Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Madonna wins adoption appeal

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2009
A CONTROVERSIAL bid by the pop star Maddonna to adopt a second child from Malawi was approved today.
The pop star appealed after a lower court rejected her application to adopt Chifundo "Mercy" James, a four-year-old girl, in April.

The country's highest court announced its decision to allow the adoption.
Previously, a judge and a lawyer told reporters that Madonna, 50, did not meet a requirement that prospective parents must be resident in the country for 18 to 24 months.

The residency rule was waived in 2006 when Madonna was allowed to take her adopted son, David, to London before his adoption was finalised in 2008.

The Supreme Court of Appeal said that a lower court failed to take modern realities into account in initially rejecting Madonna's application to adopt the little girl.

Chief Justice Lovemore Munlo also said that Madonna's commitment to the welfare of disadvantaged children should have been taken into account.

She has two biological children, Lourdes, 12, and Rocco, aged eight.

Madonna has founded a charity, Raising Malawi, which helps feed, educate and provide medical care for some of Malawi's more than one million orphans, many of whom have lost their parents to Aids.

But welfare groups have expressed concern over the adoption plans.

Development agency Plan has said it could not condone "whisking a single child off to a fairytale lifestyle in Hollywood".

Anna Feuchtwang, chief executive of international development charity EveryChild, previously said that high-profile adoptions sent out the wrong message and the focus should be on the work done to help vulnerable families stay together.

She said: "This may be less glamorous than international adoption by pop stars but it is the only viable solution to provide safe and secure homes for all of Africa's children."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2009 10:19 AM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Madonna
 
1

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 12/06/2009 10:31:03
This decision was wrong.
2

Mashimaro,

China 12/06/2009 10:36:47
Yeah cos it's better to let her grow up in a disease-riddled third world country
3

Media at One,

12/06/2009 10:42:56
It will not be long until the American government change the laws and refuse American citizens the right to bring adopted kids to America -
If Hollywood carries on the way it is at the moment with all of them looking for a little black accessory,it wont be long till America is Africa.
Ok that is a bit of an exaggeration, but the hollywood sport of black adoption is shocking. Thank goodness black celebrities dont go about eatern europe looking for poor white kids to adopt.
4

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 12/06/2009 11:40:04
2 No, because it breaks the very sensible adoption rules for that country.
5

,

12/06/2009 12:59:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

WL,

Livingston 12/06/2009 15:02:42
If you have enough money you can still buy children in Malawi, no matter what the adoption laws are.
7

Observer,,

Glasgow 12/06/2009 19:40:15
How do you decide which child will live a life of pampered luxury and which child will take their chance in a very poor land.

I don't know how she can make such a decision ethically. She's just so self centred it's unbelievable.
8

Mashimaro,

China 13/06/2009 01:49:37
She wants to help a child. And you want to stop her? Why? The child she helps will have everything she needs for a better life. You have some very skewed "morals" if you think that to support them one more more child should live in poverty, disease, violence and illiteracy. Nice. Perhaps it's just because Kenya used to be a Brit colony that you feel a twinge of guilt that it's still a basket case.
#8 she decided what child she wanted. If you can change the life of a child for the better, you get to decide. Don't take a moral high ground on this, people take babies from China all the time. All of them decide "which" child to take back to their posh western homes. If you had your way these kids would be raised in Chinese orphanages, which as the entire world knows, leave a lot to be desired.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.