Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Home Office whistleblower sacked for exposing failures

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 April 2009
THE civil servant at the centre of a Whitehall leak inquiry was sacked yesterday.
Christopher Galley, a junior official in the Home Office, lost his job following a disciplinary hearing.

Mr Galley and Damian Green, the Tory immigration spokesman, were arrested by police investigating leaks from the department but were told last week they would not face charges.

Mr Galley was suspended on full pay after his arrest in November but disciplinary proceedings were put on hold while the criminal investigation was concluded.

The 26-year-old admitted leaking four documents, including one which revealed thousands of illegal immigrants were given clearance to work in the security industry.

After he learned he would not face charges, Mr Galley was defiant about his actions, claiming he leaked the documents because he was shocked at the incompetence he discovered.

"I did it because what I saw happening was wrong," he said.

Sir David Normington, the most senior civil servant at the Home Office, has written to officials in the department reminding them of their duty to work for whoever is in government.

The letter says: "When we sign up to work in the civil service, we agree to work to the best of our ability for the democratically elected government of the day.

"It is not for any civil servant to put his or her personal preferences of political opinion ahead of that duty."

Last week, Mr Galley said the police officers who arrested him said he faced life imprisonment.

He said police accused him of being part of a network of moles and demanded that he "named names".

A week ago, Keir Starmer, the director of public prosecutions, said the string of leaks were not damaging enough to require criminal charges.

Mr Starmer rejected the suggestion by senior civil servants that the leaks damaged national security.

He said the leaked information, including the revelation that an illegal immigrant had been employed as a cleaner in the Commons, was already widely known as well as being in the public interest.

The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, defended the police search, saying it would have been "irresponsible" not to have taken action. Mr Green, however, insisted he was simply doing his job.

"As immigration spokesman, it's my role to expose the failings of government immigration policy," he said.

"That's why ministers were so embarrassed."

Mr Green also said police searched his private e-mail account in his Parliamentary office looking for references to Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, the human rights group.

Mr Green was questioned for nine hours and had his homes and Commons office searched after being arrested.

The five-month inquiry reportedly cost £5 million.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2009 12:02 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Immigration and refugees
 
1

Tris,

25/04/2009 00:04:25
I bet he counts himself lucky. The last guy "committed suicide" or some such thing, didn't he?

Didn't he?

Oh. Right.
2

Tris,

25/04/2009 00:08:14
By the way, why would a 5 month inquirey cost £5 million? Did they fly people around the world to interview them, feed them on fresh lobster and vintage champagne, treat them to nights at the opera, give them all free cars and make overs in Palm Springs and nights with top call girls/boys?

For heaven's sake, every organisation has to have inquiries when things go wrong. In most cases it takes all afternoon and costs nothing.



3

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 00:13:38
Mr Galley acted as an agent run by Mr Green in a government department. He got caught, and now he's been sacked. In many countries he'd have been shot.

Here he gets his jotters and no reference. Sounds fair enough to me.
4

Moonraker007,

25/04/2009 00:22:04
3 - Fancy that! Fifi the Labour employee attacking a man who exposed incompetence.

Had he been a LAbour employee responsible for the immigration mess he would have been promoted!

Thousands of illegal immigrants getting here fraudulently and criminally, whereas if your a gurkha willing to give your life you get the wisdom of a lickspittle like woolas trying to defend a moraly reprehensible and wormtoungue legal argument into a "flood of hundreds of thousands of ex service people..."

Fifi you should really stop commenting you just sound like a parrot.
5

Moonraker007,

25/04/2009 00:47:07
#3 just noticed your comment on "in other countries he would be shot"

In this country he would go for a walk then be found dead after bleeding out his entire blood supply from a tiny wound too the wrist. Or if he were a producer of a damaging documentary he would wait for a lift and be blind to the fact that in walking forwards there was infact no lift present.


Fifi right and wrong is not an area your very familliar with is it? I think anyone attempting to teach you any sense of morality or right and wrong would be like teaching a autistic person the importance of comedic timing.

I rest my case.
6

Conan the Librarian™,

25/04/2009 00:49:11
No Tris, they just have to pay lawyers...
7

,

25/04/2009 01:06:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Moonraker007,

25/04/2009 01:41:24
Here? Did anyone see on TV recently the story about NUJ stating the Scottish media is dying on it's bottom and the blame being attributed to English Owners and Journalists with Scottish pens names writing on Scottish political issues and parliamentary issues, without knowing the territory?

