Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


$1,000,000,000,000: The astonishing cost of US government's desperate bid to rid the economy of toxic debt

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 September 2008
THE UNITED States government is preparing to spend $700bn (£382bn) buying up "bad" mortgages as part of a massive financial bail-out to tackle the credit crisis.
The US Treasury is proposing the fund to buy back a large proportion of the bad debt in the US mortgage market. Business insiders fear the total cost of the bail-out could rise to as much as $1 trillion (£545bn) or $1,000,000,000,000.

President George Bush hailed the move as "unprecedented action" in the face of "unprecedented challenges" to prevent the US economy from grinding to a halt as problems sparked by the credit crisis spread through the entire financial system, leaving jobs, pensions and companies under threat.

The move is part of the largest financial bail-out since the Great Depression and the sum involved is equivalent to almost one third of the British economy. Bush yesterday insisted the cost to taxpayers from shoring up markets was better than the alternative of job losses and blighted pensions.

He admitted the measures required the US "to put a significant amount of taxpayer dollars on the line". But he added: "I'm convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative. Further stress on our financial markets would cause massive job losses, devastate retirement accounts, further erode housing values, and dry up new loans for homes, cars and college tuitions.

"We're going to work with Congress to get a bill done quickly. I found a common understanding of how severe the problem is and how it's necessary to get something done quickly and I think we will."

The bail-out follows the collapse of investment giant Lehman Brothers last week which had incurred huge bad debts related mainly to the US mortgage market. Its rival Merrill Lynch was bought out by Bank of America, and the US government has bailed out insurer AIG and mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Officials from Congress and the Treasury will meet to work on the plan. The deal is expected to be signed into law within the next few days. The plan would give the government broad powers to buy the bad debt of any US financial institutions for the next two years. It also would raise the statutory limit on the national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion – making room for the massive rescue.

The aim of the bail-out is understood to be a way of bringing all the bad debts into one organisation whose task will be to hold them on behalf of the taxpayer until they can be sold off at some point in the future. The draft of the proposal does not specify what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal help.

There are some members of Congress who are unhappy at the thought of the taxpayer taking on hundreds of billions of dollars of currently worthless debt. But the leader of the Democrats in the House of Representatives, Steney Hoyer, said he expected quick action.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said a "bold" move was needed to restore the financial system's health and that the package needed to be "large enough to have maximum impact". He added: "This troubled asset relief programme must be properly designed and sufficiently large to have maximum impact, while including features that protect the taxpayer to the maximum extent possible.

"The ultimate taxpayer protection will be the stability this troubled asset relief program provides to our financial system, even as it will involve a significant investment of taxpayer dollars. I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative – a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion."

The US government is also stepping up action to increase the availability of capital for new home loans. Its next task will be to overhaul bank regulations. The chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Christopher Dodd, said: "We understand the gravity of the moment."

On Friday, the US government announced plans to guarantee money market funds – mutual funds that typically invest in low-risk credit such as government bonds – up to a value of $50bn.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 September 2008 7:01 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Credit Crunch
 
1

Itchy,

21/09/2008 01:34:30
translated in plain English: "Let's all pretend that a free lunch is possible".

No doubt the illiterates will be here soon to blame this on capitalism.
2

ARYA MENSA Consultants,

Fresno, CA 21/09/2008 01:41:12

The Financial Markets CANNOT be bailed out !!!!!! 9/19/08



Here's the bottom line:

The skeleton of the world's dollar denominated financial system is one quadrillion dollars worth of unregulated over the counter derivative contracts. These derivative contracts can not be closed out. Forget about the solutions that you have heard about so far. There are only two possible resolutions:

1) Default through hyperinflation of the dollar - injection of hundreds of trillions of dollars in to the world's money markets, while issuing of new derivatives is stopped dead in its tracks.
2) Bankruptcy

What we have now is a combination of both 1 and 2. This will continue until the disease has been purged. Unless reasonable assurances are given to the market that the number of dollars to be printed will be contained, the dollar will be destroyed. Only a re-linking to gold, either directly or implicitly, can save the dollar.

