Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Targeting city's tax shirkers is the right course to follow

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 September 2008
IT would pay for three new secondary schools, provide nearly 5000 new care workers, or repair over two million pot holes on the city's roads.
More than £92 million is presently owed by Edinburgh residents in unpaid council tax, with some debts stretching as far back as 1996, when the local authority was formed.

Over £14m is outstanding from last year alone – the second highest amount in
Scotland, and the third highest in the UK.

According to the GMB union, which published the figures, this money is "urgently needed by councils to provide necessary services, particularly to the elderly and vulnerable".

City finance leader Gordon Mackenzie, right, agrees, and today vowed to chase those who refuse to pay tax "for ever and a day".

Several attempts to improve collection rates have been introduced in recent years, and the level did reach a record high in 2007-08. However, at 93.1 per cent, that still equates to 12,000 people who did not pay a penny.

The GMB figures were published just days after the SNP Government announced its legislative programme for the coming year, including its flagship policy of a local income tax.

According to Nationalists, scrapping the "unfair" council tax would reduce problems of non-payment, as money would be collected directly through the income tax system.

Joe Fitzpatrick MSP says: "Councils across Scotland are currently owed £112m in council tax arrears for the last year alone.

"For the councils, this is a black hole they now have to struggle to fill by employing sheriff officers to chase arrears – often from people who will be financially struggling to meet these payments.

"Instead of leaving individuals to navigate the often complex council tax system themselves, and leaving councils with the long-running problem of collecting arrears, the SNP's proposals will ensure those who can afford to pay will pay – and that there will be no need for people to navigate the bureaucratic nightmare of paying council tax any more."

Yet according to finance leaders in the Capital, collection rates are actually much lower when it comes to income tax.

Across Scotland, residents were issued with council tax bills worth a total of £1.94 billion last year, and they paid £1.83bn.

That represents a collection level of 94.2 per cent.

In 2006-07, Her Majesty's Revenues and Customs (HMRC) collected £125bn in income tax and £85bn in National Insurance contributions through Pay As You Earn (PAYE).

Yet according to recent estimates, each year the department may not be pursuing some £880m of tax due.

In his response to the consultation on a local income tax (LiT) for Scotland, the city council's director of finance, Donald McGougan, says: "It should be noted that ultimate collection levels for income tax are substantially lower than for council tax.

"It is likely that LiT collection rates will be more in line with income tax, so a much higher bad debt assumption will need to be built into the yield estimates."

Councillor Mackenzie, who as a Lib Dem politician supports a local income tax – but set locally – also says it would be "difficult to argue" that collection rates would improve.

Mr McGougan adds: "Millions are owed by people who can afford to pay (council tax] but have chosen not to.

"This is unfair on the majority of residents who do pay and means the council has less to spend on services for the people of Edinburgh.

"It's only right that we make moves to recover that debt as quickly and as cost effectively as possible.

"Our collection rates continue to improve and I'm confident that recent changes in our procedures will maintain that trend."

In 2003-04, the council's collection rate hit a record low of 87.6 per cent. Since then, the level for that year has risen to 94.9 per cent, as the council and sheriff officers catch up with non-payers.

Similarly, since March 31 last year the council has collected another £5m – taking its collection rate for 2006-07 to 94.2 per cent.

The improvements have resulted from improved and faster debt recovery, together with an increase in direct debits.

The council hopes to bring about further improvements in the collection rate by reducing the number of stages involved in enforcement.

If a payment is missed, the reminder issued will now also serve as a final notice and unless the money is paid immediately, the account will automatically be passed to sheriff officers.

Cllr Mackenzie says: "We also still chase people for poll tax – and we will be after them for ever and a day."

Around £73m in unpaid poll tax is still owed by Edinburgh residents.

Citizens Advice Scotland recently urged councils to consider writing off very old debts, claiming many cases are disputed.

However, Mr McGougan says since 1996 the council has collected £69m from those still due to pay the charge, and has declined to write off the remaining money.

Regardless of the fairness of any tax system, it is right to chase up those who refuse to pay.

