Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Evidence mounts on overeating and obesity link to gene

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 January 2009
FURTHER evidence that gluttony can be genetic has been uncovered by British scientists.
Researchers studied 131 children aged four and five who were offered a plate of biscuits right after eating a meal. They found children who kept eating biscuits were more likely to have versions of a gene which has been linked to eating when full an
d being overweight.

Professor Jane Wardle, director of the charity Cancer Research UK's Health Behaviour Research Centre at University College London said: "Previous research has shown the FTO gene is linked to larger body size. We believe this (new] research tells us more about how some children are more responsive to signals in their bodies encouraging them to eat when full than others. Knowing how the genes work is the first step to minimising these negative effects."

Prof Wardle added: "This study showed some children don't know when to stop, which could lead to the onset of obesity and a lifetime of health problems".

The new study failed to find any link between the FTO gene and children's willingness to take exercise.

• PEOPLE who are borderline obese are almost a third more likely to develop bowel cancer than those of a normal weight, a cancer scientist warned today.

Dr Rachel Thompson, science programme manager for World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), said people with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 have a 30 per cent higher risk of bowel cancer than someone with a BMI of 20, which is the lower end of the healthy weight range.

Dr Thompson said: "The evidence that being overweight increases your risk of cancer is stronger now than ever before.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 January 2009 8:17 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/01/2009 01:00:38




Just by chance, were the "Researchers" "Fat" BTW?

Any excuse for 'Eating Food',....'HUH'??


2

syntax,

Edinburgh 12/01/2009 02:43:29
What a non-story? An Indian researcher 'uncovered' this gene in chickens years ago and was totally ignored by the scientific community. So much so that he had to move to the USA to continue his research.

Strange that now British scientists have 'discovered' the gene it's big news ?

It's not new and it's not British !!
3

fife runner,

12/01/2009 06:41:10
so why not the obesity issue we now have rearing its head years ago? Or has the human population undergone a genetic mutation. Perhaps that would be a good piece to research.
4

OldWife,

12/01/2009 09:31:32
What bunk, our genes are still 99.9% stone age and so suggest that an obesity gene has suddenly sprung up to affect white middle class Westerners is pure BS. What these kids were were sugar addicts, pure and simple.
As for the other part about bowel cancer, no-one has ever said exactly HOW this happens rather than it might. They are so full of bull to attract headlines but no substance or fact to their claims.
5

TheSmith,

12/01/2009 09:49:19
If I was a 5 year old being offered biscuits after a meal as part of an experiment, I'd see it as a treat and something out of the ordinary - so of course I'd eat them!
6

drunken proffet,

Tassy 12/01/2009 09:49:23
#4 Sorry OldWife, I was brought up in the forties and fifties when a lot of things were on ration including sugar. There were still a lot of fat wee gits in the classroom and from my own part I cannot remember being sylph like.
7

fife runner,

12/01/2009 11:10:28
# of course we had some fatties in the 50's and 60's but not as much as now. We did not have to build bigger maternity beds, have bigger seats on planes, etc or see the same number of fatties as we do today. Even you have to admit that.

If that were the case why is type 2 diabetes on the increase or eye probs due to obesity etc on the increase. We have an obesity problem which we did not have back then
8

fife runner,

12/01/2009 11:11:42
even my trousers for eg. I have 36 waist. But me recent pair of works trousers are bigger made and are more like a 38 as fat is the new thin.
9

OldWife,

12/01/2009 13:13:48
#6. I was keeping it simple in using 'sugar' to represent all carbohydrates. In the 40s and 50s I bet you ate a lot of flour, bread, potatoes, starchy root veg, rice, fruit and margarine (v bad fats). These contribute greatly to obesity not just white sugar and the body can't differentiate between one or the other, it is all glucose in the end and the because it contains no nutrient value the body demands more and more and more just to try to get the nutrients that never come until you eat protein (meat etc) and fat (butter, dairy).

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.