Most financial entities will be destroyed. Pooled stock accounts will be raided during bankruptcy proceedings. Exchange traded funds that track hard commodities like gold and silver will default. Futures markets will default.

Here's where to find financial safety right now, most secure at the top, less secure going down

a) Gold and Silver physical bullion in your personal possession.
b) Share certificates in well capitalized companies (that do not have forward sales or derivative exposure) that produce, hold or have royalty streams in gold and/or silver
c) Swiss treasuries - Make sure that you own these in your name. I don't know exactly how to do this
d) Canadian treasuries - Make sure that you own these in your name. I don't know exactly how to do this
e) US Treasuries - Make sure that you own these in your name. I don't know exactly how to do this

Depending on how things turn out, items c,d and e may end up being worthless.

ARYA MENSA Consultants
P. O. Box 11264
Fresno, CA 93772-1264


3

Forward not Back,

21/09/2008 03:00:16
Hello inflation! We thought you were our enemy but now you're our friend again!!
4

W Smith,

Middle East 21/09/2008 03:36:10
Here's another headline Mr Editor.

TAXES WILL SOAR IN CREDIT CRISIS

"Leading forecasters say the government will soon be forced to borrow as much as 100 billion pounds a year, giving Britain easily the biggest budget deficit of any western country".

This after our Gordon has spent, or squandered, 8 trillion dollars as Chancellor and just months ago was boasting how he had eradicated boom and bust cylces.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4795086.ece

So Scots vote Labour because they're morally superior to the Tory voters in the SE of England then, eh?

My a**e!

Scots vote Labour because they don't understand finance more like.
5

Pender Paul,

Pender Island 21/09/2008 04:02:48
Ah yes, free enterprise when times are good but state socialism (to bail out the capitalists) when times are bad. I finally get it!--behave like a complete moron, run up huge debts, live like a king, bring the economy to near collapse, rob your neighbour, support financially wreckless overseas adventures where you actually get to shoot people and engage in important weapons tests, and have then the most right wing fascist the US has ever known come along with a package to provide taxpayers' money to bail you out. Isn't capitalism as she is now practiced wonderful!!
6

Rex Plunger,

California 21/09/2008 05:00:04
Pender
Lovely huh. And I tremble when I hear that the race for a new US leader is close one.
7

donald,

glasgow 21/09/2008 05:17:30
If the capitalist system is not to blame, who is? It wisnae me.
8

Proud to have Scots blood,

Brooklyn, N.Y. 21/09/2008 05:40:27
My mum, a very wise woman, and my dad, always told me, if you can't afford it, don't buy it. When your bills come in, pay them right away. Put your money in the bank & you will have money. They were right. My country is in a mess because of the "have to have it NOW & pay later" mentality. Credit cards with $1,000 credit line are offered to young people with no jobs who are ready to graduate from school. Where the hell
did the banks get off giving loans for houses to people who could not afford them. It is disgusting what has happened in the U.S. and the U.K. & probably elsewhere. There is nothing wrong with Capitalism, whats wrong are the CEO'S and idiots at the top of every heap. How they toy with people's lives. Rats, all of them.
9

Jim A,

21/09/2008 05:40:44
#8 Donald, a big boy done it and ran away
10

Lanna,

21/09/2008 06:03:07
#10
agree with you there, the 'I want it all now' mentality, as well as just plain greed.

I read this other article, and the following just didn't set well:
"The proposal is a mere three pages long, but it gives sweeping powers to the government to dispense gigantic sums of taxpayer dollars in a program that would be sheltered from court review."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080921/ap_on_bi_ge/
financial_meltdown;_ylt=Ap0r8t9AkjjJAf8s3sLPYt2yBhIF
11

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 21/09/2008 06:28:17
And this is a direct result of the Iraq and Afgan wars.
The rot started when the oil prices started shooting up and stayed high.
So tell me again who is winning this war on terror now?
12

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 21/09/2008 06:30:23
12

And what is Scotlands share in this magnificant financial utopia you present? The barnett formula
what a wonderful union dividend.
13

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA ; for more WAR VOTE McCain 21/09/2008 07:48:29
Hey U SNP dudes,

Forget going independent . U don't have diddly squat to support your miss guided dream,.

