Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Nature body delays land sell-off decision

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 June 2009
SCOTTISH Natural Heritage has delayed a decision on whether to sell off up to a fifth of its land.
SNH is considering selling up to 7,800 hectares of the 35,800 hectares of land in its care across the country.

It believes that, due to a lack of resources, some of this land – such as Loch Leven, Rannoch Moor, and parts of Beinn Eighe and Rum, co
uld be better managed by alternative owners.

It has drawn up a list of 26 areas it may consider selling or transferring to the management of local authorities, private landowners or charities.

Some, such as parts of Beinn Eighe, could be put to better use for crofts, it believes.

Yesterday board members voted to put on hold any decision on the draft policy on land ownership for about three months, while more information was gathered.

SNH has emphasised that selling this land would not significantly reduce operating costs.

Profits from sales would be passed back to the Scottish Government, or would result in a reduction in funds.

Sarah Boyack, Labour's shadow environment secretary, said the plan had "come out of left field".

"This is worryingly similar to the SNP government's failed attempt to sell off part of the forest estate," she said. "It is crucial that the management of some of Scotland's most stunning landscapes is not compromised."

Jonathan Hughes, of the Scottish Wildlife Trust, said it would be "a sad day" if areas were sold to "unsympathetic owners".





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 June 2009 10:24 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 17/06/2009 01:08:18
Hang on a minute, Sarah Boyack states
"This is worryingly similar to the SNP government's failed attempt to sell off part of the forest estate," she said. "It is crucial that the management of some of Scotland's most stunning landscapes is not compromised."
Yet at the same time she is a devout advocate of fully turbinising Scotland and in particular the south west.
All so that her buddies in the wind industry can make huge profits at our expense.
2

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 17/06/2009 07:50:02
Strange, I thought the SNP only wanted to long term lease Scottish forestry, not sell them. Or am I wrong?

Yeah nabodican, the dichotomy or the SNH and indeed many nature bodies - protect/preserve/wrap in aspic the countryside but slather them in turbines to make oodles of cash.

Never saw the sense in that. It effectively prevents the people of scotland progressing whilst at the same time strengthening the bodies that prevent the people from doing anything in the first place (and these are publically funded bodies, or worse, charities - large land owning subsidy hoofing charities).
3

carrottop,

17/06/2009 08:09:39

When is a nature reserve not a nature reserve?

answer -when its the island of Rum and a bunch of money grabbing opportunists want the best land for nothing.

Where do you think the wild horses graze and the deer come down to at night if its not the grassy lowlands of the Island. The lack of human influence on the animals here has always been correctly touted by the nature purist as the reason for Rum to be such a fine nature reserve.

Either its a nature reserve or it isn't.

This island was Given to the then nature conservancy for the nation to be used for nature conservation and was not intended to be given to opportunists looking to feather their nests. Don't tell me they are paying for it, they are being given our money to buy a piece of our heritage (= given the land). The most recent people to come to this transient place knew what Rum was for but their motives for coming were obviously not a love of nature. If they are serious colonists try a piece of St. Kilda but then I doubt there would be any money in that for them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.