Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Qatari man's guilty plea 'a grim reminder' of threat to US

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 May 2009
A QATARI man has admitted he trained in al-Qaeda camps and came to the United States one day before the 9/11 terror attacks.
Ali al-Marri, 43, pleaded guilty on Thursday to one count of conspiring to provide material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organisation.

A second charge of providing material support or resources to a terror group was dropped by the
court.

Al-Marri faces up to 15 years in prison and a $250,000 (£168,000) fine when he is sentenced on 30 July.

The government claimed he met Osama bin Laden in the summer of 2001 and was sent to the US to help al-Qaeda operatives carry out post-9/11 attacks.

Al-Marri obtained a student visa and returned to the US the day before terrorists crashed the two planes into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

Al-Marri admitted he trained in al-Qaeda camps and stayed in al-Qaeda safe houses in Pakistan between 1998 and 2001, where he learned how to handle weapons and how to communicate by phone and e-mail using code.

He also admitted meeting and having regular contact with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and with Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, who allegedly helped the 9/11 hijackers with money and Western-style clothing.

"Without a doubt, this case is a grim reminder of the seriousness of the threat we, as a nation, still face," Eric Holder, the US attorney general, said.

He added that president Barack Obama had ordered him to review the al-Marri case shortly after he took office in January.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2009 9:29 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: International terrorism
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are US threats to cut tourism and business ties over the Megrahi case justified?
Yes, Americans have got a right to be angry
No, they’re in no position to claim the moral high ground
No, the decision to free Megrahi was the right one

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.