Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Christmas spirit off limits as police halt shops' mulled wine tradition

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 December 2008
POLICE have used anti-social behaviour laws to stop shopkeepers handing out mulled wine to customers as part of a village's Christmas celebrations.
Traders are angry that officers from Fife Constabulary moved in to stamp out a practice that has been a tradition in Anstruther for 17 years.

They have been told they must apply for an alcohol licence in future for the event, which begins the East
Neuk community's festive season.

Police said shopkeepers were sending out the "wrong message" when officers were trying to tackle alcohol abuse and underage drinking in the area.

The festive tipple was handed out by several shops when they stayed open late two weeks ago.

Martin Dibley, the secretary of the Royal Burgh of Kilrenny, Anstruther and District Community Council, said: "It's a bit of 'bah, humbug'."

Mr Dibley, who runs a pet shop in the village, said: "In a small community you know your customers, who are also your neighbours, and this was to thank them for a year's business. I found the police's action a wee bit strange, but then we live in strange politically correct times."

Another trader said: "Giving adults a glass of spicy mulled wine to celebrate Christmas can hardly be compared to throwing vodka down a teenager's throat. The whole thing was hardly done in the Christmas spirit."

Elizabeth Gordon, who lives in the village, said police were telling shop owners they would "nick" them if they gave out mulled wine.

She added: "Meanwhile, I saw three young people pouring their Buckfast into lemonade bottles up the street. Where were the police then?"

However, the police said they had to be even handed.

Inspector David Brown said: "Preventing misuse of alcohol is a key commitment of Fife Constabulary and requires rigorous enforcement of the by-laws banning drinking and carrying of open containers of alcohol in public places.

"While our emphasis is on using the by-laws to target alcohol abuse and underage drinking in the Anstruther area, it would send out the wrong message if we were to permit drinking in public for other groups of people.

"However, groups organising events where alcohol is to be served either indoors or outdoors can apply for an occasional licence from the licensing board.

"This is an inexpensive option which ensures they can enjoy their event and we can continue to tackle the underage drinking and anti-social behaviour, which we know is a source of concern for the whole community."

Elizabeth Riches, a local councillor who lives in the village, said the police found themselves in an awkward position.

She said: "They probably had to act when they heard about this. It's regrettable, but they are damned if they do and damned if they don't."


BACKGROUND

DRINKING in public places has been banned in many areas of Scotland under local by-laws.

The restriction was introduced by local authorities following a successful experiment in parts of Galashiels, Motherwell and Dundee 15 years ago.

It now covers around 500 towns and villages across the country.

The ban was introduced after ministers agreed that public drinking could adversely affect the quality of life for residents.

Some councils have gone further, with South Ayrshire banning the possession of an open container of alcohol in a designated place.

This is intended to avoid the difficulty of proving that someone had been drinking if they were not seen to be doing so.

The Scottish Government said such bylaws have significantly reduced the nuisance and disorder associated with public drinking.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 December 2008 9:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 24/12/2008 00:09:53
Obviously an easy option for the polis!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 00:29:48



Salmond 'HAS'! A lot to Answer for!

Any 'The Wonder' Votes are Lost??


3

Guga II,

Rockall 24/12/2008 01:36:22
Typical heavy handed attitude of the police; and they expect us to trust them to run an intelligence database. I wouldn't trust them to run a kindergarten sweetie shop.
4

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 24/12/2008 01:43:56
Anymore of that sh*t Guga and you will be arrested under the anti terrorism law!

You don't have to be paranoid to know they are out to get you nowadays!
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 01:57:45


Donnie Murdo ~4,

Well! "Guga II" Is being a little serious this-morning!

All I can say, to further this Madness, brought on by the,....

....'Scottish Parliament' DON'T FORGET!!!!!

God Help these Shop Keepers if they hand out the forbidden Smokes, as in Cigars! to celebrate our traditional,,,,,


,,,,,'New Year'!

...'VOTED IN, NOW TO ONLY PROVE, THEY WANT TO DESTROY SCOTTISH HERITAGE'!!

.....WELL-DONE, WELL-DONE INDEED!,......'NOT'!!!!



