Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Protesters celebrate city's 'cult' stance

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 May 2008
PROTESTERS who branded Scientology a "cult" were celebrating today after Edinburgh council bosses said they had "no objection" to the use of the word.
Earlier this month, a teenager taking part in a London protest held up a sign which read "Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult," and was handed a court summons by police for refusing to put it down.

The Crown Prosecution Service h
as since ruled the word was neither "abusive or insulting" to the church, which counts actor Tom Cruise as a follower, and no further action will be taken.

But to avoid similar problems in Scotland, protesters who regularly rally outside the Scientology centre on South Bridge contacted the city council.

A council official replied: "I understand that some of the signs you use may display the word 'cult' and there is no objection to this."

A Lothian and Borders Police spokesman also said the force had "no issue" with the use of word as part of a peaceful protest.

Jen Corlew, media director with human rights group Liberty, said today: "The leadership shown by the City of Edinburgh Council's decision to protect free speech is a positive step."

The youngster in London was told his sign breached the Public Order Act, which makes it an offence to display a "threatening, insulting or abusive" sign.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 May 2008 11:24 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 27/05/2008 12:40:48
I think that it is a great pity that Scientology can't just be banned outright from 'practicing' in the UK.
2

Mikey,

27/05/2008 13:22:20
And ban all the other 'cults' as well....
3

The Hallucinist,

27/05/2008 13:30:22
Can we ban tom cruise as well!!
4

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 27/05/2008 13:40:25
#1: It's not a pity at all. Certainly the clamheads seem to have beliefs even more halfwitted than other superstitions such as christianity and islam, but if we're to have free speech, then even the clamheads get to practice the nonsense of their choice.

The question is now whether we have free speech at the Evening news, or whether "cult" can pass muster where "clamhead" cannot.

5

the good doctor,

Kos Flaps 27/05/2008 13:47:06
i presume 'cult' is a mis-spelling. They should really just ban all religions.
6

Jam Tarts 1874,

On the Rebound 27/05/2008 15:22:58
#5. Just because you don't follow or believe in any faith does not mean others should not have the freedom to believe in and practice anything they like.
7

NRM,

27/05/2008 15:50:24
Anonymous (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology) have no problem with religion or people's beliefs. They are protesting about the evil and dangerous behaviour of the organisation 'Scientology' and the executives at the top, who financially exploit and brainwash their members. Scientology also brutalises and attempts to destroy its critics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_%28Scientology%29); this isn't conjecture, it is POLICY by a so called 'church'. (BTW Scientology is not a religion in the UK). This is why they wear masks - (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulette_Cooper)
8

Calum Crubag,

27/05/2008 16:17:08
It is a cult. But so are Christanity and Islam and we allow them 'observance' in schools which is little more than brainwashing.

Funny, how 'accepted' cults are a bit 'atheist' when it comes to others' beleifs?
9

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 27/05/2008 23:22:39
The cult I would most like to ban is the Man-made-global-warming one. Most of its followers seem to be walking about in a hypnotic trance. Scary!
10

radge dug,

28/05/2008 18:50:37
Religion is a curse. Keep it out of schools! All these superstitions are cults. It's just that some are bigger than others.K
11

Louis Catorze,

29/05/2008 12:24:19
"The youngster in London was told his sign breached the Public Order Act, which makes it an offence to display a "threatening, insulting or abusive" sign"


Just like the ones the demonstators against Danish free speech were carrying when the cartoon thing blew up (no pun intended). I do remember the police taking a particuarly hard line back then...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.