Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Doctors warn Brown: Don't make us pay for your errors

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2009
THE leader of the UK's doctors yesterday attacked the Prime Minister and the Westminster government, warning them not to make doctors the scapegoats of the economic downturn.
Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the British Medical Association, said the NHS and medical profession was facing some of its biggest and most serious challenges, as funding for public services was squeezed.

But he warned that the NHS and doctors mus
t not be made to suffer with cuts in staff and services for the mistakes made by politicians and bankers.

The BMA's annual conference in Liverpool yesterday also heard warnings about the effects of the target-driven culture on patient care.

Dr Meldrum told doctors that cuts in finances would be a challenge to the NHS. He added: "That, combined with a tainted and hamstrung political system, a devastating loss of trust and confidence in politicians, as a result of their perceived greed and corruption, and a government and a Prime Minister who simply seem to be clinging on to power, does not make for a happy state of affairs."

He said he knew doctors would face pressure on their incomes, the medical workforce and pensions, adding: "We are not going to allow doctors to be the scapegoats for the failures of the politicians or the bankers."

The Prime Minister's spokesman said: "When we make reforms in the health service, they won't please everybody but our focus is on the patients."

The conference yesterday also debated the situation at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, which was condemned for "appalling" standards of care that led to patients dying.

Much criticism was aimed at the focus on targets at the trust, clinical and financial, which led to problems with patient care being missed. A report in March estimated that 400 to 1,200 more people died than expected in the region in a three-year period.

Dr Meldrum said: "We suspect that (the situation at] Mid Staffordshire is not isolated. We need to ensure we have a climate nationally and locally where people are not afraid to speak out where they see standards of care affecting care of patients."

The BMA has launched a "whistleblowing" phone line for doctors who want to warn about problems in their workplace.

Dr Jane Lolley, deputy chairwoman of the BMA's Scottish consultant committee, said Scotland needed to be wary of the same situation arising in its hospitals.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The NHS in Scotland works to deliver challenging targets to make patient care better, tackle health inequalities, provide faster access and more efficient services.

"Patient safety is always at the forefront, which is why clinical need will always take precedence over targets and standards."

Shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley said: "Today's announcement shows that Gordon Brown has learned nothing.

"The 'patient entitlements' are in fact targets which already exist. There is nothing substantive to empower patients or professionals. It's little wonder that confidence has been lost".





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 June 2009 9:32 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Nevsky;,

Moscow 29/06/2009 22:53:47
Brown busy destroying the NHS along with the economy it seems. Fairly damning indictment of Brown by Mr Meldrum..good on him..he has it spot on!
2

Darien,

Panama 30/06/2009 01:03:41
Doctors warn Brown: Yer aff yer heid.

#2 a typical Scots-Unionist Quisling condition. Yellow by name and nature.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 01:46:34





Doctors should have More Respect!, It was the Labour Party, that made the NHS possible in the First Place!!





4

Dr JS,

Aberdeen 30/06/2009 08:00:41
Well done McBroon

If you beat the horse it will run faster, but in this case, it will bolt in the oppoiste direction!

Cutting practice funding will result in a reduction in frontline services. This will mean fewer appointments with a GP, reduction in staff and all in all poorer services for patients. All this at a time when zaNU labour have promised widespread reform and increased investment within the NHS. I also note with great dismay that the numbers of administrators seems to be exponentially increasing! more and more managers will mean, greater costs and more failed initiatives ( failed IT scheme already cost 12Bn)

MP's have proven time and time again throughout this parliament that they are incapable of delivering real services, its high time that trained professionals were allowed to perform without interference.







5

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 30/06/2009 09:59:37
Doctor's are paid far too much and something needs to be done about it. Nurses work harder and get peanuts.
6

Sioux Man Chu,

30/06/2009 10:16:01
~6 Agree. Doctors will not sign up to anything that threatens their lifestyles, salaries, bonuses, merit awards etc.
7

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/06/2009 11:35:49
Doctors warn Brown: Don't cut our massive pay and bonuses or the dummy's oot the pram.

However, we can have some sympathy with doctors in the sense that everyone needs Broon to be oot as well. And then when the next lot get in they can have a forensic examination of NHS costs to find out why it costs so much to deliver a mediocre service and why we plough billions into an organisation that can't even keep its wards clean.
8

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 30/06/2009 11:58:59
But wait a minute, Brown doesn't make "errors".

(In his little dream world that is!)
9

Dr JS,

GRANITE CITY 30/06/2009 16:03:59
Some of the comments posted on this website seem to totally miss the point of the article. It seems that some of our readers have a axes to grind no matter what their doctors seem to do. It is obvious to me that these comments are based on a total ignorance of the realities of a general practitioners workload, and also bitterness and envy at the salaries they earn

This article is pointing out that surgeries will lose funding based on several questions in the practice surveys. A case in point.... according to todays papers a surgery with a list size of 10 000 was deducted almost ten thousand pounds based on the replies of 50 patients who were found to have complained about access to surgeries.
that
another management journal has today shown that almost 91 per cent of the public questioned seem happy with the service that their doctors provide

(source http://www.managementinpractice.com/default.asp?title=GPPatientSurveyshows91%25aresatisfiedwiththeircare&page=article.display&article.id=17396)

This was on the basis of a department of health survey conducted by MORI that cost £8 million!! The government so it seems are content to throw millions of pounds at surveys and at the same time attack the profession at every opportunity.

Some of the readers here cannot seem to see these facts and no matter what is achieved in primary care, will always attack the medical profession because of the issue of pay!

MP's and especially Labour could nee even imagine a 91% approval rating!

10

Alan B,

30/06/2009 19:48:30
Bit of a silly outburst by doctors. The fact is everyone will have to suffer due to browns economic mismanagement.

Also part of the problem with labours management of the nhs is it through money at doctors increasing rapidly the gp salaries when they were already very well paid. What was needed was more gp and doctors through more training places not increasing doctors salaries. It was a very silly and short termist mistake by labour.

Doctors in the uk are one if not the best paid set of doctors in europe. When we needed to increase capacity of the nhs labour wasted the money on salaries for no return.
11

Dr JS,

Aberdeen 01/07/2009 09:03:15
@11

I agree to some extent your point about additional doctors/ GP's in the NHS. For far too long the service has been running short staffed (this includes nurses, midwives etc). The costs of training more staff, especially GP's however would be astronomical

Case in point....5 years medical school training is estimated to cost in the region of £250 thousand pounds per doctor graduating. Following this, someone who wishes to train as a GP will be required to spend another 5 years minimum (this looks set to increase as GP VTS training is now going to be 5yrs, on top of the junior foundation years- may total 7yrs soon). The post graduate deaneries may therefore spend another £300-400 THOUSAND POUNDS PER TRAINEE , meaning a total of nearly three quarters of a million pounds to train 1 GP!!!!!!

Around the time of inception of the new GP contract there were a massive number of established GP's ready to retire. Had they done so, the service would have collapsed, and also led to young doctors shunning general practice (traditionally known as the sick boy in the medical field- you did this if you could nee become a consultant!!)

So I agree we need a greater workforce to deliver better service (including out of hours care which currently is woeful in parts of the country) but my question to you sir is how are we going to pay to train an extra five to ten thousand GP's that we are short of over the whole of the UK??





 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.