Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Salmon farms braced for jellyfish invasion

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
24 November 2007
SCOTLAND'S salmon producers have been put on alert due to an invasion of stinging jellyfish which have already wiped out a fish farm in the Irish Sea.
Fears have been raised after swarms of the alien creatures, normally found in the Mediterranean, were spotted off the west coast, with some stranded on beaches.

Just a few centimetres long and relatively harmless in small numbers, the jellyfish can be deadly when amassed in such vast quantities.

The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) said it has received reports this month of millions of baby mauve stinger and compass jellyfish being seen in "blooms" off Skye, Eigg, Ullapool and in the sea near Durness in the far north of Sutherland.

Mauve stingers were the species which last week killed 100,000 salmon worth over £1 million at Glenarm Bay and Red Bay, Cushendun, off the Co Antrim coast, site of Northern Ireland's only salmon farm.

They attacked by stinging and then stressing the salmon, which were in cages about a mile into the Irish Sea. The attack lasted seven hours, with the jellyfish covering an estimated sea area of ten square miles and 35ft deep.

With the potential threat to Scottish fish farms, the Scottish Salmon Producers' Organisation (SSPO) has warned its members to be on their guard.

As well as using their sting, jellyfish can kill caged fish by using up oxygen in the water or, if small enough, getting into their gills to suffocate them.

A SSPO spokesman said: "Dealing with the presence of jellyfish is a feature of working in the marine environment. However there appears to have been very little that the farmers in Northern Ireland could have done to prevent this from having the devastating impact it has. The scale of attack is unprecedented - reports have suggested there were billions of jellyfish.

"Farmers in Scotland have been made aware of the size of the invasion and will remain vigilant over the coming days."

The MCS has also warned fish farmers to be aware of the hazard. It wants them, as well as people on beaches, sailors and surfers, to report sightings of the jellyfish as part of a national survey.

Anne Saunders, the MCS Scottish projects officer, said that while compass jellyfish were common throughout UK waters during the summer, mauve stingers were relatively rare and usually only occasionally recorded in the south-west.

"It is quite unusual for this number of juvenile jellyfish to be occurring in UK waters at this time of year," she added. "But these blooms are phenomenal and consist of millions of individuals. They are being washed here by strong Atlantic currents, which bring them much further north than usual and that's why they are turning up off Scotland and Ireland."

The latest reports of the jellyfish invasion came from Durness last week, when a council ranger reported thousands of compass jellyfish washing on to the shore at Balnakeil beach.

Before that, MCS received reports of huge blooms of baby mauve stingers off Skye early this month, and of mass compass jellyfish strandings on Eigg.

A fisherman reported huge blooms of small mauve stingers in Ullapool harbour last week.

Ms Saunders warned people not to touch jellyfish in case they are stung. So far over 4,500 jellyfish "encounters" have been reported since the MCS survey was launched in 2003.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 November 2007 11:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Fish farming industry
 
1

Boy Wonder,

24/11/2007 08:16:12

Can't these jellyfish be harvested and used for a food source? That would reduce the numbers. Though who'd eat one I don't know! Not me .... I'm not a fan of seafood!

2

UserNameTaken,

Hiding behind the settee 24/11/2007 09:56:32

I always thought the collective noun for jellyfish was a "smuck".

A "bloom" of jellyfish?

Identify fraud is everywhere - and where would they keep their ID cards, eh?

Humph.

3

Tweedmouth,

24/11/2007 10:45:50

The explosion of jellyfish populations is closely linked to overfishing. When jellyfish are hatched they are tiny little plankton, and are eaten by all the fish which eat plankton - sandeels, herring and so on. But since we allowed the Danes to take up to 900,000 tonnes of sandeels a year in the 1990s from the North Sea and the West coast of Scotland - billions of jellyfish predators were killed - hence the explosion in jellyfish. The double whammy is that mature jellyfish eat small fish fry - so baby sandeels, herring and cod get caught in the tentacles of adult jellyfish.

And what happened to all those millions of tonnes of sandeels? They were pulped and dried to make pig food, cattle food, chicken food and . . . .wait for it . . . .farmed salmon pellets.

So the farmed salmon industry has created its own nemesis. Well done chaps!

4

Guthrie,

24/11/2007 11:44:22

It's getting international coverage:
http://scienceblogs.com/shiftingbaselines/2007/11/smuck_h...

And "smuck" is apparently the collective noun for jellyfish, as used by usernametaken. But it was apaprently coined in 2000.

