Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


VisitScotland overhaul 'will damage Capital'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
23 October 2007
A NEW shake-up of Scotland's main tourism agency will risk damaging the Capital's money-spinning industry, city leaders have warned.
Council chiefs have condemned a planned overhaul of VisitScotland amid fears efforts to promote the city will be sidelined.

VisitScotland Edinburgh and Lothians - set up just two years ago - is set to be scrapped and replaced by a new regional authority covering an area including Fife, Stirling, Falkirk, Clackmannanshire and Loch Lomond.

The Scottish Government has ordered the move to tie in with a reorganisation of Scottish Enterprise's local enterprise companies.

However, the latest reorganisation has triggered fresh concerns from within the council about the value for money it will get from its annual £650,000 grant for VisitScotland.

Senior council officials believe the city would be better served by an independent tourism and marketing body, similar to ones that exist in Glasgow and London.

A new report by the council said action needed to be taken to help boost tourism in the city if it was to remain at the forefront of a "highly competitive marketplace".

City development director Andrew Holmes said: "Tourism is Edinburgh's shop window to the world. However, more co-ordination of tourism and city promotion is needed to market the city as a key destination. There are key funding, promotion and infrastructure issues which must be addressed if the city is to maintain its competitive position.

"In light of the recent announcement of changes to the Scottish Enterprise network and VisitScotland, our staff will begin discussions with these organisations to establish the implications for Edinburgh. We have a real concern that the strength of Edinburgh's tourism promotion may be diluted by this new wider approach."

The council revealed today that it had ordered a major review of how the city is currently promoted.

Details of an action plan are expected to be announced later this year but are expected to include a breakaway organisation from VisitScotland.

A senior council insider said: "It has been a mistake for Edinburgh not to have its own dedicated marketing body. The council is reviewing its input into VisitScotland as there are real concerns over the value for money the city is getting."

Ron Hewitt, chief executive of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "We've argued for some time now about the need for an independent marketing organisation for the city."

A VisitScotland spokeswoman said: "The proposed changes are about improving the way we work with local authorities and other agencies. By working even more effectively we can offer better support to local tourism businesses and focus more of our efforts on helping the industry."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 October 2007 10:32 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

alex paterson,

embra 23/10/2007 11:46:42

Capitals money-spinning industry spinning and how.

2

JMC,

Dumfries 23/10/2007 11:54:38

If Edinburgh is not getting value for money then who is? Those of us living in the sticks often feel that all our money goes on advertising the capital city. I am very much in favour of a system which allows different areas to compete with each other.

3

Micjonger,

Cambridgeshire 23/10/2007 12:00:45

I stopped using VisitScotland as a gateway when I discovered 'in the small print', that it would take 10% of my estimated £900 Edinburgh hotel bill as a booking fee.
I eventually got the same hotel through a travel agent for £740.

4

Kieron,

Stirling 23/10/2007 12:19:14

No.3 You are correct of course. The tourism in this country has revolved around Edinburgh for years and it is time things changed. Edinburgh is known the world over for its beautiful scenery, tat tartan shops, cold winds and busy festivals. Therefore why should it have further benefits in tourism funding alone? It shouldn't and it is about time the rest of country took some of the share.

5

eric,

Lothian 23/10/2007 13:00:27

Damaged long time ago!One can get tartan tack in Blackpool And trams! oh and Rock ,Sounds familiar.

6

Tomsk,

23/10/2007 13:15:53

No. 6

And they've got schools too!

7

eric-shaun,

Lothian 23/10/2007 13:27:40

6
Thats handy for the next time you go down on your horse,Seems familiar,Oh yeah.

8

Thomas the Tank,

Embra 23/10/2007 14:56:06

Surely it can be no co-incidence that Andrew 'Mr Bean' Holmes already has his ticket in and is due to retire as Director of City Development early in the New Year. This is the man ultimately responsible for Edinburgh's Traffic Shambles putting down a marker for a lucrative wee bonus to his already massive, inflation-proof pension. No doubt he anticipates being retained as a 'Consultant' to both Tie AND the new Regional Tourist Quango. Maybe his buddy Teflon Don Anderson will also get him on board with Mountgrange/PPS. Something STINKS here - come back John Lindsay, all is forgiven!

9

GP,

23/10/2007 15:04:25

5# he who pays the piper call the tune!
Edinburgh pays £650k for advertising itself via visit scotland and quite rightky they want ot be sure their money gets good value and not squandered on places like Stirling.
Other places should band together and senure their area gets some notice but not at others expense, at their own.

10

IanfaeFalkirk,

doon hame 23/10/2007 15:04:47

Maybe the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce should take the lead and become the "independent marketing organisation for the city"? After all, with an ex-Scottish Tourist Board spin-doctor in its ranks, and a membership base, who better to take the lead in converting Edinburgh tourism marketing back into a member-led initiative?

11

Old Cartha Boy,

23/10/2007 15:13:15

If you judge an organisation by the effectiveness of its website, visitscotland (which still comes up as the Scottish Tourist Board!) ought to be a stall at Ingliston Market! How many of their useless staff are currently in Moscow promoting Scotland to the Muscovites.......let me count how many flights there are from Russia to Scotland....shut VS down now!

12

sweet76,

South of the Border 23/10/2007 15:16:26

Visit Scotland could save it's self some money by not advertising on English TV. Having veiwed some of the hateful comments put on this website I'm sure they wouldn't be welcome.

13

My opinions count for more than yours,

because I'm special 23/10/2007 15:29:54

Where does one go to comment on the chip-pan fire story?

14

Brad,

Glasgow 23/10/2007 15:33:12

Didn't you know. #13, we don't want tourists - just post your money instead...

15

Calum Mac,

23/10/2007 16:15:28

#9 Oh how I wish there was a satirical magazine or publication in Edinburgh for people like you to be journalists in. It's like the electronic equivalent of flinging rotten fruit like the punters used to do to politicians and their servants in the old days.
Brilliant!

16

GlobalScot,

California, USA 23/10/2007 16:28:35

I doubt that any VS Overhaul could do nearly as much damage to Edinburgh's image as the usual cynics who post on this site. Just keep them away from the tourists who mostly see past the tartan tat and weather to the city's natural beauty and history. When people I meet find out I'm from Edinburgh, and they have visited it, they just rave to me about our city! Marketing guys can't make silk purses out of sows' ears, but with Edinburgh, they have wonderful starting material to work with!

17

Mensa George,

DC 23/10/2007 17:49:12

If the locals really wanted to help tourism, they might consider putting an end to the Edinburgh Evening News online which allows folks around the world to see what a toilet the City has become.

18

Dan McShann the Tampon Man,

Falkirk 23/10/2007 18:23:07

Yes, but cities that are toilets are considered "edgy" and therefore cool.

19

Mensa George,

Washington, DC 23/10/2007 18:59:40

If 19 is correct, I live in the coolest of cities, which I doubt.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.