Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Rush to buy surgical masks but experts say they are useless

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 April 2009
FACE masks are being snapped up as concern grows about the threat of a swine flu pandemic, despite health experts warning that they offer the general public little protection against the virus.
The news comes as the Department of Health said supplies of the masks would be increased across the UK to try to protect health workers.

Yesterday, Scotland's health secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: "We have a stockpile of nine million surgical fa
ce masks and almost half a million high- fidelity respiratory face masks for use by healthcare workers.

"Action is under way at UK level to increase stockpiles of face masks."

Gordon Brown also told parliament that "several million more" face masks were being ordered for NHS workers and would arrive over the next few days and weeks.

Pictures from Mexico – where more than 150 people have died from confirmed or suspected swine flu – have shown people in the streets wearing masks. This has prompted people in the UK to investigate buying masks in case more people are confirmed with swine flu infection.

But Scotland's chief medical officer, Dr Harry Burns, yesterday said the masks offered little protection to the public. "Surgical face masks, in terms of the general public, are not believed to have much protective effect," he said.

"You wear a face mask, it becomes damp during the course of the day and that allows the virus to spread across your face.

"The evidence is that the pictures we see of people out in the streets of Mexico wearing these face masks is that it is unlikely to offer much protection.

"We do have surgical face masks available for people like healthcare workers if they have to have contact with one of these individuals who has evidence of infection for brief periods.

"But we would not be advising that the general public wear these masks."

Professor Hugh Pennington, a leading microbiologist based in Aberdeen, said masks could offer protection against someone coughing into your face, but smaller particles could still get through.

But he said one benefit of the masks was that they could remind people about the importance of covering their mouths when coughing and sneezing.

"I think the health departments are on to a no-win situation with masks," Prof Pennington said.

"They will be criticised if they buy them for wasting public money because there's no real evidence that they are really effective.

"But they would be criticised if they didn't buy them because people would say we need masks."

Prof Pennington suggested masks could even make matters worse.

"When you take it off and it's all sodden with your secretions, what are you going to do with it? How are you going to wash your hands?

"Wearing a mask could give a false sense of security."

England's chief medical officer Professor Sir Liam Donaldson said: "The scientific advice for face masks is that they are of very little value.

"First of all because they get moist and that enhances the risk of the virus transmitting, and because the virus is so small they can go through the pores."

He, too, suggested the masks could worsen the situation by making wearers wrongly feel they were safe.

On medical supplies websites, face masks range in price from almost £100 for 20 full masks with respirators, to about £20 for 50 simple surgical masks.

Airline fury over call for travellers to avoid going to Mexico

AIRLINES have reacted angrily to a European commissioner's call for travellers to avoid non-essential travel to Mexico and affected areas of the United States.

The row came as the European Commission said it could not impose a Europe-wide ban on flights to Mexico, which has been urged by France to help curb the spread of swine flu.

EU health commissioner Androulla Vassiliou made the call over non-urgent travel yesterday on the eve of a meeting of health ministers to discuss the issue.

However, Association of European Airlines secretary-general Ulrich Schulte-Strathaus described the warnings as "irresponsible and ill-advised".

He said travel advisories could do more harm than good and said airlines were "well-prepared to handle health crises".

The official said the association, which includes British Airways and Air France-KLM, was informing passengers about the disease, risks and precautions.

"A priority now is to establish a co-ordinated European response and avoid a diversity of national rules and requirements," he said.

French health minister Roselyne Bachelot said she would push for the EU to suspend flights to Mexico at today's meeting.

But she added that flights from Mexico should be maintained so tourists could get home.

However, the European Commission said it was up to individual countries to impose their own restrictions.

An EC official said: "Member states can impose restrictions on their own merits, but there is no competence for a ban at EU level and the European Commission has no plans for restricting travel to or from Mexico."

Tour operators have already cancelled all charter flights from Britain to Mexico for the next week, including three from Glasgow. However, British Airways is operating its four-times-a-week service between Heathrow and Mexico as normal.

Other European airlines with feeder flights from Scotland are continuing flights to Mexico unchanged, such as KLM, whose Amsterdam hub has links from Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen.

Up to 14,000 Britons are believed to be in Mexico.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 April 2009 11:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Swine Flu
 
1

sonofcosmos,

limbo 30/04/2009 00:14:23
roger..have you not heard the words of the who..we are all going to die...listen to david bowie "heroes" when you bury me ..cheers x
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 30/04/2009 00:37:44

Is this the reason I have not seen Mr Salmond for the last 10 days?

