Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Will recycling target end up on scrapheap?

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 February 2009
AS MOUNTAINS of rubbish are emptied by the lorryload into a shed at one of the dozens of landfill sites across Scotland, the aim of recycling almost three-quarters of all we throw away seems a long way off.
To some, it is impossible to imagine meeting the target of recycling 70 per cent of all waste in Scotland by 2025. To others, it is a challenge that is achievable with innovation and a change in habits.

Some 3.4 million tonnes of municipal waste a
re produced in Scotland each year. Every day, 500 tonnes of waste is sent from Edinburgh alone, and dumped in the Oxwellmains landfill site near Dunbar, operated by Viridor.

Among the rubbish inside the bin bags spewed from the back of lorries there are large quantities of paper, tin cans and plastic, suggesting there are still many people who are not recycling.

The average recycling rate in Scotland is 32.2 per cent. However, in some areas, it is far lower. In the past year, Glasgow recycled only 18.4 per cent of its rubbish, far from the 70 per cent target, and just 0.2 points higher than the year before. By contrast, some European countries, including the Netherlands and Austria, already recycle about 60 per cent.

However, even if everyone in Scotland stepped up their recycling, a huge challenge would remain: what to do with it all.

The recession has brought this into focus, as the market for recycled materials has shown worrying signs of starting to dry up, meaning there is nowhere to send rubbish after it is put in the recycling bin. There are even rumours of large quantities of UK rubbish sitting in storage – a situation experts insist has not yet arisen in Scotland.

Colin Murchison, a researcher at Glasgow Caledonian University, who heads a programme called Remade that aims to create a bigger market for recycled materials, thinks that, despite the challenges, the 70 per cent target is achievable.

He says: "2025 is still a way away, but there's no question that it's a challenge for us, because it requires a change in the way we as a society treat our materials."

He thinks key to meeting the targets will be to establish more of a market for recycled goods. This could be done, in part, by setting targets to force producers of goods to use a certain percentage of recycled materials – an idea the Scottish Government consulted on last year.

Mr Murchison also thinks a market can be established for food waste, which forms nearly 20 per cent of the rubbish we throw away. Already trials are being carried out by seven local authorities in Scotland into kerbside collections of food waste.

The food could be used in anaerobic digestion plants that convert the food into methane, which is then burned to produce electricity that can be sold to the national grid.

Mr Murchison argues that establishing plants in Scotland to process recycled materials could create jobs and boost the economy. However, before that can be done, a constant supply of raw materials will be needed, which means more people need to recycle.

"We need to increase the flow of recycled materials," he says. "We need a constant flow. At the moment, it's more of a trickle."

Shipping waste overseas to be dealt with has attracted a lot of negative publicity. However, Mr Murchison thinks it is good to have those markets available as Scotland builds up its recycling rates to levels where it can set up manufacturing plants at home. And even though transporting the waste produces damaging greenhouse gas emissions, he thinks it is still beneficial to the environment to ship them overseas to be recycled, when the carbon footprint of creating a new product instead is taken into consideration.

"By the time you have extracted the raw materials, processed them, transported them, fabricated the product and delivered it to customers, then there's a huge carbon footprint associated with it," he says.

Currently, about 50 per cent of the recycling material produced in Scotland is dealt with here, and the other half is either sent to England or abroad, particularly to China.

None of the newspapers thrown away in Scotland are turned back into paper in this country, but are instead sent mostly sent to England. The majority of plastic is sent to Asia, although some is turned into bottles and fleeces in England. However, most of the glass, electronics, aggregates and components are processed within Scotland.

Last week, Richard Lochhead, the environment secretary, announced £5 million of funding to help create the infrastructure to process recycled plastic in Scotland.

He said: "With most of the plastic collected for recycling in Scotland taken to England or even further afield, I want to see an improved infrastructure for plastic in Scotland and hope that the new scheme will kick off significant investment in this area. And by getting reprocessing operations up and running within Scotland, we will reduce the amount of carbon emitted by shipping plastic overseas.

"Getting these operations up and running will not just be a boost to the environment. There are considerable economic benefits including job creation to be taken advantage of – particularly welcome in these difficult economic times."

The UK has gained a reputation as the dirty man of Europe for the amount of waste sent to landfill, perhaps due to the wide availability of sites such as disused quarries. It is a cheap and easy way of disposing of rubbish, and the Viridor plant near Edinburgh shows how slick an operation it has become.

