Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Repairs to keep Meadowbank up and running set to cost £12m

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 November 2008
THE cost of "patching-up" Meadowbank Stadium to keep it running while the controversial redevelopment is put on hold could hit £12 million, it emerged today. Council chiefs have been forced to delay plans to build a new £25m sports centre after it emerged the land being sold to fund the majority of the project will now fetch just £5m, not the expected £17m.
But the ageing facility is in such bad condition that the council may need to plough in £11.9m – almost half the cost of a new stadium – to keep it in use in the meantime.

As well as its crumbling condition, Meadowbank has expensive mechanical and electrical problems, out-of-date changing facilities and damp. The city council today said it hopes to be able to maintain Meadowbank for less than the £11.9m quoted by its own consultants, but could not put a figure on how much it will cost.

City sports leader Councillor Deidre Brock said: "Whilst we wait for economic conditions to improve we need to be sure athletes have access to training facilities in the build-up to the Olympic and Commonwealth Games.

"To do this we will aim to put maintenance funding in place to make sure Meadowbank is fit for use in the meantime, but beyond that we will press ahead with a new facility. Meadowbank, in its current form, is coming to the end of its life and it isn't meeting modern sporting standards."

The News revealed on Thursday that redevelopment will have to be put on hold due to the drop in land value due to the credit crunch. Council chiefs have admitted that the project is "unaffordable" at the moment and will be delayed for the "foreseeable future".

Meanwhile, £6m the council had set aside for the redevelopment will now be used to plug a £4.75m funding gap in the Royal Commonwealth Pool refurb.

A survey on the current condition of Meadowbank has been ordered to see how much investment will be needed to keep it up and running for now.

The most recent survey, last December, revealed that £11.9m would be needed "simply for the facility to remain operational".

Labour group sports spokesman Paul Godzik is worried by how much will need to be spent to keep it up and running.

He said: "If they're going to have to spend that kind of money, it's not just a patch-up job, it's a serious investment in the stadium with no sporting benefits. We would basically just be flushing that money down the pan."

His Tory counterpart, Cllr Gordon Buchan, added: "This is crisis point for Meadowbank. . It's a very worrying situation and it could lead to partial closure."

But Save Meadowbank Campaign spokesman Kevin Conner said: "We employed our own architect to carry out on assessment on what it would cost for a full refurbishment and he put the cost at £25m so to suggest it will take half that figure just to keep it up and running doesn't add up."

Funding to keep the facility running will be agreed in February's budget and come out of the capital investment programme.

A city council spokesman said: "We will aim to reduce the original estimate for maintenance because we are aiming to rebuild when the financial climate improves. This figure was based on the building being maintained on an ongoing basis in its current form."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 November 2008 10:47 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Meadowbank
 
1

Liz,

Edinburgh 17/11/2008 11:15:04
Strange isnt it. We do not have £25million to do a proper job at Meadowbank but we have 700million to replace the 22 bus route.

Some may suggest that somebody, somewhere, have their priorities wrong.
2

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 17/11/2008 11:35:05
#1. Agree 100% as will most of Edinburgh residents apart from the pro tram nutters.
3

Skip McClendon,

17/11/2008 11:59:23
#1, #2

Although, to pre-empt the protrammie argument, "most of that money is coming from the Scottish government, not from Council Tax payers".

Which in bizarre pro-tram world makes it all OK, of course. Since Scottish Government money is apparently provided free by the tooth fairy, or something...
4

LUVMACITY,

IN THE LOBBY 17/11/2008 12:03:50
Accept it, they are coming.
5

raythebear,

edinburgh 17/11/2008 12:13:17
£25m for a new stadium, fantasyland!
6

Randan,

17/11/2008 12:18:57
Now if they had put decent money into year on year maintenance, would they need to be spending £12m now?
Or is it that they've been patching up on the cheap in expectation of demolition?
7

cynicalm,

Edinburgh 17/11/2008 12:19:49
If you ignore the need to carry out regular maintenance on a structure, eventually the repairs required will cost nearly as much as a replacement. Blame the Council numpties for failing on this as well as every other major building, e g Usher Hall.
8

alex paterson,

edinburgh 17/11/2008 12:22:17
If the Council can get a new purpose built stadium of £25 million its cheap at half the price,just do it.
9

,

17/11/2008 12:22:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Hector the Red,

17/11/2008 12:23:07
knock it down!
11

badger464,

17/11/2008 12:25:39
twice the size but half the cost, that sounds like a good deal to me
12

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 17/11/2008 12:36:34
THIS IS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR THE ANTI TRAMMIES TO GET A DIG.
WAIT UNTIL TOMORROW, THEIR WILL BE AN EEN ANTI TRAM STORY THEN.
13

Skip McClendon,

17/11/2008 12:38:00
#12

You've not read all of today's paper yet, have you...
14

Skinnybob,

17/11/2008 12:39:10
The council didn't spend much (if anything) on keeping Meadowbank in decent condition because they had their greedy eyes on the money they could make by selling the land for houses.