6

Scunnert,

http://scunnert-nation.blogspot.com/ 24/12/2008 01:59:48
And here was me thinking the polis were there to protect our way of life not destroy it. Jerks.
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 02:03:51


Scunnert ~6,

Don't Blame the "polis", they are only carrying out instruction's from Mr Salmond!


8

Scunnert,

http://scunnert-nation.blogspot.com/ 24/12/2008 02:13:07
7 Charles Linskaill

I don't think Salmond is that petty or stupid.
9

bill inch,

EDINBURGH 24/12/2008 02:34:41
Nulled whine ten.
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 03:03:44

Scunnert ~8,

The latter, is more the Case!


11

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 24/12/2008 05:15:02
Prevention of crimne is one of the police's basic functions - this initiative should be supported, if only to ensure that consumption of mulled wine does not lead to mass outbreaks of the 'Hokey Cokey'

Be very araid.
12

overton,

aberdeen 24/12/2008 06:56:33
Yet another attempt by the Police to criminalise law abiding people so that the criminals don't appear to be victimised - and we pay for the privilege.
It's a funny old politically correct world we live in these days!
13

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 07:02:23
I suspect that Mr Linskaill has already been over indulging somewhat in the mulled wine.
14

Regulator,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 07:13:54
At least when the Police are tackling shop keepers and Hokey Cokey singers, they are not putting themselves in danger by tackling hardened criminals.
15

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 24/12/2008 07:20:31
Soon you'll no be able to phart without a licence.
16

observer9,

24/12/2008 09:00:04
For every acting force there is an opposite reacting force.

Therefore I hope the put upon shopkeepers and Anstruther locals put an equal amount of pressure on the police to comply with the law when a crime is reported to them.

This edict is ludicrous, are the police living in glass houses? If so, when you need them keep lobbing stones at them, dont let them rest, keep them on thier feet and ensure they follow up and pursue "peoper" criminality.

17

alsirat,

Embra 24/12/2008 09:17:39
Our Church wants to run a coffee shop, mainly for pensioners or house parents and sell home made cakes (at a price just to cover the cost) as a service to the Community. Not allowed. Every home where the cakes are made would have to have a licence, and meet a raft of regulations designed for restaurants. We are not selling booze here, and our purpose is innocent enough.
18

Snails dont like curry and chips,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 09:21:24
We are living in "politically correct times" says Mr Dibley - substitute "politically correct" with "the beginning of Stalinist Russian" and you have got it right. This country is being taken over by a bunch of self righteous control freaks who need to be dealt with at the next election! This moronic nonsense cannot be tolerated.
19

11+failed,

the pans 24/12/2008 09:39:11
That public relations disaster bug infecting the Met seems to be spreading!
20

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:08:49
Who......let

CHARLES! ....the random


out of his padded room ?
21

Hugh Roscombe,

24/12/2008 10:09:53
1 Petty.
2 Búgger all to do with the SNP
3 Charles Linskaill is shooting blanks again.
22

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:18:57
since you all seem to be having a little trouble with this....picture the scene

Some local politician dying for a wee feather in his cap starts to hassle the local plod about the neds. The local chief inspector plod also sees this as a big ol' feather in the cap opporchancity so decides he'll do something BIG to sort out this problem. They then ban the drinking of alcohol on the streets so they have an excuse to stop and hassle the teenagers (coz that's easier than finding them something to do).

Of course then the local mp and the local chief inspector plod have to get together for a wee photo opporchancity to pat each other on the back and talk about how much they're improving their community.

simple enough really




23

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 10:20:38
This obsession with controlling everything has got to stop. It has reached insane proportions.

#28:

1 Petty.

Agreed.

2 Búgger all to do with the SNP

Oh yeah? And who is it who is advocating massive, unfair crackdowns on alcohol at present? who is it that is proposing to hit hundreds of thousands of innocent people in the hope of pursuing a tiny minority who can't handle their drink? Who is it that actively supports crackdowns on alcohol related matters and would dearly like to see regulations tightened up even further?

