Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Anger over Fringe play with letters from killer

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
26 July 2006
A PLAY created with the help of letters written by Ian Brady is set to be staged at this year's Fringe despite protests from the family of one of his victims.

Check performance times and buy tickets for Wasted at edinburgh-festivals.com

Wasted has been given a three-week run at the Pleasance Theatre and is partly based on correspondence between Brady and playwright Henry Filloux-Bennett.

The play was set to be staged in Nottingham but was pulled after theatre bosses were upset by the script, which tries to portray Myra Hindley in a sympathetic light.

The playwright said he used the content of the letters to help mould his portrayal of Brady and his partner Hindley.

Today, the mother of Keith Bennett, who was murdered by Brady and Hindley aged just 12, said the play was inappropriate.

Winnie Johnson said: "The Festival is supposed to have a good atmosphere. I don't think this kind of play is appropriate as something that people go to for enjoyment. I haven't been told about it but it would have been nice to be invited to see it before it goes on stage."

Law graduate Filloux-Bennett, 23, got in touch with mass-murderer Brady after drafting the play because he wanted to create a historically accurate script. He received a series of letters from Brady who is held at Merseyside's high-security Ashworth Hospital.

Set in Hindley's prison cell just days before she died, it involves a number of monologues from her, as well as flashbacks to the period between the night of the final murder and the couple's arrival in court the following year. Mr Filloux-Bennett also drew on psychiatrists' reports and court transcripts to try to get inside the heads of Brady and Hindley, who murdered five children in the 1960s.

He today defended his decision to write the play saying: "There is always a section of society which is offended by something and we respect their views. But it is not a reason to attempt to ban it. You can choose not to go and see something rather than try to ban it.

"I think it is narrow-minded. I have real issues with people who either with or without reading the script decide that just because of the subject matter and their own personal opinions you shouldn't be able to express your point of view or an artistic piece.

"The way it was written originally was to present Hindley not as a picture but as a human being who was actually sorry for what she had done."

The playwright described serial killer Brady as "helpful and courteous". He added: "He has been exceptionally helpful in allowing us a first-hand account of what happened. Obviously the man is clinically ill and insane so you do have to take what he writes with a pinch of salt sometimes."

"He's not tried to stop us or do anything except help us on how we've portrayed him and Hindley. When you're trying to do a play it is very helpful to get that kind of first-hand information. The cast often have questions they want to ask about habits and quirks and he can help with that."

The play's cast are bracing themselves for a storm of protests when the show comes to Edinburgh. Fringe bosses today said they did not regulate any of the plays staged as it is an open arts festival.

But Antony Alderson, director of the Pleasance, said: "Part of the role of the Edinburgh festivals is to provide a social forum and to bring up different issues. It is up to people to make up their minds about this play. I think it is a good play and a very relevant play.

"It is an issue that is difficult to talk about but that does not mean we shouldn't talk about it. The writer is not glorifying Hindley or Brady, or anything that they have done. I think it is a very good play."

Alastair Paisley, the Tory culture spokesman on the city council, said he was appalled that the play is to be performed at the Fringe. He said: "There is no justification for any performance to even start to justify what they did."

AN EXTRACT FROM CONTROVERSIAL PLAY WASTED


Extract from scene 6: Myra, 59, in her cell:

"When you saw me, it wasn't what you expected was it? No, but then again you didn't know what to expect - the same bleached hair from when I was 24?

"To you, I'm a name and a crime. More to the point I'm the crime that put me here. When you look at me you just think of that, and I accept that. You don't know me. Now I don't give a f*** if you don't want to know me, but I'm sitting here, and so are you, and I hate silence, so I'm going to talk, cos you lot haven't said a word since you saw me.

"Next thing - you don't get to judge me. I'm not here to be judged. Someone's already done that in this life, and someone's waiting to do it in the next life - so get in line. More to the point, you don't have the right to judge me; I've felt more, done more, and lost more than most of you will ever feel, do or lose, so don't think that just because you're not in a cell and I am that I'm here to ask for acceptance. Because I'm not.

"I'm an angry person. This place has made me angry. I was born with freedom, and that's been taken away from me. What I have now is a Mam I can hardly see and a cell bed and packet of fags that I can see all too well. That's it. Yes, I'm angry. You have to wait for a bus that's two minutes late and you get p***** off. I think we've got different perspectives."

