Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ian Swanson: Ban on airguns finally looks to be in Holyrood's sights

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2009
WHEN two-year-old Andrew Morton was killed four years ago after being shot with an airgun, there were widespread demands for a crackdown on the deadly weapons.
Andrew was being carried by his 13-year-old brother in Glasgow's Easterhouse estate when he was hit by a pellet in the head. An unemployed 27-year-old man, who had been taking pot shots from the window of his flat, was later sentenced to life impris
onment for murder.

Andrew's parents collected 11,000 signatures calling for a ban on airguns.

Regulations were tightened in the wake of Andrew's death – the minimum age for possession of an air weapon was raised from 17 to 18 and firearms dealers were required to register with the police.

But moves to go further – for instance, piloting a licensing system in Scotland that would have restricted airguns to those involved in pest control or shooting clubs – were rebuffed by the Home Office.

However, after the publication of the cross-party Calman report this month, it now looks as if responsibility for legislation on airguns is going to be transferred from Westminster to Holyrood – and the SNP will act to ban them.

Despite previously opposing such a transfer of power, the UK government has now signalled it is ready to agree to the move.

And justice secretary Kenny MacAskill has promised he would use the new powers to bring in a ban on air weapons.

Exceptions would be made for those who use airguns in the course of their job – for example, farmers using them for pest control – and registered gun clubs.

But general sales would be outlawed and an amnesty would probably be declared in a bid to gather in most of the 400,000 air weapons thought to be held in Scotland.

Three Scots have died and more than 1,150 injured in airgun incidents over the past nine years.

Just a few weeks after Andrew Morton's death in 2005, a six-year-old boy in Edinburgh was shot in the head with an airgun near his home in Pennywell Medway, Muirhouse. Tyler Scott was playing outside with his eight-year-old sister Jodie when he felt a sharp pain. Doctors said if the pellet had hit him a millimetre to the right, he too could have been killed.

And in September last year, a young mother and her baby daughter had a lucky escape after a bus they were travelling in came under fire. Lynsey Wade, 20, and one-year-old daughter Rihanna were on the X95 First bus service approaching Edinburgh Royal Infirmary when the window they were sitting next to was shattered by what appeared to be an airgun pellet.

There have also been numerous attacks on animals using air weapons, including the case last year of a stray cat in South Queensferry that had been shot up to 40 times, leaving him so badly injured a leg had to be amputated.

Last summer, a pet cat in Tranent, East Lothian, lost an eye after being shot by an air rifle.

Soon afterwards, a champion showjumping horse was shot in the neck by gun-wielding thugs as it grazed in a field near Musselburgh. The pellet missed a main artery by inches.

And this month, the Evening News reported how Jinky the ginger and white moggy from South Queensferry lost his miaow after he was shot in the throat with an airgun.

An advertising campaign launched by the Scottish Government in March aimed to end any remaining myth that air weapons can be treated like toys.

Former first minister Jack McConnell wanted to go further than the UK restrictions on airguns, but his lobbying for a licensing or permit system fell on deaf ears at Westminster. And after the SNP took over at Holyrood, former home secretary Jacqui Smith repeatedly rejected proposals from Mr MacAskill for a pilot licensing scheme in Scotland and declined jointly hosting a summit on the issue.

Edinburgh City Council even considered passing a special bylaw to ban airguns in the Capital, before giving up the idea because of "legal, political and practical difficulties".

There were an estimated 145 firearms offences involving airguns in Lothian and Borders last year.

The Calman commission – set up by Labour, the Liberal Democrats and Tories – said it was not convinced Scotland had a general problem with firearms, but it acknowledged there was "appetite" to deal with air weapons differently in Scotland and concluded that the advantages of enabling the Scottish Parliament to do so outweighed the disadvantages.

The SNP now wants the apparent unanimity on the transfer of responsibility to be put into action as quickly as possible. A Scottish Government source says: "No further debate is needed – there is now complete agreement between the Scottish Government and the Calman parties."

The switch could be effected under secondary legislation and the SNP says that means it could easily be completed before the end of the year. The government source believes there would also be cross-party agreement on a ban.

If powers were transferred sooner rather than later, the pressure would then be on the Scottish Government to act quickly.

Provided the SNP could find room for an airgun ban in its legislative programme – and one of the criticisms of the current government is that its list of forthcoming bills is rather light – then the measure could be passed before the next elections in 2011.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 June 2009 9:26 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Airguns , Gun crime
 
1

Alan Moulding,

NE England 24/06/2009 12:17:24
Politicians must have TERRIBLE memories. Banning air guns will do precisely nothing to cut air gun crime. Just look at how much gun crime has fallen since hand guns were banned.

