Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Boys 'should be vaccinated' in cervical cancer fight

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 July 2009
DOCTORS have called for boys to be included in the vaccination programme to protect girls against cervical cancer.
In Scotland, girls from around the age of 12 and 13 are now offered a vaccine to protect against the human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes the majority of cases of cervical cancer, with a catch-up campaign for older pupils.

But doctors at the B
ritish Medical Association (BMA) conference in Liverpool yesterday argued that the programme should be extended to cover boys as well.

Experts believe this could stop boys passing HPV to unvaccinated girls. Doctors also said that if the Government had chosen a different vaccine, it could also have helped protect both boys and girls from genital warts.

Dr Sohail Ashraf, from the Preston, Chorley and South Ribble BMA division, said HPV was the most common sexually transmitted viral infection in the UK. "The majority don't even know they are infected and may be passing the virus on to their partners," he said.

Dr Ashraf congratulated the UK governments for introducing the HPV vaccination programme. But he said they had "missed a trick" in not appearing to recognise that HPV infection affects both male and females.

The vaccine chosen for the programme – Cervarix – is effective against two strains of HPV, whereas rival Gardasil also protects against two strains linked to genital warts.

Dr Ashraf said: "I believe we have to argue for Gardasil as the extra marginal cost of this vaccine will more than pay for itself in future years due to the reduced cost of treating genital warts."

He said sexually active 20 to 24-year-olds were most at risk of HPV infection, adding: "Recent research figures suggest that many young women may become infected with their first sexual experience and the risk infection increases with the number of sexual partners.

Sir Charles George, chairman of the Board of Science at the BMA, said the Government's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had said immunisation of boys was not necessary. He said: "If we follow what is recommended here (at the conference) the cost of the programme will presumably double, which means around £400 million a year rather than £200 million."

Despite this warning, doctors backed calls for boys to be vaccinated as well as girls – a stance previously backed by other medical groups. In Scotland, figures in March showed that uptake of the first of dose of HPV vaccine was over 92 per cent, with 88 by the second dose of the three-dose course. A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The question of whether to immunise boys against HPV was considered by the UK Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation, who did not consider immunising boys to be a cost-effective way to prevent cervical cancer in girls."

Sarah Woolnough, head of policy at Cancer Research UK, said:

"The (Scottish) Government must do more to publicise the benefits of vaccination and ensure that girls can have the vaccine easily."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 July 2009 6:02 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cancer in children
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 01:05:26

Absolutely Crazy!, when we have a now ongoing debate about this 'Jabs' Safety, and I doubt unlike our Girls, the Boys will not be soo willing to have this 'Jab', and the take-up will be Low.


2

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 03/07/2009 08:25:13
Why? Boys don't have cervixes.....
3

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

03/07/2009 09:06:51
2...Males carry the virus and then pass it onto females....
4

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 03/07/2009 09:14:02
3

Thank you, I know. It was to confuse Chuckles at 1, he's a hoot!
5

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 09:47:44
Obviously Charles has no problem paying for the treatment of ignorant people who have sex without condoms and get an STI. Me, I'd rather my taxes went towards preventing the STIs. People are idiots and the fact that there are still people who don't understand how important condoms are makes an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure.

Now I just wish they'd put a sterilization into the jab so that they won't be breeding either.
6

livilion,

livingston 12/07/2009 11:34:50
#5 SandyBottoms
'People are idiots' presumably because they breed and you don't?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.