The world economy is operating in a vast credit bubble, led by my country the USA.

The artificial duo of capitalism + human greed combined, will fail globally sooner than later.

When this global credit bubble bursts, the shi*t will really hit the fan.

Head for the Hills

GC (still smiling)
14

commonsense,

Beginning to Wonder 21/09/2008 09:38:24
I am struggling with this one ,but it appears that I am not alone.The usa government will effectively underpin their housing market, which, short term, at great cost should restore confidence and allow prices to rally again,allowing the cycle to repeat itself a few years down the line.
A few basics missing here.
If I have to compete for a house,with somebody on the same income,and the banks allow our multiples of income to increase to obtain a large mortgage,Both of us become worse off as our disposable income decreases,and neither obtains a bigger house,because they all increase based on the money available.
Being strict on multiples of earnings,benefits the vast majority of people.
Bring back some common sense and restrict credit card debt,yes there will be an initial drop off of sales ,but the debt has to be paid sometime,and better on goods than interest.
15

Itchy,

21/09/2008 10:04:54
#6 "Isn't capitalism as she is now practiced wonderful!! "

How is exactly is this capitalism? Words clearly have no meaning to you.
"have then the most right wing fascist the US has ever known come along with a package to provide taxpayers' money to bail you out"

Fascism is a form of socialism.
16

Itchy,

21/09/2008 10:08:26
#18 "The artificial duo of capitalism + human greed combined"

INTERVENTIONISM, thicko.

Ever heard of the Federal reserve? It's a strong central bank and a key plank of the communist manifesto.

This crash is the result of need, not greed? Who was it that forced banks to lend money to bad credit risks? It was the state.

More interventionism cannot solve this problem.

#8 It was the INTERVENTIONIST system that caused this.
17

Media 1,

cape town 21/09/2008 10:27:58
So the republicans have run up a massive debt..They have created an enemy that didnt exist and sent thousands of soldiers to their death on the back of personal power and wealth for cronies. They have turned their back on the victims of 9/11 by supporting Osama Bin Laden and keeping him safe in his hideout as opposed to tracking him down - go figure!
They blamed 9/11 on Al Quaeda, a CIA derived enemy and then went after Saddam in the most obvious snub in American politics.
And now they have another war mongering leader at the helm...
Man, no wonder Barrak is the favourite to win the election...
18

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 21/09/2008 11:10:40
5

Scots voted Labour cos they thought they were going to get a socialist government but we got a right wing neo fascist conservative government instead and here we are now. All as a result of Thatherite dogma.
Your dogma ya tube.
19

Tiree,

Canada 21/09/2008 11:18:52
Now let´s get this straight. 700bn or 1trillion to buy back ´bad mortgages´using taxpayers money. So those taxpayers who were royally screwed (by these finacial parasites)should, as taxpayers, be allowed to keep the homes that they were conned into. Otherwise áll hell´should break loose. Enough is Enough!!!
20

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 21/09/2008 11:56:39
Does money actually have any value?
21

Jay Kay,

21/09/2008 11:58:49
What really gets my blood boiling is the enormous sums of money the top of the tree boys are walking away with, so they totally stuffed up yet still get to keep the millions and millions in the golden parachute.

I sometimes wished some of the misguided souls instead of going amok in some school took it upon themselves to direct their anger at the people who truely deserve a damn good thrashing.

These big bankers deserve nothing
22

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 21/09/2008 12:38:22
The legacy of George BabyBush and his corrupt and incompetent Cabinet will probably be a worldwide depression.

Has there ever been such a STUPID President in the whole history of the US of A?

