Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obama urges Iran to halt 'unjust actions'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 June 2009
President Barack Obama challenged Iran's government to halt a "violent and unjust" crackdown on dissenters, using his bluntest language yet to condemn Tehran's postelection response.
Mr Obama has sought a measured reaction to avoid being drawn in as a meddler in Iranian affairs.

Yet his comments have grown more pointed as the clashes intensified, and his latest remarks took direct aim at Iranian leaders.

"We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people," Mr Obama said in a written statement.

"The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."

Mr Obama has searched for the right tone in light of political pressures on all sides. On Capitol Hill, Congress pressed him to condemn the Iranian government's response.

In Iran, the leadership was poised to blame the US for interference and draw Mr Obama in more directly.

Mr Obama met with advisers at the White House as developments in Iran grew more ominous, with police seen beating and clashing with protesters.

"Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away," the president said, recalling a theme from the speech he gave in Cairo, Egypt, earlier this month.

"The Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government," Mr Obama said. "If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion."

Protesters in Iran have demanded that the government cancel and rerun the June 12 elections that ended with a declaration of overwhelming victory for hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Reformist presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi says he won and claimed widespread fraud.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said there was no ballot rigging. He warned on Friday of a crackdown if protesters continued their massive street rallies.

Then yesterday, police beat protesters and fired tear gas and water cannons at thousands who rallied in open defiance of Iran's clerical government.

Mr Obama cited civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr's statement that "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice".

"I believe that," the president said. "The international community believes that. And right now, we are bearing witness to the Iranian people's belief in that truth, and we will continue to bear witness."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 June 2009 11:52 AM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

,

21/06/2009 12:11:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Trond,

Home of trolls 21/06/2009 14:32:11
The Iranians, as well as the Scots, belong to the peoples that lived outside the areas flooded by the River Euphrates. About these, who lived outside the reach of the flood, Noah the Islamic prophet said:

My Lord! leave not upon the land any dweller from among the unbelievers

(Koran, chapter 71)

Unbelievers still exist among the demonstrators, pray once more Ali Khamenei.

freeafterlife.org
3

,

21/06/2009 15:22:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Ifan Har,

Scotland 21/06/2009 16:01:22
Post #3 Shaft, Lock Haven

Unfortunately, this "unrest" has the fingerprints of a typical interference in the affairs of a sovereign country funded operation by the CIA and MOSSAD all over it.

The present orchestrated situation in Iran is normally a contrived crisis that is a prelude to military action by the US to "liberate" an oppressed people!

It is known that "black ops" has been carried out in Iran by the US for some time!

Stand by for Iraq 2.
5

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 21/06/2009 16:17:30
Thank you 'one more time' for coming back. I agree with you in #1.

there have been journalists saying for about 2 years that the US has been funding undercover operations in Iran to try to overthrow & destabilize the Iranian regime. There was an incident where a group inside Iran attacked the presidential convoy. Ahmadinejad was not injured, but other people in his convoy were killed as were some of the attackers. Recently there was a suicide bombing in Iran. It seems highly likely that these things were funded by the US. Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com recently had a column on this subject.

On American tv the Americans are being taught that the iranian election was fraudulent. Like I keep telling you the Americans will believe anything their tv tells them. A professional poll done in mid-May showed Ahmadinejad at 37% and Moussavi at 14% with other candidates at 1-2%. At that time there were many 'undecided' people. But the end results on June 12'th were not so different from the mid-May polling. Ahmadinejad was said to have gotten over 60% of the vote in his last election in 2005. why is it so hard to believe that Ahmadinejad got 62% of the vote? because the power of the tv (& mass media) is very large. They create their own version of reality by showing information in a selective manner. If the tv networks all together told the people that experts have recently concluded that 2+2=5 the Americans would believe it and call anyone stuck on the old math to be a heretic, odd-ball, conspiracy theorist, etc.

American tv is engaging in propaganda to fan the flames and to get the Americans thinking that we should intervene militarily to help the Moussavi forces. If Moussavi's people get into a violent conflict with the Iranian government, then watch out. It could be the start of WW3.
6

,

21/06/2009 16:31:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Observer,,

Glasgow 21/06/2009 16:31:29
Hold on a minute do we expect Obama to reverse everything the US has done for decades in the space of a few short months ? What he said was right the Iranian Govt is behaving violently and unjustly. We all know that. What Obama needs to do is giove the dissenters moral support without interference. So far he seems to be doing that. Let's condemn him when he does something wrong.
8

Observer,,

Glasgow 21/06/2009 16:33:30
6 I think it is slightly more terrifying to hang young teenage girls from cranes for being sexually active and wearing make up. However it is for the Iranians to deal with this we should not interfere other than with moral support.
9

Carolyn 1,

21/06/2009 17:33:32
President Obama has been called leader of the world. Although I disagree with that statement, I think the president has missed an opportunity to use his popularity and convene an international conference - a coalition of democracies, to use Bush's term.

The coalition could show a future of unity and diplomatically support that the will of the Iranian people for a free election be counted. By voting for Mousavi they were voting change but instead got violence and increased oppression. The next few days will change the course of the world, to sit by and not gather a united world voice is a missed opportunity. Maybe the Czech president will do so...