Birds of prey are used to keep away seagulls, and the rubbish is entirely contained within plastic – as though wrapped in a huge plastic bag – to stop any nasty by-products seeping into the environment.

The methane gas produced from the rotting waste is collected and burned to produce electricity, which is sold to an adjacent cement works.

Clive Barber, area manager of Viridor Waste Management, which operates the landfill site in East Lothian, believes it will be almost impossible to achieve the 70 per cent recycling target by 2025. He thinks it will be extremely difficult to replace landfill with another equally convenient and efficient method of disposing of the mountains of rubbish created in Scotland each day.

"Whatever we replace landfill with has to be there 365 days of the year and it has to work," he says. "Landfill is the cheapest option. If the alternative costs £50 more a tonne, the local authorities won't go for it."

He is also clear that, without a change of attitude from the public, there will be no hope of meeting the targets. One of the best ways to cut down on waste would, he thinks, be too produce less in the first place, by cutting through the "cycle of consumerism".

He says: "How on earth did we get to this point where we have got to have our pork chops or our pears wrapped up in layers or packaging?"

Campaign will target the £9m worth of food Scots bin yearly

SCOTTISH families throw away an average of more than £400 worth of food each year, it was revealed today.

The average household wastes £410 worth of food every year – a figure environment secretary Richard Lochhead described as "staggering". But a new campaign is being launched to help people make better use of their food.

Almost £9 million worth of food is thrown out every year in Scotland.

And 57 per cent of all food waste could have been used if it had been better managed and sorted – with 8 per cent of discarded food not even out of date, while 23 per cent is still in its packaging or intact.

The latest phase of the Scottish Government's Go Greener campaign will highlight that if everyone in Scotland stopped wasting food, the environmental impact would be the equivalent to taking one in four cars off the roads.

The initiative will use online, radio and outdoor advertising to get its message across.

Mr Lochhead said: "Recent years have seen a growing awareness of the need to change our ways, including recycling more, being more energy-efficient and leaving the car at home."

And he said the campaign was a "fresh drive to raise awareness of the benefits, both to the planet and to people's pockets, of ensuring food isn't thrown away".





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 February 2009 9:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Greener Scotland
 
1

Canada,

Canada 09/02/2009 05:10:28
Rubbish
2

fife runner,

09/02/2009 06:47:23
#2 any constructive remarks. Fly tipping was with us long ago even before it cost for special uplifts. Anti social elements will be with us even with free uplifts. I run across some really scenic out of the way routes in NE Fife. It amazes me how someone can go to all the bother of lifting a heavy washing machine into a car for eg and drive miles to an out of the way spot when they could drive nearer to the local dump and deposit for no cost. The one that really puzzled me was the load of boxes from St Andrews driven mile past a dump and into the countryside. It was from there because I loaded them inot my vehicle and dumped them back in the man's garden who looked quite sheepish.

3

fife runner,

09/02/2009 06:49:13
so we now have the excuse for fly tippers it wisnae my fault but society to blame.
4

Unimpressed one,

09/02/2009 07:47:47
"And by getting reprocessing operations up and running within Scotland, we will reduce the amount of carbon emitted by shipping plastic overseas."

However by dumping the same said plastics into landfill it will be quite secure 'carbon' wise, for 100 years.

Only the pc-obsessed UK could make such an issue of waste management, led by the myth of 'the sky's falling in', aided and abetted by the useless EU diktats.
5

Number 6,

Germany 09/02/2009 09:17:00
I can't tell you how depressing it is to read that Scotland STILL can't get it's head around re-cycling.

Don't take your cue from the serial failures south of the border. Get some proper observers over to Germany, or better still, Austria to see how easy it is to recycle.

Charging for special uplifts is a disgrace and should be challenged in court.

The recycling industry can create thousands of jobs in Scotland. We would then be able to make money from recycling englandshire's rubbish, as they will be the last country in Europe to get their head around it.
6

Brian_Stewart,

Kirkcaldy 09/02/2009 09:22:44
A wee bit off topic but the Fife Free Press reported that Fife Council are looking into emptying our gray general waste bins once a month! To encourage us to recycle our food waste. But the brown bins we have says we can't put kitchen scraps like potato peelings etc in there either. It's all nonsense, bringing in regulations without the infrastructure to back it up as always. last one out switch the lights off, got to keep the CO2 down.
7

drunken proffet,

Tassy 09/02/2009 09:22:47
Well you have the first part right, collecting the rubbish. I do not know how many private recycling companies you have in Scotland but it is not normally recognised by entrepreneurs as the way to make money. Sorry, you are going to have to subsidise them or better yet, start government recycling centres.
8

E300,

09/02/2009 09:25:13
"Getting these operations up and running will not just be a boost to the environment. There are considerable economic benefits including job creation to be taken advantage of – particularly welcome in these difficult economic times."

