Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mandela's glorious legacy under threat

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 July 2008
AFRAIL Nelson Mandela turns his back on the bright lights of the cities and returns to his birthplace in rural Transkei to celebrate his 90th birthday today.
Mr Mandela, the man who spearheaded South Africa's transition from apartheid to all-race democracy, clearly intends to signal that he is taking another step away from the world stage.

He is seeking relative quiet in Qunu, his boyhood village home,
from the torrents of adulation and from the pressures imposed by all those vying to get a slice of him. Although he officially retired from public life in 2004, his assistant of 14 years, Zelda la Grange, said his personal charity, the Nelson Mandela Foundation, receives some 4,000 applications a month for appearances or for interviews.

"For a 90-year-old and someone who is supposed to be retired, that is way too much," said Ms la Grange, a white Afrikaner who has been almost as close to Mr Mandela as his wife since he asked the then 23-year-old to work with him when he became state president in 1994. "Hopefully, after his birthday celebrations, we may be in a position to ensure at last that all his time is spent only on the things he chooses to do."

It is only possible to guess what will be going through his mind, but he will surely be remembering how he could so easily have died nearly half a century ago at the end of a hangman's noose.

The state prosecutor at the treason trial of Mandela, then the leader of Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation], the armed wing of the banned African National Congress, demanded the death penalty.

Mr Mandela responded from the dock: "I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die."

Judge Quartus de Wet said that, on a technicality, he had decided not to impose the supreme penalty and instead sentenced the then 45-year-old Mr Mandela to life imprisonment.

Mr Mandela will surely also be contemplating the possibility that his successor as state president, Thabo Mbeki, has come near to destroying the legacy bequeathed him. Mr Mbeki's presidency is being widely denigrated as a disaster, with many commentators debating the possible "Zimbabwe-isation" of South Africa beneath headlines like "Fears we could slide like Zim."

Except for today, the fact is that the euphoria of the five-year period in which Mr Mandela ruled has evaporated. Many South Africans, especially the better educated, are leaving for other countries while others are looking at ways to quit.

"I am compelled to utter something I never in my wildest imagination thought I would say," said Mondli Makhanya, editor of the Sunday Times, South Africa's best-selling quality weekend newspaper. "I am afraid of the (ruling] African National Congress. Afraid of what it could do to our republic. One has to say that we are rolling down a very rocky slope."

South Africa, nine years after Mr Mandela stepped down, is beset by so many crises on so many fronts that they add up to a "perfect storm".

Apart from the disintegration of Mr Mbeki's presidency, perhaps the most ominous development is the encouragement being given by ANC leader Jacob Zuma to his allies to attack the most important institutions of state. Mr Zuma is tipped to be the next state president.

However, Mr Zuma, who in 2006 was tried for rape but acquitted, now faces trial for fraud, corruption and tax evasion in connection with South Africa's controversial multi-billion-pound arms deal with British Aerospace and other European Union companies.

He has been trying every possible manoeuvre to get the case dismissed or delayed until he takes supreme power next May. The main target of attack is the Constitutional Court, the finest achievement of the Mandela era.

The 12 judges of the Constitutional Court are superior to parliament in so far as they can pronounce on whether laws passed by parliament conform to the constitution.

In a reversion to some of the ANC's darkest Stalinist days in exile, Mr Zuma's two main "attack dogs", Julius Malema, the ANC Youth League President (a position Mandela held in the 1940s], and Zwelinzima Vavi, the general secretary of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, have labelled the Constitutional Court judges "counter-revolutionaries".

Mr Malema and Mr Vavi have also both warned they and Mr Zuma's supporters are "ready to kill" if the FBI-style National Prosecuting Authority insists on going ahead with their patron's corruption trial.

Zimbabwe's slide into chaos and impoverishment began with Robert Mugabe's assault on the judiciary at the turn of the century when the president's militiamen invaded the highest courts.

