Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cost of bloodiest day: three of eight UK Afghan victims were teenagers

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2009
THREE teenagers – one the father of an eight-month-old baby – were named yesterday among the eight British soldiers killed in 24 hours in the bloodiest day for UK ground casualties in Afghanistan.
Three of the soldiers were 18, among them Will Aldridge from Herefordshire, one of the youngest on active duty in Helmand province. He had only been allowed on active service after his 18th birthday in May.

Another Rifleman, Joe Murphy, 18, from Birmingham, died when he tried to rescue a colleague, Daniel Simpson, 20, of Croydon, who had been injured by another bomb. Both men were killed instantly when a second device exploded.

Corporal Jonathan Horne, 28, from Walsall, and Rifleman James Backhouse, 18, from Yorkshire – who leaves three brothers – were also killed in the same set of explosions while on foot patrol near the Army's Forward Operating Base Wishtan, in Sangin. All five were members of 2nd Battalion The Rifles.

A sixth man to lose his life on Friday was named as Corporal Lee Scott, 26, of the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment. He was killed during an explosion while taking part in Operation Panther's Claw, just north of Nad Ali, Helmand Province, on Friday.

The two soldiers killed on Thursday were Rifleman Daniel Hume, 22, of The Rifles, and Private John Brackpool, 27, of 1st Battalion Welsh Guards.

The eight deaths represented the bloodiest day on the ground for UK forces in Afghanistan.

Rifleman Aldridge joined 2 Rifles in Northern Ireland last December aged 17. He was said to be fiercely proud of being one of the youngest British soldiers in Helmand, and was described by his commanding officer as a "natural field soldier".

He left a mother and two young brothers, who said in a statement: "He achieved his dreams by becoming a Rifleman and was very aware of the sacrifice he may have to make. He will leave a huge void in our lives and always remain the perfect son."

The parents of Rifleman Murphy, Brian and Jill, said: "Joe died doing the job he loved whilst serving his country. Our thoughts and prayers go out to his comrades in Afghanistan."

Rifleman Simpson leaves an eight-month-old son, Alfie.

The names of the dead were released as it was announced that two US marines were killed yesterday.

In an interview with the British Forces Broadcasting Service, Prime Minister Gordon Brown acknowledged that it was proving to be a "difficult summer" for the troops in Afghanistan. "These sacrifices that have hurt so many families in our country are ones that the whole of Britain will want to acknowledge," he said.

He said he had been assured by commanders that the Operation Panther's Claw offensive to drive the Taleban from central Helmand province was making "considerable progress".

Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said the eight British deaths would have a considerable effect on troops in Helmand. He praised the commitment of the armed forces, say-ing: "Their successes will mean our streets at home are safe from the threat from terrorism."

UK ROLE 'CRITICAL' SAYS OBAMA

PRESIDENT Barack Obama has praised the efforts of British armed forces fighting in Afghanistan, saying they were protecting the UK from a terrorism risk that was at times higher than that faced by the USA.

Mr Obama said his heart went out to families of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan as he and the Prime Minister warned of more tough fighting to come this summer.

"Great Britain has played an extraordinary role in this coalition, understanding that we can not allow either Afghanistan or Pakistan to be a safe haven for al-Qaeda, those who with impunity blow up train stations in London or buildings in New York," Mr Obama said.

"The likelihood of a terrorist attack in London is just as high, if not higher, than it is in the US, that's the reason why Tony Blair and now Gordon Brown have made this commitment. It is not because they wish to put their young men and women in harm's way.

"The contribution of the British is critical."


Page 1 of 1

 
1

Sylvia in Regina,

Canada 13/07/2009 00:29:24
How absolutely terrible... My heart breaks for the families of these young men, who really are still children, as so many of them were teenagers!!

May God grant them eternal peace.
2

Fletty73,

Stirling 13/07/2009 00:58:18
Tragic waste indeed. Especially considering we are invading the wrong country.