Their selfishness is simply adding to the pain of Edinburgh's most vulnerable citizens during the current climate of sweeping service cutbacks.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 September 2008 9:20 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

familymanwith2jobsandawifeworkingfulltime,

EDinburgh 12/09/2008 12:26:22
If LIT is introduced (god help us) I personally will do everthing possible to ensure I don't have to pay it.

A proposed system where the hard working minority are to support the idol majority, just turns my stomach.

THis kind of taxation is actually the kind of thing i'd expect from Gordon Brown, but no, only the SNP could come up with such an unfair tax.
2

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 12/09/2008 12:46:32

I remember I was once £6 behind in my council tax payments - and CEC set the Sheriff's Officers onto me.

Such lovely people, the Sheriff's Officers. And such friendly "customer service as well".

Maybe if the Council weren't incompetent they could set up a system whereby they send you a statement every now and then, so you know your oayments are up to date? (And save the Sheriff Officers the bother of sending intimidating letters)

Anyone else had this kind of CEC experience
3

Merouane,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 13:40:15
Ok, maybe I'm being stupid here, but if HMRC collect £210bn in 06/07 and they miss out on ~£880m, then they collection rate would be ~99.6%.

This is compared to the collection rate for council tax in 06/07 of 94.2%. Ok, so this might rise over time, but if the 03/04 rate is still less than 95% over four years later...

So is Donald McGougan's statement that final collection rate for council tax is higher than income tax correct?
4

Steven P,

edinburgh 12/09/2008 13:42:54
Quoted -
"...the city council's director of finance, Donald McGougan, says: "It should be noted that ultimate collection levels for income tax are substantially lower than for council tax..."

According to the newspapers figures - £1,83bn out of £1,94bn council tax is collected (94,3%); and £209,12bn out of £210,00bn IT/NIC is collected by PAYE (99,5%).

Mr McGougan would appear to be a mathematical cretin (worrying given his position within the council but at least consistent with the budgetary dissaters he has supervised over recent years).
5

Linda,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 15:42:27
Local Income Tax is cheaper to collect (half the cost) and much more efficient. The Council Official quoted in above article is talking rubbish under PAYE you can't avoid paying Income Tax.
6

Steven P,

edinburgh 12/09/2008 16:45:38
#6 - This council official is the head of finance, no less.
How staggering that the finances of a city of Edinburgh's size and reputation are being administered by a buffoon who cant even do sums (and even boasts about it).
Those who rant against incompetence at the top of local councils hereby rest our case.
7

Merouane,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 18:02:06
#7. If the EEN has reported the figures correctly, then it looks to me like a council official getting caught playing politics. I suppose he worked for Labour for quite a while and might feel beholden to them.
8

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 12/09/2008 19:12:40
The Sheriff Officers and the Council - what a combination. It's like pairing the Gestapo with the Three Stooges.

"You owe Curly, Larry and George Grubb £6 ya ******* - pay up or we'll harrass ye"

Also, I don't like the way the Sheriff Officers keep such a low profile - there needs to be more transparency about who these people are, their methods of chasing debtors, and what kind of debts are being chased?

1. People like me, who miscalculated a CT bill and owed CEC £6.20.

2. People who were inappropriately offered credit from an American credit card company and couldn't afford the repayments, never mind punitive levels of interest.

3. Ok, so there are some people who deliberatley avoided paying CT, these are fair game for the CEC attack dogs. But not me.

CEC, you disorganised, money wasting, idiotic, bureaucratic, hopeless numpties - have a radical rethink soon. I wouldn't trust you to run a toy shop never mind a city.



9

Duncan in Edinburgh,

12/09/2008 20:26:34
#6 Linda, more barefaced making up of stuff from you! How can you possibly know how expensive LIT is to collect? The SNP's proposal doesn't even explain how it will be collected! It's quite possible that it would be illegal for it to be collected through HMRC, and a separate local collection system would have to be put in place, just as is necessary for Council Tax.

You SNP lot have a habit of thinking that if you say something should be the case, then it is. The world doesn't work like that.
10

Merouane,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 21:33:43
#10. Well you could look at it that way. The other way of looking at it, is that if there is something they want to do (with the support of Parliament) then they should find a way to overcome any administrative barriers that might exist. I suppose it comes down to how you perceive the devolution settlement. Do you want to push the boundaries or do you see them as sacrosanct.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.