Mr Makhanya asked rhetorically whether it is really worth destroying Mandela's South Africa for Mr Zuma? "The answer, it seems, is yes," he said.

"The ruling party will destroy the country for Zuma. There are some in the party who will stop at nothing in their quest to get their man into the Union Buildings (the State Presidency in Pretoria]. Institutions that were painstakingly built by the people of this country, led in the main by the ANC itself, will be pummelled if they stand in the way."

Meanwhile, the reputation of Mr Mbeki, now the lamest of lame ducks, goes from bad to worse.

This week, after opposing sanctions against Mr Mugabe alongside China and Russia in the United Nations Security Council, his latest negotiating initiative in his eight years of "quiet diplomacy" with Zimbabwe fell apart. Opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai refused to join talks about talks while Mr Mbeki remains the sole mediator.

In one of many damning judgments on the fading Mbeki era, the president of the South African Institute of Race Relations, Professor Sipho Seepe, said his ten years in power will be remembered "for the (electricity] blackouts, Aids denialism, abuse of power, nondelivery (of essential services], corruption, erosion of the rule of law, the abuse of the state South African Broadcasting Corporation, growing inequalities, cronyism, the (shady] arms deal and political arrogance. (Under Mr Mbeki] we lost the vision of a democratic and non-racial society."

True hero, but human frailties that make him greater still

NELSON Mandela achieved the status of hero in an era, spanning the late 20th century and the early years of the 21st, starved of true heroes.

His imprisonment for three decades, directly arising from his resistance to racial apartheid, was vindicated and capped by personal triumph when he led South Africa to full democracy in 1994 and he was elected state president.

Mr Mandela achieved a cult status of almost mythic proportions, comparable to the Pope, Pele and a reincarnated Elvis Presley rolled into one. He became a symbol of hope for human relations and reconciliation worldwide. But the fact that he also had real human frailties made him a greater man than was grasped by those who believed only the legend and could not see through the fog of adulation. His first two marriages failed, but he seemed to achieve happiness when, at the age of 80, he married again.

While he has been hailed for his apparent remarkable absence of bitterness after being freed from prison, Mr Mandela himself has said there are a thousand things he was bitter about. But he said he knew more than anything else that he had to project the exact opposite emotion and preach a philosophy of "forget the past."

While building trust between black, white and all the varied ethnic groups in South Africa, Mr Mandela had to suffer the unbearable pain of having been cuckolded by his second wife, Winnie. Having stood by her during her infamous trial for the kidnap and assault of the murdered child activist Stompie Moeketsi, Mr Mandela sued for divorce, telling the judge: "I was the loneliest man during the period I stayed with her. If the entire universe persuaded me to reconcile I would not. I am determined to get rid of this marriage."

His parting of the ways with Winnie gave way to the flourishing of his relationship and marriage to Graça Machel, widow of the former Mozambican president Samora Machel.

Mr Mandela these days spends much of his time at Mrs Machel's white marble home next to the Indian Ocean in Mozambique, relaxing completely and reading widely. Talking about their marriage, she said: "When I met him he was very lonely. At the end of the day, after the public meetings, he would go home and he would be alone." She said their relationship gave the companionship both of them deeply desired.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 July 2008 8:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 18/07/2008 01:08:29
#2 You are free to state your opinion-something that the unconscionable apartheid system in SA wouldn't allow nor the current gangster Mugabe.
You simply are stating what the English said about Wallace and what the British said about Collins. But millions regard these two as freedom fighters.
Did Wallace fight for an eventual union of England and Scotland? Did Collins fight for the theocracy that was much of 20th century Ireland? Of course not but that doesn't mean that their actions were in vain or wrong.
2

indune1,

Canada 18/07/2008 01:30:37

FFS Scullion! Try to extricate your wee head out of yer ar*e.

We are not talking about SA 40, 50, 60 yrs ago. We are talking about it now. Mbeki is a fool. A coward. One of his cabinet ministers believes that AIds can be cured by herbal remedies.

