Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SNP backs plan to reform stamp duty in bid to 'defreeze' property market

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 October 2008
THE SNP is to back a major reform of stamp duty next week in a move which would cut taxes for thousands of middle-income home buyers.
The Nationalists say that stamp duty should be levied in bands in a similar way as income tax, so that the higher rates of the duty only apply to those homes above a certain price.

Currently, somebody buying a home valued at over £250,000 pays 3%
stamp duty on the entire cost of that property. Stamp duty is levied at 1% for properties between £175,000 and £250,000.

Under the SNP's proposals, only the part of the price above £250,000 would be priced at 3%. So, for example, a house worth £300,000 would attract £5,500 stamp duty. Currently, a home buyer has to pay £9,000 in stamp duty for such a house.

The tax cut for such middle range homes would be paid for by increasing the stamp duty on those homes at the top of the range. Currently, the top stamp duty rate is 4% on homes worth more than £500,000. The SNP support a bigger tax take on homes above this price.

The SNP insist that such a change would help to 'de-freeze' the property market in the crucial mid-range. There is growing speculation that the UK Treasury may adopt the plan at the next budget in the spring.

The proposal will be put forward at the SNP conference by Alex Neil. The party is expected to back it at which point it will become policy. However, as stamp duty is a tax reserved to Westminster, the SNP is powerless to bring about a change in Scotland. Such a reform would have to be enacted by the UK Government.

Neil said: "This will be passed at conference. It is a much more sensible and fairer system and there isn't really any opposition to it.

"I expect we will see the UK Government do the same because the current system doesn't make sense."

Neil added: "This would have a far greater effect on stimulating the housing market than the current freeze because it would be a permanent change. By definition you are going to give benefits to people at the lower and middle end of the market."

Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, recently announced that home buyers purchasing properties worth less than £175,000 would pay no stamp duty at all for the next year.

However, figures last week showed that the property market has now all but ground to a halt, as buyers wait to see whether the value of homes will continue to fall.

A spokesman for the Treasury was unable to comment on the SNP's proposals.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 October 2008 7:11 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

AM2,

Scotland,UK 04/10/2008 23:32:27
Alex Neil in "quite a good idea" shock! Is there a blue moon tonight?
2

Jimmy Le Pie,

05/10/2008 00:46:25
#1 AM2

You should stick to statistics, sarcasm doesn't suit you.
3

AM2,

Scotland,UK 05/10/2008 00:59:01
#2 Jimmy

In that case, Alex Neil should stick to being wrong all the time.
4

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 05/10/2008 01:04:12
This is a much better idea than HIP. Just watch the housing market crash even further soon.

I've just sold my house, and estate agency fees alone cost £800 plus VAT. Add another £700 for HIP, and you're looking at a massive amount just to get your house on the market, let alone pay the conveyancing fees, the cost of buying another home, the stamp duty, and the removal costs.

Stuart Maxwell needs to look again at the impact HIP will have in Scotland.
5

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 05/10/2008 06:17:07
At first this article seemd a step in the right direction until I read that they plan to balance the books by slapping even more tax on homes over 500k which at present pay 4% on the lot.
This tax should be scrapped completely as it is simply a rip off.
You work hard to get a nice home and these eejits charge you for the pleasure of buying it, not satisfied with that, they then whack up your council tax also.
Rip off Britain !!!!
6

Rufus T. Firefly,

05/10/2008 07:16:46
Once again the Scottish Numptie Party waste time, effort and money sticking their nose into something that they have no control over.

Why do they bother?

Why do they not, instead, sort out all the unresolved policies that they do have control over?

For example the missing extra 1000 policemen?
7

Rufus T. Firefly,

05/10/2008 07:17:53
#3 Great reply AM2.
8

GM,

05/10/2008 09:40:55
Sheesh AM2

when the SNP come up with something you agree with you cannot help but be snide.


and that is why you fail.
9

subrosa,

05/10/2008 11:42:02
Alex Neil was also one of the three politicians who has endlessly campaigned for free school meals for P1-P3 children.

He is an efficient MSP and doesn't deserve snide comments from the likes of you AM2. There are many other politicians of every hue you could ridicule and also gain some support from your efforts.
10

Electric Hermit,

05/10/2008 12:33:42
5 nabodican, Rural Scotland 05/10/2008 06:17:07
This tax should be scrapped completely as it is simply a rip off.

Since you are apparently unable to suggest a way of replacing the lost funding, this is nothing more than pointless whining.

And, since we must have taxation, is it not better that it should be progressive rather than regressive?
11

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 05/10/2008 12:48:54
#1 & #3 AM2

Childish posts.
12

Brian Hill,

05/10/2008 14:09:27
SNP not only running Scotland but yet again showing England what its next move should be.

Well done Alex Neil.
13

Electric Hermit,

05/10/2008 17:31:55
13 Isore, 05/10/2008 14:26:48
Yes, and the Titanic was expertly "run" at an iceberg!

Would you like to try explaining what is wrong with this suggestion? Are you limited to infantile jibes?
14

AM2,

Scotland,UK 05/10/2008 18:16:37
#11 connaughtboy

Not childish. Facetious, I'll admit. Alex Neil is the SNP's Newsnight attack dog and little else. Yet there's a germ of a good idea here. The property banding concept is particularly good, albeit most appropriate in the context of local taxation!

(Yes, that was facetious again. But it's a serious point.)
15

AM2,

Scotland,UK 05/10/2008 18:18:19
#12 Brian Hill

Is this a new SNP tactic? Predict what the UK government will quite possibly do anyway and then very publicly "advise" them to do it. We've seen a few such instances over the past couple of weeks.
16

Electric Hermit,

05/10/2008 18:34:46
16 AM2, Scotland,UK 05/10/2008 18:18:19
Is this a new SNP tactic? Predict what the UK government will quite possibly do anyway and then very publicly "advise" them to do it. We've seen a few such instances over the past couple of weeks.

So the SNP are at fault for being quicker and smarter than their counterparts in other parties.
17

dude,

wishaw 05/10/2008 19:59:29
AM2 your blog is not only racist and selective it is also an outlet for your obvious bigotry of the orange flavour, we dont need your kind in Scotland so go home to your beloved England or NI, begone you bigot

Alex Neil is my hero, he just didnt look the part at first but he kind of grows on you, the way he described the lib/lab coalition as a "showers of bast*rds" was pure quality
18

AM2,

Scotland,UK 05/10/2008 20:44:14
#18 dude

Congratulations. Your unhinged post is my "CyberNat comment of the day".
19

bumpkin,

05/10/2008 23:42:47
there is only one change needed to stamp duty;
Make the seller pay it , not the buyer.
Its the seller who is cashed up.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.