Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Sketch: When the hand of history should be used for a clip round the ear

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 January 2009
THE hand of history massaged the jolly Green shoulders of Patrick Harvie yesterday, as the innocuous-looking little fellow scuppered the Nats' Budget. When I say "history", of course, I don't mean anything that anyone will remember. And when I say "Budget", I don't mean a proper thing with a leather briefcase, whisky and implications for VAT and the price of your pint. For, as Margo MacDonald (Ind) rightly pointed out, the Scottish "Budget" is just dis
But, in the small scheme of things, passions ran high in Holyrood yesterday as party representatives scuttled to and fro, trying to do last-minute deals. Patrick expressed himself furious at all this jiggery-pokery, even as he was being dragged from
the chamber by Eck Salmond to have his ear bent one last time.

But Patrick's ear was not for bending. "Some of us are not playing last-minute political games," he frothed.

John Swinney, the finance secretary, tried placating him with funding for an insulation project. As a sop to the Tories, he also announced a town centre regeneration initiative. While Patrick got into a paddy, the Tories were chuffed enough and backed the SNP. This prompted Michael MacMahon (Lab) to refer to Tory finance spokesman Derek Brownlee as "Mini-Swinney", while Jeremy Purvis (Lib Dem) went so far as accusing him of making the finance secretary a cup of coffee. A serious allegation.

Hangdog Hugh Henry (Lab), rose like a micturating fountain to froth about needing more information. For example, quoth he, what did Eck say to Patrick when he summoned him from the chamber? Said Hugh: "What we now have is the reintroduction of pork-barrel politics of the worst kind."

I know Eck's no Twiggy, but this was getting personal.

Hughie said it was a matter of printed record that he'd always supported town centre regeneration: "Even Derek Brownlee and the Tories would be able to read the joined-up writing." Hang on, if it's a matter of record, it would surely be printed. What joined-up writing of record was Hangdog Hughie referring to? His diary ("Today, I had beans for tea, and supported town centre regeneration.")?

Next minute, a security guard's wig blew off, a pigeon was hurtled backwards and a door started slamming on its hinges. Yes, James "Foghorn" Kelly (Lab) had begun to holler. His constituency boasted the fourth-lowest number of GPs in the country, he roared, and yet its citizenry had many illnesses – not least tinnitus, I suspect, if he's blundering aboot the place sounding forth.

David McLetchie (Con) held forth about Scotland being "an integral part of the United Kingdom" – don't remind us – and, accordingly, all major financial decisions were made by "Her Majesty's Government", and not by His Eckiness's Government in Scotia. His main gripe was with Labour: with its cherished trade union heritage, how could it scupper a budget with the risk to public-sector pay and jobs?

Politically, I was all at sea: unionist ultras, the Tories, backing the SNP and the public sector? Whatever next? It was getting difficult to tell who was who.

Liam McArthur (Lib Dem) said the Tories had proved themselves a "cheap date for ministers". Alex Neil (SNP) talked of Labour and their "Liberal poodles", prompting Mike Rumbles (Lib Dem) to get up on his hind legs and howl, which Alex took gracefully with the words: "I will let you bark because there will be no bite." Miaow!

Patrick, meanwhile, had reappeared, apologising to the presiding orifice for nipping oot. Hangdog Hughie demanded again to know what was said. But Patrick said it was not his practice to relay gossip. Instead, he announced that, unless John came up with more dosh for insulation by 5 o'clock, he wasn't backing the Budget.

Accordingly, at 5pm, he (and his mate) gave it a big "niet", and the vote was tied at 64-64. The presiding orifice, Alex Hercules O'Blenkinsop Fergusson, said he had to use his casting vote to back the status quo, so Swinney's Budget went doon the Suwanee. He said he'd be back with another in a couple of days. Then who knows what the hand of history will do to Patrick? Poke him in the eye, I shouldn't wonder.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

29/01/2009 00:29:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Embra Don,

29/01/2009 01:41:00
John Swinney should invite each of the opposition parties to put forward amendments to the budget detailing where they would make cuts to pay for their wish list. Let Parliament vote on them. If they are carried, consider it as a vote of no confidence call an election and let the people decide. I'm sure Labour would love an election in April.
3

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 29/01/2009 03:34:32
"Liam McArthur (Lib Dem) said the Tories had proved themselves a "cheap date for ministers"."