Unless I am very much mistaken or have been in a coma dreaming about this for the past 18 months, I would say that the person in question is Kenny McAskill---the SNP Justice Minister. Because the SNP leadership has done nothing whatsoever to curtail McAskill's actions, by implication they support his daft views. And other SNP ministers have actually stated this, including Gruppenfurhrer Robison.

Fair enough, McAskill may not be DIRECTLY responsible for this, but he has been instrumental in facilitating it due to his incessant rantings about drink. Senior coppers tend to fall in line with politicians if they want to keep being senior coppers. If this knee-jerking about alcohol didn't exist then the mulled wine would continue to be handed out and no doubt the village bobby would enjoy a tipple himself whilst chatting to the residents.

3 Charles Linskaill is shooting blanks again.

I wouldn't know anything about that!
24

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:25:13
Rab the Ranter....you seem to know a lot about vermin, maybe you should get new friends ?

Unfortunately for you, we have this clever system worked out where people vote for who they want to run the country and....(and this is the really clever bit) whoever gets the most votes wins and gets to be heid honcho.

The people of Scotland decided they wanted the SNP to have a wee go at that, and in the eyes of the majority of voters in this wee neck of the woods....they are doing a damn good job, a much better job in fact than the scum who have taken our money and made false promises while they sold us down the river for years (or NEW Labour as they like to be known)
25

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 10:29:46
#22:

You have my sympathies. Rules such as those to which you refer were designed for commercial restaurants in order to control serious health risks due to cutting corners in order to make money. They were never intended to be applied to church coffe shops and the like. It is ridiculous to try to apply them because there is no way that the people you are talking about would be able to meet them.

The same thing applies to health and safety regulations nowadays as well. The original idea behind H&S regs was to control real hazardous environments like shipyards, mines, foundries, machine shops etc. They were never intended to be applied to offices and the like. It is plainly ridiculous that before putting up a christmas tree in an office, someone has to carry out a risk assesment. I tell you what, if you put many of these H&S jobsworths in a real hazardous environment, they would cr4p themselves.
26

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 10:32:42
#31:

"...we have this clever system worked out where people vote for who they want to run the country..."

It's not a clever system at all. It's a stupid system. We should have a meritocracy, not a democracy. People should have to pass a psychometric test before they are granted a full vote.

After all, you wouldn't call the plumber to ask his advice if you had toothache would you? In the same way that if you had a leaky tap, you wouldn't give the dentist a ring.
27

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:36:51
H&S laws applying to any premises that sells food are in place for a very good reason. Food produced for sale to the public must be prepared in a suitable environment, which means a kitchen that has been passed as fit for the purpose. If we could all just make food at home and sell it wherever we wanted food poisoning would be a much more serious problem than it is. This applies to restaurants and wee church coffee shops i'm afraid, and in this case the laws that are in place are exactly what we need.
28

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:38:22
#31 genious

so what you are really saying is don't let the dafties vote, because in their ignorance they might vote for someone different to you ?
29

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 10:50:36
#35:

No. What I'm saying is don't let the dafties vote because they don't understand enough about what they are voting for and we end up with the kind of government(s) we have now. One has destroyed the economy of the country, both have created a nanny state and one is more concerned about bl00dy fag machines and who uses them than the economic future of Scotland.

Both stupid labour and the SNP governments are products of people voting with their hearts rather than their heads. Oh yeah! How romantic... A Free Scotland... Only it won't be free if the SNP have their way because all freedom of choice will be removed from the individual and we will be living like puritan sheep.

That's what you get when you give idiots the vote. They vote for idiots. If you don't believe me, look at stupid labour's lack of economic policy, the SNP's plans to hit the law-abiding majority in order to control the law-breaking minority and the list of "achievements" of the Scottish Parliament since it came into being---A hunting ban, a smoking ban and the scrapping of a £1 bridge toll. Yeah. Fantastic.
30

BorderLineScottish,

24/12/2008 10:51:50
Ha ha! What muppets?

As if responsible, established shop owners would be dishing out the 'potent' mulled wine to the hoards of neds, who, no doubt, were queuing around the block instead of getting their usual cases of Buckfast from the unscrupulous licensee down the road.