Unfortunately, many are dumb enough to be hoodwinked by his "downhome" verbal mannerisms to their peril and the US of A may reflect the title of a celebrated Canadian film, "The Decline and Fall of the American Empire".
23

Glasgow Expat,

Desert 21/09/2008 12:55:19
Yeah yeah..shoot the capitalists..workers of the world unite. Boring. #3 is spot on. These things move in long cycles between boom and bust. Try www.thelongwaveanalyst.ca or www.elliottwave.com for some education. Government intervention just makes it much, much worse than if it was left to market forces to sort out. The great forces of DEflation are upon us now and these desperate attempts to hide the underlying problems will fail. Dow 4,000. Turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so...
24

commonsense,

Location,Location,Location! 21/09/2008 13:06:06
#26

Chance Gardener comes to mind,still,never mind, there should be growth in the Spring.
25

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 21/09/2008 13:39:12
26

And they put him in TWICE thats what grips my sh*te.
Mind you we put Blair in 3 times and Thatcher in 3 or was it 4 seemed like a 1000.
Seems some folk just shouldnt be allowed out to vote.
26

Booster,

21/09/2008 14:39:50
All here might appreciate that Lehman Brothers still intend to pay out $3Billion in bonuses to its traders.

Fear not though as in a couple of years that might buy a good cup of coffee.
27

nolimits,

Far North 21/09/2008 15:22:58
#24 Evan: Actually no! Money has only a perceived value, that is traded for goods and services. If all the money in the world were to "disappear",all of us would quickly find a way to trade, barter or whatever to acquire the goods and services we needed to survive. The thing is, all of us in one form or the other trade our time for goods. How we set a value on that time is between us and the supplier of the goods. Here's the thing, I know that energy costs to the consumer in GB/Scotland etc, are astronomically high. My Gram pays 35-40% of her pension to stay warm and have light. Now, IF, she and every other client of the energy suppliers refused to make payment on their billing for a month or more, what would happen? Well, the company would spend $$ sending threatening letters, probably shut off the service at the street, but then what? When enough folks have followed this route, the company finds it is losing $$ faster and faster. Sooner or later it Will have to negotiate with customer for a price that both can live with. The problem is we all have been blinded by the untruth that business knows best. Bull Sh3t. I am a business man and know better. Have a great day!
28

NYScott,

Upstate NY 21/09/2008 15:44:51
As I watched by IRA go down 17% I was wondering what or where Chaney & Bush had their money invested. Oh Wait I know... In Columbia! Seems that the Pres can swing a Trade Deal with whom ever he pleases without the consent of the Congress or people. Can the Prime Minister do that! Think of all the money you make buying out business down there, then approving the trade agreement, then selling those companies off for hugh profits! Way to go GW!
29

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 21/09/2008 16:57:21
This is in part because the lending institutions, would give mortgages to people who could not afford them bundle them in groups with a couple of good mortgages, sell them as a package to investment houses and investors within a time period of 45 days. These mortgage companies had not much to lose as they were only required to hold them for only 45 days before selling them.
The AIGs, and the Lehman Brothers of the world just continued to buy them..
Liar's Loans were hidden among the good mortgage loans.
It all stems from greed, and wanting things now.
What were these people, who couldn't afford these homes thinking? That's why all the forclosures.. the Liar's Loans. Thank Mr. Clinton.. he pushed for this.
30

Tiree,

Canada 21/09/2008 17:04:54
28. Commonsense. GOOD COMMENT!

We´ve see nothing yet. Wait until the Derivatives market hits the fan.
31

Pilrig,

Livingston 21/09/2008 17:22:46
Come on comrades, lay off Comrade Dubya he's only got a couple of months to go.
32

Madbagpypr,

STEORNABHAGH,LEODHAS,NA h-EILEAN SIAR 21/09/2008 18:17:22
From what I remember of Mr. Clinton, the budget was in the black and most of the world didn't HATE the U.S.

So he got his knob polished by some young tart. He got caught doing what most other politicians do.

Remember when all those Senators were raping the Congressional Pages? Boys and girls 15 and 16 years old getting rogered my crusty old Republicans, and when someone screamed foul, your George Bush Sr. had everything swept under the rug.

Scary thing is how many GENERATIONS will it take to pay this down. In just a few years going from a superpower to a country that owes more than any country on the planet. Sounds like Rome is falling....again.
33

santa cova,

21/09/2008 18:51:21
Whats new? The United States of America was built on greed!
34

US Cavalry,

Va, USA 21/09/2008 19:27:46
The US Government could easily get back part of the cost by confiscating the billion dollar homes and personal property of the Corporate managers, who created this problem in the first place. It was a criminal act what they did. And Joe public is paying for the scheme. But then our elected official are deep in their pockets. So that won't happen.
35

Doh,

21/09/2008 20:03:30


Private profit, public debt.