I bet a few at hootsmon are feeling a little embarassed and are spitting on their NUJ cards!
9

,

25/04/2009 01:58:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 25/04/2009 02:41:56
#11&12 You've got what it takes!
11

Colin B,

Bearsden 25/04/2009 03:10:49
public interest is usually a defence and even the DPP agreed there was public interest.

Civil Service which is really just an arm of the Labour party have managed to eke out another non left winger

WOuldn't be at all surprised if the poor fellow Galley suffered some tragedy given Jacqui SMith and Gordy seem to be learning their lessons from RObert Mugabe- its the only way the hold on to power
12

Jason,

Japan 25/04/2009 03:52:50
The IPCC whistle blower that exposed police lies to ITN in the de Menezes shooting (make that state sponsored murder), was the only person arrested. Says it all.
13

Incandescent,

25/04/2009 04:07:01
3 Fifi

"he gets his jotters"

I think that phrase tells those of us of a certain age group all we need to know about you.
14

terry osser,

morden 25/04/2009 04:45:21
but look who took over france after the revolution. french politicians are corrupt+++++++++++
15

Charlie Ferrier,

Hamilton 25/04/2009 05:21:29
Sir David Normington is responsible for the operation of the civil service. I assume therefore that he will also be sacked for wholly incompetent performance in discharging his duties. After all i'm pretty sure its not government policy to employ illigal immigrants or criminals.

He himself indicates in his own memo this is a political decision - So is he now the whistle blower? or is he trying to shift blame for his incompetence.

Mind you with the incompetent bosses he has what would you expect?
16

McNasty,

Edinburgh 25/04/2009 06:39:38
Does Sir David Normington mean loyalty at any price?

This government has blood on its hands through its recklessness and utter deceit. Anyone who grasses them up is a hero in my book.

It is a great pity Mr. Galley picked a Tory, they are not much better.
17

cabrach loon,

inverness 25/04/2009 06:54:10
Surely it is Ms. J. Smith who should be sacked, did she not waste five million pounds of the taxpayers money on a fruitless inquiry and behave like stalin ofr hitler / as well as putting her grubby fingers in the sweety jar. But then in truth thewhole incompetent disgusting mob of zanulab should apologise and go before they do more damage. Surely enough is enough!? But being immoral that will never happen whilst led by the chief backstabber and sleazeball.
18

Mallory,

Edinburgh 25/04/2009 07:06:39
Lucky he didn't leak the a liberal rag like the Guardian. We might have been spared another nauseating spectacle of a load of journalists debating at a 'chapel meeting' whether to 'shop' the source of the leak to plod or abide by a basic principle that the press always protects it's sources.

It is a dangerous thing to sack a civil servant whistle-blower. How did the news of asbestos at New St Andrews House surface?
19

It's me!,

25/04/2009 07:12:46
Galley deserved the sack because he did not expose the shortcomings on immigration for laudable reasons but to spy for a political party. No doubt we will soon see him as a Tory candidate in the next election. The people who authorised illegal immigrants to work in the security industry need to have their employment status examined as well. Was there backhanders or other dodgy dealings involved as I seem to recall watching on a television programme some time ago? Seems to me that some quality control is required in the Home Office.
20

WallaceJohn,

25/04/2009 07:18:36
#9 & #12 http://www.allmediascotland.com/articles/3930/24042009/agm_of_scotsman_publisher_to_be_lobbied_today_by_nuj
21

,

25/04/2009 07:18:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 07:35:27
26
Nice line naive bluster unfortunately the truth is rather more prosaic. Mr Galley was a politically motivated mole who abused his position to break confidences in order to forward the interests of a political party.
That cannot be allowed to happen and Mr Galley was quite properly sacked.
23

Alan, New Zealand,

Leeds, UK 25/04/2009 07:41:14
Labour are in a shambles, the Country is in an even worse mess, thanks to them, and Fifi #3 from the Labour Party, would obviously like him shot to deter others exposing the truth.
Any chance the incompetents in the Labour Party will do the honorable thing? Do they know they are incompetent?
This guy should get a top job in the next Government to let the people know that corruption and deceit will no longer be tolerated.
Last question, has any of the illegal immigrants been sacked?
24