5

alex paterson,

embra 24/11/2007 13:25:09

Fresh water Crocs love them.

6

Adrian Clegg,

England 24/11/2007 13:27:04

Farming salmon is not natural. Salmon should be free like all other fish and if they were free then jelly fish would be no threat.

It's the same with foxes and chicken. If chicken were truly free range without clipped wings they would be able to escape their predators. When a fox enters a chicken run it kills all the chickens because they are there and cannot escape. In the wild it would take only one chicken and the others would escape.

As #4 Tweedmouth stated, well done chaps

7

n/,

perth 24/11/2007 16:07:10

#4............"closely linked to over fishing"?

Could you therefore explain why there were similar happenings in the fifties and sixties?

8

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/11/2007 17:32:38

This is extremely bad news. A few weeks ago I attended a lecture by international jellyfish expert, Dr Mark Gibbons, of the University of Cape Town. The number of jellyfish is set to increase worldwide, the major reason being that we humans are eating the fish that eat jellyfish larvae, both free floating and in the anchored polyp stage. Without natural predators, the jellyfish populations explode. And the jellyfish in turn eat fish eggs and hatchlings, so preventing the fish stocks from ever recovering. This inversion has already happened off the coast of Namibia, and appears to be a permanent change.

9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/11/2007 17:41:05

#1: According to Dr Gibbons jellyfish are almost entirely water, and no one so far has discovered anything that would make fishing jellyfish economic. You can't even use them for fertiliser. The jellyfish fill and break fishing nets, but are very difficult for fishermen to avoid. Work is being done on redesigning nets to prevent jellyfish from entering them, but this is not much help because the jellyfish destroy what little fish are left over by human harvesting.

Jellyfish favour slightly higher sea temperatures than those normally occurring around Scotland. Changes of just 1-2 degs Celsius due to global warming are expected to cause large increases in jellyfish numbers in many places, with severe effects.

10

WHISTLEBLOWER,

24/11/2007 17:49:58

"Farming salmon is not natural."

Nor is the alphabet, or writing on a computer.

Why isn't the cold weather killing them off if they are a Mediterranean species?

11

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/11/2007 17:52:08

#8: If my car breaks down tomorrow, and my car broke down during 1990, does this mean that my car must necessarily break down tomorrow for exactly the same reason?

The oceans are more complicated than my car. Jellyfish population explosions in the 1950s and 60s might have been partly caused by local overfishing, but they might also have been caused by disease epidemics, unusual sea current patterns, unusual weather, and so on. If they were due to overfishing, then restricted fishing quotas in certain ocean areas introduced after the 1950s and 60s might have led to the partial recovery of stocks later noted.

12

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/11/2007 17:52:59

#11: Because it's not cold enough.

13

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/11/2007 18:13:01

#7: If chickens were truly wild they would still be Burmese jungle fowl. If released, chickens would rapidly be wiped out by cars, cats, and cold.

There are definite problems with farmed salmon, not least that escapees are threatening the natural genomes of wild salmon, the chemicals used to treat salmon for disease and parasites are causing problems, and the salmon seem to absorb large amounts of toxic pollutants such as PCBs.

However, there are problems with all types of farming. It all boils down to the fact that our species is intent on using as much of the planet's resources as it can to support human flesh and blood. The UK is blessed with vast swathes of fertile land and good rainfall, and its farms are extremely productive. Yet even the UK only produces 60% of the food it requires to sustain its population. While the economy cannot possibly bear a sudden, sharp drop in the population, we ought to agree upon a very gradual decrease in our population. The UK can achieve this almost immediately by reducing (but not stopping) immigration, but a real global decrease can only be achieved by aiming for an average of 2 children per family, worldwide.

14

n/,

perth 24/11/2007 19:34:07

#12......Local over fishing? Global warming?

2 children per family world wide?

I really do not know what sort of indoctrination and gumf you have been exposed to......but I would seriously go back to your Dr Gibbons and ask rather more searching questions.
Neither of you seem to have any grasp whatsoever of the bigger picture. Go see the world,preferably not in a car but on foot and with your eyes open and in silence. There is much I would suggest you still have to learn. "If my car broke down tomorrow...........etc etc"
Dearie dearie me.

15

Guthrie,

24/11/2007 20:54:25

So #15 is yet another to add to the "the world is so complex we can't possibly understand it" list.

16

Steve Ev,

Malta 25/11/2007 11:13:02

Any chance of blaming the Government on this one!!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.