If there were any economic benefits they would be being exploited by "greedy" companies long ago. Most, but not all re-cycling is just economic madness, something which councils seem to be learning the hard way.
9

Number 6,

Germany 09/02/2009 09:58:47
#11 E300 ,
your attitude is soooooooo depressing, yet typical.

There are economic benefits, like towns with Free electricity, job creation for the long term unemployed, even tourism.

Of course, if your one of the "We cannae dae it" brigade, then your attitude is understandable.

As we have seen this week with a spot of bad weather, Britain is not ready for anything, still using salt on your roads, then running out of supplies !!!.

Once again, Britain is the laughing stock of Europe.

Don't let Westminster hold Scotland back on this, it's very important for the future. And lets face it, if there is a country that needs a good clean up, it's Scotland.
10

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 09/02/2009 10:22:47
Walking up a street in Glasgow I remarked to my student son "Is that budget accommodation?", pointing to a recently-discarded mattress on the pavement. He hadn't even noticed because it is apparently common practice in some areas not to bother too much informing the cooncil you want your large rubbish disposed of - at a cost.

Anyway why not burn most of it in an eco-friendly way and the resultant ash can be compacted thus a) generating cheap electricity b) reducing the need for landfill. I agree that paper, plastic and metals should be recycled - this is just common-sense use of scarce resources, something that other countries seem to manage because they don't seem to be blighted by being populated by some people who think the world owes them a living and have no pride in a clean place to stay.
11

Douglas,

Bathgate 09/02/2009 10:38:07
A deposit on bottles and cans, take them back and get a small refund. It works for Barrs, why not Budweiser et al?
12

Number 6,

Germany 09/02/2009 11:56:32
#14 Here in Germany you get 8 cents back for every small glass bottle. Large plastic bottles are fed into a machine in the supermarkets, which calculates what you are due in return. The machine then produces a reciept that you take to the cash desk and exchange for money.
13

bluehead,

edinburgh 09/02/2009 13:02:29
If it ends up on the scrap heap,where it should be,it will be in good company ,for nothing is more sure than that the labour goverment will be there along beside it
in fact the scrap heap is to good for that pile of rubbish,that is called a goverment,there must be many
names that could describe in a more realistic way
14

SimonHurrll,

South 09/02/2009 14:05:28
The comments here recorded in this article need challenging.

1] "Campaign will target the £9m worth of food Scots bin yearly: SCOTTISH families throw away an average of more than £400 worth of food each year, it was revealed today."

This is absolute nonsense for there are two errors straight away.

...Firstly if the population of Scotland was 5.2 million and the average family comprised 4 persons [unlikely] then this would be £520 million not the £9 million reported!

...Secondly I do not know of anyone in the UK who wastes this quantity of food, let alone my dear friends in Scotland.

...This whole rhetoric concerning the disposal of Food Waste in Scotland and the accompanying cries in WRAP [the Government Quango in England] which allegedly has worked out that the UK wastes over £10,0000 million of food each year, is faulted throughout.

...The statement is reported as follows: with Phillip Ward, Director for Local Government Services at WRAP saying:
“We throw away 6.7 million tonnes of food every year in the UK - £10,000,000,000 [Ten thousand million pounds worth] - and most of that goes to landfill. Even those households that believe they aren't producing much or any food waste are discarding on average nearly 3 kg per week."

...This is absolute nonsense as it defies all logic. This means that the UK with a total population of between 67 to 70 million people - men women children - [including nursing children, hospitalised people, disabled persons, prisoners, pensioners etc.] throw away 6.7 million tonnes of food a year.

...Let's consider this in real TERMS! Let's put it bluntly, each person throws away 100 kg of food per year. [The calculation 6.7 million tonnes and 67 million people, per year!] What nonsense.

...Let's consider this in real TERMS, again. Bluntly this means that it costs each one of us roughly £3-00 per week. [The calculation £10,000,000,000-00 (£10 billion) and 67 million people, per year = £2-87 each per week!]
15

SimonHurrll,

09/02/2009 14:08:39
[Continued] from above

...With figures like this bounded around No wonder there is total scepticism in the country about the issues of recycling. And the Newspapers [like yours the Scotsman, Herald, Guardian, Mail, Times etc.] or the so-called learned journals like MorethanWaste or DEFRA and Engineering Magazines like the NewCivilEngineer and others, as well as in Bus Shelter hoardings print it without thinking and without challenging.

