Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

No bed blocking in Scottish hospitals

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 May 2009
THERE were no cases of 'bed blocking' in Scotland's hospitals last month for only the second time ever, figures disclosed today.
Health service statistics for April this year showed that no patients had to wait longer than six weeks to be discharged.

The only other time this has been achieved was in April last year.

And it compares with January's figures, which showed th
at 79 patients were still in hospital six weeks after they were ready to leave.

The problem of bed-blocking, known as "delayed discharges", has involved patients, usually elderly, who are ready to leave hospital but unable to do so for various reasons, such as lack of a place in a care home.

And it peaked in October 2001, when 2,162 hospital patients had to wait longer than six weeks to be discharged.

Public Health Minister Shona Robison said: "This Government has, in partnership with NHS boards and local authorities, made tackling delayed discharges a top priority.

"Our guiding principle has been that no patient should be left languishing in a hospital bed when they are well enough to leave. This is frustrating for the patients themselves but may also mean much-needed beds are not available for those who need them.

"So I am delighted that these figures show no patient was waiting longer than six weeks after being ready for discharge."

She added: "This returns us to the position first reached in April 2008 and we will continue to devote all our energies to maintaining and improving upon this achievement."

The figures for April showed that 468 hospital patients were delayed after they were ready to be discharged – but no one had to wait more than six weeks, which is the target.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 May 2009 11:51 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Native Guide,

USA 26/05/2009 12:15:03
"So I am delighted that these figures show no patient was waiting longer than six weeks after being ready for discharge." No longer than an extra 6 weeks is considered good!? They just keep lowering the bar until it's down to their level. We're going to get a health system like yours; I hope it doesn't take us 60 years to get it honed to this fine point.
2

The real dracula,

26/05/2009 15:27:48
#1 how is it the hospitals fault that the patient has nowhere to go ???
The hospital is doing the patient a favour by keeping them.
It is social services fault if the person is still in hosp awaiting residential care. Soc services and the NHS are two seperate organisations.
At least british hospitals dont throw people out on the street because they cant pay their bills.

I would dread to have a system like the USA it is cruel and immoral.
3

Edin Advocate,

Edinburgh 27/05/2009 10:52:10
I have just read this article and was shocked to hear this as i support one individual in hospital, as their advocate, and he has been waiting 9 years on delayed discharge!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the Western General ditch its fresh-cooked meals to make more room?
Yes, it’s cheaper to bring in food from elsewhere
No, patients need decent food to help them get better
Maybe, it depends what they make room for


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.