Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Biggest £½bn wind farm 'must go ahead'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2008
BUSINESS leaders last night called on the Scottish Government to back plans to build Europe's largest wind farm in the Outer Hebrides.
In an open letter to energy and enterprise minister Jim Mather, the signatories expressed fears that turning down the scheme on Lewis will be detrimental to the economy.

The letter says: "Failure to act will undermine the confidence of would-be i
nvestors and threaten the long-term sustainability of fragile rural economies."

It is signed by Stephen Boyd, assistant secretary of the STUC; Liz Cameron, executive director of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce; Peter Hughes, chief executive of Scottish Engineering; Alan Wilson, chief executive of the Scottish Council for Development and Industry; and Iain McMillan, director of CBI Scotland.

Their letter comes as a special meeting is due to be held today in an attempt stop the scheme being rejected. Western Isles Council has pressed the Scottish Government to approve the scheme, or show how otherwise it will revitalise the islands which are suffering chronic depopulation.

First Minister Alex Salmond has been urged to make an 11th-hour intervention in the decision to reject the £500 million scheme for 181 turbines. The move follows revelations last month that the Scottish Government is "minded to refuse" the wind-farm project on the environmentally sensitive Lewis peatlands, home to rare birds of prey such as golden eagles.

Mr Salmond is also being invited to the islands to hear first-hand how the wind-farm project would benefit and assist in meeting the government's renewables' targets.

The council's vice-convener, Angus Campbell, last week met Mr Mather to discuss economic development in the islands. Mr Campbell has claimed the scheme has majority support on the island – despite it receiving about 5,000 objections, including from community councils, various conservation bodies and the islands' MP, Angus MacNeil, and MSP Alasdair Allan, both Nationalists.

If the development went ahead, there would be 88 miles of road, eight electrical substations, 19 miles of overhead cables, 137 pylons, 18.3 miles of underground cables and five rock quarries. But it could also mean £6 million a year in local-community benefits, multi-million-pound leisure and sporting facilities in peripheral communities, plus at least 300 jobs.

There is speculation Lewis Wind Power will submit a smaller scheme for 60 turbines if the larger one is refused. The final decision rests with the Scottish Government and an official announcement is expected in two to three weeks.

TURBINE 'THREAT TO RADAR'

CONCERNS about wind turbines interfering with military radar are threatening government plans to boost renewable energy production.

The Ministry of Defence has already opposed at least four wind farms because they make it impossible to detect aircraft.

Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, insists that radar capability must not be impaired.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform , acknowledged there were "issues" over military radar and turbine sites.

An MoD spokesman denied the military would lodge objections to new plans, saying: "All applications are assessed on a site by site basis."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Navvy,

04/02/2008 02:38:46
300 jobs! for how long?
2

Guga II,

Rockall 04/02/2008 03:40:11
This whole project is based on a blatant lie, or, to be more precise, a series of blatant lies.

There may be 400 jobs on offer during the construction phase, but most of these jobs will go to people from outwith the islands; probably Poles as they can, and do, exploit them by paying them less than the going rate.

As for the alleged 70 ongoing jobs, that is utter rubbish. In the large scheme they built in Wales, there are only 3 full time ongoing jobs, and only one of them has gone to a local.

The people in the islands will not benefit in any way from the construction of these monstrosities. They will not get a halfpenny extra in their pocket, and they will not get cheaper electricity. The power from this scheme will be sold to England, and the profits will go to foreigners also.

These towers will be 487 feet high, and the proposal was for 187 of them spread out over an area the size of greater London. They will be blight on the landscape, and will not even be able to be utilised for a high percentage of the time because the winds will be too strong for them to operate.

Ignoring the numpties in the Comhairle, the majority of the people do not want, or need to have these monstrosities despoiling their island, especially when they will have no benefit from them. There is a lot to be said for bringing back annual elections for councils, otherwise these overpaid and underworked numpties will continue to do things against the wishes of the people. They should also remember that the church will not protect them, or ensure their re-election forever.

If they want to increase the population and the economy of the islands, the only way is to have Sunday ferries, and Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) on the ferries. Not by blighting the landscape for the benefit of foreigners.
3

williamx,

canada 04/02/2008 04:04:42
The scheme could go ahead so long as the development is a public company registered in Scotland. The company will also construct and pay for the power stations required to provide power when the wind is not blowing-like 70% of the time. Also, like new oil contracts in the rest of the world, the central government gets a 15% stake for free. Wind power anyone?
4

Kenny A,

04/02/2008 07:32:44
Two points from this artical that stand out.

1 Angus Campbell is either deluded or a lier of both. Even though duly elected, just. He seems to represent himself and big buissness not the people who actualy elected him. Long story regarding these elections.

2 I am not aware of anyone of the signaturies to this letter having anything to do with the Islands or ever having contributed to the economy of the Islands. I could be wrong on this but do not think so.