Obama should know better that the London Bombers came from Manchester whilst the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
3

williamx,

Canada 13/07/2009 02:28:44
Everybody knows the 9/11 boys came from Saudi Arabia but then so does all that light sweet crude. Surprised Blair Bush did not pick Scotland as the land to invade. Would have been even less casualties. Wonder what stopped them. Ah yes-no WMD and no oil.
4

Finlang,

Hong Kong 13/07/2009 02:59:27
#3

Scotland - no oil? Nearly 40 years of it and its revenues flowing in a southerly direction. Lots of unnecessary WMDs too.



5

,

13/07/2009 05:08:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

dave A,

NZ 13/07/2009 06:13:56
Well,Obama would say that wouldnt he "UK role critical"
because none of the other so called allies in Afghanistan are right up the sharp end as our lads are.
They have more sense.
7

steve 1511,

aberdeen 13/07/2009 06:22:54
our servicemen have been betrayed by this labour government
8

Rabhairt,

Australia 13/07/2009 06:42:20
LEST WE FORGET



They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
Lest we forget.
R.I.P sincere condolences to their families and Friends, from an old "Digger'.
9

donald,

glasgow 13/07/2009 06:47:35
18 has always been the accepted age of British service personnel, whether in World Wars, National Service or Imperialist invasions.

At 18 years of age I was sitting on my kitbag on an ageing Valletta bomber on my way to Cyprus and the Middle East. None of us questioned the age qualification, or poor equipment, as compared to the Yanks. Few were politically conscious of anything, except the next meal, the next beer and most were fooled by the recruiting adverts to boost National Service.

I must have been one of the few, questioning the ethos of reactionary British Nationalism and to fall foul of the Army's Special Investigation Branch.
10

Russell M,

Stirling 13/07/2009 06:59:50
How many of our sons and daughters have to die in this ill advised war before we call T Blair to account. Blair began his reign by vilifying 57,000 British Sportsmen for the actions of one before turning his ire against Afghanistan. Who, unlike us, has a long history of fighting back. Imperialism does not work either abroad or at home. If we are to save our culture and our nation we must clean the rogues out of political and corporate leadership. And to do that we need the basic tools starting with a written constitution limiting government and a bill of rights empowering the people.
11

John Cameron,

St Andrews 13/07/2009 07:06:46
I knew a number of the leading members of ZANU Labour in their student days. They fought like ferrets in a sack. The one thing that united them was their contempt for the military and this was especially true of Gordon Brown. General Dannatt is justified in his belief that the PM has no interest in Phony Tony's “silly wars”. He has his own agenda and it is simply a distraction. From the start he blocked every effort to provide the resources to equip our soldiers. He has been compared to Richard Nixon, but at least Nixon extricated the USA from the Vietnamese quagmire he inherited. The Great Ditherer must realize that the situation is impossible since the Taliban can win by not losing. So what is our war aim - to kill ALL the people in Afghanistan? In the end the greatest problem is that Brown neither believes in the war nor does he have the guts to cross the Americans by pulling out.
12

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 13/07/2009 07:07:39
#9 So you are also one of the "old and the bold", I will refrain therefore from commenting on your politics.
13

Udith Fonseka,

Kandy Sri Lanka 13/07/2009 08:13:08
Use your own soldiers to secure your own borders. And/or properly staff your visa sections in your High Commissions.
14

Oldhabits,

Bristol 13/07/2009 08:29:26
#11

A good article. However, can someone please explain to me why Labour has always had a contempt for the military.
15

me150,

13/07/2009 09:03:39
They were soldiers. Be they 17 or 70 they knew, understood and accepted the risks involved. Being teenagers they had the choice not to join up with the knowledge of recent military history.

They were killed, this is tragic, but all part of being part of a military fighting force.
16

me150,

13/07/2009 09:13:01
I shiver at the extremely poor attitude towards peace and rights of civilians in these posts.

Of course the war against terrorism is right, there is no two ways about it.

Unless of course you don't give a damn about anyone in a country ruled by dictators or in countries without the power to stop radicals and terrorists killing freely and taking control. This is what would happen without global action and it would only be a matter of time before these groups wanted to expand their activities.

War has changed, we have to accept this and deal with it. The alternative, eventually the growing might of the terrorists would seriously threaten the entire globe.