So I am being asked to bail out fat cats that make obscene amounts of money for screwing up.

This has all been made worse by deregulation and the privatisation of the buildings societies.

Thanks Thatcher. Thanks New Labour.

Yes I do think New Labour should be given a state funeral.

What about a war on speculators?
36

Duke,

21/09/2008 20:06:18
So, in the future banks can gamble again with the knowledge that the Government will bail them out. Better to get rid of the stupid bonus schemes that these b(w)ankers seem to hold so dear and are based on short term profiteering rather than on long term sound financial gain.
37

Sandi,

San Diego 21/09/2008 20:58:28
This is actually more of a Democratic Party /Obama problem than Republican/McCain. In fact, McCain's hands are clean here. Here is a very interesting and clarifying article from NoQuarter:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/47w3r8

38

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 22/09/2008 01:50:48
Sandi, thank you just saw this article. That no one really knows the scope of this is because the media refuses to write about it. They just keep letting him slide by.
39

Lloyd,

Nashville 22/09/2008 07:41:03
US Cavalry:

You've got the basic idea. The top managers, CEOs, corporate board members, and bankers have raked off a few trillion dollars all together over the past few years, and paid precious little tax on it all because their accountants know how to hide it all from the IRS.

It's time they paid their fair share -- say 50%? Buy out the bad mortgages with this money, and allow the poor schmucks who were suckered into the subprime mortgages to pay off their loans at 2% interest over 25 years while staying IN their homes.

If the greedy bums aren't willing to pay their fair share, confiscate it -- anything over a couple of million in assets gained over the past decade from financial trades goes into the pot. Anything left over after the mortgages are paid goes to buy the country back from China...
40

Unimpressed one,

22/09/2008 07:55:37
I think I'll choke if my bank manager has the temerity to question me on my ability to pay back any loan that is effectively underwritten by the taxpayer(me).
41

US Cavalry,

VA, USA 23/09/2008 03:34:36
Absolutely Lloyd
42

seattlebarbie,

here not there 23/09/2008 16:25:58
right on Lloyd! Greedy ba$tards should pay back unwarranted / unearned millions. Why should fiscally responsible people pay and pay (higher taxes)?
43

Finnking,

Lempäälä 26/09/2008 15:31:04
"It also would raise the statutory limit on the national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion – making room for the massive rescue."

Where has all that money gone? 50% of all the world's debt owed by 300 million people. Where did it go? Massive public spending projects? Nope. Reduction in class sizes? Nope. National Health system? Nope. Straight into the bank accounts of the elite? Yup.

Via scams like having your pension based upon the '(not so)free market' and YOU taking risk while the elite take profit. Via war and the massive military budget resulting in a huge transfer of wealth from the many to the few in exchange for weapons.

Is the bankrupt state of the USA still going ahead with giving Israel $3 billion a year in weapons? Yup, because the majority of that tax payer money will go straight to the bank accounts of serious wealth.

"But, hey, don't let that stop ya! Now's a great time to make a killing on the stock market!You too can keep the American Dream alive by having two jobs, ill health, a burden when you're old, major stress AND your very own shares in this mess!"

This is the system these clowns, using Raygun and Maggie as the Spin Doctors, forced through in the late 70s, with CLinton/Bliar/Bush helping spinning it further.

"You Thatcherites by name, lend an ear, lend an ear
You Thatcherites by name lend an ear
You Thatcherites by name, your faults I will proclaim,
Your doctrines I must blame, you will hear, you will hear
Your doctrines I must blame, you will hear

You privatise away what is ours, what is ours
You privatise away what is ours
You privatise away and then you make us pay
We'll take it back some day, mark my words, mark my words"

Bragg Lyrics to trad song (Jacobites by name)
44

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 28/09/2008 07:58:14
They could always sell Hawaii and Alaska to the Chinese. Save them having to pay them the interest payments on top of the borrowed capital.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.