He does nothing about Mugabe.

Yet Nelson remains silent. And, oh yes, I don't accept his meaningless bromides given before his birthday celebrations in London and they were not not the words of a "freedom fighter". To be a true freedom fighter, you must be colour blind and be relentless in the application of such an important principle.

Whites, what's left of them, continue to be terrorized and their lands stolen.

Democracy is denied to all citizens. Is this the Africa that Nelson foresaw?

A whimper from the so-called lion.

uoYrs mergf id oot !
3

,

18/07/2008 03:33:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 18/07/2008 05:22:00
#2 Robin . Yes, he was a terrorist but he was able to achieve something that I and, I suspect from your post, you could not.

What he was able to achieve was to emerge from 30 years in prison and preside over a peaceful transition to democratic rule in South Africa with absolutely no bitterness, hatred or thoughts of revenge.

In an environment as violent and volatile as South Africa that was an achievement second to none and he is therefore rightly revered both here in South Africa and across the world.

The point of the article is that his successor(s) are not even fit to clean his shoes let alone fill them!
5

Pilrig.,

Livingston 18/07/2008 05:39:45
2 - and of course apartheid South Africa was a beacon of Christian democracy.
6

Pilrig.,

Livingston 18/07/2008 05:43:49
One person who regarded Mandela as a terrorost is being granted (at taxpayers' expense) a state funeral. She was also a supporter of the likes of P W Botha and Pinochet.

"Know them by the company they keep."
7

Erchie Broon,

18/07/2008 08:38:16
Freddie go and check South Africa's history. Percy Yutar never called for the Death penalty although the crimes Mandela committed were punishable by death. The words spoken by Mandela from the dock in mitigation were not his.They were written for him by Braam Fischer a fellow Communist and I think this is the whole point about Mandela. Nearly his entire life but more so that from 1994 onwards has been a myth. He was used by the ANC and the Russians after his incarceration in the 60's as a propaganda tool and again by the Americans after 1994 for the same reasons.He achieved no tangible positive after his release which many forget could have been 10 years earlier had he accepted PW Botha's offer of release in exchange for giving up his terrorist agenda.It is also forgotten that Mandela as President of South Africa ordered the shooting of Zulu marchers in Johannesburg which became commonly known as the Shell House Massacre and he regularly sang for the killing of all Whites.
He may be a hero of the celebrity world but they are hardly known for making any intelligent decisions and sure the PC Liberals also love to continue the myth but inreality Mandela spent his Presidency years making promise he could not keep and waving at crowds from balconies to ensure the ongoing funding of his so called Charity.
8

donald,

glasgow 18/07/2008 09:33:02
Maggie Thatcher wanted Mandela to be released unconditionally. Kinnockio only wanted him released if he renounced violence against the violent SA state.

The Imperialist Labour hacks supported Mandela in opposition and basked in his sunshine, whilst supporting tyrannical regimes around the globe and breaking every human rights obligation in Ireland.
9

Media 1,

cape town 18/07/2008 13:10:49
A good article, living here I can embrace this article in its entirety and say that the journalist has done his homework.
Mandela is the father of our nation and Madiba to all. But you might find that the black masses in SA are more inclined to reserve real hero status for the other liberation fighters like Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu and Steve Biko who was from another party.
Mbeki is the typical African leader, hell bent on destruction. SA is in dire trouble, dont let anyone tell you otherwise.
Crime is horrendous to the point that rape, murder and savage beatings are no longer reported. The stories we hear on a daily basis in passing are to dispicable to mention. AIDS is out of control, our alcoholic health minister who says beetroot and garlic is the best cure for aids is being protected by Mbeki. Our safety and security minister who has failed to curb the violence and who says that people must leave if they dont like the crime is also protected by Mbeki, as is our national police commissioner who is up on corruption and fraud charges as well as a glut of other government criminals. Electricity supply is bordering on black out, the roads are slowly being destroyed and never maintained, the mini bus taxi's are out of control and killing people right, left and centre.Basically, even the most simplest of tasks is to difficult for our new system to handle. If you want to see how to f@kc up the most simple of tasks come over here and you will be astounded.
Yet it continues without challenge because too many at the top are corrupt.
SA is the next Zimbabwe, of that there is no doubt.
10