Better to attempt to rid us of this threat now than to sit back and ignore it as it would appear a lot of people want to do.
17

Bruce's spider,

13/07/2009 09:22:01
What a dumb war to be fighting. No one has ever defeated the Afghans and ISAF will fare no better. Its disappointing that a President who promised so much has already fallen back upon the cliches of his predecessor namely the likelihood of a terrorist attack on these shores being high. By invading countries like Iraq and Afghanistan we give the disparate strands of extreme Islam reason to find common cause and this only increases the likelihood of terrorism not reduces it. Terrorism is a term like Swine Flu which is used to put fear into the public and persuade them that our leaders know what they're doing when clearly they're out of touch and don't have any idea of what they're doing. After the WMD lies I don't trust our leaders or so called experts in the field any more. Troops out now and let the Afgans sort their own future out.
18

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 13/07/2009 09:37:43
No wonder Obama praises the involvement of the UK. Did anyone else see a contribution of any magnitude from any other NATO country? The boys dying out their are British and American.

#14 - correct - we go to the lengths of invading a foreign country and in the meantime the way we police our own borders means that there are many more risks from illegal immigrants with ill intent than there are from Afghanistan.

Brown does not want to know about the war, that much is plain. He'd rather squander the money on 3rd world dictators or our idle than that. Plus he can't afford to cut down on immigration legal or otherwise because - ye - this is a source of VOTES - much more important than giving the squaddies half a chance.
19

blackley,

Edinburgh 13/07/2009 09:45:10
Stop the war and bring the troops home. We've got enough problems here with drunken mayhem in our streets and towns and decent folk unable to go out at night.
Let the Army loose on some of the yobs at home instead of trying to meddle in a country far away.
20

mr broon,

Edinburgh 13/07/2009 09:45:33
Prior to these recent losses, the total number of coalition casualties in Afghanistan was 1,205.

US losses are 712, the UK 179, and Canada 122.
The other coalition forces have lost a total of 254
men and women.

Spain has also lost 87 members of its armed forces, 62 of whom were killed in a plane crash, similar to the UK Chinook and Hercules air disasters.

The US has always had the largest contingent in Afghanistan, followed by Canada, the UK, and Germany, which has lost 38 personnel.

The US has the largest force in Afghanistan followed by the British and Canadians.

21

Willie Mor,

13/07/2009 10:01:05
With boy soldiers the Ministry of Defence know exactly what they are doing by holding teenage soldiers off active service until they reach their eighteenth birthday.

#22 hits the mark exactly when he says that the MOD want fresh faced youngsters with zero world experience who can be drilled into the commodity required.

And yes, given the MOD reluctance to provide proper equipment, it is clear that these kids are expendable as they cost a lot less than a helicopter or a properly armoured transport vehicle.

Of course when Blair declared war and that the army could have everything it wanted, he was only kidding because he knew that his chancellor would never allow it given the arithmetic.

Tragic but true.
22

Thistledhu,

13/07/2009 10:46:10
A lot of ill advised distastefull post here.

This is a fight the civilised world can not afford to lose if Afghanistan falls to the Taliban so will pakistan. Result a nuclear capable Al Queda/taliban controling two large country,s

My deepest condolences to the family and freinds of the soldiers Killed.

Someones Son
Someones Brother
Someones Huband/Partner
Someones Mate

They Grow Not Old.
23

Thistledhu,

13/07/2009 11:22:10
25 Re jigging A persons words while deleteing other parts of the post is a form of censorship worthy of Terrorists and there supporters.
24

Thistledhu,

13/07/2009 11:28:41
no i dont support labour. Fairly fond of democracy though and the free speech that goes with it you obviousley Are not.
25

Thistledhu,

13/07/2009 11:48:44
#22 MACGREGOR DESPITE THEM
Spot on
26

qohldr,

13/07/2009 12:03:05
My condolences to the families and friends of these brave lads.

#13
You seem to have changed your tune, yesterday you were insinuating they were murderers.

