Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Dunblane father urges Scots control of guns law

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 March 2009
A FATHER whose five year-old daughter was murdered in the Dunblane massacre has called for firearms legislation to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament.
Dr Mick North has argued that giving MSPs control over firearms would allow them to tighten laws to deal with Scotland's specific gun problems.

North, who lost his daughter Sophie in the killings, on March 13, 1996, claimed that UK ministers tend
ed to ignore Scottish trends in gun use and misuse.

His argument, set out in his submission to the Calman Commission – the body set up to examine giving Holyrood more powers – once again sets him on a collision course with the country sports and shooting lobby.

North has been a prominent campaigner for tighter gun controls since Thomas Hamilton's shooting spree at Dunblane Primary School, which saw him take the lives of 16 pupils and their teacher before turning his gun on himself.

"Powers over policing and justice are already devolved and it is perverse that this one key area of legislation, whose consequences are felt by local communities and are dealt with and administered by local police forces and courts, remains reserved to Westminster," North said.

The SNP has long argued that the Scottish Parliament should have control over gun laws. Last week, the Lib Dems made a similar point when it outlined improvements they believe should be made to the constitution.

The gun lobby remains opposed to the idea. In its submission to Calman, the British Shooting Sports Council claimed that devolving firearms legislation would harm the economy and require border controls between Scotland and England.

David Penn, British Shooting Sports Council secretary, said: "At present there are no border controls between England and Scotland but, if firearms legislation were to be different in the two countries, some sort of control might well be necessary and this would impact on the free flow of general trade."





Page 1 of 1

 
1

subrosa,

08/03/2009 01:44:18
Good for you Dr North and I do hope Calman takes your point seriously.
2

,

08/03/2009 02:04:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Brian Hill,

08/03/2009 02:09:58
Dr North is absolutely right. In an era of increasing personal violence using guns and knives it is essential that the people of Scotland have the right to control these potential weapons of death.

Holyrood should obviously have these powers.
4

,

08/03/2009 03:21:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 08/03/2009 09:46:15
I agree with Mick North and trust that common sense prevails.
6

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 08/03/2009 12:09:49
Has Dr Mick North ever 'demanded answers'(a phrase fashionable among politicians) from George Robertson, then MP, who thought he knew better than the professional judgement of Central Scotland Police? Thomas Hamilton had been identified as a nutter and a loner with both an unhealthy interest in young boys and a significant arsenal. The police wanted to revoke his Firearms Certificate but Robertson's 'political intervention' in support of Hamilton forced the Chief Constable to back down. Robertson's involvement was largely airbrushed out of the enquiry after he started waving Writs about. But, curiously, he was 'sidelined' off to a sinecure in NATO fairly soon afterwards.
7

,

08/03/2009 16:21:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Allan(handofgod137),

09/03/2009 17:07:02
So why was my comment above deleated? To reiterate Dr North and the Snowdrop campain were merely a smokescreen to deflect critisism of the police, and cover up the consequences of the labour party using its influence to ensure that an unsuitable person was allowed a firearms certificate. Don't forget that if the truth about labours involvement in this tragedy had been exposed from the start, it would have cost them votes in the upcomming election.
9

,

09/03/2009 18:58:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

09/03/2009 19:07:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

09/03/2009 19:09:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

CommonbloodySense,

Dunblane 12/03/2009 16:43:29
I think people need to remember this is about Mick North trying to have legislation changed which should have been sanctioned already. This is not about Labour cover-up's or other political gains. What happened in Dunblane was awful, mistakes were made by people in dealing with Hamilton before the incident, but they can not be held accountable for what happened.

Futhermore, to say that we should be allowed to 'bear arms' is ridiculous. They are not the solution to a problem, it would only compound the situation.
13

AtheT,

13/03/2009 14:38:41
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
Gun controls dont work, so why vote more laws in?
Proper gun control is a nice tight group.
Gun controls kill more people then they save.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.