Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Policemen's careers in ruins after lying about street fracas

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 May 2008
THE careers of two policemen who lied in an attempt to frame a law student were in ruins last night.
Community officers Neil Jones, 35, and Andrew MacRobert, 28, claimed William Reid and his friend were shouting and swearing in the street after a night out, and charged them with breach of the peace.

Mr Reid, 22, was handcuffed and put in the back
of a police car after his friend, Callum McCaig, 22, ran off in Bothwell, Lanarkshire.

The two policemen later fabricated evidence which claimed Mr Reid had sworn at them and become aggressive in their patrol car in February 2006 – a claim he denied.

They were both suspended from their posts in Blantyre police station, before they were put on trial at Hamilton Sheriff Court.

During the trial Jones was criticised over several inaccuracies in the crime report filed after Mr Reid's arrest.

A charge that Jones hit Mr Reid on the face was dropped by the Crown, but they were later found guilty of lying about the arrest of the student.

Yesterday, Sheriff Ray Small fined Jones £2,000 and MacRobert £1,250 as he told the pair they had "tarnished" the reputation of Strathclyde Police.

He said: "This case is all the more disappointing given that you were both promising young police officers.

"Your evidence against Mr Reid was totally fabricated, and I find it particularly concerning the harm this will have caused to Strathclyde Police."

Yesterday, Jones's lawyer, Frances McMenamin, QC, told the court that the conviction would almost certainly mean her client would be kicked off the force.

She said: "Although a first offender, this conviction will have a very serious impact on every aspect of Mr Jones's life.

"As well as ruining his reputation as a promising young officer, it is highly likely he will also lose his job, Ms McMenamin said.

"There has been a great deal of surprise in this conviction; indeed he was highlighted as a role model for young and inexperienced officers in his latest appraisal review.

"Neil Jones was an officer held in such high regard by the public and his colleagues that I can only invite your lordship to deal with this matter leniently."

Iain Duguid, QC, acting for MacRobert, said: "Mr MacRobert continues to deny any involvement in this matter. The situation is not that dissimilar in that he could be about to lose his career.

His honesty and his integrity as a police officer has been lost," said Mr Duguid.

"He has placed his life on hold since the start of proceedings, and this conviction will affect him dearly for a number of years."

A Strathclyde Police spokeswoman said a report on the pair would now be sent to the Deputy Chief Constable, John Malcolm.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 11:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

08/05/2008 01:17:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Jason,

Japan 08/05/2008 03:27:07
It's a start. Now start prosecuting cops for manslaughter, because that's what "death in police custody" really in.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 08/05/2008 04:34:21
#2 Jason. It was also interesting that the Metropolitan police, for once, shot someone that was actually armed. Makes a pleasant change.
4

The Daleks,

Longmen 08/05/2008 05:44:46
No surprise.

The plods have been fabricating evidence and lying in court since the year dot.

The surprise is that two of them have actually been prosecuted and found guilty!!
5

Douglas,

Bathgate 08/05/2008 08:27:06
This seems tantamount to perjury. Even respected authors and reknowned party givers with fragrant wives end up in the big hoose for that. Why, given their conviction, are two plod given the equivalent of a free pass.
6

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

08/05/2008 12:07:23
Question is...why did they find themselves up sh*t creek?....this is normal, I repeat, normal police behaviour...what's so special about these two they got rumbled??
7

Brother Walfrid,

08/05/2008 12:44:10
Pity the article doesn't clearly state how they were rumbled.

Two cops in a car say the bloke in the back was shouting and swearing. As long as they stick to their story most judges will believe them.

If one or two discrepancies arise, the judges usually say that's normal and actually points to a lack of rehearsal.

Most of ten you can't win when they clear their throat and say "he was shouting and swearing repeatedly, using words like c***s and b******s...I warned him regarding his conduct but he refused to desist and so I placed him under arrest."

Hey presto! You've got a conviction.
8

yockel,

08/05/2008 14:32:09
3# Guga; to stop him from committing suicide presuamably.

Seems to be an awful lot of extrajudicial execution going on in London for a country that prides itself in not having the death penalty.
9

Gina Gibson,

Wales 08/05/2008 18:38:11
Policemen telling lies......surely not??????
10

Patronus,

UK 15/05/2008 21:48:10
1@4 It is easy to comment on the actions of the police from your arm chair. They have to walk a fine line of political correctness whilst dealing with the most undesirable elements in society.

Do you think you could do a better job? Please apply most of the Scottish forces are applying! Or are your middle class liberal sensibilities offended at the thought? Please try walking in their shoes.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.