,

25/04/2009 07:45:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 07:49:06
28
Alan,
This has nothing to with the Labour Party. It has got everything to do with a politically-motivated spy deliberately passing confidential information to his party for political gain.
No government or administration should tolerate this behaviour, indeed if a Scottish civil servant was caught passing confidential information to the Labour Party then they would be sacked. And quite right too.
26

Faux Cul,

25/04/2009 07:58:19
I think we should be expecting pronto, the resignation or sacking of all the top Civil Servants, Political advisors of the Government, who are civil servants, and every bloody Government Minister for leaking. They do it ALL the time often to deflect the people from knowing the truth. Dr David Kelly anyone.

What this junior civil servant did was leak the truth to a series of leaked and spun Labour Lies!


GRahamski

"This has nothing to with the Labour Party. It has got everything to do with a politically-motivated spy deliberately passing confidential information to his party for political gain."

IMHO RANK STINKING HYPOCRISY.



Grahamski
27

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 07:59:24
Anyone sacked for leaking info to Broon in the past...


Broon freely admits to this on a tv documentary.

Well their you go..
28

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 08:01:03
Dr David Kelly was a good men ...









MURDERED .............
29

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 08:01:24
MAN
30

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 08:03:04
32
So, you'll defend the right of a member of the Labour Party to get a job in the civil service so they can get their hands on sensitive information to use as ammunition for the Labour Party to attack the SNP?
Are you mental?
31

david team,

25/04/2009 08:04:27
re 3

you are very foolish

there are hundreds of examples where cover ups should be disclosed , and people are needed to be brave to do so
32

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 08:04:44
33
Even for you Puskas that was a vile post......
33

david team,

25/04/2009 08:09:00
re 3 again

on reflection you´re not foolish .... you´re just a waste of space !!
34

paul o,

Wodonga 25/04/2009 08:22:40
The more I read about 'whistle-blowers', who hi-light wrong-doing, being prosected or harassed, the more I become convinced that the NAZIS did win the Second World War. The NAZIS may have lost the battle in 1945 but they have surely won the 'public service' of ALL Western Democracies.
Just look at the American CIA, British MI5, et al and Australian ASIO.
ALL ABOVE THE LAW AND UNACOUNTABLE TO ANYONE, because of "NATIONAL SECURITY".
All 'security' organizations have been infiltrated by the NAZIS's. Why else would the new American Government be struggling with the revelations of government sponsored torture and kid-napping of persons deemed a "potential national security risk".
My Grandfathers died trying to defend us from these monsters and 50 years on, we just 'roll-over' and accept it.
Can't understand !!!
35

Stan Butler,

25/04/2009 08:26:01

How long before Mr galley is employed by the Tory party or selected to stand for hem?

36

Stan Butler,

25/04/2009 08:28:40


It's interesting how the cyber gnats are so vocal in their support for the Tory Mr Galley.

37

,

25/04/2009 08:34:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 08:56:01
42
Arf arf, aye right enough it's just a coincidence that the nats are naturally drawn to right-wing tories like Guido Fawkes and this character Galley.
Let's have a look at this story without the nat hysteria:

Two years ago, disillusioned with his career as a junior civil servant in the Home Office immigration directorate, Galley approached the Tory party looking for work. He was eventually interviewed by Damian Green, the shadow immigration minister, but 'failed to land a job' says the Times.
The Times also reports that shortly after his interview with Damian Green, 'Galley resumed his civil service career, which included work in the private office of Jacqui Smith.'
Following his arrest, Galley is alleged to have told police that Damian Green "induced" him to leak the documents.

Aye, sounds like a hero of the people right enough....
39

,

25/04/2009 09:00:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

Stan Butler,

25/04/2009 09:03:53

Quisling Gogs

Are you the moron who considers Shakespeare to be 'guff'?
41

,

25/04/2009 09:05:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

,

25/04/2009 09:09:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

,

25/04/2009 09:18:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

Toast,

25/04/2009 09:29:18
Give the guy a medal,shame the liars in government aren't pursued with such vigour,Brown is incapable of honesty,must be his upbringing.
45

Stan Butler,

25/04/2009 09:29:45

#46 Quisling Gogs

Well you've conceded that you are a moron, so that's a start.
46

smokey joe 1,

25/04/2009 09:44:30
A wee bit of advice for Mr Galley. Dont go for any walks in the countryside alone.
47

Ham Mei Si,

Hong Kong 25/04/2009 10:12:38
What a load of rubbish you all talk.