Pretty ironic coming from the party whose traditional role in Scottish Politics is that of the Labour Parties "Kept Woman".
4

Grahamski,

Falkirk 29/01/2009 07:12:19
2
John Swinney should put forward a budget that the democratically elected parliament finds acceptable. That's his job and so far he has failed to do so.
Still, he must be right chuffed that he's allied with the tories...just like old times, eh?
5

TWC,

29/01/2009 08:25:10
The democtraticly elected members should make their position plain first pass, which they did with the exception of Lab.
Labour may have mentioned apprenticeships - a one trick pony. How many apprentices can we have and what happens when they finish their time?? they get the sack!
I know a guy who had to pay his son's employer to keep his sons in work. That was before the crisis.
6

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 29/01/2009 09:33:31
The voters were overwhelmingly in favour of the budget. The MSPs' job is to represent the voters. Let's see if Labour, the Lib Dems and the Greens REALLY want to give the voters a chance to express their opinion on the matter.
7

,

29/01/2009 10:07:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

alanh,

ek 29/01/2009 10:33:34
this " journalist" seems to think this is just a good old joke?????

This budget is ver important for the running of our country.
Not one "journalist" has questioned nu liebores "wishlist or asked the lib dums where they would cut to pay for their stupid tax bribe?

We now have a month where local govt cant plan because they may have to settle for last year's budget figures. That could mmean a 30% rise in all of OUR council taxes just so that they can play schoolboy party political games. As for Grey's laughable no confidence question, please just do it so we get to wipe those political pygmies out of their troughs for good
9

Edward,

29/01/2009 11:29:18
One question that fails to be asked by ALL journalists, to the Greens, Labour and the Libdems.
Is this, 'ok so you want this amount spent on your pet projects, exactly where is the money to be found?'
Not once have any BBC journalist asked this, why?
10

MandyMac,

Glasgow 29/01/2009 14:10:41
145,000 votes were ignored so it's a bluff to call the parliament democratic. An election is the best all round but the SNP will need to diet...
11

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/01/2009 15:57:05
#12 Rab's column is the political sketch. It's *meant* to be a joke.

It's odd how most people who are unable to grasp that simple concept turn out to be Salmond supporters.
12

Eve,

Scotland 29/01/2009 16:42:44
Whats this artcle supose to be about? There some bizar words in there and my head spins when I try and read this artcle.

Isn't actualy worth my while reading?
13

Thomas79,

Ayrshire 29/01/2009 17:28:45
Labour MSPs were laughing at FMQs today, during angry clashes between Alex Salmond and Iain Gray. Surely they do not think this situation is humorous? I am all for compromise and deal making, but the SNP should stop wasting energy trying to get Labour on board. And Lord Foulkes is running around saying his party should demand a vote of no confidence,to bring down the SNP government, as that would be good for the Labour party.
14

Eve,

Scotland roll on Independence 29/01/2009 17:42:17
#15 Duncan in Edinburgh: Awh so that why it makes no sence. Cause it fiction!!!

I'm glad you cleared that one up.

15

alanh,

ek 29/01/2009 18:05:04
#15 duncan

yep i know this "sketch" is meant to be a joke............but its simply NOT FUNNY as a lot of people could be seriously effected by this jape by the opposition parties
16

Curley Bill,

29/01/2009 18:47:28
Does anyone still know Morse Code? I've been trying to decipher Giggity's eye twitches and I think it says, "Help me Murphy, I've fookrd it up!"
17

Eve,

Scotland 29/01/2009 20:13:37
#20 Curley Bill: Bad Bill is that you?
18

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 29/01/2009 23:28:00
rufus ,stole yer name from the marx brothers eh?,why dont you use harpos character in room service as it sums you up perfectly"Faker Englund"
sounds like broon on hes faker scotsman
19

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 29/01/2009 23:29:29
#22 cont
or you could use The Merchant of Weiners,as like yer wee pal gordo broon
20

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 29/01/2009 23:32:57
as a member of the marx brothers comedy club,im sure you now owe tons in back paid royalties to the relatives of the marx brothers
they were comic legends ,and you are a legend in your own lunchtime
21

Dark Lochnagar,

Symington 31/01/2009 01:59:48
James "Foghorn" Kelly complains, " the GPs in my constituency are the fourth lowest in the country". Aye after 50+ years of rule by Labour in Scotland. You couldnae make it up!!! Do they ever think what they are saying before they open their mouths or do their brains not click in on time.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.