PC gone mad!
31

BorderLineScottish,

24/12/2008 10:56:08
She added: "Meanwhile, I saw three young people pouring their Buckfast into lemonade bottles up the street. Where were the police then?"

How thick are the neds? Surely Coke bottles would have been better seeing as Buckfast is a different colur to lemonade!

Or was she just adding a bit of embellishment to spice up the tale?
32

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 10:57:18
#36 - I'll just make all your decisions for you because you need protecting from your own fragile pea-sized brain.....is that how it works in your fantasy ?

there is really not much you can say to arrogance like that, except thank f*&k you're not in charge
33

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 11:10:37
#39:

It's not arrogance.

Clearly you are prepared to put up with the insane situation where people who do not have a proper understanding of things are allowed to contribute to decision-making.

Tell you what, if you run a business, I bet you don't put all board decisions to the entire workforce and moreover, invite them all to have a say in who makes up the main board. If anyone ran a business like that, it would go under---very quickly. Why should we run a country like that? It just doesn't make sense. And the evidence is plain to see.
34

DeniseX,

24/12/2008 11:23:31
Where's the Christmas 'spirit'?
35

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 24/12/2008 11:50:50
#40 - here's the thing....if I owned a business it would be mine, therefore the decisions would be mine to make, unfortunately we have to share Scotland....yes, yes I know, even with the dafties....inconvenient tho it may be for you

So yes, to suggest that some people are to stupid to have a say in who runs THEIR affairs is absolute arrogance......what would you call it ?
36

Toast,

24/12/2008 11:57:34
#40 fascist jerk,go and live in Zimbabwe,you and Mugabe are totally in tune,he knows best as well.
37

yockel,

24/12/2008 12:19:43
Kenny will be wanting the Kirk issued with a license before holding communion next.

Mind you it might just be that the Polis have acted unlawfully, again.
38

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 12:29:40
#43:

"to suggest that some people are to stupid to have a say in who runs THEIR affairs is absolute arrogance......what would you call it?"

You are missing the point. What I am saying is that in order to make an informed decision on something, you have to first understand the problem. A significant percentage of people do not understand the proverbial problem.

Take an example. It was labour's incompetence in their building the economy on credit that has made things a lot worse than they needed to be. What is their proposed fix? To "get borrowing started again". Even a kid a secondary school could see that the way out of a problem caused by debt is not going to be solved by more debt. Then we have the other "measures" they have taken (too numerous to list here) which put the country perilously close to absolute bankruptcy and hold it up as a shining beacon of gross incompetence.

Yet despite all this, given a 2.5% cut in VAT, (plus a RISE in fuel duty, alcohol duty and tobacco duty) and the government's preparedness to FORCE banks to start lending has people supporting them in droves.

Now, apart from political bias, is the sudden surge in support for this kind of incompetence logical? Is it the act of sane people? Does it demonstrate an understanding on the part of the supporters? The answers are plainly a resounding NO! NO! NO!

If things carry on as they are then this bunch of fools who have already plainly demonstrated themselves to be incompetent might even stand a chance of getting re-elected. This would be an absolute disaster for Britain and should never be allowed to happen. The only reason it could happen is due to the fact that millions of people are simply too plain stupid to realise what is going on.

THAT is why some form of test is required to qualify for a full vote. In that way the direction of the country wouldn't be at risk of being determined by those who can only see the magical 2.5% VAT reduction and the promise of more easy c
39

gordon'sboomhasbust,

glasgow 24/12/2008 12:29:56
Lunatics definitely in charge of the asylum.
Asbo threats for shopkeepers trying to keep their businesses afloat during the worst recession since 1947.
And the local Lib Dem ( yes them again ) councillor Ms Riches who is depute leader of the council and on 7 committees says the police probably had to act. And it is regrettable.
She should be fighting tooth and nail for her little village and telling the police where to go.
But she obviously has a cushy post and won't want to rock the boat.
40

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 12:30:11
(cont)

...and the promise of more easy credit. This isn't arrogance. It's logic.
41

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 12:32:00
#46:

Clearly you don't understand the difference between fascist dictatorship and meritocracy. Tell you what, go and look the words up an a dictionary and when you understand them properly, then you might qualify to comment on the matter.
42

gordon'sboomhasbust,

glasgow 24/12/2008 12:45:05
#34 Lee
H&S Laws had nothing to do with this story. What are you on about ?
The shopkeepers were warned under anti social order laws.
And then possibly licensing laws.
Then maybe H&S Laws.
And probably even anti discrimination laws no doubt as it may offend those religions who are against alcohol and so can't go into the shop.
Like I said before. We're busy thinking up laws to stop us doing things while the country goes down the tubes in Gordons massive bust.


