Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Lazy Guide to Net Culture: Levant levity

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 August 2006
I HAVE a made a serious error of judgment.
I have just returned from holiday. This morning I bounced happily into the scotsman.com newsroom, my mind full of candyfloss, beaches and splashing in the sea.

As I sat down behind my desk and waited for the soul-drains to be jabbed into my eyeba
lls, I innocently asked: "So, much been happening while I've been away?"

Came the reply: "Apparently, Tommy Sheridan's very hairy."

"That's nice," I said as the chill claws of my PC slowly dug their way into my heart.

"Oh and Fidel Castro's not dead."

"Good-o," I murmured as the concrete sarcophagus of my workstation shut out the sun.

"Oh, and World War III is breaking out."

Hmm. Before I head off to await the end of the world in my bunker in the Highlands I feel should write about events in Lebanon but I hesitate. I hesitate because it will unleash a flamewar of epic proportions and deluge me with crazed email from extremists of unsound mind from both sides of the madness.

I mean it's bad enough dealing with the net fanboys (and - let's face it - it's usually boys) who get their nit-picking knickers in a twist if you don’t define their online hobbies in the kind of forensically precise detail usually reserved for idiots savants. If I had a penny for every time some obsessive somewhere has mistaken my describing an obscure online concept to a wider audience with being "poorly researched", I’d have 17p. (By the way, if you felt that my definition of machinima - or any other pursuit mentioned in this column - was not exact enough for you, please feel free to get a life already.)

But that's nothing compared to what happens when you mention "Israel", "Palestine" or "Lebanon" in an article, no matter how even-handedly or temperately.

Here goes. Please be aware I will not be looking at my email ever again after this so don’t bother contacting me.

Before we go any further, here are some basic principles. I believe Israel has the right to exist. I believe democracies are better than dictatorships. And I believe terrorism is evil.

I also believe wading into other people's countries and killing loads of civilians does not defeat terrorism but encourages it. Tempting though it may be for the Israelis to bomb Hezbollah into the Stone Age that only works if they can hit Hezbollah's fighters rather than, say, the UN's.

Finally, I think that Israel will be as successful in bringing peace and stability to the Middle East as George W Bush has been in Afghanistan and Iraq. The British experience in Northern Ireland shows that the only way to end terrorism is to involve the terrorists in the political process, distasteful and painful and slow as that is.

I think there should be an immediate ceasefire. I think Israel should withdraw from Lebanon. I think the ills of the Palestinian people should be addressed to ease tension in the region. And I think Hezbollah should be disarmed.

I also think Santa Claus should bring me an E-type Jag for Christmas. It doesn’t mean it's going to happen…

There are a ton of Lebanese and Israeli blogs commenting on the conflict. Two of the most interesting are Siege of Lebanon and Israeli Bunker.

This post on LebaneseBloggers is particularly thought-provoking:

One thing must be clear to all Lebanese - and I mean ALL: what has transpired over the past two weeks eliminates all the pretence for Hezbollah's existence as a military force. Its proclaimed ability to protect Lebanon from Israel has summed up to nothing more than causing a fraction of the damage to Israel in retaliation.

A large number of right-wing blogs are circulating the "fact" that the apartment building in Qana bombed by the Israelis did not collapse until eight hours after the attack. This rumour appears to have started with this article on Ynet.com. The theory is, frankly, bollocks, as is clear from the comments of the Israeli Defence Force brigadier general quoted:

""according to foreign press reports, and this is one of the reports we are relying on, the house collapsed at 8 A.M. We do not have testimony regarding the time of the collapse."

But, hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good bit of propaganda? So let's immerse ourselves in trivia while waiting for events at Har-Megiddo to unfold.

Why not watch this amusing video of Americans being ignorant about world affairs. George W Bush is only in it in spirit.

My favourite was this:

Question: What is a Mosque?
Answer: An animal


However, I fear this one is prophetic rather than stupid:

Question: How many world wars have there been?
Answer: Three


The Lazy Guide will take a short break to cower in a bunker and cover the Edinburgh Festival. It will return in September



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Lord Pasternack,

08/08/2006 16:27:37

E-type Jag... is that some machine that guzzles fossle fuels and pollutes the air?

Look at MY prospective family vehicle:

http://www.ultimate-quadracycle.com/showroom/grandsportru...

I'll be doing 15* on the freeway with the wind in my hair, the rain in my face, my man beside me and the little one strapped in the back.