The Highlands and Islands were previously decimated by the Great White Sheep in the times of the clearences. Now it looks like it will be the turn of The Great White Elephants to cause the damage.
5

Boy Wonder,

04/02/2008 07:37:44
No no, a thousand times no to this monstrosity they want to foist on Scottish soil. If they want it so badly ... put them on the damn Pennines!
6

Kenny A,

04/02/2008 07:58:30
Its not vital to the economy, more than likly long term damage the economy.
7

Unimpressed one,

04/02/2008 08:14:27
"Failure to act will undermine the confidence of would-be investors and threaten the long-term sustainability of fragile rural economies." Strangely no mention of 'saving the planet'.
8

HA,

Beith 04/02/2008 09:03:05
It should be noted that one of the signatories Alan Wilson, former Labour Energy Minister and currently chief executive of the Scottish Council for Development and Industry is also an Senior Executive with Airtricity, one of the more profitable multi national players in the wind industry.

Scotland's main employer is tourism. The wind industry employs very few people after the initial (destructive) construction phase. Airtricity's Ardrossan windfarm, shares its TWO computer operating personnel with Community Wind Farms Limited in Dalry.

Concurrent with the proliferation of windfarms is the increase in our CO2 emissions. THIS IS ABOUT MONEY.
9

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 04/02/2008 09:08:30
There is not one piece of peer-reviewed study that agrees that man-made carbon dioxide emissions are in any way responsible for global warming. The planet is getting warmer at the very slow rate of 0.6 degrees per century - and has been doing so since at least 1742 when records began at Armagh Observatory.
This is part of a natural cycle of rising and falling global temperatures and it has very little to do with carbon dioxide. It is caused by deviations in the earth's orbit around the sun. Building windfarms all over Scotland will do nothing whatever to combat global warming - it will make some people very rich at taxpayers expense.
10

Deeko,

04/02/2008 09:29:11
Get Donald Trump to turn it into a crazy golf course. It'll sail through then...
11

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 04/02/2008 10:02:18
2. Guga claims that the wind farm will occupy an area 'the size of greater London.'

The area of greater London is 1600 square km.

The area of a rectangle drawn round the Lewis wind farm is 570 square km.

The area actually occupied by the wind farm, which is spread out in a straggly T shape north of Stornoway and leading to the NW coast, is far less than that.
12

Destroy the Planet,

04/02/2008 10:31:44
Dave, nae need tae get yer knickers in a twist. The fact that only 77 out of the 4000 odd letters to the comhairle agreed with the proposed developments says it all really. Naebody benefits from this bar people like Oppenhiem and Lomax's familys. There is a 'clearances' feel about the whole thing, disgraceful.
13

CallumIain,

Isle of Lewis 04/02/2008 11:20:45
16. What tripe. Put it into perspective. What says it all is that only 4,000 letters were received against it. There are far more for it. There are 20,000 adults in the Western Isles. Only 2,000 of the letters against were from island addresses - mainly people in well-paid jobs on the mainland who do not care tuppence that I have difficulty feeding my family because of lack of work here.
Still, we can starve gracefully on a beautiful island with an unspoilt moorland full of bloody birds. Some of you people make me sick.
14

Harbinger,

On a hillside far away 04/02/2008 11:57:01
#5 "put them on the damn Pennines!"

Unfortunately, they already are and any other place where London Politicians don't live. It would be interesting to see what would happen to a proposal to put them on Beachy Head, a very windy site, or on Box Hill or the Hog's Back, in Surrey. Spread them along the South Downs and see what the response would be. Greenpeace and FoE might find some of their affluent supporters fading into the distance.

In the meantime, global warming appears to have stopped since 1998, (the cycle is moving on). This is from Professor Philip Stott, one of those damned inconvenient global warming deniers and a scientist as well.

http://web.mac.com/sinfonia1/iWeb/Global%20Warming%20Politics/A%20Hot%20Topic%20Blog/A%20Hot%20Topic%20Blog.html

..since 1998, ‘global warming’ appears to have - wait for it - stopped. The data is taken from the UK Met Office’s ‘HadCRUT3’ dataset, a globally-gridded product of near-surface temperatures, consisting of annual differences from 1961-90 normals.

In other words, since 1998 there has been no global warming [not even any ‘global warming’]. Yet, atmospheric CO2 has continued to rise, from c. 368 ppmv in 1998 to c. 384 ppmv in November, 2007 Moreover, politicians persist in claiming that temperature is rising faster than at any other time in the history of the whole Earth..... but then, we always believe our politicians, don’t we?"

And the madness continues....

15

Neil,

Glasgow 04/02/2008 12:12:14
The full letter, published in another paper says the windfarm is needed

"in view of the Scottish Government's recently announced decision to refuse planning consents for future new nuclear generation plants."

The corollary is obvious though it would have shown more guts for these "leadwers" to have said what they are clearly thinking. It is noteworthy that the sinuatures from the Greens & FoI are absent. Having fouisted this £1 billion a year subsidy devouring "industry" on us they are receeding into the background, doubtless to propose some other Luddite insanity. And since the BBC & ITV are clearly controlled by eco-fascist interests & willing to tell absolutely any lie to help them, no doubt the next complaint will get excessive publicity from them too.
16

Kenny A,

04/02/2008 12:35:55
14, Fred

Draw a box round the lewis windfarm proposal, then the Eisken and Pairc proposals which are fairly close together. Combined these proposals are visable from most of lewis and a lot of the southern isles and also Skye in the inner hebridies, then see the size of proposed developments.

