Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SNP 'can lead UK in opt-out organ donation'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
03 November 2007
THE Scottish Government was today urged to carry out a public consultation on an opt-out system for organ donations after a survey found support for the change was higher in Scotland than the rest of the UK.
Lothians Labour MSP George Foulkes, who has been leading a campaign on the issue, said strong Scottish support for reform could lead the way for a change in the law for the whole country.

He has written to Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon, calling for a full public consultation and urging her to submit a response on behalf of the Scottish Government to the UK-wide task force looking into the idea of "presumed consent".

The suggestion is that medical staff can assume a dead person's organs are available for transplant unless the individual has stated otherwise.

Ms Sturgeon and First Minister Alex Salmond have both indicated their support for such a change. And the SNP conference in Aviemore last weekend gave overwhelming backing to the idea.

Mr Foulkes said: "Every day someone in the UK dies waiting for an organ transplant.

"If Nicola Sturgeon is serious about tackling organ donation she should launch a public consultation on the issue now and use the wealth of public and professional support for a change of law here in Scotland to lead the way across the United Kingdom."

An opinion poll by the BMA showed 74 per cent of Scots were in favour a system of presumed consent, ten per cent higher than the strength of public of opinion in England and Wales.

Mr Foulkes said Scotland could set the pace on organ donations as it had on banning smoking in enclosed public spaces.

Around two dozen MSPs have already signed his motion in the Scottish Parliament calling for an opt-out system.

And despite initially warning against a change, Scotland's Chief Medical Officer Harry Burns has now announced a change of heart to support presumed consent.

Mr Foulkes said: "We have the public and professional backing we now need for a change in the law."

In a statement, Ms Sturgeon said changes in the approach to organ donation needed to carry the support of the community at large.

She added: "The Scottish Government believes there is a need for a debate on the issue. The Organ Donation Task Force is currently looking at the area of presumed consent and will make recommendations to UK health ministers.

"The law in relation to organ donation was recently updated with the passing of the Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006 which gives more weight to the wishes of the deceased and strengthens the system of opting in."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2007 1:40 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Organ donation
 
1

I'm no really here,

03/11/2007 15:51:16

Given that the SNP lead the UK in politics anyway - why not in this too.

2

alex paterson,

embra 03/11/2007 18:47:39

The SNP could not lead a blind person into their house.

3

Pen pusher,

04/11/2007 00:31:03

I really don't want the state to have first call on my body.

4

AnneMarie,

04/11/2007 08:05:58

This is a very positive thing to do and will have the potential to save so many lives. How many people intend to become an organ donor and never get around to it? And those that don't want to can opt out easily. If I'm dead, do I care what happens to my organs? No, I don't. And if my organs can save somebody's life than I'm all for it. Look at families where somebody has to go to dialysis regularly as his/her kidneys are no longer working. See the suffering and misery and then think again if you really care about your own kidneys once you've passed away.

I work in the medical law area and thus know that there is no way that doctors will just let somebody die to harvest the organs - that is a myth that has no foundation in reality.

As for the organs of children - since parents are the official guardians, they can opt their underage children out of the programme.

This is a win-win situation and can only be recommended. SNP - go for it, please! This system already runs successfully in Austria and if anybody now gets it into their heads to compare this with Nazi times, please, don't even try. Rather, get your facts right.

5

AnneMarie,

04/11/2007 08:06:41

...and by the way, I have already signed up as an organ donor.

6

Jams,

04/11/2007 10:24:15

No - I do not want the government to have first dibs on my corpse. I am a registered organ donor and that is my choice.

It is a small step from taking organs to deciding what else might be taken "for the benefit of others". We have already had massives scandals where hospitals broke existing laws what confidence can we have when the have a partial mandate to help themselves.

If my family are so upset after my death that they dont want my body used by others then that is their choice and I will forgive them. What I wont see is some government suit turning up and demanding bits of my corpse because "its the law".

Given the reliability of government systems how can we even be sure that our registration of no would be respected ? Surely the correct way is to assume no unless proved otherwise ?

If this law is brought in I will tear up my donor card and register on the no list.

7

Maisie from Morningside,

morningside 04/11/2007 11:04:44

how come I don't know any of this 74%?

8

Apple,

Edinburgh 04/11/2007 16:50:12

I agree with post no. 4. The amount of lives that could be at least improved and at best saved through an opt-out system would justify this system. No. 6, why tear up your donor card? "Some government suit" isn't going to turn up demanding your organs when you die. Having worked in healthcare my experience is that the people at the frontline (ie, the medical staff) are extremely well-trained in assisting family members to make what can be a very difficult choice at a stressful and traumatic time.

9

,

04/11/2007 17:41:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

04/11/2007 17:43:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Rv2!,

Seafield Crematorium Fridge. 04/11/2007 18:45:24

If I want my bits to be used, I'll tell you.
I do not want to be "used for spares" because they happen to "not find" my rejection card.

Everybody should have to carry a concent card, not a "lack of concent" card.

12

Sarah Higgins,

Edinburgh 04/11/2007 22:39:27

It doesn't matter whether you carry a card or not - they always check to see if you're on the database, whether you've got a card in your wallet or not, they're not just going to use your organs to save someone else's life because you have a card (it could be anyone's, you might not be registered), so it would be the same to check to see if you're not on the database - they wouldn't just 'take' your (of absolutely no use to you) organs, they would check to see whether you had opted out. And because a lot more people would be on the organ donor database if they didn't have to register for it themselves (a lot of people would like to be on it but never get round to it - I only registered the other week), a lot more lives would be saved.

People who believe in the opt-in system are selfish and paranoid.

13

Julian,

05/11/2007 01:21:05

Jams # 6,

You put forward a pointless argument. You're quite happy to donate your organs but if we go to an opt-out system you'll be against it. That's illogical.

And for you and those other who argue against it, basically what you are saying is that you will let thousands of people die just in case some people forget to register and end up having their organs taken after death. Is that something you are happy to have on your conscience?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.