The bottom line is, Christopher Galley is an idiot for getting caught!
48

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 10:22:32
This guy was not a histle blower. He didn't act in the public interest. He was a Tory mole who was looking for information to pass to the Tories, to help them electorally. Before nationalists consider defending him you should consider whether you would find it acceptable for a civil servant based in Scotland to do the same against the SNP Govt.

There is a whistle-blowers charter which guarantees legal protection to civil servants who genuinely act in the public interest. The Civil Servants Union - NOT affiliated to Labour - are not shy of industrial action to defend their members interests and we haven't heard a cheep out of them.

This man is no David Kelly or Clive Ponting.

Furthermore, as there was no prosecution of Mr Green it is quite clear there were no issues of national security involved or Governmental lies, merely complete incompetence, which everyone already knows about, so this man has no excuse for breaching his terms and conditions of employment.
Anyone in his position regardless of who was in government would be sacked.
49

,

25/04/2009 10:31:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

Grahamski,

Falkirk 25/04/2009 10:37:13
56
Colin,
Mr Galley was in breach of his contract. He has no grounds to take his employers to a tribunal.
51

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 10:46:11
56 They wouldn't have sacked him if he had grounds for an amployment tribunal. There is a clearly defined path for whistle-blowers to take which prevents them from being sacked. He didn't take it. That's because he wasn't a whistle blower.
52

Nellie,

Liverpool 25/04/2009 10:48:33
IMO there ought to be protection for whistle blowers if they expose dishonesty within Government especially where information is CLEARLY being withheld because it is merely politically or personally embarrassing. National security is obviously different and there was no suggestion this was breached.
In short, I regard this man behaved honorably in the face of a Government that evidently lacks a integrity, that it quite prepared to lie and cheat for political gain. He did this in the knowledge that others who have done the same also sacrificed their jobs; so what he did was courageous. It is disgraceful that a) he should have lost his job and b) that he is being used to intimidate others who would otherwise also reveal unpleasant truths being buried by dishonest politicians and their amoral or immoral sycophants. I hope he considers suing the Civil Service and Government for unfair dismissal.
53

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 10:58:18
59 I take it you have never heard of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 ? I take it you are not aware that whitehall has a specific code governing whistle-blowing in the public interest ? No. Neither was Mr Galley. The very last words that should be applied to him are honourable and corageous. But no doubt that is how he will describe himself when he stands for political Office. He acted in sheer self-interest.
54

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 25/04/2009 11:02:42
This guy signed a confidentiality agreement as part of his contract (as do most people when they sign a contract). He clearly broke this by divulging information to others outwith his workplace so deserves to be sacked.
The fact remains that his actions were politically motivated.
Why didn't he go to his superior and report this first ?
Why go to a member of the opposition party ?
Why didn't he go to the press where I'm sure he'd have reached a far wider audience ?
He went to the opposition parties immigration spokesperson because he supports that party and wanted them to score political "points", nothing more, nothing less and he cant' complain because he got caught !!
55

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 25/04/2009 11:12:06
Funny how Labour supporters support secrecy, lies and the covering up of Labour incompetence & sleaze.

The hypocrisy of Labour is also breathtaking. Gordon Brown himself has received leaked information when in opposition.

Anyone exposing corruption & incompetence in a government of whatever persuasion (Labour, SNP, Tory) is doing the right thing.

To see Labour supporters whining because yet more sleaze was uncovered is pathetic.

#42 Quisling Gogs is 100% correct:
"We are not supporting any particular party in this but supporting the right to know what our corrupt government is up too."