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Mark j,

freedom a state of mind 26/07/2006 13:51:24

We cannot ban that which we find distasteful in art media. We do have a choice to go or not. Now, victims and their families should have protections from serial killers and media sensationalising the murderer. Of course, murderers should not profit. Question: MYra says she hates silence - isnt that part of her payment to society. Why is she entitled to have visitors who arent related to her allowing her to be their muse and her a break from the tedium of cell life? Why is she allowed cigarettes? She even still percieves herself as a victim, when she says her freedom was taken from her. Correction, she gave up her freedom when society caught up with her evil murder. The criminal had a choice not to kill, the real victim and families have no choice. The criminal gets to demand not to be judged further, but she will be continually judged. There is no remorse here for her crime, if there was any remorse she would have declined an interview. The 23 y/o writer need have been better in choosing his discriptor of Brady. Perhaps, this is youth and innocence of the writers pen. To the writer, this murder happened a very long time ago, before his birth. This writer had better treaded with respect upon the graves of Brady's victims. Noone knows what it is like to lose a child to an unhuman act of violence.
I speak from experiance as my brother was beaten and strangled to death aug 12th three yrs ago. My parents will never get over it. I dont know if i will.
The murderer doesnt see harm in what they have done, the vicitm is objectified (no longer a person but a thing) inorder for them to be able to harm.
I donot blame the author asmuch for his work and need to do his work. I do blame the authorities for allowing the interviews. Society is supposed to be protected from these ego centric maniacs. How are victims and families protected when murderers can lash out via media?
I hope the story haunts the authors' life as did Truman Captote's was haunted afte

2

Martin.,

26/07/2006 14:24:00

A typical knee jerk reaction from the usual suspects. If the play offends so much then surely it won't get beyond the first night because of poor ticket sales. If not, then let it be and allow people to make their own minds up.

I'm sick of being told what I should find offensive and what I can or can't watch.

3

Miss Gruntled,

Galashiels 26/07/2006 15:05:16

I smell a publicity stunt

4

,

26/07/2006 15:10:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 17188, Article id was mapped to record!
5

Cant use my name anymore-Alex,

Prisoner of the MACHINE 26/07/2006 16:56:08

Anger over Fringe play with letters from killer says the headline,

ehh who exactly is it thats angry then, Ive missed that bit, some theatre owners in Nottingham were "upset" and Keith Bennets mother thinks its inappropriate but no angry people mentioned at all.
So who phoned the evening news with this tip off, the playright or the Pleasance?

6

mary,

USA 26/07/2006 17:27:55

Perhaps the Author should listen to the tapes that were played on the radio at the trial. Most everyone that listened broke their hearts. When the little girl said there is no God it was heartrending. I agree people should choose to see what they want but to write about the moors murders and use it for a play is incomprehensible.

7

pi,

26/07/2006 20:37:29

there is a fine line between attemting to make a fast buck from a freakshow and art

or is there?

8

Scottish Unionist,

26/07/2006 21:26:47

Typical guff from the Fringe, trying too be controversial to annoy certain sections of society. There will be no need to ban it because it will be a load of tripe.

9

terry,

cambridge 26/07/2006 23:36:15

I can only imagine that the people who have left all the negative comments have already seen or read the play, if so I would love to know where/how...If they haven't, how on earth can they begin to comment? I would imagine that the only person who is in a position to be judgemental is the Director of the Pleasance because he will have read the play, please correct me if I'm wrong. Personally, I will make up my own mind when AND ONLY WHEN I have seen the play myself!

10

Scottish Unionist,

26/07/2006 23:50:52

I don't need to see it to ascertain that it's crap. I don't tend to enjoy watching plays about sadistic killers...

11

Joanna,

London 28/07/2006 10:57:08

I was one of the people priviledged enough to see a first version of the play when it was workshopped in Nottingham- although I understand it has changed a lot since then. I enjoyed first and foremost as a piece of dramatic art. It is not entirely accurate but that is because it is drama not fact. The version I saw was in no way offensive to victims or families and did not portray Hindley and Brady in a sympathetic light at all. It is a difficult subject to try to attempt to dramatise but it helps to remind us of those terrible events and take precautions about their repitition


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.