Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


David Alexander: HBoS takeover by Lloyds TSB is a bad business idea

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 October 2008
There is no other way of saying this: the proposed takeover of HBoS by Lloyds TSB is a bad business idea, full stop. It is bad for employees, bad for customers, bad for Edinburgh and bad for the Scottish economy.
Make no mistake, if you felt aggrieved that the earlier merger with Halifax diluted the "Scottishness" of Bank of Scotland then be prepared for much worse to come.

When the proposed merger between HBoS and Lloyds TSB (or, to be precise, takeover
by Lloyds) was announced a few weeks ago I was in London on business. The reaction among the City and other financial services types with whom I mixed was that "the Halifax is being taken over by Lloyds TSB". The term "Bank of Scotland" or even "Halifax Bank of Scotland" was hardly ever mentioned.

Of course we are all used to finding ignorance of Scotland south of the Border but this is something else – the distinct possibility of the near obliteration of the unique national identity of a Scottish institution that has prospered for most of its 300-plus years of existence (including the two biggest and costliest global conflicts ever seen).

Politically I am not a nationalist but when thinking of the proposed takeover, the words of Parcel of Rogues, Burns's comment on the Union of 1707, keep coming back: "Farewell to all our Scottish fame . . . farewell even to our Scottish name".

But there are also good practical reasons for worrying about the diminution or perhaps even total loss of the Scottish identity. Bank of Scotland – even Halifax Bank of Scotland – was not so named for nothing. The "Scotland" bit means more than a sign over a branch doorway. It is an indication that the bank is headquartered, or at least part-headquartered, in Edinburgh and that its senior personnel know what makes Scotland tick, in both the business and socio-economic sense. Given that Lloyds TSB is the predator and has a London-centred management structure, Scotland is likely to become a branch of a merged bank's wider economy, even if the new management offers some sort of fig leaf by placing a divisional HQ on The Mound.

Because of even wider economic issues, jobs in banking and financial services in Edinburgh will go and in this respect the proposed merger is likely to make a bad situation even worse. House prices will fall, almost certainly putting anyone who purchased a property in the last two years into negative equity. There will be less money to spend in the shops, which will not just affect retail jobs but will seep through into commercial property values, making Princes Street and George Street less attractive to investors. Hotels, restaurants, bars, taxi drivers, sandwich shops, even flower sellers on street corners, will all experience a drop in trade. The growth in direct overseas flights from Edinburgh Airport – which local business and leisure travellers alike have welcomed – could be put into reverse.

It is true that nowhere in Britain will be immune from the effects of a severe national economic downturn but the worry is that given Edinburgh's reliance on financial services, this city has harder and longer to fall than any other.

What I find particularly frustrating is the thought that, when the threat to the city's economy could be mitigated by HBoS staying independent, this merger should still be going ahead at all. With the bank battered by stock market selling, a takeover by Lloyds TSB seemed at one time to be a welcome intervention, especially as it offered the prospect of rescuing HBoS from total collapse. But it has now emerged that Lloyds TSB itself has had to go to government seeking money, albeit to a lesser extent than HBoS. There may have been a time when a merger seemed the only option but that is no longer the case – especially when Hector Sants, chief executive of the Financial Services Authority, states that HBoS (with an injection of government funds) is now sufficiently capitalised to stand alone. Quite simply, the raison d'etre for the original proposal to merge has been overtaken by events.

At the end of the day a fusion of HBoS and Lloyds TSB may still be the least-worst option (I cannot bring myself to say anything "good" about it) but the situation has changed so much in just a few short weeks that, at the very least, merger talks should be suspended and other options seriously explored before any resumption takes place.

Who knows, one alternative might even be to consider splitting Halifax from Bank of Scotland, a move that I am sure would meet with much approval not only in Edinburgh but across Scotland.

David Alexander is sole proprietor of DJ Alexander, which is based in Edinburgh and is Scotland's largest independent residential letting company.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 October 2008 9:32 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Linda,

Edinburgh 21/10/2008 12:28:39
As it is our cash is using (well apart from its all borrowed from abroad),why hasn't Gordon Brown secured Edinburgh HQ for HBOS part of business as part of the deal.
2

The Answer,

Glasgow 21/10/2008 16:09:06
"Linda,Edinburgh 21/10/2008 12:28:39

As it is our cash is using "


Only 8% is as you say "our cash" , the other 92% is coming from England , and dont you forget that!

ps:
how's your diet going, or are your lips still stiched together?
3

leofric,

Edinburgh 21/10/2008 22:52:46
Get real - there wasn't a merger with Halifax it had to take over BOS because BOS couldn't find another bank to merge with! The loss of BOS as a brand is no big deal.
This board has spent a long time banging on about the Scots identity with HBOS but it's the Scots in Westminster and on the HBOS board who have brought about the fall of a great English institution.
4

Quinag,

Edinburgh 21/10/2008 23:29:29
Thankyou, Mr Alexander, for putting my thoughts, about this 'merger', into words. The London financial establishment/media are dribbling at the thought of the headquarter functions of HBOS & RBS being transferred to 'The City' - Daily Telegraph yesterday. There is also speculation that Lloyd's will dispose of Scottish Widows. Is Standard Life next?
Edinburgh's reputation, as a financial centre has always been an irritation to them. If this takeover proceeds, be prepared for a much poorer, more provincial Edinburgh. That will be bad news for all the residents of this wonderful city, & for Scotland
5

GLasVegas,

Glasgow 24/10/2008 02:14:56
Mr Alexander is part of the Heritors group https://www.heritors.com/who_we_are.htm#

Found this Article form Jan 2008

" Edinburgh townhouses sold to Heritor's Residential Property
Acting on behalf of the Viewpoint Housing Association, Ryden has sold three adjacent Georgian townhouses at 6, 7 & 8 Inverleith Terrace in Edinburgh to Heritor's Residential Property (Scotland) Limited at a price of £2.25 million. The property is currently in use as a care home but is to be converted to townhouses.

The three buildings provide 7,282 sq ft and are Listed Category C. Although Viewpoint reluctantly decided to sell Inverleith Terrace, proceeds will be reinvested by them in a new home which will meet the needs of future generations of older people.

Heritor's Residential Property (Scotland) Limited is a joint venture between the Heritor's Group and HBoS. The purchasers were represented by Rettie & Company."
6

Geed,

24/10/2008 10:50:57
Nice find GLasVegas @ 5

A true indictment of Johnston press using their blanket media coverage of Edinburgh to allow businessmen, such as DJ Alexander, to support their own vested interest via their publications. It stinks and should be investigated by the press complaints commission.

Scraping the barrel of scum as usual Johnstone press?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.