By the time they get round to it the housing market has collapsed and we are left with a dilapidated run down facility.

15

In my opinion...,

17/11/2008 12:58:13
The Council’s proposal involves spending £42 million and ending up with a vastly reduced facility and losing upwards of 1/3 of the MB site:
Stopgap work on MB: £12m
Sale of more than 1/3 of MB site in future to obtain an imaginary £17m
New Velodrome away from MB: £5m
Sport Scotland grant £2m
Council capital fund: £6m

The Save Meadowbank Campaign architect estimated that £27m would upgrade the entire facility without involving any sale of land, and provide a new covered velodrome on site. This figure included more than £3m for construction industry inflation which if we remove brings the sum to £24m.
Instead of spending the following on a vastly inferior facility, the Council could spend it on upgrading and creating a fantastic facility at Meadowbank:
Council Capital fund: £6m
SportScotalnd: £2m
New Velodrome: £5m (half to come from Scottish Govt.)
Additional fund required = £11m, which is less than the £12m the Council wants to flush down the toilet.

Meadowbank should now be subject to a phased upgrade. The funding already set aside should now be used to carry out the first stage of that upgrade.
16

Randan,

17/11/2008 13:06:35
#15 Please keep out of this debate with your common sense solution.
That's not what the council want!!!
17

In my opinion...,

17/11/2008 13:25:28
Forgot to mention that by upgrading the centre, we save a further £5m which the Council estimated it would cost to clear the site (demolish the existing facility and prepare it for rebuilding.)

See Council's own docs:
http://cpol.edinburgh.gov.uk/getdoc_ext.asp?DocId=113266
Go to page 7
18

Stotty,

17/11/2008 13:33:30
Where does this figure come from? Who has verified it? Load of nonsense if you ask me.
19

James Collins,

Leith 17/11/2008 13:42:24
I regularly play at Meadowbank. What number 15 says would be perfect but at the very least they could spend a few thousand/hundred thousand in some key places.

The inside is fine - gym and halls quite useable. The indoor changing rooms are great (but 2 of the hair dryers have needed repair for the last 3 years) and the field and lights are fine. The main things I can see need urgent attention are the main stand and removal or replacing of the wooden seats round the far side. The outside changing room would be nice as well but aren't used by many.

A lick of paint, replacement of broken seats, some repairs and a clean would make the facility look at lot nicer and may get the facility more users.

There is the last 3-4 years of outside routine maintenance that needs to be done before a larger upgrade should then take place.
20

Chris1745,

Prestonpans 17/11/2008 15:33:13
Isn't there some way that the improvments that are paid for just now could be utilised in the new stadium? Make sure the money is spend intelligently and it could be reused. Changing facilities, lighting , seating, even the track could be moved if they take these things into account before they build them
21

AaronL,

Plannet Earth 17/11/2008 16:39:35
#19
well, that'll be £1m for one hairdryer and £1m for the other). sorry we can't afford that so the whole of Meadowbank will have to be knocked down ;p

it's amazing the council get away with such bullsh!t
22

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 17/11/2008 17:25:37
This is one of the few good things to come out of the ''credit chrunchie'' - no more greedy land sales !
23

micky,

edinburgh 17/11/2008 19:22:05
#19 no offense meant but if you think the changing rooms inside MB are great I sympathise with anyone who has to use your loo !!!! They are damp,squalid & totally minging !!!
If the building trade is in near recession wouldn't the work to revamp MB come in much cheaper than in normal times ?
Lets just do what the vast majority of MB users want & use this opportunity to rebuild it as the brilliant facility it deserves to be & the Edinburgh public deserve!
24

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 17/11/2008 22:31:06
from,17.mill.to.5mill.somebody.was.realy..shafted
25

Julian.,

edinburgh 17/11/2008 22:43:02
#14 Skinnybob,

Yes but if they had been quicker and sold the land before the crunch we would now be left with a reduced size complex with no velodrome and half the number of sports halls. And the land that was sold would be in private hands forever more.

I'll take the not so dilapidated full complex after they've spent the £12m on it anyday.
26

Jam Tarts 1874,

On the Rebound 18/11/2008 11:03:53
SNP = Tartan Tories = Cuts, Cuts, Cuts.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.