Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Christmas Gift Guide

Chitra Ramaswamy: Camp, surreal and often grotesque... we love it!

Notebook

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 June 2008
WHY do people hate Sex And The City? If I were to slip on a pair of micro shorts, nibble on the fruit from my Cosmopolitan and ponder the big questions in the manner of the highest-paid and highest-heeled journalist in the business, this is the one I would want the answer to.
In the past week, since the release of the film version of the series that made Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte the most famous female foursome on TV (not that there are many to choose from), the knives have come out again. Sex And The City i
s vacuous, materialistic, trite, stupid, anti-feminist, boring, embarrassing and more. And that's just what women think. The New York Times deemed the film "dumpy" and "desperate", the Guardian said it is "unbelievably girly, whirly and twirly", while Scotland on Sunday's own critic wants to see Carrie Bradshaw's head stuffed into a Prada bowling bag.

Critical reception aside, it's fascinating that the only film out this year – and pretty much any year – about a group of independent, intelligent 40-plus women would incite such extreme reactions, and in some cases revulsion. I'm beginning to think this goes beyond simply slamming the film.

Since Sex And The City started, I must have defended it more times than Samantha has got her rocks off. And I'm not about to stop. I remain convinced it is one of the best representations of modern women in popular culture. The women are super-smart, super-stylish and not conventionally beautiful. They talk frankly about sex, care for one another, and take home enormous pay packets for doing... well, what is it they do again?

The comeback is to point the finger at all that whingeing and whining about finding a man. Where's the feminism in chasing Mr Big for six seasons and a two-and-a-half-hour film? Not exactly 'Go girl!' moments, are they? Yet to suggest that it's impossible to be a feminist and at the same time want to share your life with someone is a bizarre criticism. Isn't this exactly the difficulty for successful, independent, single women today? It is for the ones I know. That Sex And The City is precisely about the tension between trying to be strong and wanting someone is why women like it so much. And remember, there is only one Charlotte; only one conventional, marriage-seeking Park Avenue princess, and her naive romanticism is often laughed out of the bar.

I dig the $500 Manolos too, despite having no interest in tottering around in a pair of nosebleeds myself. The fashion – a fifth member of the cast – is camp, surreal and often grotesque, and that's exactly how I like it. If you think that's odd, take a look in any women's glossy and you'll see page after page of it.

Even the outcry about the product placement in the film seems over the top, as though it's the first time a prop has been plugged in celluloid. When it's James Bond's Omega watch or Aston Martin we deem it iconic. But a Vera Wang wedding dress? A Louis Vuitton bag? Shallow, girly frivolity is the verdict. It's a double standard with a distinct whiff of misogyny.

The problem is that Sex And The City has a lot to carry on its couture-clad shoulders. We don't demand that the characters in 24 speak for counter terrorist units everywhere, do we? Films and television series about women for women aren't exactly 10 a penny so when we do get one, it's hardly surprising that we want it to be all things to all women. Actually, as romantic comedy goes, Sex And The City can be pretty revolutionary when it's on top form. Most chick flicks are bland and clichéd. Sex And The City manages to push out of the conventional mould of girl meets Big, loses Big, regains Big (over and over). How? By putting the women centre-stage.

The most important part of Sex And The City is the focus on the women's relationships with each other. I can't think of other examples of this: Rachel, Monica and Phoebe are paired with Ross, Chandler and Joey, Grace has Will, and don't even get me started on those Desperate Housewives.

Genuine, long-standing, grown-up female friendship isn't exactly the meat and potatoes of mainstream cinema, either, and especially not romantic comedy. The story may revolve around sex, but not once do any of the four women compete for a man. In the TV series, it's Carrie who is with Miranda when she gives birth, and Charlotte who lends her a down payment to buy her apartment. A large proportion of the film is about the women rallying around Carrie when the bleeding obvious happens. As for endings, have you ever watched a film where the last scene sees a group of women toasting a 50-year-old's birthday, then drinking to the next 50? Me neither.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

tillietellall,

Toronto, Canada 01/06/2008 01:06:03
I totally agree with your comments. For goodness sake, the entire TV show launched fashion labels into the stratosphere.. why are the critics mocking the movie for this.. it just wouldn't be SITC without the labels!!! Any, yes it was a bit trite in some respects.. but hell.. do you see high art in Knocked Up that received rave reviews from the press???
2