He is wearing a "Mask", and I cannot recognise him!
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

30/04/2009 07:02:57
The social implications of all this need some thought. One respected authority has suggested that the first person in any social situation to be seen actually wearing a facemask will be the subject of much opprobrium - http://tr.im/k4Nh.
4

sam the god,

30/04/2009 08:13:08
you want an NDC gas (10) mask
5

Weel Kent Jambo,

30/04/2009 08:21:40
Don't panic Captain Mainwaring....

6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

30/04/2009 08:29:01
"When you take it off and it's all sodden with your secretions, what are you going to do with it?"

I wish people would stop asking me this.
7

AJ Fife,

30/04/2009 09:30:47
Yuuuuck!
8

,

30/04/2009 09:48:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

The Hon. Liam Fairtod,

30/04/2009 11:03:33
I'm just going to hold my breath until all this blows over.
It's the only way to be safe.
10

Queen D,

Glasgow 30/04/2009 11:20:26
Having been to Mexico in the 70's coutesy of a large firm, we were wheeched out of Mexico City at 6 a.m so that we would'nt have to suffer the pollution when the working week got started.
Some of the wealthier locals wore face masks even then!
I do remember a dreadful smell on arrival in Mexico City and we were well warned NOT to drink the water or put ice in our drinks.Of course it was so hot that we all did put ice in our drinks and out of a party of 60 UK citizens 58 had the diabolicals.The two who did not were in danger of being beaten up by the 58 who had!
( prevented only by the pressing engagement of the bowels!)
11

Bien E. Bien,

30/04/2009 11:31:58
I wouldn't be too worried about swine flu. In the minute or so that it will have taken to read the above article, chances are that two people somewhere in the world will have died from malaria.

12

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/04/2009 11:54:36
If I were cynical I might believe that Obama and Bruin have dreamt this one up as a sideshow diversion!
13

Deadpan,

London 30/04/2009 12:30:02
I'm okay, I went to the doctor and got some oinkment.
14

Tartan Viking,

30/04/2009 12:56:01
There are a few MPs at Westmonster who should be wearing masks as a matter of course - highway robbers that they are, with their thievery of expenses and all that.
15

Queen D,

Glasgow 30/04/2009 12:57:28
Deadpan , you forgot the Boom! Boom!
And I lost my coffee!
16

Tartan Viking,

30/04/2009 12:58:33
Those measuring the swine flu outbreak say the rate of infection is showing peaks and troughs.
17

Time to Show Courage,

30/04/2009 14:34:24
Do not belive everything that you hear about masks. Masks or "respirators" will protect you from breathing in the flu virus. However, the mask would have to be a particular type, it would have to be fitted correctly, and changed regularly. If the masks are not labelled "FFP3" they will not offer any protection. The Health and Safety Executive recommend the FFP3 masks for anyone coming into contact with viruses, including swine and avian flu. Also, using surgical masks is as much use as trying to stop a bee with a tennis net. A correctly fitted FFP3 respirator, worn on a clean shaven-face and changed regularly, will prevent the passage of a virus.

If masks were useless, why would the government stockpile 34 million of them to be issued to healthcare staff?

A correct standard of mask costs around £4 - £5.
18

Class On Grass,

Unmasked 30/04/2009 16:37:49

Make the people showing symptoms or those in contact with victims, or who live in a 2 mile radius of sites infection wear masks.
Isolate areas of infection and stop flights to airports within a 100 mile range of infected sites.
Some initial measures which wont be implemented due to the cash dependant society we've become
19

english charlie,

30/04/2009 19:27:11
The following web site will explain why only those with the virus need wear a mask:
http://www.naturalnews.com/026160.html
20

Evia,

01/05/2009 01:31:10
#19

Check out Triosyn respirators. People are rushing to buy surgical masks that offer no protection. They are meant for medical staff to prevent them from infecting the patients. The following site gives simple to understand information. www.viraldefender.com/aplications.htm These are avai.lable from different companies in the UK
=======================

#10

Yours is the most sensible comment on this board. If people had bothered to research the subject they would not have rushed to buy just anything. I spent a long time searching for the most effective protection and this is what I found, Triosyn T-5000V respirators. These seem to be about the best FFP3 disposable respirators available, individually sealed, that gives them an effective life of 5 years. If people want the best they have to be prepared to pay for it and these fall within a more reasonable price range, depending on where you shop. They cost from about £6 upwards for the valved ones, depending on quantity purchased.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.