I also assume that you didn't travel to your holiday destination by solar and/or wind-powered jet, and as such, I reserve the right to imply hypocrisy on your part. Maybe I don't really care... or maybe I do... that people are, as ever actively choosing to be part of the problem.

Although perhaps I don't care about that either.

*RPM

2

Ian MacFarlane,

St. Petersburg, Florida USA 08/08/2006 17:40:36

Re: World War III. According to Winston Churchill, there already have been three world wars. WWI was what we naive Americans call the "French and Indian War (1754-1763). WWII was what we call WWI, or "The Great War." WWIII was what we call WWII and the Russians call "The Great Patriotic War."

So, why not call the current Islamic war against the rest of the world WW IV? That's OK by me!

3

Also from Canada,

Canada 08/08/2006 22:59:09

Actually, many scholars argue that WWIII was the Cold War. By that theory, this new one will be WWIV. Enough already!

4

Betsy,

Oregon, U.S. 09/08/2006 06:29:53

Amen to your theory about involving the terrorists in the political process, as distasteful as it may be! Finally, someone with some sense! (Could you move to the U.S., please?) Somebody FINALLY needs to come to the conclusion that you are NEVER EVER EVER going to win a battle with ANY group of people that say they are fighting to do their God's will. Because these people will gladly die and take you with them, if it gets them to their God quicker.

5

RAVIS,

in the borders 09/08/2006 11:05:03

hey number one! can't really be bothered with your name, it's too long and I fear a little too much work has gone into it and I really wouldn't encourage you!
this bike thingy - is it powered by your overwhelming sense of superiority? if so, you could probably do 60* (whatever that is) in it.
the article above is about war - not rinky dinky transport! I mean, of course you're excited about your little bike, but please keep it to yourself!

:-)

6

Gerryz,

England 09/08/2006 11:53:49

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein, 1879-1955.

7

Ewan,

Washington DC 09/08/2006 16:00:17

Aaah... Let us all laugh at Americans. How mature. How about we go to Sitehill, Valleyfield, and Drumchapel and ask people the same questions?

8

GrahamL,

England 09/08/2006 16:20:26

Ewan- that would be "Sighthill". Typical Americans...


:-)

9

Lord Pasternack,

09/08/2006 23:09:21

"Number one" - you got that right, baby! :-P

As for the bike, I've got a ideas for a prototype to be made to run on my overwhelming sense of superiority, but I haven't yet let my prospective husband know, as he already found the kiddy seat at the back something of a bombshell. (Tch... And he's nearly 30, too...)

And, not wanting to be a big serious killjoy here, but you might also wanna have a dig at Mr. Kirkpatrick for being so offensive to those who (pathetic though he may think they are) know more about what he's writing his column than he does at times.

I say if you're writing a bloody sci-tech column you have to expect the odd geek, and you ought at least to appear as though you do actually know what you're on about on the matter. And for someone who spent his adolescence playing Elite (and probably still would play it if he had it)...

10

Lord Pasternack,

10/08/2006 18:55:29

I'd just like to take this moment to pre-empt Stewart in stating that there's panic on the streets of London; panic on the streets of Birmingham...

http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1163182006

Because he'd never believe me if I told him that I thought of it before he said it, and that would annoy me.

But don't let that put you off using it...

11

Onyer Tod,

Sydney Australia 11/08/2006 00:07:34

Stewart, I love your column ( or whatever its called these days) but can we stick to the weird and wonderful and leave mainstream news to the others?

Ewan, Sorry if you are upset that someone had a wee laugh at the expense of the USA.
In my experience the rest of the world views 99% of Americans as xenophobic and ignorant of almost anything outside of the USA. Its not immature. Just reality.

12

TrueFifer,

Edinburgh 11/08/2006 13:12:00

'Ere, Mrs Scarf whatever your name is, Do us all a favour and get of your high horse and go find yourself a life!

After reading all the comments you seem to be the only one talking alot but not saying anything. Carmen, I think you hit the nail on the head.

13

Lord Pasternack,

11/08/2006 23:20:22

Izzy, does anyone ever tell you you have a problem with taking things far too seriously?

And I'm not married, either.

14

Motown Mame,

St. Clair Shores, Michigan, USA 12/08/2006 13:16:47

News flash: the total number of peaceful people in the world at this moment outnumbers those engaged in hostile conflict.

Peace is the majority! I cordially invite you to proclaim your personal commitment to peace, here, there, and everywhere. RSD

15

Lord Pasternack,

13/08/2006 14:44:13

Square go!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.