To try and paint this as 'anyone supporting this exposure is a Tory supporter' is really stupidity of the highest order.
56

bluehead,

edinburgh 25/04/2009 11:14:40
britain is known far and wide as the country that always shoots the messengers,this rotten goverment
has stunk out the name of politics even worse than ever
before,in fact they have become a national Disease,
in a world of fairness MR Galley would be prime minister and brown would be the one to be sacked
what a rotted pile!!!!!!!
57

Anajinn,

Canada 25/04/2009 11:54:46
He should have had a medal. I can't believe the incompetency of the British government. I've had first hand dealings with many departments at a very high level, and I can assure you that they are incompetent and don't care. To punish this man for rightfully highlighting a problem is unforgiveable.
58

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 12:05:25
They say you can't fool all of the people all of the time, but Mr Galley certainly seems to have fooled some of them.
59

old soldier,

Muir-of-Ord 25/04/2009 12:11:15
This gentleman deserves a medal it is time we got the truth out of all the government. Where is the openness we were promised all they give us is lies and miss information to suite the party line. It is time they were all shamed into telling the truth.
60

Stan Butler,

25/04/2009 12:25:12
#56 Colin r

'I hope Mr Galley goes to an employment tribunal'


So do I.

Then we might learn the truth about the relationship between Galley and Green.

Did it start when Green interviewed Galley for a post with the Tory party?

What contact did they have thereafter?

Did Green groom Galley to be his mole?


61

The Ayrshire Bard,

25/04/2009 13:04:31
Why does the messenger always fet shot in this country?
62

Phil1,

Edinburgh 25/04/2009 14:02:11
3 Fifi la Bonbon,25/04/2009 00:13:38

I guess as a member of the nasty party you think government ministers whether in Holyrood, Holywood or Westminister should be able to lie to the public without fear of the truth getting out.

I think you should take 200 lines for your 'jotter'
"I must not write rubbish thoughts down in public"
63

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 14:53:30
I am shocked and stunned to say that I agree completely with Observer in this matter.

Mr Galley was recruited and run as an agent of the Tory Party. He was motivated by the possibility of gaining the political role he had initially been denied. If he had been a genuine whistleblower, motivated to demonstrate failings on th paert of the government in cracking down on immigrants, he would have used the routes provided for in the Public Interest Disclosure Act. He worked to serve two masters - the state, and his handler, Mr Green, a professional journalist used to handling informants.

#70 - if a civil servant in the scottish government was daft enough to let himself or herself be run as an agent by a Labour MSP, then hell mend her or him.
64

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 15:01:08
#17 said "3 Fifi "he gets his jotters" I think that phrase tells those of us of a certain age group all we need to know about you." What on earth does that even mean?

The expression "he gets his jotters" is a well known and specifically Scottish idiom. Google the phrase "gets his jotters" and you'll see.

In what way does it "tell those of us of a certain age group all we need to know about you?" - I'm assumng that you aren't trying to convey a subtle compliment, but are motivated by the sectarian red mist that perceives anyone who isn't in the cybernat fold as an enemy to be attacked without thinking.

65

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 15:03:00
Also, Mr Galley looks like Sylar out of Heroes and is almost certainly a patricidal shape-shifting psychopath.
66

Ozone,

ST THOMAS 25/04/2009 15:19:50
Normington should be summarily hanged. Unbelievable stupidity at the top should not be tolerated. I've been a monarchist until now. I think the monarchy should be scrapped - it's quite apparent to me she could care less about anything - not just giving titles to nincompoops but seeing the country go to the dogs. I am a vet but it would appear an ignorant vet.
67

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 25/04/2009 15:20:39
The lady running the Home Office should be given a job suitable for her actual abilities - running a Pick & Mix Counter at Woolworths. Oh, they got rid of Woolies too.
68

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 15:50:47
No37..


" Even for you puskas that was a vile post"



Explain yourself.
69

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 15:54:16
"Jotters"

The last time I heard that was in the "50's"
70

Anthony,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 16:32:43
I agree with the majority of comments - but there is a minority of seriously ignorant people on this thread.

Politicians are elected to serve us. If they lie to us, and mislead us, as they did here, then a civil servant is not acting in an immoral or wrong manner by exposing those politicans as telling us lies - we are supposed to be a democracy, remember? People can only decide how they are going to vote based on the information they are given. If that information is fabricated, as the government's statistics on immigration clearly were, then this strikes at the heart of democracy.

