Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Amid slump, Charles costs almost a quarter more – but aide insists he's still great value

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2009
PRINCE Charles cost taxpayers £3 million last year – an annual rise of almost a quarter – while his own tax bill fell by almost ten per cent, Clarence House accounts showed yesterday.
PRINCE Charles cost taxpayers £3 million last year – an annual rise of almost a quarter – while his own tax bill fell by almost ten per cent, Clarence House accounts showed yesterday.

The money from grants-in-aid and Government departments jumped
23.5 per cent, from £2,454,000 to £3,033,000.

The main cost was a 48 per cent rise in official travel by air and rail, which increased from £1,157,000 to £1,710,000.

Prince Charles's private income increased by just 1 per cent to £16.4m during the last financial year. The money, which comes from the surplus generated by the Duchy of Cornwall – the landed estate given to the heir to the throne which funds the public, charitable and private activities of Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall, and a proportion of the costs of Princes William and Harry – increased by £185,000 to £16,458,000.

His official expenditure rose nearly 20 per cent from £10,451,000 to £12,513,000. He paid less tax, with his bill falling from £3,429,000 to £3,093,000 – a drop of almost 10 per cent.

Non-official expenditure fell by 23 per cent, from £2,217,000 to £1,710,000, which is partly attributed to his decision to holiday in the UK last year.

Senior aide Sir Michael Peat said Prince Charles had been mindful of tough times. "It's a recession and we have to say that we've looked at all costs very carefully," he said.

"We are by no means immune to it. The Duchy is a ship designed to sail in most weather conditions but we have to look at areas and be careful. We are always reviewing costs."

Sir Michael said the value of Duchy assets was just under £600m and Prince Charles took a long-term approach to finances: "He didn't borrow money. We've planned for the long term. We've entered recession without having a great boom before we got into the recession, which means we're not suffering any bust at the moment, touch wood."

He said the rise in costs for official travel was due to the two long-haul trips to the Far East and South America.

"It's easy to underestimate the importance and success of these tours," Sir Michael said. "They're all requested and paid for by the Government for good reasons."

Anti-monarchy group Republic called for the Prince to fully disclose his expenses. A spokesman said: "This is a double-whammy for the taxpayer – less tax and more subsidies while the Government is having to make swingeing cuts to public services. The taxpayer is asked to subsidise the Prince through multimillion-pound grants – we deserve to know the details of his expense claims that he is using to reduce his tax bill."

The two foreign trips cost just over £1m and focused on the Prince's passion for fighting climate change and protecting the environment.

Other figures in the annual accounts showed that the Prince spent £6.2m on staff salaries, £65,000 on his gardens and more than £500,000 on official entertaining and receptions. The number of staff he employs rose by six to 125 full-time equivalent employees – his highest yet.

Sir Michael stressed that the increase was because the Prince was busier than ever.

PRINCELY SUMS

Income

Duchy of Cornwall £16.5m 1% increase on last year
Grants-in-aid £2.2m +13%
Government departments £821,000 +63 %
Total income and funding £19.5m +4%

Expenditure

Staff salaries £6.2m +15%
Staff training and recruitment £230,000 +32%
Travel and subsistence £308,000 +36%
Consultants and professional fees £171,000 +37%
Entertaining and receptions £527,000 +27%
Donations and gifts £66,000 +65%
Utilities £182,000 +31%
Residences and offices £703,000 +68%
Press and media £89,000 -21%
Stationary and office equipment £218,000 +19%
Computers £347,000 +8%
Housekeeping and cleaning £105,000 -20%
Insurance £45,000 -8%
Gardens £65,000 +3%
Depreciation £180,000 +18%
Total spent on official duties £9.5m +19%

Other expenditure

London office and official residences £422,000 -41%
Official travel £1.7m +48%
Communications support £80,000 No change
Overseas tours and military aides £821,000 +63%
Total £3m +13%

FOREIGN TOURS COST HIS SUBJECTS A COOL MILLION POUNDS

TWO extensive overseas tours by the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall cost the taxpayer just over £1 million.

The couple's visit to the Far East and South America on behalf of the Government contributed to a 48 per cent rise in their official air and rail travel.

The travel – paid by a grant-in-aid from Parliament – increased from £1.1 to £1.7m during the last financial year. In March Prince Charles and Camilla flew to Chile, Brazil, Ecuador and the Galapagos islands. They also visited Japan and Brunei last October but the Duchess returned home at her husband's expense before he travelled on to Indonesia.

The cost of each trip was about £500,000, and much of that would have been down to the chartered planes used to make the long-haul flights and other journeys associated with the tours.

The main theme for the visits was climate change, with Charles focusing on the threat to rainforests. He made major speeches in both regions calling on the world to protect the natural resources.

The Far East tour was sanctioned by the Government despite the global financial crisis hitting Britain's financial houses.

Clarence House stressed that the visits were at the request of the Government to further British interests overseas.

Peter Ricketts, the Foreign Office's permanent under-secretary, said that the prince "has 40 years of international experience, with an established reputation as a thought leader in areas such as climate change and engaging with the Islamic world".



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 June 2009 12:47 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Prince of Wales
 
1

Jardine,

24/06/2009 06:33:50
"The main cost was a 48 per cent rise in official travel by air and rail, which increased from £1,157,000 to £1,710,000."

