Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cervical cancer jab may be offered to all women up to age 25

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 April 2008
A VACCINE to protect against cervical cancer could be offered to more women than first planned, it emerged yesterday.
The Scottish Government has outlined details of a £64 million school-based programme using the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for the under-18s, starting in September.

But Shona Robison, the public health minister, yesterday said discussions w
ere ongoing about whether it could also offer benefits for women up to age 25.

Research has so far suggested the vaccine works best in young girls who are not yet sexually active. But it may also offer some benefit to older women, especially those who have had limited exposure to HPV through sexual contact.

HPV is sexually transmitted and causes the majority of cervical cancers. The vaccination should protect against the strains of the virus responsible for about 70 per cent of cervical cancers.

Currently the vaccine Gardasil – the first HPV vaccine to be approved – is licensed for use in women up to the age of 26.

Ms Robison said the existing programme was focusing on under-18s because the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation did not recommend it for women up to the age of 25. "It is not part of the national programme," she said. "But we are continuing to look at whether there is something that could be done for that group of women who may have newly acquired HPV infection, but we have not reached any conclusions on that."

Ms Robison said it was a complex issue, but a decision was expected in the next few months.

Pamela Morton, from the cervical cancer charity Jo's Trust, said allowing older women to have the vaccine would be a welcome development. "In Australia, they offer women aged 18 to 26 the opportunity to have the vaccine free of charge.

"The results show that 80 per cent have taken up the offer. To have a similar system in the UK would be very welcome."

Until a decision is made on this older group of women, health boards have to start preparing for the school vaccination programme. Ms Robison said they would receive an extra £1.5 million this year. It is expected that special teams of nurses will deliver the vaccine in schools, while older girls may be targeted through their GP.

In the first year of the programme, girls in S2, S5 and S6 will be vaccinated. Scotland is starting the catch-up campaign for girls up to 18 a year ahead of the rest of the UK.

In the first two years, 180,000 girls will be offered the vaccine. A campaign this summer will inform parents and young people about the plans.

Previously, some have expressed concerns about young girls being vaccinated against what is essentially a sexually transmitted infection.

Ms Robison said she was confident that people would support the vaccine programme and parents would be asked for consent. However, girls could still overrule the wishes of their parents.

She said the programme was the biggest and most expensive immunisation campaign ever undertaken in Scotland.

"It has potential to deliver tremendous health benefits for future generations of young women, offering them protection against the virus responsible for almost three-quarters of cervical cancers."

But the Royal College of Nursing questioned whether enough money had been made available to introduce the programme.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 April 2008 11:13 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 00:35:59
I see the 'Brainwashing' has begun!!

This, .'Jab' is being sold as,,

'Have-it, and Never get Cervical Cancer'

Its a, 'Darned out Lie'!!

Also, whats the long term, 'side affects,?

If the Woman/Girl that has this jab and ends up pregnant, will it affect her Baby, in years to come,?

Whilst the concept appears OK, and no-doubt will curtail Cervical Cancer, as in the research, there are far to many other factors that need answered!

Why the,,'Big Push'?

Who's 'Making the Fortunes',? (silly question, we all know)

As usual, the Women become a ,..'Medical Experiment'!

Which as we all know from history, goes 'Tragically Wrong', all too often!!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 00:49:45

Recap the tragedies!

But hey! we make the money and it IS Safe!!

'AYE',..'Right Then'!

Thalidomide! (morning sickness)

Stilboestrol! (breast feeding, out of fashion, welcome to 'Breast Cancer')

The list goes,..'ON'!

3

Crank Parent,

Livingston 09/04/2008 10:08:51
What a waste of money.

This jab does not protect against cervical cancer, it claims to protect against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 in certain circumstances. It has had limited efficacy and no safety testing. In particular, it has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity and has not been tested for efficacy in the age group of children to be vaccinated (9-15).

Between June 2006 and May 2007 1,637 reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine were reported to the FDA, including 371 serious reactions and 3 deaths. Side effects included pain, fever, nausea, dizziness, itching, paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome and seizures. Between May 2007 and September 2007 an additional 1800 adverse reactions were reported, including more deaths.

Judicial Watch (US government watchdog) have noted large donations to key politicians originating from Merck, the manufacturer's of Gardasil...
4

Em,

09/04/2008 16:15:17
One statement I find alarming in this report is -"parents would be asked for consent. However, girls could still overrule the wishes of their parents."

This means the rights of the parents can be easily cast aside when they send their child to school where they can be persuaded to be vaccinated.

The vaccine has been proven ineffective in preventing HPV and does nothing to eradicate the virus from women who already have it. In the vast majority of cases HPV goes away by itself without the need for medical intervention.
It is well known by medical professionals that HPV occurs in almost all women who are sexually active, and is most common between the ages of 20 and 24, however, vaccinating women who already have HPV has been found to increase the risk of developing high grade precancerous lesions by 44.6%
In other words, if the vaccine is given to a young woman who already carries HPV in a “harmless” state, it may “activate” the infection and directly cause precancerous lesions to appear.

And here we have Shona Robinson putting forth the idea that the vaccine should be considered for women of an age group where HPV is most prevalent, this can only result in an increase in the number of women to develop cervical cancer.
5

CentreScot,

West Lothian 09/04/2008 16:46:18
Why woman and why up to 25.
This sounds like a repeat of the Rubella tactics. Unless this is a gradual rollout.
Give it to all susceptible individuals.

Up to 25% of all head and neck cancers have shown the presence of Human Papilloma Virus type 6. If it works why not demand from all possible victims?
6

Eve,

Scotland 10/04/2008 22:25:00
#1Charles Linskaill: You've ovbuesly never had the Cervical smear test!! OMG it is so painfull (for some of us!)and at least unconfrotable for most.

Me I'm to auld to get the jab! BUT I wish I didn't have to get thoes stuiped smears. Haven't had it sucessfuly yet!! Cause it's to painful.

BUT ofcourse you would rather all women went through that brech of deginty every 3years. With the jag they won't have to to get it so often and thats a good thing. Cause being a women is hard enought with out haveing to skeduel in an apointment to get a stuied painful smear.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.