43

Logie Almond,

24/12/2008 12:55:22
Not entirely clear whether they were giving the mulled wine away or selling it. If they were selling it the police were right. If it was given away the shopkeepers did not need a licence and the police had no authority to do what they did.It's typical of today's police force to go for a soft target such as this.
44

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 13:00:00
#34:

Lee,

If you went to the village in question and didn't wish to drink the free mulled wine, no-one would be compelling you to do so. Likewise, if you went to a church fete and chose not to sample the cakes made by the local WI, no-one would be compelling you to do so.

On the other hand, if you do decide to partake, you do so at your own risk. Quite simple really isn't it?
45

gordon'sboomhasbust,

glasgow 24/12/2008 13:00:30
#53
It's quite clear in the article Logie.
The wine was ' handed out ' by the shopkeepers to ' thank them [ customers ] for a years business '
46

Tarchin,

Lothian 24/12/2008 13:12:58
Why not serve a non-alcoholic punch based on spiced fruit juice(s). We have served this at Christmas and New Year to drivers, children and people who don't want to drink alcohol. There several recipes on the net. Hot Kinderpunsch with a 'Parlie' is a real treat.
47

gordon'sboomhasbust,

glasgow 24/12/2008 13:27:10
#56
Sounds nice but you should never pander or compromise to the PC brigade. It only encourages them and helps make Scotland a worse place to live.
48

baroda,

Spain 24/12/2008 13:49:14
Glad i dont live in the uk anymore. The lunatics are now running the asylum.
The police would rather do the easy work than go and catch the real neds.
Whats all this about the hokey coakey.Surely nobody is going to take any notice of this absurd ban
I thought the wall came down in 1990 but looks like its been exported to the uk.
Someday you may get a sensible elected government instead of a bunch of lunatics.But again you get who you vote for.

GB. R.I.P.
49

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 14:43:06
#59:

"But again you get who you vote for."

Which brings us round again to the point I was making earlier...
50

Hugh Roscombe,

24/12/2008 14:54:52
Every shop here has on the counter a selection of sweets, biscuits, cakes and alcoholic beverages. No-one seems to mind. The local policeman was just in front of me in the baker's this morning. He had a strong drink plus a sweet. He then drove off on his motorbike.
51

thesmallerhalf,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 14:56:19
Can the inspector explain how a piece of paper prevent alcohol abuse? This appears to be a typically stupid example of tick box bureaucracy. It covers the police's backside legally, costs the public money and achieves precisely nothing tangible. Or have there been outbreaks of drunken shoppers reeling about Anstruther having overimbibed free mulled wine.

This type of stupidity brings further derision and contempt upon the head of the police and local authorities.
52

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 24/12/2008 18:36:12
sounds a little heavy handed by police but then again, perhaps people are taking advantage of the "free" Christmas cheer and are causing accidents. Still, it's sad to see another tradition fall to the way-side. Some people ruin it for most of the responsible people and that is a shame. Anyway, MErry Christmas from this side of the pond.
53

Sanny,

Glasgow 24/12/2008 19:17:10
And I stupidly thought it was only the Met in London that suffered from the Excessive PC Madness.
The Police - in all parts of the Union need to remember that in these islands they Police by Consent of the People or has someone turned us into a Police state without our noticing?
54

Sanny,

Glasgow 24/12/2008 19:17:11
And I stupidly thought it was only the Met in London that suffered from the Excessive PC Madness.
The Police - in all parts of the Union need to remember that in these islands they Police by Consent of the People or has someone turned us into a Police state without our noticing?
55