Media 1,

cape town 18/07/2008 13:22:08
Donald

You are missing the point. This is about SA!
Mandela came out of prison and within months of the new democracy crime was more savage than anyone had ever known. Our city centres were destroyed and ransacked, still most city centres are no go areas when the sun goes down..And even during the day in some of them. But crime was the only problem and had Mandela stayed it would have been sorted. Instead along came Mbeki and since then the entire nation has spiralled out of control in almost every single area of society, government and public life.
Another African disaster is in the making.
11

JCA REID,

Annan 18/07/2008 13:36:50
The real reason for majority rule in SA is because GORBACHOV dismantled the Soviet Communist system. In the early 90's the WHITE South Africans then voted overwhelmingly for majority rule.
Despite Mr. Madela being the figurehead for a free SA, he has been involved in dodgy arms/financial dealings & as for his wife, Winnie, and the business of burning people - ALL blacks with "necklacing", as a means to improve the lot of all South Africans just goes to show the mentality of their so-called leaders & what is going to happen in the future. Unfortunately SA is heading down the path that Zimbabwe has already taken & the Free World will do nothing scared of being branded racist & despotic.
12

Gere,

Scotland 18/07/2008 14:06:15
What do you consider the murder of of unarmed civilian rail passengers by bombing a civilian railstation?

What do you consider the gunning down of unarmed civilians working in the goods reception area of a chainstore?

What do you consider the gratuitous murder of an unarmed female civilian bank clerk at her place of work after having been taken hostage by Mandella's followers?

What do you consider the murder of unarmed civilians attending a church service?

What do you consider the murder of unarmed civilians by a car bomb outside a nightclub?

What do you consider athe murder of an unarmed civilian female employee of a supermarket by a soviet limpit mine placed in the Female toilet??

There are many more examples of the actions of the "Freedom Fighters" of Mandela and his ilk?

I think that those "operations" to have been murderous terrorist acts. Mandela went to prison for plotting violence against the state, but his minions in the "military wing" murdered unarmed civilians in cold blood.

Explosives were produced in court as exhibits at his trial. I understand that he had been offered freedom on more than one occassion during his incarseration in exchange for his renouncing violence, he declined each time!
13

Who?,

18/07/2008 15:28:09
Not to worry, a lions tour in 2009 and the football world cup in 2010.
14

,

18/07/2008 22:21:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Gere,

Scotland 19/07/2008 17:54:15
Post# 15 Ribbonman

History is being obfuscated, let us look at terror.

On 22ndJuly1946 Jewish terrorists in the form of the Irgun terrorist organisation led by Begin, later to become an Israeli Prime minister murdered some 91 people by bombing the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.

On the web site for MI5 at:
http://www.mi5.gov.uk/print/Page337.html
you will find official documentation that Jewish organizations such as the Stern Gang and Irgun introduced terrorism into Palestine. Today the world reaps the terrorist crop from the seed the Jewish terrorists planted in Palestine.

The Britsh Government ensures that the murder of British soldiers and other atrocities committed by the Jewish terrorists is not taught in schools.

Then, as you pointed out history is controlled! Today the British Government glorifies the terrorist activities of Mandela and honours him with a statue.

Should they not be collectively charged for glorifying terrorism?????
16

The Daleks,

Longmen 20/07/2008 10:42:52
"Mandela's Glorious Legacy"

Don't make me laugh! The man was a convicted terrorist, who was behind the murder of innocent white civilians, and his/ANC leadership has brought SA to its knees.

Of course in the topsy-turvy PC world this is a good thing, and Mandela is deserving of praise.

Nuts.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.