Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Afghan farce shows folly of training prince for a role he could never fulfil

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 March 2008
Prince Harry was never going to regarded as a fully deployable officer (your report, 29 February), which begs the question why he was accepted into the army in the first place. It is difficult to believe that everybody involved lacked the foresight which would have prevented the inevitable farce we have just witnessed. Perhaps they thought that having him sign up for them rather than either of the other services was a feather in their cap.
There is more than one loser here, the biggest being the unknown soldier – the young man or woman who could have taken his place at Sandhurst and gone on to do full duties without an accompanying media circus.

ANDREW KEMP, Mossbank, Rosyth, Fife


People may be a little surprised at the media blackout over Prince Harry's Afghanistan tour of duty by every British newspaper and broadcaster; a conspiracy to withhold the truth from the public. Would never happen in an open democracy, would it? Well no it wouldn't, but clearly we don't live in an open democracy. Laughable really when you consider the number of reports sent by British foreign affairs journalists in some of the most totalitarian regimes, who invariably premise their report by saying they are working under severe reporting restrictions.

What else is the British media establishment withholding from us?

MARK JOHNSTON, Brandywell Road, Abernethy, Tayside

After the nation was subjected to the blanket media coverage of Prince Harry's secret sojourn into Afghanistan, my immediate thoughts went out to the parents and families of the fatalities and casualties of this never-ending war against the Taleban.

If every serving soldier was given the protection Harry enjoyed, their families would not be suffering as they are now. It all seems to have been such a pointless exercise.

KENNETH S HARRIS, High Street, Dalkeith, Midlothian

Those involved have done well to keep the story under wraps for so long. But this should hardly be seen as co-operation or "collaboration", by the media. It is surely a legal requirement. Communicating sensitive operational intelligence to unauthorised recipients in time of war is a serious criminal offence. There is no "public interest" justification for disclosure as it would have been made public in weeks anyway.

JOHN RISELEY, Harcourt Drive, Harrogate, North Yorkshire

The media frenzy surrounding Prince Harry being in Afghanistan is farcical. Will the newspapers and other media be commenting on every young man who actually does the job he is paid to do? Or is it just shocking that one of the Royal Family is doing work in return for state money?

ROBERT STEADMAN, Henry Avenue, Matlock, Derbyshire





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 March 2008 9:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scotty Cameron,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 08:49:29
I really don't see the point in this "media blackout" in the name of security. By all accounts, every British journalist knew about Harry being there and troops out there with him were writing home to their folks telling them that he was there - but "not to tell anyone!" Do we seriously believe that the Taliban hadn't got wind of this through one source or another when half the country (or world?) already seemed to know about it?
2

Upbeat,

03/03/2008 10:59:28
The only thing that differentiates Prince Harry from many other soldiers is that his absense from public life if he " disappears " on any operational deployment, will always draw attention. This does not mean to say that the training and experience he has gained while part of the armed forces is worthless.( as Mr Kemp's letter above tries to imply )

The armed forces are perfectly capable of keeping secrets. No Special forces soldier will ever expect the system to " leak" exactly what he personally may have been tasked to do. Arguably the safest place for Harry now will be back within the anonymity of the armed forces, on operations , but without a "tagged on" media circus.

As a result of the events of the past week it can be expected that the armed forces and individual soldiers within any unit, will be even more protective of Harry's rights to be permitted do his duty now, than they may ever have been before.
3

CRAGman,

03/03/2008 14:27:41
Mark Johnston,
what a sad and bad person you seem to be. Good job you weren't alive in WW2 or else the ordinary folk would have strung you up for the comments you've just written.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.