Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ian Swanson: The MPs who'll pay for expenses

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2009
THE Westminster expenses scandal looks likely to lead to one of the biggest clear-outs of the Commons in living memory at the next general election.
A host of Conservative and Labour politicians – some of them senior figures – have already decided to stand down rather than risk humiliation at the polls. Many more could still follow suit.

And those who opt to ask voters for their continued supp
ort despite being exposed for questionable claims could well find themselves decisively rebuffed.

Labour's electoral prospects were looking grim before. And although all parties are implicated in the expenses crisis, Labour stands to lose more in Scotland, if only because they have the most seats.

So what will it mean for the politicians who represent Edinburgh and the Lothians at Westminster?

Chancellor Alistair Darling, MP for Edinburgh South West, was one of the first targets of the Daily Telegraph revelations, accused of "flipping" homes four times in four years, which meant he could claim towards the costs of his Edinburgh home and a London flat.

Tory hopes of winning the seat –which contains much of the old Pentlands constituency once held by Sir Malcolm Rifkind – were already buoyed by the state of the economy and the hope that voters would take out their anger on the man in charge at the Treasury. The expenses scandal has boosted their hopes further. But Labour insiders say Mr Darling is well respected in the area. He won with a majority of 7,242 last time and it would take a good swing for him to be ousted.

Michael Connarty, Labour MP for Linlithgow & Falkirk East, has a substantial 11,202 majority, but he has been the subject of some lurid coverage over his expense claims, which included a £250 alarm clock. And his response – saying politicians should not be forced to shop at 99p stores – has done nothing to help him.

Such a big majority may be difficult to sweep away entirely, but Mr Connarty could well see it slashed dramatically.

Neighbouring Labour MP Jim Devine, who took over the Livingston seat from Robin Cook, looks more vulnerable. He is accused of claiming £2,157 for rewiring his London flat, but presenting an invoice with a false VAT number and the name of a fictional company. And his office assistant says despite running up car and mileage costs of £11,700 she only received £60 from Mr Devine for driving him around the constituency.

His majority is 2,680 and the SNP is targeting the seat after winning the equivalent constituency at the 2007 Holyrood election.

Edinburgh South MP Labour Nigel Griffiths has one of the smallest majorities in Scotland – just 405 – and is therefore seen as the most vulnerable MP in the Lothians. He has not so far been named in the expenses scandal, but he did appear on the front page of a Sunday newspaper two weeks running over an alleged sex romp with a mystery woman in his Commons office.

The Liberal Democrats and the Tories are both targeting the seat and Mr Griffiths' only hope of survival could be if they split the anti-Labour vote. Labour insiders say, however, defeat is almost certain.

On paper, Labour's Mark Lazarowicz in Edinburgh North & Leith is also vulnerable with a majority of 2,153. But party insiders predict he will hang on, claiming he is well-liked and hard-working.

Mr Lazarowicz became part of the expenses story when he decided to repay £2,500 of his expenses – half of a legal bill for extending the lease on his London flat – despite having done nothing wrong.

The Lib Dems are targeting the seat, but might find the SNP taking a big chunk of the opposition vote.

John Barrett, Lib Dem MP for Edinburgh West, and David Hamilton, Labour MP for Midlothian, both have safe seats and seem to have been untouched by the expenses scandal.

East Lothian Labour MP Anne Moffat – majority 7,620 – has been criticised for her expenses in the past. In 2003-04 she topped the league for travel costs with claims totalling £40,000 but has not been highlighted in the Telegraph revelations. However, the tensions between her and local activists which led to talk of deselection are said to be in abeyance rather than resolved. But it would be a major upset for Labour to lose such a loyal seat.

Gavin Strang, the long-serving MP for Edinburgh East, announced some time ago he would be retiring at the next election. Labour has chosen former councillor Sheila Gilmore to replace him and as a new candidate she is exempt from the expenses scandal.

But the SNP won the equivalent constituency in the Holyrood elections, partly due to divisions in the local Labour party, and will target it again for Westminster.

MPs' excessive and arrogant expense claims have rightly sparked unprecedented public anger. They will not be the only factor at work when voters go to the polls, but they can only add to the problems of politicians whose jackets are already on a shoogly nail.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2009 9:20 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Ian Swanson
 
1

smokey joe 1,

28/05/2009 09:59:35
Brown was asked if any of his sleaze ridden cabinet ministers would be punished for blatently ripping off the public for everything the greedy scumbags could think of.


This was Browns response
http://tinyurl.com/ofqf22
2

Vivas,

Edinburgh 28/05/2009 11:37:50
"But Labour insiders say Mr Darling is well respected in the area."

Really ? They still believe that ? I think not. Deep down they know otherwise. Maybe they should start knocking on a few doors and ask people what they believe *now* about Darling. The "flipping" chancellor, the treasury-heid who pays someone else to do his tax return for him.

Darling is out on his airse in 12 months, fact.
3

Sgian Achlais,

28/05/2009 13:32:52
#2 Vivas,

I imagine Labour will have to campaign as well as vote by post. Many of the current Labour administration are not safe to walk the streets of their constituencies anymore.

Imagine the scene in Glasgow or Falkirk.

Labour MP: Knock, Knock. good Afternoon. I am you current Labour troughing pig who has been claiming thousands while you struggle just to eat and keep a roof over your head.

Glasgow Resident: Excuse me kind sir while I locate my stanley knife.
4

Mykel Mzoritz,

28/05/2009 13:49:34
The parties are all the same...

http://tinyurl.com/allthesame
5

Iainbroch,

28/05/2009 14:27:15
re3

Is that before or after the application of the Glesga Kiss?
6

steve 1511,

aberdeen 28/05/2009 14:46:09
what about ERIC JOYCE the mp for falkirk west who has claimed second home allowance for his family home in croydon for the past 8 years this guy has drained the trough with his false claims for housing allowances to a total of 160K he was not entitled to,he did not have a second home to claim on
VOTE THE TROUGH FEEDERS OUT
7

Time to Show Courage,

28/05/2009 15:49:42
Have a look at The Times "Full List" of expense fraudsters. They have published a huge list of all of the biggest and most outrageous claims. In fact, this list is nearly a week old, and we have had more trough feeders exposed since then. Including the Chancellor!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6272805.ece

Guess what folks...Once you have read it, try holding down Ctrl +F on this page and in the search box type "SNP". How many do you get?

Zero.

Vote with your head. Vote for separation from this bloodsucking leech, better known as Westiminster. Its your money they are stealing.

Vote SNP. Its your children's future.
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 28/05/2009 19:26:50
A growing number of MP's who have been exposed as abusers of the Commons Expenses system are declaring their intention to stand down at the next General Election which could be a year away.

Am I the only one who is disgusted at the fact that this is seemingly deemed acceptable by the media when it means that these crooks, some of which will eventually be found guilty of criminal charges, should be allowed to take home another year's salary, expenses (albeit somewhat reduced) and pension entitlement?
9

Stuart505,

Glasgow 29/05/2009 03:46:11
#8. Not only that, they are entitled to a "golden parachute" lump sum dependent on how long they have been there, the first 30,000 being tax free. This on top of their pension.

The lambs still insist they are underpaid.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.