So, One's carbon footprint is increasing, is it not? To quote Oneself, as Private Eye magazine is wont to do: "It really is appalling."
2

paulr,

edinburgh 24/06/2009 08:31:44
Parasites to the right of us, Parasites to the left of us , all emanating from buckingham palace.

But lets all be good little peasants and dig deep to give the poor parasites more cash.
3

Grumpy,

24/06/2009 08:48:56
At last Charlie lets the Dutchy of Cornwall supplement his expenses - unlike brother Andrew who seems to think UK Ltd is there to serve his golfing desires by letting us taxpayers provide him with a helicopter and chartered aircraft to use when his Mum at least has the decency to only use such benefits for official business.

Let's get the Scotsman to publish the expenses of Andrew, Anne and whatisname? Edward?

I bet Anne gives best value for money.
4

JaF,

24/06/2009 08:55:04
............said that the prince "has 40 years of international experience, with an established reputation as a thought leader in areas such as climate change and engaging with the Islamic world".

Now what has he achieved in the 40 years a thought leader ? does this mean he has been the unelected leader of the Thought Party for the past 40 years ?
5

Unimpressed one,

24/06/2009 09:08:16
If he already has an income of £16.5 million why does the taxpayer need to hand him a further £3 million?
6

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 24/06/2009 09:24:06
At a time when most people are cutting back, Charles is busy getting snorted in to the trough. Face it - his Far East tour and South American tour were rather expensive holidays. "Climate change" is a convenient cover for being able to use one's own private jet and entourage being drive around in luxury cars all at our expense and completely blowing holes in his own CO2 "budget". What a hypocrite. I would have far more respect for his views if he conducted his business in accordance with his own principles. What happened to tele-conferencing?

What we are never told, naturally, is what actual effect his interventions have had on the ground - are the Amazonian rain forests any better off? Are there specific examples of what has changed as a result of him being there? Where's the half-million result?
Why does the government think at the time of a deep recession that it's OK for Charles and Camilla to go on a jaunt round the Far East (which she failed to complete).

The time for the taxpayer acting as inexhaustible resource for junketing princes and idiot politicians is long over.
7

Mcsnagpile,

24/06/2009 09:27:30
As Charles said --just talk to the tree.
8

bumpkin,

24/06/2009 09:39:07
and the poor tenant farmers of the duchy of cornwall fund him to the tune of 16million quid.
They are consigned to live in poverty while he jets round the world.
9

bumpkin,

24/06/2009 09:41:09
we are only 200 yrs behind europe, they gave the land back to the peasants long ago.
10

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 09:44:36
#1:

No. The tax and duty one has to pay on fuel has risen substantially.
11

famie,

australia 24/06/2009 10:41:31
Isn't it about time that this royal thing was put to rest and their properties taken over by the people of the country? What is their purpose?
12

Jardine,

24/06/2009 10:49:03
#11

"Two extensive overseas tours by the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall cost the taxpayer just over £1 million.

The couple's visit to the Far East and South America on behalf of the Government contributed to a 48 per cent rise in their official air and rail travel.

The travel – paid by a grant-in-aid from Parliament – increased from £1.1 to £1.7m during the last financial year. In March Prince Charles and Camilla flew to Chile, Brazil, Ecuador and the Galapagos islands. They also visited Japan and Brunei last October but the Duchess returned home at her husband's expense before he travelled on to Indonesia.

The cost of each trip was about £500,000, and much of that would have been down to the chartered planes used to make the long-haul flights and other journeys associated with the tours.

The main theme for the visits was climate change, with Charles focusing on the threat to rainforests. He made major speeches in both regions calling on the world to protect the natural resources."


One would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh, wouldn't one?
13

Ronald Penman,

Glasgow 24/06/2009 12:16:25
Oh and hasn't the "Great Man" been an example to us all?

Family values?

Er.....Camilla. Numberous affairs. Betrayed his wife.
And look how the children - Harry in particular - have turned out.

The Environment?

Er..... 7Lt Motor Sports cars and Limos ,helicopters,private planes. Cattle (Meat) Farmer.

Tackling Poverty?

Er...the billionaire lifestyle.servants to squeeze the toothpaste. chickenfeed to "charity". Pays little or no personal taxes.

Miltary "Service"

Er.... Over three hundred uniforms, medals by the dozen - for what exactally?

Honesty and character.

Er..... if he lied to his wife,then.....? Vile temper.
Treats his flukys like muck. Foul snob. Cruel to wild animals - Shoots wild birds.Fanatical hunter.
Extreme right wing views like his father. Interveens in political matters
14

Alan B,

24/06/2009 20:44:56
Charles is an inspiration to us all. lol
15

Finlang,

Hong Kong 25/06/2009 04:48:40
Lugs's deluded supporters continually trot out the "value" of "One" and his family to "The Nation" in tourism terms. That is so much rehashed bollix.

Tourists from far and wide (and I have personal experience of this) visit the UK to travel not only to London and the court of "One", but to Stratford (Shakespeare country), the Lake District (Beatrix Potter, Wordsworth, to mention a couple and not forgetting the lakes and the fells), Yorkshire (Brontë sisters and much more), Edinburgh and the other cities and the fantastically wider Scottish countryside, for starters, much of which his family have appropriated for their very own pleasure.

I could go on ...



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.