Put the windfarms near citys or prefferably a nucular powerstation, because it is the citys which use the most power and contribute to most polution.

Leave rural populations alone unless they want these developments. Believe there are a number of smaller proposals doing the rounds with no objections even from the RSPB.
17

Geomac 1,

Kinross 04/02/2008 13:51:12
This letter from various self important individuals forgets to mention one significant FACT.
if it were to be built, the 181 turbine factory would generate around 1.2 million MWhr of electricity per year - this would command some £50-60 million pounds of consumer subsidy in the form of Renewable Energy Certificates (ROCs) per year (at approximately £45-£55 per ROC). This money is, of course the "reward" for the developers, who then claim to be Robin Hood like people, who generously give some £6 million per year to the community - hmmmmm!??? By the way, they will also be able to make some £30-35 million per year from selling this electricity (it commands only a low price because of its unreliability and intemittency!)
Once built wind factories do NOT provide any signifant employment and then the developers generously give back some (very small %) of the money they have obtained as subsidies from other electricity consumers. Also it is highly questionable how much local employment will be available - remember the Robin Rigg rescue operation - where some 22 people had to be rescued - only one Scot with the remainder largely from India!!
18

Neil,

Glasgow 04/02/2008 16:34:50
Good post Geomac. If the windmill fans could do arithmetic they wouldn't be on that side.
19

Greenheatman,

TAIN 04/02/2008 17:03:14
Geomac 1,

Good post but you forgot to mention the 150% tax break that is available on capital outlay - that means no tax to pay for years on of these big profits!
20

Bauldie Willie,

bolton 04/02/2008 17:06:51
I say build it. It will give the Lewis people something nice to look at for a change as, let's face it, Stornoway is slightly less attractive than Airdrie and the rest of the island is a blasted heath.
21

Kenny A,

04/02/2008 18:02:33
27 Willie

I take it you may have been to Stornoway and possibly the North of Lewis. Try the South West and East of the Island, vast views, mountains, lochs, islands in the distance, views only God could create.

Fancy a few of these towers in the scenic hotspot and land of tranquility that is down town Bolton by any chance?
22

Greenheatman,

TAIN 04/02/2008 20:07:42
The problem, as I see it, is nobody appears to understand that dodgy variable and random electricity from a wind farm is the wrong sort of electricity.

The right kind of electricity is secure base load electicity, preferably from renewable energy source(s) like my invention Gentec venturi.

Properly engineered tidal energy hybrid projects can now provide 100% of the nation's electrical base load capacity, now that I have solved the intermittency problem.



23

HA,

Beith 04/02/2008 20:40:01
You're right No 30, wind farm energy is very dodgy. They don't work if there is not enough wind or if it is too windy when THEY SUCK energy from the grid. Ergo, not one conventional power station has been or will ever be shut down because they cannot be replaced by unstable unpredictable energy. So what do we have? Violation of the landscape, carbon emissions on the increase, more and more elderly people thrown into fuel poverty (check tonight's Dispatches and weep!) to pay for the massive profits of the multi nationals behind the wind industry.
24

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 04/02/2008 23:42:49
Hello All,

To the Socialst, anti-capitalist Mindless Hordes I have but one thing to say:

I hope your taxes and your energy bills go through the proverbial roof!

You ungrateful Lot are most assuredly lacking in the ability to understand basic maths, logic, or the needs of the poor!

You are Arrogant Elitists and quite useless in Real World Terms: you live in the Land of Theory.

To those Enviro-Fascists who are both hypocrites and math challenged-arguing against the Wind Farm, allow me to point out that you Lot have been whining, screaming, begging, threatening, pleading on your knees, for DECADES, for towns, cities, and nations, to BUILD RENEWABLE ENERGY FARMS, both Solar and Wind, wherever they can be built.

NOW on the other hand, what are you doing?

You're whining, screaming, pleading, and threatening, AGAINST the Building of those very Renewable Energy Farms.

Hypocrites, pure and simple.

Mathematically speaking, you lot couldn't pour urine out of a boot, with the instructions written on the heel!

MEGAWATTS which are produced, by whatever means, are a POSITIVE addition to the Energy Supply, because those MEGAWATTS DIDN'T EXIST, prior to the generation of said energy, by the aforementioned Wind Farm.

Did you GET that you hypocritical LOT?

The Wind Farm would GENERATE Energy which CURRENTLY does NOT exist and CURRENTLY cannot be used, because it doesn't exist right now.

When the Wind Farm is built and the turbines begin to turn, Energy which did NOT exist prior to that moment, WILL COME INTO EXISTENCE, which can THEN be USED!

Did you GET that basic math?

The Wind Farm would ADD to the Energy Supply, NOT detract from it!

What dullards you Enviro-Fascists are!

Build the Farm and help the poor!

Cheers from the Rockies

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.