Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Mumbai gunman reveals chilling details of attack

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 December 2008
THE gunman captured in last month's Mumbai attacks had originally intended to seize hostages and outline demands in a series of dramatic calls to the media, according to his confession.
Mohammed Ajmal Kasab said he and his partner, who assaulted the city's main train station, had planned a rooftop stand-off, but they couldn't find a suitable building, the statement to police says.

The two killed dozens of people inside the statio
n, but it's unclear if they ever held hostages.

Kasab's seven-page confession, given to police over repeated interrogations, offers chilling new details of the three-day rampage through India's commercial centre that left 164 people plus nine gunmen dead.

He said the assault, which started on November 26, was initially set for September 27, though he doesn't explain why it was delayed. The gunmen had been told by their handlers to carry out the attacks during rush hours when the station is teeming with commuters.

After reaching Mumbai, Kasab and his partner, Ismail Khan, the group's ringleader, headed to the train station by taxi.

"Ismail and myself went to the common toilet, took out the weapons from our sacks, loaded them, came out of toilet and started firing indiscriminately toward the passengers," Kasab told police.

As a police officer opened fire, the two militants retaliated with grenades before entering another part of the station and shooting more commuters.

The men then searched for a building with a rooftop where they had been told to hold hostages and call a contact named Chacha, whom Kasab identified as Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, the suspected mastermind behind the attacks.

Chacha, which means "uncle" in Hindi, would supply phone numbers for media outlets and specify what demands the two should make. "This was the general strategy decided by our trainers," Kasab said.

After failing to find a "suitable building," however, the two men instead stormed a hospital where they looked for hostages and exchanged more gunfire with police, he said.

Kasab, 21, confirmed he was Pakistani national and said he was trained by Lashkar-e-Taiba, the terrorist group banned by Pakistan in 2002 and blamed by India in the attacks. He said he was given lectures on India security and intelligence agencies, as well as instruction in how to evade pursuing security forces.

Police said yesterday that Kasab has written to Pakistani officials to request legal help.

In a letter written on Thursday, he asks for "legal aid" from the Pakistani consulate and to meet a consular representative, said Rakesh Maria, Mumbai's chief investigator.

The letter was forwarded to India's government to relay to Pakistani officials, but it was unclear whether it had been delivered, Maria said.

A number of Indian lawyers have refused to defend Kasab against criminal charges amid outrage over the attacks.

Kasab is being held on 12 offences, including murder and waging war against the country, but has not yet been formally charged.

Islamabad has refused to acknowledge Kasab's nationality, complaining that India has yet to furnish any evidence.

• The 105-year-old Taj Mahal Palace hotel, one of two luxury hotels hit by Islamist militants in the Mumbai attacks, is set to reopen its doors next Sunday , its owner said yesterday.

Gunmen took scores of guests hostage and battled commandos inside the flagship hotel of Indian conglomerate Tata Group. "To reopen the Taj with such speed but with no loss of attention to details, shows our resolve to commemorate all the innocent and brave people who lost their lives during the terrorist attacks," said Raymond Bickson, managing director and chief executive of the Indian Hotels Company, part of Tata.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 14/12/2008 00:39:09
"To reopen the Taj with such speed but with no loss of attention to details, shows our resolve to commemorate all the innocent and brave people who lost their lives during the terrorist attacks,"

Should read,
"We're bloody greedy and don't want to lose another day in carrying out business as usual and to hell with the lives lost and those that are suffering."
2

Lynne,

14/12/2008 01:09:07
Postmark55.. ONLY the new wing is going to be opened. It doesn't have to read anything of the kind. That wing was being built before the attack. If you think that entire hotel that was hit with grenades, and under fire, caught on fire is totally rebuilt.. then you are not thinking straight... as usual.
3

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 14/12/2008 02:19:06
#2 Lynne,
The version of the Scotsman article I'm reading here in China as we speak says no such thing, so either you're making it up or you have subscribed and paid for your subscription and you're reading the whole story.

The version here, as my quote clearly shows, talks about the reopening and mentions nothing about the opening of a new wing.
The article also shows this, and I quote,

"The 105-year-old Taj Mahal Palace hotel, one of two luxury hotels hit by Islamist militants in the Mumbai attacks, is set to reopen its doors next Sunday," its owner said yesterday.

So I am thinking straight, as usual, and I am using direct quotes from the article, not something made up in my mind.
See if you have the fortitude to apologize to me, or is that asking too much?
4

Lynne,

14/12/2008 02:28:02
PM55..You are right, I am apologise.. I get a minimum of 28 different sources sent to me every day.. I cannot find the article at this moment.. but let me assure you, it is only the new wing that is opening.
5

Lynne,

14/12/2008 02:29:23
PM55


am apologise is supposed to read I do apologise.
6

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 14/12/2008 02:50:15
#4 Lynne,
Thank you for your apology,
and gratefully accepted.
7

,

14/12/2008 17:18:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

10/04/2009 13:43:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.