If Obama's hope and change is just another slogan that means nothing, than I guess we can say the Iranian people have just been thrown under the bus.
10

Carolyn 1,

21/06/2009 17:34:06
Where's Hillary and Bill by the way?
11

,

21/06/2009 17:50:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

21/06/2009 19:08:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

alan mirs,

Tehran 21/06/2009 20:15:13
His harsh reaction could unit people!
14

billengland,

21/06/2009 20:43:19
Looks like the CIA have fouled up again.
15

Observer,,

Glasgow 21/06/2009 21:07:44
12 Whit ?
16

Observer,,

Glasgow 21/06/2009 21:08:26
12 My extra comma was earned.
17

,

22/06/2009 02:28:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 22/06/2009 03:14:29
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4823.shtml

here is Paul Craig Roberts' column where he says that Iran is in more danger than it knows.

19

KampungHighlander,

22/06/2009 06:29:18
# Wally

"Ahmadinejad was said to have gotten over 60% of the vote in his last election in 2005. why is it so hard to believe that Ahmadinejad got 62% of the vote?"

Well I don't know for a fact whether ballot box stuffing was common practice in the last election but Press TV, an Iranian English-language news channel funded by the Iranian Government, reported that the Guardian Council admitted that there were some irregularities in the election, specifically that in over 50 cities more votes were cast than there were eligible voters.

So the demonstrators claim of fraud are legitimate.

Even if Ahmadinajad manages to cling to power by terrorising his own people into silence, what little credibility he ever had as leader is now gone.

#17 Steve

"I'm not so sure about the "unjust actions" when demonstrators are throwing molotov cocktails bombs, burning down gasoline stations, cars, mosques and anything else they can set fire to."

I am sure that British Police can count on you support next time some demonstrator gets killed in the UK.

If you stop people from exercising their right to peacefully protest, they will fight back.

All this anti western self loathing is really boring.

Just because you lot loath yourselves for the life failures you are doesn't mean you have to project it on the rest of us who actually live free and happy lives.
20

,

22/06/2009 06:36:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Mashimaro,

China 22/06/2009 06:56:17
sshhh... uh uh uhhhhh! resist the urge, Barry. Resist!
22

,

22/06/2009 07:10:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Colors,

22/06/2009 13:12:03
Let Iran get on with their own business and everyone else mind theirs.
24

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 22/06/2009 17:16:04
Kampung in #19; I've no sympathy to any of your arguments. In every single major election here in the US we have many reports of election fraud or irregularities. It happens every single time. On the web-sites frequented by democrats there will be a ton of reports that seem very credible and serious that always accuse the republicans of cheating in the election. And on the web-sites frequented by republicans it is the complete opposite, the reports indicate that democrats cheated here or cheated there. For example, a county will report that over 100% of its eligible voters voted and all voted for one particular party. Rarely do these reports get on tv and therefore 95% of the population feels they don't exist and is offended if you merely mention them. You mention these types of incidents in the Iranian election and use it as evidence that the election results are wrong. Now you want a civil war that will kill hundreds of thousands of people. and you self-righteously ridicule anyone who doesn't want all this death as being 'anti-western'.

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_56073.shtml

There is no evidence the election was stolen. professionally done opinion poll commissioned by a non-profit group in Ohio showed that Ahmidinejad was ahead by more than a 2-1 margin in mid-May. The power of the tv is very large. It causes people to believe what they are told.

we see protesters in Tehran with signs in English, we see them chant in English. and from what I can tell there's not so many of them. English is not their native language, English is not normally spoken in Iran.

If Mousavi were a patriot of his country, he would tell his supporters that they lost and they should go home. There is something wrong with Mousavi's behavior. Can anyone point to a credible opinion poll showing that mousavi was favored by the people of Iran?

25

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 22/06/2009 17:38:57
I am amazed at how many people are convinced that the Iranian election results are illegitimate due to news stories that focus on incidents indicating possible fraud in the voting process. as I said above we have those types of incidents in every election here in the US, but due to the fact that virtually none of them are reported in the mass media the people of america are blissfully ignorant of them. Now we see lots of Americans watching tv and learning about these incidents and as a result convinced that election fraud caused the wrong result in the election. Why are these people not concerned about vote fraud in America?

We now use vote machines in America that make it easy for vote fraud to occur and impossible to detect after it occurs. The people of America don't even care. because it is not reported on tv that it is a danger. We have college professors travelling the country telling us it is a danger. The #1 college professor who did that was killed. but those points of view speaking against the vote machines are not spoken on tv. therefore, to 90% of Americans such concerns not only do not exist, they are illegitimate.

On the day of the 2004 election one of America's top pollsters, John Zogby, issued a statement late in the day about the time that voting booths in the east were closing. He basically said he felt there was vote fraud in 5 states. All 5 states went for bush, but private exit polls asking people how they voted showed that Kerry won those 5 states. Only in 5 states out of 50 did the exit polls clash consistently with the official results. and in each of those 5 states the error went to bush's favor. Those 5 states were critical to Bush's re-election. and the odd numbers all happened late in the day.


That was real evidence of significant election fraud. America's top pollster issued a statement on it. But it mattered nothing. because the tv networks and mass media did not focus on this. and therefore, the Ameri
26

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 22/06/2009 17:40:50
That was real evidence of significant election fraud. America's top pollster issued a statement on it. But it mattered nothing. because the tv networks and mass media did not focus on this. and therefore, the Americans are convinced that anyone who even suggests vote fraud happened is a conspiracy theorists.

How easily these people are manipulated by the mass media. Today we see westerners advocating violence in Iran where hundreds of thousands of people could be killed. These people who say this should not be respected.
27

,

23/06/2009 04:31:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.