#16
You are right every one who joins are told of the dangers from their first visit to or from the recruitment teams.
Every one serving knows that they may be sent to war and lose their life but those who send them have a care of duty to ensure they have the right equipment to carry out the tasks set with the minimum of risk.
27

Boab,

13/07/2009 12:28:28
#17 me120:

'Unless of course you don't give a damn about anyone in a country ruled by dictators or in countries without the power to stop radicals and terrorists killing freely and taking control.'

Seems strange your idealism has held out over the last decade, but here goes: we support the brutal dictatorships in Saudi Arabia and Algeria because they keep selling us oil; North Korea have WMD but no oil, so we leave them alone; the Taleban don't seriously threaten anyone, unless you're trying to protect the oil pipelines going to Europe from Central Asia, which is why we're fighting this war.
28

Oldhabits,

Bristol 13/07/2009 12:34:03
#19

Spot on!1 I am disappointed that more are not agreeing with you.

I wonder even if we were to defeat the Taliban in the next 12 months if we in the UK would be any safer?

A smokescreen to hide the fact that the real danger has been created by Gordon Brown with his open border policy, as you say all for votes!!

I really wish that the British public would see sense and get rid of this deceiptful man. The sooner the better!!
29

Tartan Viking,

13/07/2009 12:44:03
There are two tragedies here.

The tragic loss of the lives of these brave men.

And the fact the perpetrator Tony Bliar is walking about in luxury with millions of pounds in his bank account. A tragedy we let this guy get away with it.

30

Thistledhu,

13/07/2009 13:53:31
Boab, There is no oil pipeline through Afghanistan A simple straight fact.
31

Dylan fan,

Planet earth 13/07/2009 14:05:48

Dreamers
I suppose terrorists can plan and strike randomly at will. It is a tough fight.
Will man ever evolve into a creature that can settle things without killing his fellow-man? We can go to the moon, Mars, conquer disease..We so desperately want to live and survive..long years into the future on one hand... Then get involved in a maiming/killing war with zelots of hate....sending our youngest-finest to face them for us all! We can't sanction them economically, because they live in the rocks and are supported by others with very little,we can't reason with them because they are filled with hate for us all, it seems. We need to break this circle of hate/war... We MUST evolve as human beings...
32

Beachcomber,

Edinburgh 13/07/2009 14:36:53
#34 Thistledhu

The simple straight fact is there is a Pipeline through
Afghanistan..

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html


Our very brave young men and woman, laying their lives down for a rotten corrupt government of wasters and liars.. Off with their bl**dy heads..

33

Boab,

Glasgow 13/07/2009 15:02:56
#34 Thistledhu

I had to look it up but you're right there: no pipeline through Afghanistan as we speak, although there are several through neighbouring reasons. I'm speculating that the West are trying to create pro-western governments to protect their oil interests, using terrorism as an excuse.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1626889.stm

I got the pipeline theory from Nafeez Ahmad's book 'The London Bombings'. The fact remains, very few people over 12 in the entire planet think that the war on terror is about something other than oil.
34

Il Penseroso,

Inverurie 13/07/2009 15:24:25
#33 TV I hope more people read your post. This whole debacle has been caused by that smiling assassin Blair and his accomplice Bush. The Republicans and New Labour drafted the plans that have led to all the killings, military and civilians.These two should be put in front of an international court and tried. I remember the look on that evil man Blair when he was confronted by a journalist at his weekly meeting after the invasion. The lad asked him "are you now content to have blood on your hands". That was a killer blow and I wish Blair had dropped on the floor. Of course Brown aided and abetted Blair to get his o.k. for him to be the next P.M. Well he's got it and he'll go down in history as the first unelected PM to call an election and get thrown out when it comes. All his kissing of Blair's backside amounts to nothing and Blair walks off a multi millionaire. What a nightmare that must be for Ooor Gordon. What a disaster that man has turned out to be.
35

qohldr,

13/07/2009 15:37:22
#37
The Labour Party clearly supports the murder of innocents in Afghanistan as it has singularly failed to rein in its leaders.