All of this could be avoided if Britain would simply commit its constitution to writing. We are the only country in Europe who do not, and one of only three supposed democracies in the World who do not. That is why these problems arise because of a lack of definition on duties rights and responsibilities.
71

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 17:11:27
#78 - the information that the agent Galley passed on to his handler over a period of time related to information that was calculated to embarrass the ministers in the depaetment he worked for. It didn't relate to "fabricated statitics". If it had done so, Mr Galley had an alternative means of drawing attention to his concerns undeer the law. He chose not to use these,
72

Fifi la Bonbon,

25/04/2009 17:14:28
#78 - the information that the agent Galley passed on to his handler over a period of time related to information that was calculated to embarrass the ministers in the department he worked for. It didn't relate to "fabricated statitics".

If it had done so, Mr Galley had an alternative means of drawing attention to his concerns under the law. He chose not to use these, and instead acted surreptitiously in passing information to a political party which he hoped would in time prove a way to advance himself politically.

He wasn't motivated by patriotism, but by thoughts of self-advancement.

A "written constitution" wouldn't protect us from selfish individuals like Mr Galley, and the older men who would seek to exploit their weakneses.
73

Pilrig,

Livingston 25/04/2009 17:43:46
Dr David Kelly - victim of New Labour.
74

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 25/04/2009 17:51:50
He can take some satisfaction from being one of the few willing to expose the lies and corruption at the heart of New Labour and how they operate on a daily basis. The incompetence and stupidity in this case were on a heroic scale.

No doubt they will have their Ceaucescu moment soon.
75

Phil the Flooter,

25/04/2009 17:57:14
He does look a bit like a Mole though..

Moooleeey... Mollllleeeeey
76

Roy Forrester,

USA 25/04/2009 18:18:39
I would like to remind Sir David Normington that civil servants, including Sir David Normington, are employed by the taxpayer and are there to provide a service to the people of the United Kingdom irrespective of their political affiliations. It is the "Government who should be fired, not the whistleblower, since it was the "Government" which was in error.
77

puskas,

East kilbride 25/04/2009 19:37:27
No37 Grahamski..


Explain yourself.... A wee help.

Whats vile? and why?..


Mr David Kelly was an honourable man treated horribly by the state .. He carried much information regards Iraq, and worldwide..
A man of his experience and lifes time work doesn't commit suicide...... I would say the mass majority in the UK would agree with that. or at the very least be deeply suspicious..

Whats is vile about that and why?

I'm certainly no Tory but anyone who wishes to leak untruths from any political party gets my vote..

I believe legal action is now being taken regards 1 of the e.mails from No10.
Hopefully it goes through the courts and Broon gets called under oath. After all it came from No10.


78

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/04/2009 20:43:50
71 I prefer Shock and Awe and I do find it very funny I'm on the same side as you, Stan, and Grahamski but that demonstrates that your belief that nationalists are somehow against the same fair-ness as you is wrong. Although admittedly only in my case. I think a lot of the Hootsman commenters are seriously weird.
79

John1,

Stirling 25/04/2009 22:24:47
What is new about a whistleblower being sacked? It happens to all of them right through all levels of government. Remember when the massive corruption at the top of the EU was exposed? Remember who got fired? Remember wwhat happened to the corrupt officials?
We need an ombudsman to whom whistles can be blown, with the integrity and power necessary to see justice is done and the whistleblower is protected. Does such an individual exist? Perhaps in a modern constitutional monarchy/democracy this could be a function of the sovereign, who would need to be protected from people like the the smokescreen generators above who have tried to divert us from the issue with claims that passing information to an opposition spokesperson was politically motivated. Under present circumstances, who else should he have blown the whistle to?
80

Alan, New Zealand,

Leeds 26/04/2009 07:17:45
Re #57
Everybody takes this idiotic government to a tribunal at our expense via legal aid, or should that be illegal aid. For example, the latest batch of 11 illegal pakastanis whose visas are long since expired. This govenment are too weak to do anything about it. If someone is here illegally, throw them out, no appeal, no questions, no expense, just out.
The same goes for all the other abuses' of our legal aid system.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you feel concerned by the staff shortages in the city’s Indian restaurants?
No, I don’t really like Indian food
Yes, I think it will mean a fall in quality
They’re businessmen, they’ll find a way around it.


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.