce that moving jobs out of Edinburgh was good as the public sector stifles the private sector...again, if Glasgow is a sound economy it shouldn't be 'stifled' (McConnel's words) by the extra burden of more public sector jobs.

There would be a BIG fuss if Glasgow public sector jobs were moved to Wick (or anywhere else) as the bulk of our MPs/MSPs come from the West of Scotland due to the demography of the Central Belt. Trust me, they would not allow one public sector job to be moved from the heartland. They are also resentful that the Parliament is in Edinburgh, a place that a lot of people in the west do not like; some go as far as to call the place more akin to England, not 'real' Scotland whatever that may mean.

My third paragrpah refers to Scotland's biggest city - which at the moment is still Glasgow. Watch the reaction to this - the west of Scotland talk about a Greater Glasgow of 2million- but over what square mileage would that be? If you take within Glasgow's city boundaries the city has about 650,000 only.
Edinburgh is always quoted by the sneerers as the wee city of 450,000 -but I would be intrigued to know what that rises to if the same mileage that Greater Glasgow is calculated on was used...

Hope that clears it up!

27

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 16/03/2007 18:43:58

Is them in the Highlands allowed to vote???


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

28

Yonthing,

17/03/2007 10:33:49

#15 Sean B, re #13 - At the same time that the Scottish Executive are backing the £592 million pound introduction of a mass transit service for Edinburgh, they are removing a large number of its potential users to other towns.

Just a double waste of money.

To answer your question, I do not support the moving of existing jobs to new locations to "spread the jobs around the country". It makes economic sense for any organisation to have its administration in as few locations as possible - this is standard business - look at Edinburgh Council and its new headquarters - they didn't try and build that in Musselburgh or Currie, did they - they built it centrally near to their other offices.

By all means encourage business to locate NEW jobs outside of Edinburgh - but why waste public money recruiting staff in one town at the same time as paying off others who have been successfully doing the job for many years.

29

Johnnie Wilkinson,

Edinburgh 17/03/2007 12:00:30

Another reason among an avalanche of reasons not to vote New Labour/LIB DEM in May. Thank God I do not work for a quango anymore where our staff were treated very shabbily for reasons of political expediency and it is nice to see the SNP in the Lothians sticking up for the interests of Edinburgh which has been damaged so much by this New Labour/Lib Dem administration. VOTE THEM OUT.

30

Herb Aishus,

Border 17/03/2007 16:23:18

Is it true that the grassy roof of the kid-on parliament is there to practise crofting?

31

Biker,

Ayr 17/03/2007 18:40:50

The real problem with de centralisation is the discemination of services, not to mention the paranoia of persons working remotely. Scotland is'nt such a big landmass. Keep the bloody jobs where they are for propper continuity and communication. Wee Jock is electioneering, and not to any great effect it would seem.

32

rpb,

17/03/2007 19:49:40

Sean B, 18...

Sorry to go on and on...but the other reason that "why would there be a fuss if Scottish Enterprise was relocated to Wick?" - your words- is that Glasgow happens to be home to both BBC Scotland and STV (in other words Scotland's TV reporting & editorial opinion is monopolised by one city and its self interest...). Do you honestly expect objective reporting if Glasgow public sector jobs were moved anywhere?


31 Joe - its good to rant!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.