Your words, I am positive neither Blair, Brown or any other member of the Labour party have pulled the trigger or dropped the bomb that killed any one.
As they are not committing these murders personally then some one must be committing them on their behalf.
Please enlighten on exactly who you believe these murderers are.
36

Allan(handofgod137),

13/07/2009 15:51:07
Here's an idea, why don't the relatives of those whos deaths would have been prevented by having the proper equipment get together with the no win no fee lawers, and bring a class action, naming those MPs who have been padding their expense, including, the relatives who benefited, eg C.Blair, who's armourd limo was paid for by the taxpayer, on the grounds that the money these b@sdt@rds stole could have been better spent on body armour and suitable vehicles.
37

John Cameron,

St Andrews 13/07/2009 16:21:29
War imposes moral obligations, especially upon those who send men into action. If they will the end, they must will the means. In Afghanistan, this only required the basic tools of modern warfare, such as modern armoured vehicles and helicopters. Without them, we are effectively reduced to WWII methods. The C.O. of the Welsh Guards was driven to his battalion's front-line positions, as he would have been in 1945. If a helicopter had been available, he might still be alive. There have been endless warnings but ZANU Labour has taken no notice. Wherever there is out-dated equipment, whenever men's lives have been endangered by a failure to spend small sums, the fingerprints of one man are always to be found: Gordon Brown. In 1997, the Chief of the Defence Staff, Charles Guthrie, offered to brief every Cabinet minister on defence. All were briefed except Brown who could not be bothered. The only time he is interested is when there was a prospect of some warship construction at the Rosyth shipyard, in his constituency. Otherwise, he is his usual negative, surly, unpleasant self. However since he became PM he has cynically tried to wrap himself in khaki whenever he thinks that there might be votes in it. Yet he has done nothing to remedy the deficiencies which he spent ten years creating. His interest in military matters is on a par with his talk about values and the family: a contemptible abuse of language and decency.
38

qohldr,

13/07/2009 17:13:30
#44
Well why don't you enlighten me? Blair, Brown or member of the Labour party are not personally committing these murders yet you say they are murderers.
Some one must be murdering on their behalf so tell me who is it.
39

qohldr,

13/07/2009 18:10:28
Why wont you answer the question? who is committing these murders on behalf of Blair, Brown and the Labour party.
You have declared them as being murderers yet they have not personally murdered anyone so who is committing these murders.
You know they have murdered so who is doing it for them why wont you say.
40

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/07/2009 20:28:12
40 If someone is killed as a result of an illegal act who do you hold to be the murderer. In the straightforward instance it would need to be the person who committed the act, but you can't do that here. It's the men who made the decision start the War that we hold responsible for the illegitimate deaths.

The cassus belli 9the legal justification) for the war was that Iraq had WMD which could be dispatched within 45 minutes and posed a threat to the UK. Lord Goldsmith (eventually) ruled that there was enough in law to justify the invasion, that the tests had been met (with the dodgy dossier presented to the Parliament).

What we are saying is that the cassus belli was false, and that Tony Blair, John Scarlett, Lord Goldsmith, and sundry others with privy access to the facts knew it was false. What we are saying is that they fixed the facts around the policy and manufactured evidence to appear to be complying with the law.

That is why we hold Blair et al responsible for the subsequent deaths.

It's complicated but that is a summary for you.
41

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/07/2009 20:31:19
40 Sorry I think I picked you up wrong I was talking about Iraq. In relation to Aghanistan none of this is illegal it is an international operation. But it is remarkably stupid and there is enough evidence available to more or less prove that this action will be unsuccessful. So no they are not murderers in the case of Afghanistan, they just have moral responsibility for these deaths, not legal responsibility.
42

eamon,

13/07/2009 23:17:27
The graveyard of empires might be the end for the American war machine. If we built schools and hospitals in Afghanistan, as well as gave them alternative crops to grow instead of poppies, we might see light at the end of the tunnel. Its very hard to convince a man, woman or child to fight against somebody if they have just educated you or saved your daughters life.
43

Billy Boy,

Sherman Oaks Californiacation 15/07/2009 20:50:41
Will Aldridge, A poor under-educated boy who never had the chance to be a man. Another ghost in the Blair Legacy,I hope they haunt his every dream!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.