Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Oil industry's own goal over claim of huge losses caused by refinery strike

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 April 2008
Industrial action by Grangemouth refinery staff will cost the oil industry £50 million a day (your report, 25 April) and affect the national economy through loss in tax revenue.
Of course, such an attempt to gain public support for the company in this dispute should be taken in context; like every other industry, it will simply lose one day's production for each day of a strike.

In fact, this statement is something of an
own goal, as it reminds us that £50 million is a normal day's takings, and generates the massive profits BP and the government make through the overpricing of fuel.

WALTER J ALLAN

Colinton Mains Drive

Edinburgh


However bogus the strikers' "justification" for their dispute (over a gradual and minimal contribution to their pensions from their apparently high average pay, and an end to the final-salary basis for future employees' pensions), let no MSP have the gall to criticise them. It has been clear for more than 15 years that such final-salary pension schemes are unsustainable. But what MSP, MP or MEP has even begun to consider the need to change their own top-of-the-range gilt-edged pensions, and all other public-sector schemes, let alone bring forward legislation? On the contrary, they've had the nerve to improve their already inflated benefits, and they never have to threaten strike action. I'd like to have said "guilt-edged" but, regrettably, that would be a misnomer.

JOHN H BIRKETT

Horseleys Park

St Andrews, Fife


I cannot recall such unhelpful and conflicting messages being given about anything in the way differing and contradictory statements have been made regarding the current fuel situation.

When pumps are empty, being assured that there is plenty fuel is a bit rich. If you have an empty fuel tank, the fact petrol is available 50 or 100 miles away is irrelevant.

As for urging motorists not to panic-buy, human nature dictates that people will fill up when they can, for fear of not being able to get fuel later. No amount of urging against this will work when drivers face reports and pictures of empty fuel pumps.

JUDI MARTIN

Alma

Maryculter, Aberdeenshire


We can be sure of two things about the industrial dispute at Grangemouth: there will be a resolution; and the two groups of people not to suffer will be the management and trade union leaders. Workers will lose money and the public will be inconvenienced.

So why do we continue to ignore the simple proposition that the right to strike is a sacred cow that should have been slaughtered many years ago?

That means a complete ban on strikes throughout our public sector and services provided by privately owned organisations such as transport and fuel supplies.

It cannot be too much to ask for an independent arbitration service making decisions binding on all concerned.

JIM PARKER

Banchory Green

Glenrothes, Fife






Page 1 of 1

 
1

jj veritas,

28/04/2008 09:53:51
When government negotiated with the civil service over pensions it just caved in. Why doesn’t the private sector do the same?
2

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 28/04/2008 10:26:36
I regularly see Mr. Parker's letters in local papers here on the rocky outcrop, and he is a literate and thought provoking correspondent.

In this letter he has made a valid proposition, however, the major flaw is when one side decides that irrespective of an arbitrated decision, they don't like it and refuse to implement the decision.

This is exactly what happened in last year's Police pay negotiations (remember the Police are forbidden by law from striking) when the long standing negotiating structure was subjected to guerilla tactics and smears by this Government, and when the arbitration went in favour of the Police, the Government decided they didn't like it, threw the toys out the pram and withheld the entirety of the modest pay rise they had been seeking.

We then had the ridiculous spectacle of the Scottish Ministers ratifying the pay rise in full, honourably recognising the contract while in the rest of the UK the Government are 'not playing'. Scum.
3

G,

dundee 28/04/2008 13:06:41
Mr Parker
Some people let their dogs foul the pavements so why do we continue to ignore the simple proposition that the right to own a dog is a sacred cow that should have been slaughtered many years ago?

Some people use one example to suggest that a basic human right(to remove ones labour) is removed from all. Therefore since "some people" (i.e. you) cannot use their "right to free speech" in a responsible and coherent way "we" should remove their rights to express it at all...
Doesn't quite work......

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.