Captll,

USA 01/06/2008 04:20:49
Beautifully written, and 100% true. For some reason, men (and certain types of women) are very judgmental and negative about this movie, even though they haven't seen the series. That baffles me. The characters are called s-luts, and the fashion is undermined to be some airhead thing "chicks" like. What gives? Why don't women judge male-oriented shows about sex with women, violence and fast cars?? What's this crazy backlash by men all about?
3

sjpforme,

usa 01/06/2008 05:17:53
thank you! thank you! thank you! this has been the most honest real look at the movie!! I don't get all the haters out there! Are the men just upset that they don't have that many friends and that they aren't comfortable enough with their own sexuality to dress it a hat and carry a whip to their movie?? To a real fan this was a love letter! anyone who was devoted to the show always knew it was about the girls not the sex,labels,or men!! It was everything i had hoped for and even more than i could imagne!! And just a little side note my husband was my date and willingly wanted to go!! He enjoyed it as much as i did!!
4

Samcafe,

Glasgow 01/06/2008 10:05:30
Ladies, get over yourselves its only a fictitious film.
5

The Thracian,

Batavadorum 01/06/2008 12:53:43
The female equivalent of The World of Wooster meets Men Behaving Badly. With Americans.
6

Queen SITC,

Detroit, MI USA 01/06/2008 20:40:18
I love this show and have loved it from the beginning. It really bugs me how people call the show mindless and say they're a bunch of promiscuous women! I feel that the show is very realistic, at least very similar to my life anyways. I put up a blog on another website asking who was excited to see the flick as I was. There were more negative comments then positive. Like you said, we see all the stylish designer labels in the magazine and stores, women bonding together, and having ups and downs in their relationships. If that isnt real then what is? I hate to sterotype but it seems to me that the women who have problems with this are the ones who are boring and mindless. They need a dose of reality and be quiet if they cant keep up with modern times!! I loved the movie, me and my girls made it a ladies night out. We went to dinner, saw the movie, and the club for a few drinks. A night to remember! I'll be purcahsing it soon as it's avaialble on DVD!
7

Midwest Gal,

US 02/06/2008 15:34:49
I don't know why people have such a hard time with intelligent, hardworking women getting a little frivolous pleasure out of fashion and friendship. People all over the world, of both sexes, spend discretionary dollars on things that give them pleasure. You could answer a man's questioning who needs a $500 pair of shoes with who needs the $100,000 car that questioning man is getting into.

Many of those well-shod women are getting into those shoes and raising excellent money (and donating themselves) for worthwhile causes. Many are also putting bread and butter on the table for their families and keeping the economy rolling along. If they can afford the shoes, they're probably paying plenty of taxes as well!!!!

I've never seen a movie theater with a more engaged audience then the one I was in on Friday night. I went with 4 ladies and resolved after years of taking care of family and business to turn some of those acquaintances into better friendships. I want that in my life as I enter my Samantha years!!!!!
8

Miss Bea Have,

Edinburgh 03/06/2008 00:48:13
Having read Scotland on Sunday's film critic's review of the movie I found her point of view was a lacklustre whingey attempt of jumping on the band wagon to slate it. While most women headed for a cosmo after the movie with their gal pals she returned to the solitude of her flat and put on the only clean sweater she could find. Wow. What a night she had. Is this really a person qualified to comment on SATC? It was never meant to be a Gandhi, Schindler's List or any other epic movie -it's just a movie. It was great to see women out with their friends, dressed up, having a laugh. Was ET real to life? Was the Wizard of Oz? of course not - they were movies made just to be enjoyed for what they were. Okay SATC is not directly comparable to these but they share a common purpose. To give us a 2 hour window of escapism - time not to worry about the bills,the kids, the housework, the other problems we all may have. Don't we have the rest of the 22 hours in the day to do that? It seems to me that in the recent past when she may have been more diligent with her laundry she had a mishap with a super high jimmy choo and it is misfortunately lodged where one can only imagine 4 inches of $500 italian leather clad steel could be.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.