Sanny,

Glasgow 24/12/2008 19:19:25
Sorry; I think I must have doubled clicked!
56

DeniseX,

24/12/2008 19:38:33
It's all to do with the police carrying out Government control.
57

FerryPort,

24/12/2008 20:41:07
Was I sleeping or did a new law get passed here. I'm sure it is lawful to offer an alcoholic drink to another adult (unless it's in a designated area where this has been banned and generally outdoors)
That can't surely be classed as anti-social behaviour. Oh those sneaky loop-holes. I am raging at this. And then Inspector Brown goes on to say if they have an occasional licence it's okay. So it's down to peice of bureaucratic paper. Nothing to do with anti-social behaviour in the first place. How to dampen community spirit. Idiots.
Take a look at some of our european counterparts. In the south of Spain, drinking is part of the community's culture, on the streets, granted they have the weather but they don't have the same alcohol related problems as we do here. In fact, the majority of the alcohol anti social behaviour problems I see there are caused by young English "tourists".

#30 #35 & #40 etc A(HO)F Head has really talked it's self into a corner.
58

stopcpdotcom,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 22:07:01
The Fife polis are controlled by Common Purpose who are out to destroy British traditions.

http://www.stopcp.com/cppolice.php
59

Darien,

Panama 24/12/2008 23:10:48
"Elizabeth Riches, a local councillor who lives in the village, said the police found themselves in an awkward position."

Must be a FibDum - sitting on the fence like that. This is an example of PC gone mad, symptomatic of NewLab and FibDum's.

#68 Ferryport: You have a point. Is giving a wee drink away to friends and neighbours now to be considered a crime?
60

Teofilio Cubillas,

25/12/2008 00:11:32
#53

Nonsense. There is a local by-law prohibiting the drinking of alcohol in public. Probably brought about by the very townsfolk now complaining when it is equitably applied to them.
61

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 25/12/2008 11:52:02




----------****MERRY CHRISTMAS****-----------


..........To All The Scotsman Readers........




62

Lee Hutchison,

Fife 26/12/2008 12:34:16
#48 - no, you are missing the point. what you are suggesting is that you know what's best for people because you are more intelligent and anyone not clever enough to pass a test should not be allowed to have any say in who runs the country....call it anything you want, but you are wrong....end of

#52 - i was commenting on two other posts in this article...#22 and # 32...is that ok with you ?

#53 - whether they were selling it or giving it away makes absolutely no difference as it is illegal to consume alcohol in a public place except for licensed premises......nothing to do with soft targets

#54 - if you make cakes in a kitchen that has not been passed as fit for purpose by Health and Safety and the Food Standards Agency, then you sell those cakes to the public you are breaking the law.....quite simple really isn't it ?

#58 - go and rant somewhere else, you're boring me...btw typing something in CAPITAL letters doesn't make it true.....

#71 - thank you ...a wee voice of reason, someone who finally understands that the very people complaining about this are the same people who pushed for this bye law to be passed in the first place.......but hey it's ok for me to stand drinking mulled wine on a street corner but it's not ok to wear a hoodie and stand drinking buckfast on that same corner......this whole article smacks of hypocrisy. The police cannot pick and choose what laws to uphold and what laws to ignore.....i think we should be pleased about that
63

Matt there,

Somewhere 26/12/2008 13:28:37
Inspector David Brown said nothing! All he came out with was "I speak your weight" machine PC madness.

Inspector David Brown is a clear example of someone promoted far, far above the limit of his minimal intelligence.
64

gordon'sboomhasbust,

lapland 26/12/2008 14:16:48
#73
Merry Christmas Lee
All of the points you make may be unfortunately true but doesn't that reflect the sad state of affairs in the UK at the moment ?
Shopkeepers can't even give their loyal customers a glass of wine in their own shop ( hardly drinking on a street corner ).
Wouldn't we be better finding remedies for broken Britain rather than ensuring everyone is forced to live under a police state in order to stop a handfull of yobs ruining it for all of us ?
65

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 08/02/2009 12:07:52
Dont forget as well all those caught offending will be sent to the SNP salt mines for ten years to dig up salt by hand for the roads. No mechanical diggers just a pick and shovel

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.