The trouble with bans like this is that they only affect law abiding people. Do you honestly think that someone who is prepared to lean out of their window and shoot a child in the head will hand in their air rifle because there's an amnesty on?

All that will happen is that the thousands of people who enjoy shooting as a legitimate pass time will be forced to hand in their rifles. The idiots who shoot at people will not.

We already have the laws to put people who abuse air guns away for a long time. What we need is for them to be enforced properly. Get the judges to start handing out maximum sentences for firearms offences and send out a message that it will not be tolerated, at all.

Leave the people who shoot within the law alone, we aren't the people shooting at your children and pets. We never have been, and never will.
2

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 12:59:57
#1 Alan Moulding

I agree absolutely, if this piece of offensive legislation goes ahead it will achieve very little to deter gun crime (regardless of whether the weapons used are air guns or firearms).

Only the law-abiding citizens who enjoy shooting as a sport will suffer.

The PC brigade should be really proud of themselves.
3

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 24/06/2009 13:13:44
Banning people from owning air guns will not stop cruelty to animals the sickos who do that will find other ways to get there sick kicks frim inflicting pain.

We should be enforcing the laws on cruelty to animals that already exist. Not shouting for an airgun ban that will do very little to prevent animal cruelty.

This is typical of politicians on all sides getting on the band wagon of a populist idea. That when fully looked into will achieve jacks***.

As i said before we should be enforcing the laws already on the books not bringing in more laws. As if we cant enforce the laws we have now how will we enforce even more laws.
4

Terry del Fuego,

Leith 24/06/2009 13:29:00
Mr Swanson's article suggests quite pointedly the use of air weapons for legitimate purposes would be maintained. But how would that be administered? Apply for a licence retrospectively?
This would avoid a rather costly compensation scheme but, in all honesty, good luck enforcing such legislation.
5

Spock,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 13:38:49
Would the Evening News please clarify if the exemption for registered shooting clubs also means that legitimate target sports shooters will be exempt also, i.e. those who are priviledged to have a fire arm certificate? These guns are not generally stored at shooting clubs.

Knee jerk reaction from the SNP as usual. Sad that anyone gets killed or injured by idiots, sad that the majority have to suffer because of the minority but that is politics in Scotland now.
6

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 13:59:06
Another mindless ban that will have absolutely no effect whatsoever on the law breakers.

It is ALREADY illegal to shoot and kill two-year-old boys with airguns. It is ALREADY illegal to shoot and maim people with airguns. It is ALREADY illegal to deliberately shoot pets with airguns and it is ALREADY illegal to damage property with airguns.

How about using some of the existing laws to deal with the existing problems before jumping in with both feet to hit those who are abiding by the law?
7

Terry del Fuego,

Leith 24/06/2009 14:03:51
I am sceptical that these powers will be handed over by the Labour goverment for the SNP minority devolved parliament to play with BEFORE the next general election. More likely the idea will be a carrot to vote for Labour then.
8

Jimmy Le Pie,

24/06/2009 14:09:39
#7

Are you seriously suggesting anyone would New Labour Sleaze because of the SNP bringing in a welcome air gun ban???

The vast majority of the electorate aren't as shallow as you!!!
9

Terry del Fuego,

Leith 24/06/2009 14:25:57
#8
I am sceptical, not shallow. Anything to do with a politician requires scepticism.
10

Jimmy Le Pie,

24/06/2009 14:37:42
You missed the word unionist before "politician requires scepticism."!!!
11

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 24/06/2009 14:54:46
Excellent news. The sooner the better.
12

Colkitto,

River Clyde 24/06/2009 19:52:36
If we could only ban Trident, now that really would be something !
13

Brianwci,

25/06/2009 01:18:03
#12 Colkitto: "If we could only ban Trident, now that really would be something!"

Now that would be real power and something to get excited about.

Can you imagine European parliaments getting excited about being given the power to ban air guns?

The whole thing is designed by Westminster to make Holyrood look ridiculous and it does.

It should be accepted without fuss as part of a small measure of extra powers.
14

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 25/06/2009 10:55:37
#13 Brianwci

"It should be accepted without fuss as part of a small measure of extra powers."

I'm sure there won't be any fuss, but regarding the "small measure of extra powers" perhaps everyone in Scotland should be very cautious before breaking wind in public - talk about a spineless population?
15

JonnoD,

England 29/06/2009 13:28:42
I suggest that more people have been killed or seriously injured by being kicked in the last 9 years than have been wounded by air weapons. Can we assume that a ban on shoes will be put in place in a similar timeframe? I make this comment not as an air gun owner but as a concerned, responsible, footwear collector.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think shops should be allowed to sell replica weapons to the public?
Yes, if used properly they are just harmless fun.
Yes, but there’s no demand for them so what’s the point.
No, they could be mistaken for the real thing.


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.