Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Big rise in websites showing child sex abuse

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 April 2007
THE number of internet sites showing the worst forms of child sex abuse has quadrupled in three years, according to a new report.
The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said 29 per cent of web pages reported to it last year showed extreme child abuse, compared with only 7 per cent in 2003.

The IWF, which is funded by the telecoms industry, said reports of child sex images on t
he internet rose by 34 per cent to nearly 32,000. Of these, the group found 10,656 web pages across 3,077 sites contained illegal child abuse content.

The figures appear to show the severity of online child abuse content is increasing. In 2004, 624 reports showed what is termed "level-four child abuse" and 117 depicted the most extreme, level-five, abuse. Last year, there were 2,690 level-four pages and 352 at level five.

The IWF's annual report said a number of illegal sites had avoided closure by hopping servers across different legal jurisdictions - one site has been reported 224 times since 2002.

Peter Robbins, the IWF's chief executive, said: "Sadly, we have to report new trends regarding the young age of the child victims in the images we assess and the dreadful severity of abuse they are suffering.

"These facts, coupled with the longevity of some commercial websites, mean the victims' abuse can be perpetuated for many years as the images are repeatedly viewed.

"The increase in reports processed by our hotline team is due in part to the increased awareness of our organisation but also to the identification of a growing trend in the use of remote image storage facilities."

He added: "The UK has virtually eradicated the hosting of potentially illegal online child abuse content within its virtual borders."

More than 80 per cent of child sex abuse sites are hosted in the United States and Russia.

Vernon Coaker, a Home Office minister, said that, behind the "deplorable trends in the sexual exploitation of children via new technologies" there was a UK success story.

"The IWF has made dramatic progress in tackling the availability of illegal images of child abuse and has made a significant and ongoing contribution to the eradication of exploitation sites hosted in the UK, and the prevention of access to sites hosted abroad," he said.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 April 2007 8:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Pornography
 
1

Mallory,

17/04/2007 05:21:52

Can anyone explain why it is so difficult to stop credit card payments for these sites?

Somone is also registering the domain names and hosting the content - both items require money.

2

Guga,

Rockall 17/04/2007 06:20:57

"More than 80 per cent of child sex abuse sites are hosted in the United States and Russia".

Why can't the governments in these countries put a stop to them?

3

JG,

Fife 17/04/2007 08:05:43

I'm not sure about computer technology Guga, but I believe it has something to do with the way they re-route their websites. By the time the authorities trace one, the perverts have moved somewhere else.

Anyone who accesses these sites is no better than the people who commit the abuse. It's tantamount to sponsoring them. The only reason soemone views this stuff is for titilation - not for "research". If the subject is being studied for academic reasons, victim statements and accounts would definitely be the way to approach it - anything else is just an excuse.

4

petrol head,

Edinburgh 17/04/2007 10:51:34

So far I've not seen any of this crap online. Someone must be spending loads of time and effort seeking it out.

5

Splidoonk,

Glasgow 17/04/2007 11:00:33

Mallory, Guga, JG

This whole story is simply propaganda. The IWF are well known for this type of claptrap and churn out these scaremongering stories with regularity. Just a way to keep them in the press before the next appeal for funds.

The IWF still believe that scandals like Operation Ore were a success!

Don't believe it.

D

6

One-man-bucket's older twin,

17/04/2007 11:11:13

Guga - if these governments made any effort to stop these sites, they wouldn't have the excuse of kiddie porn to shock the public into supporting their efforts to bring the internet (and therefore all users, whether criminal or not) under their control and surveillance.

7

petrol head,

Edinburgh 17/04/2007 11:30:44

#7: Good point.

If these sites exist, the material must be hosted on a server in a geographical location somewhere. This means that they are traceable. Rudimentary tools such as 'traceroute' already exist to do this. there are also some far more sophisticated ones.

Like you say, if the authorities were really concerned about this type of material, they would simply shut down the servers.

By using tactics like content blocking they are paving the way to block other content as well.

8

Splidoonk,

Glasgow 17/04/2007 13:21:15

The IWF are one of the most appalling organisations in the world. To come out with garbage like this in order to secure their well paid jobs is really sickening.

Are we seriously expected to believe that there are sites operating for YEARS that are producing child rape images and not getting busted?

Surely CEOP are not doing their job if that's the case. But it isn't.

The notion of large scale, commercially produced child porn is a complete and utter myth.

9

JG,

Fife 17/04/2007 16:00:08

#4 weeshooie1
I can't think of a reason (apart from sexual gratification) for anyone to want to view this kind of filth. If an academic is researching into child porn it would have to be either from the victim's side or the perpetrator's. The photographic quality of the photos on show is not at all important - seeing the poor wee thing being abused would either 1) excite a deviant or 2) repulse anyone else. I am very pleased petrolhead hasn't accessed any of it.

10

Scott.A,

17/04/2007 22:22:04

the sites are all traceable. Every ISP holds records of the ip addresses that it uses and who uses them. The problem being imagine the internet as the size of edinburgh and a website being the size of a matchbox hidden somewehere in edinburgh. If you know where to look its easy to find it and shut it down.

Personally i think anybody involved in anything to do with child pornography needs nailed up in the middle of the toon and left there to rot. Prison is too good for them.

11

Bob Brundige,

Springfield, Kentucky, USA 18/04/2007 04:43:10

Who would have the nerve to download this garbage, anyway? I don't even download adult porn for all the viruses the sites usually contain. Yet, our judges cry 'foul' over the idea of banning pornography outright. Seems a no-brainer to me.

12

Jason,

Japan 18/04/2007 22:37:12

Keep in mind that pornography (particularly child pornography) is one of the justifications being promulgated for eventual control of the Internet. Go after those that produce, photograph and sexually abuse children for the gratification of perverts in advanced capitalist countries. But of course the Mr. Bigs of the porno world are beyond UK/US jurisdiction, so Authority takes out its frustration on the mug punter. Same with drugs, attack the supply. The demand is the soft option.
Justification of terrorism under the Prevention of Terrorism Act is the other excuse. So if I said, "Blair's immoral foreign policy in Iraq painted a target on London", presumably this is justification of terrorism. So no more visits to Europe or the United States (of Torture) for me.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.