Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Up to 50 MPs claim too much council tax

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 June 2009
MPS have inflated council tax bills on their expenses, receiving thousands of pounds more than they paid to local authorities, it has emerged.
As many as 50 MPs claimed sums higher than their council tax payments on expenses and then pocketed the difference. Up to 18 MPs have now repaid the sums after the uncensored versions of their expenses were leaked to the press.

The over-claimi
ng was made possible because, until recently, MPs did not need to provide receipts for payments of less than £250. An investigation has found many MPs simply filled in a round figure every month – of around £150 or £200 for council tax – which was in excess of their actual payment.

In other cases, MPs made 12 monthly claims even though their annual bills were divided into ten instalments.

Labour MP Eric Illsley is understood to have over-claimed by more than £6,000 between 2004 and 2008. He charged £10,000 over the period on council tax even though he was only charged £3,966 for his south London home.

Illsley said yesterday that the claims were submitted during a period when receipts were not required and that many MPs claimed a notional amount rather than the actual cost of the bill.

He said: "This is why the claims do not match the council tax bills. It is embarrassing. I'm sorry it has happened. I have never made any secret of my claims and I will pay back the money."

Other claims under scrutiny include those by former minister Beverley Hughes, who is understood to have profited by up to £2,000. Government whip Mark Tami is also thought to have over-claimed, by about £1,500. Tami said yesterday: "I am going to look into whether I have over-claimed and if I have then, clearly, I will pay back any over-claim."

Conservative front-benchers David Willetts and Jeremy Hunt were reported to have over-claimed for council tax by about £500 each. Willetts said it was possible he had "inadvertently" claimed for an 11th month and if so, he would pay back any over-claim.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 June 2009 7:26 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Barney Thomson,

Reading 21/06/2009 02:46:17
THESE EVIL CROOKS SHOULD BE ...

Oh, good night, I can't be bothered
2

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 21/06/2009 08:30:23
So Steady Eddie has taken 3 weeks to start and enquire into the expenses scandal, he must have been given the ok from his masters within the Scottish Labour Party.
Still Eddie better late than never! This scandal still has a long way to go, when even the members of the committee that are supposed to have control of the administrators of the Parliament are trying to hide their lack of moral compass.
What with the Governments standard line for non-discloser, which has changed from (not in the public interest) to (National Security) yup from not in the tax payers interest, to we can’t tell you the truth it would not be good for you.
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 21/06/2009 08:36:07
Well if the council tax had been based on income, this would never have happened. Jeez, sorry, I forgot that all those guys on good incomes still believe your average old age pensioner should support them.
4

Linda,

Edinburgh 21/06/2009 10:48:06
New Labour in action one law for the rich… the little fish like Devine are got rid off but Darling , Hoon & Co are not even put before the Star Chamber. Read Iain MacWhirter in to-day's Sunday Herald
The party leaders clearly believed that by forcing a few backbenchers into early retirement, they had given sufficient blood sacrifice to public opinion. But this was almost as disreputable as the belated cover-up. The Labour "star chamber" has turned into a kangaroo court which has been bullying the weakest Labour backbenchers into giving up their careers. Why is it only small fry like Jim Devine, Ian Gibson and Margaret Moran have been forced to appear before the disciplinary panel while the bigger fish, like the former front benchers Hazel Blears, Geoff Hoon, James Purnell, Tony McNulty and the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, avoid the inquisition? This is not just bad PR but an offence against natural justice.

And others are getting off Scot free. Last week, Darling let the City off the hook, announcing that there would be no new regulation of the big banks to prevent another credit crisis. There can be no doubt that a major cause of this failure to take action against irresponsible lending, the bonus culture, derivative trading, and the rest has been the moral implosion of the political class. In short: how can they take action against people like Sir Fred Goodwin when they have been caught with their own fingers in the till?
5

nostress,

grangemouth 21/06/2009 21:39:09
Michael Connarty, Labour MP for Falkirk East and Linlithgow says: "I do not agree with the argument that I'm a better MP than you, because I'm a cheaper MP. I've been 17-years an MP and I've worked my butt off. At the end of the day I don't think that £64,000 is a lot of money."

Bejasus and gommorah...that's a lie for a start! Have you seen the size of Connarty's butt? Doesn't look like he's been working that much at all if you ask me. As for thinking £64,000 isn't a lot of money? Well, maybe not in your corrupt little world Mikey, but I reckon 80% or so of your constituents might just disagree with you there. Especially, when you take into account the £633,467 you've managed to claim on expenses over the past 4 years. Now, that's what I call serious dosh Michael!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.