Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


We cannot afford to become a part of the flat-Earth brigade

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 January 2007
GENETICALLY modified crops are back in the news again, but many farmers will reckon that it is for the wrong reason. Recently the British Potato Council, the organisation to which all commercial growers must subscribe through a levy, announced that it was not going to support research into the development of GM strains of potato resistant to blight. That has to be an own goal if ever there was one.
Blight is a foliar disease of potatoes which, if untreated, eventually rots the tubers. This was the disease that halved the population of Ireland in 1845-6, either through starvation or emigration. In the modern era, blight can be tackled by sprayin
g at roughly ten-day intervals using a compound containing tin and manganese. If the disease takes a real hold then the farmer is left with no alternative than to burn down the crop using sulphuric acid, which is certainly not the most pleasant of chemicals to work with.

Blight is found in most years throughout the UK, especially when humidity levels are high. Global warming is forecast to lead to more warm soggy summers, so the threat from blight will be exacerbated.

Surely then it is better to research the possibility of introducing a gene which will render the potato resistant to blight rather than spraying crops with some pretty noxious chemicals. Scientists are confident that it can be accomplished, so let's get on with it. It would certainly be a huge benefit to the Scottish seed potato industry. On the broader front, GM crops are increasingly being cultivated around the world. Vast areas of soya and maize are grown in South America, the US, India and China with no apparent harmful side effects. Europe is being left behind in developing the technology and the crops specifically suited to a largely temperate climate.

It is estimated that the world will need to double its food production over the next half century. GM crops will be needed, so let's end this talk of "Frankenstein Foods" so beloved of certain ill-informed sections of the popular media. For those who remain unconvinced, let them consider that, in the early 1960s, a new and highly productive variety of barley called Golden Promise was developed.

The breeding process involved using gamma radiation on an outclassed variety called Maythorpe. If that is not a form of GM, then what is? Incidentally, almost 50 years later, Golden Promise is still being grown in Scotland, albeit on a limited scale. A certain distillery in Easter Ross uses virtually no other variety of barley to produce a very fine malt whisky!

Science and agriculture have gone hand-in-hand for centuries, and always must if people are to be fed. It is almost 11 years since the onset of the BSE crisis. It cost the farming industry billions of pounds and, tragically, the lives almost 150 people who succumbed to variant CJD. So the efforts of scientists in both the US and Japan who have succeeded in breeding cattle lacking in the prion, which is thought to be cause of BSE, has to be welcomed. However, it will be several years before it can be said with absolute certainty that BSE has been eliminated.

Dolly the Sheep, had she still been alive, would have recently celebrated her ninth birthday. Dolly was the world's first clone, but that process has been repeated frequently since and now scientists in the US have managed to clone cattle. The flat-Earth brigade will wring their hands and say that is both dangerous and immoral. Nonsense, because, if it can be done commercially, the consumer will be the eventual beneficiary.

In the early 1950s, there were those who said that artificial insemination of cattle would never work. Time has proved them wrong, but the livestock industry has moved on from those days and now eggs are frequently flushed from superior cows and used in embryo transfer programmes. One cow can produce not just a single calf, but a veritable litter. History has proven time after time that scientific advances cannot be ignored.

Farming needs that progress and the world will need it too.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 January 2007 9:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: GM food
 
1

Farmernot,

Darkest Midlothian 08/01/2007 10:42:52

Spot on......unless we embrace GM technology we will run out of food. Global warming on the way so lets breed drought resistant crops.Also the advent of technology to breed Golden Promise led to a rise in spirit yields of almost 10% back in the late 60's and early 70's. Its time to dispel the myths......after all the current debate in todays issue on organic crops sums it up.....there is little or no difference. well done Jim Buchan ( or are you another Journo in disguise......I know so!!!!)

2

IanW,

Germany 08/01/2007 11:55:53

GM crops have been around in one form or another for thousands of years, that is how farmers develop new crops and better yields.

All the hoo-hah which surrounds GM products is because people just don't realise this. All they think is that some chemist is creating new crops by playing God.

In reality it is a scientist who uses modern technology to help him do what farmers did by cross-pollination, grafting, etc. for all these years.

Let the research and testing flourish as eventually we will need their results to feed the world. Think about the poor production areas in Africa which could benefit from GM crops designed to resist disease, etc.

3

Russell M,

Stirling 08/01/2007 12:31:54

The surest tool (weapon) to defeat the "neo-luddites" is knowledge, widely and freely available. My thanks to the Scotsman for doing its part.

4

Kevin S,

Edinburgh 08/01/2007 16:42:43

In this specific instance the British Potato Council are spot on as there are already two extremely blight resistant varieties of potato commercially available in the UK, namely Sarpo Mira and Axona, with more being introduced to the UK by the Sarvari Research Trust.

5

PatrickB,

Switzerland 08/01/2007 18:16:42

If you want to use GM crops, you can do it and let the consumer make is choice, as long as :
1) The consumer is properly informed.
2) Products containing GM products are clearly labelled as GM products
and
3) GM products don't contain any antibiotic markers for their selection ("fabrication")

6

Mark, Las Cruces,

New Mexico, USA 09/01/2007 01:01:50

As has been pointed out, there are already resistant varieties, whether hybrid cultivars or traditional Andean varieties. There is no need to fund pointless highly expensive GM research, when there are other methods that are far more beneficial such as Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS), or changing of the endophyte symbiotic fungi present in all plants to create supercrops with no GM technology but high potential.
Let the customer make the choice, and use already available varieties instead of trying to reinvent the wheel(resistant varieties) continuously.

7

Loren,

NC, USA 09/01/2007 19:18:09

Mark,
This would be nice....if it were indeed that simple. Ancestral lines from South America MIGHT have some resistance. Crossing these lines with cultivated potatoes doesn't always work and often requires embryo rescue and tissue culture for several generations. Also, it is often the case that the resistance requires the presence of 5 or 10 or even more genes to be effective. And after all of that, the potatoes MUST yield effectively. MAS has been around for years and is effective IF IF IF there is a gene or genes to be found. This isn't always the case. Still think GM technology is pointless and expensive?

Kevin,
What happens when that resistance if overcome by the fungus? What takes its place? Disease resistance is a moving target. Why not test them both, side by side, and publish the results?

Loren


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.