...Mr RICHARD LOCHEAD, MSP the Environment Secretary should realise that his words are meaningless when these figures are quoted across the board as truths when they are blatantly incorrect.

2] The Myth of Recycling.
...As a Newspaper the Scotsman has yet again fallen into the trap of 'de facto' admitting that it is possible to Recycle 70% of the Municipal Solid Waste arisings in Scotland without checking the reality of the facts and the trends.

...Mr Clive Barber of Viridor is absolutely right when he states that it will be almost impossible to meet the 70% target for recycling.

...The truth is that it is IMPOSSIBLE to achieve.

...All the other countries around the World have demonstrated this.

...You can only recycle those commodities that can be recycled and have a reuse value or can be reworked into new products. So we collect metal cans: we separate garden waste: we separate plastics: we segregate paper and packaging. But what happens to them? Some used to be shipped to China: some like the Paper we collect travels from Edinburgh to Glasgow then by ship to China making a very wealthy Billionaire even more happier, that was until the market dried up. But this is Biomass and has other uses see later.

...You also have quoted here a statement as follows:

..."Colin Murchison, a researcher at Glasgow Caledonian University, who heads a programme called Remade that aims to create a bigger market for recycled materials, thinks that, despite the challenges, the 70 per cent target is achievable."

...You
16

SimonHurrll,

09/02/2009 14:13:29
[Continued from above.]

...You have not questioned this and this belief is taken on board by your Newspaper as though it was fact.

...Again this is absolute nonsense and cuts across all other research data across the world.

...The whole crux of the issue is can we the public afford the processes of treatment. Here the answer was partly foretold by Clive Barber again in his statement:

..."Whatever we replace landfill with has to be there 365 days of the year and it has to work," he says. "Landfill is the cheapest option. If the alternative costs £50 more a tonne, the local authorities won't go for it."

...These statements are partly correct and in the main incorrect.

...Landfill is not the cheapest option, and it never will be! There is enough biomass contained within Municipal Solid Waste which can be readily and easily converted in to the Biofuel for Transport Ethanol. So can the Recycled Paper referred to above as this is also biomass and can be converted into Ethanol very easily and cheaply. These materials are worth five to eight times more to Scotland's economy than as landfill or burning.

...Further the yields of ethanol that can be made from the biomass is sufficiently high enough to create an income from its sale sufficient enough to reduce the costs of landfill well below the figures quoted by Mr Barber.

...Such plants are a reality and they do not produce the pollutants that incineration produces, and they reduce the final quantity of waste to less than 5% of the original that would have gone to Landfill.

...And further such plants are economic to build and operate and maintain so that after a short period of time [less than 7 to 9 years] when the financing has been paid off the potential is that these economics would be strong enough to reduce treatment costs way below landfill costs and pay back an income to the Council Tax Payers you and me.

...In effect a proposal like those for Kentucky or Selby Yorkshire or the Mid
17

SimonHurrll,

09/02/2009 14:14:37
[Continued from above]

...In effect a proposal like those for Kentucky or Selby Yorkshire or the Midlands offers the potential to reduce Council Taxes rather than increase them, and Scotland need them as much as other places.

...Now let's have a proper debate here about the issues as Mr ROBIN HARPER MSP has indicated. And let us please have a proper response from your correspondents here about the issues as they are reported. For in the end the only people who incur the costs are the Public and Tax Payers.
18

paulr,

edinburgh 09/02/2009 15:37:53
I used to be a regular recycler until I watched the council lorry arrive and tip the two glass containers into the one large bin on its back.
I thought this guy has made a mistake so i watched the lorry a few times, lift the coloured glass container, tip it into back of lorry, lift clear glass container, tip it in on top of the coloured glass.
Then i realised that the council are taking the P**s, we spend time to separate out the glass and plastic and paper then they just dump it all in together.
19

paulr,

edinburgh 09/02/2009 15:39:20
You want to make a difference?
FORCE the manufacturers and supermarkets to cut down on wastefull wrapping.
20

fred bear,

09/02/2009 17:50:39
When I were a lad, all bottles carried a deposit, in fact, they were a good source of extra pocket money. We also had the rag and bone man. Result- everybody recycled.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.